IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: Blank Capital Research ("BCR") is a technology platform, not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer. The algorithmically generated signals, scores, and rankings provided on this site ("God Mode" Signals) are for informational and research purposes only and do not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to sell or solicit an offer to buy any securities.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS: The "timing scores" and "regime signals" displayed are based on quantitative models. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not actually been executed, the results may have under-or-over compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity.
RISK OF LOSS: Trading in financial markets involves a high degree of risk and may result in the loss of your entire investment. Data provided by third-party sources (Intrinio, Snowflake) is believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
© 2026 Blank Capital Research. All rights reserved. System Version: Aegis V8 (God Mode).
Verdict
Quantitative factor alignment verified for current market regime.
Quant Score
Rank
#2459
Positioning
Market Dominance
Wholesale Trade
Wholesale
$16.3B
George L. Holm
Performance Food Group Company markets and distributes food and food-related products in the United States. The company offers a range of frozen foods, groceries, candy, snacks, beverages, cigarettes, and other tobacco products. It also sells disposables, cleaning and kitchen supplies, and related products.
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
X-AXIS: EV/EBITDA (LOWER = CHEAPER) | Y-AXIS: ROE (HIGHER = ELITE) | RED CIRCLE = PFGC ANALYSIS TARGET
| Stock | Rating | Score▼ | Quality | Value | Momentum | P/E | EV/EBITDA | ROE | ROA | Gross Mgn | Op Mgn | Net Mgn | Rev Growth | Div Yield | D/E | Mkt Cap | AUDIT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$ITRN Ituran Location & Control Ltd. | 74 | 95 | 97 | 62 | - | - | 30.4% | 17.5% | 47.8% | 21.2% | 16.8% | 5.1% | 5.1% | 0.0x | $612M | VS | |
$COR Cencora, Inc. | 70 | 84 | 77 | 70 | 21.1x | 11.8x | 123.8% | 2.2% | 3.6% | 0.8% | 0.5% | 9.3% | 0.7% | 508.0x | $60.5B | VS | |
$CENT CENTRAL GARDEN & PET CO | 70 | 84 | 95 | 48 | 5.9x | 3.5x | 10.4% | 4.6% | 31.9% | 8.0% | 5.2% | -2.2% | 0.0% | 75.0x | $2.1B | VS | |
$SNX TD SYNNEX CORP | 67 | 80 | 93 | 57 | 13.5x | 6.2x | 10.0% | 2.6% | 7.0% | 2.3% | 1.3% | 6.9% | 1.2% | 55.0x | $12.4B | VS | |
$HLF HERBALIFE LTD. | 65 | 60 | 75 | 96 | 5.0x | 1.4x | -32.4% | 6.3% | 77.7% | 9.9% | 3.4% | 2.7% | 0.0% | - | $870M | VS | |
$GIC GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL Co | 65 | 82 | 60 | 62 | 18.7x | 12.5x | 24.0% | 12.5% | 35.6% | 7.4% | 5.3% | 3.3% | 2.8% | 0.0x | $1.4B | VS | |
$JXG JX Luxventure Group Inc. | 63 | 84 | 75 | 88 | - | - | 20.4% | 11.9% | 16.8% | 7.8% | 6.2% | 56.5% | 0.0% | 22.0x | $6M | VS | |
$FERG Ferguson Enterprises Inc. /DE/ | 63 | 74 | 48 | 67 | 21.4x | 14.3x | 39.4% | 12.6% | 30.7% | 9.4% | 7.0% | 5.1% | 1.3% | 68.0x | $48.9B | VS | |
$SYY SYSCO CORP | 60 | 68 | 49 | 65 | 22.7x | 9.2x | 89.9% | 5.9% | 18.3% | 3.3% | 1.9% | 3.0% | 2.9% | 595.0x | $35.3B | VS | |
$DXPE DXP ENTERPRISES INC | 60 | 58 | 55 | 79 | 21.6x | 8.5x | 25.1% | 6.2% | 31.4% | 8.5% | 4.2% | 8.6% | 0.0% | 128.0x | $1.9B | VS | |
$PFGC Performance Food Group Co | 47 | 43 | 27 | 56 | 60.0x | 13.7x | 5.5% | 1.4% | 11.8% | 1.2% | 0.4% | 6.7% | 0.0% | 113.0x | $16.3B | ||
| SECTOR BENCH | - | - | - | - | - | 19.1x | 8.2x | 8.6% | 2.7% | 22.5% | 3.3% | 1.4% | 3.3% | 0.3% | 0.5x | - | REF |
Performance Food Group Co (PFGC) receives a "Reduce" rating with a composite score of 47.2/100. It ranks #2459 out of 7,333 stocks in our coverage universe and carries a 2-star rating. Ratings are driven by a 6-factor quantitative model measuring quality, value, momentum, investment, stability, and short interest.
Sign in to join the discussion.
YOY expansion rate
Core pricing power
Operating efficiency
Bottom-line conversion
Equity capital efficiency
Asset base utilization
Financial leverage load
Direct cash return
George L. Holm
Chief Executive Officer
Labor Force
35,000
43
19
74
Audit Verdict: Lower quality and stability scores may indicate governance concerns.
No recent insider transactions available for PFGC
In-line with peers — no strong momentum signal
Expensive relative to fundamentals — limited margin of safety
Average quality profile
Low volatility — smoother ride and historically better risk-adjusted returns
Aggressive spending — empire-building risk, dilutive growth
Mid-range overall rating
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Relative valuation derived from Wholesale Trade sector benchmarks. Model weights: EV/EBITDA (40%), P/B (35%), P/S (25%). Re-calculated daily.
Projection based on user-defined inputs. Re-calculated daily against current market data.
Reverse DCF Framework — Mauboussin Methodology
Institutional-grade Reverse DCF analysis. This model identifies the growth hurdles embedded in current market prices. When implied growth is significantly lower than historical or projected rates, a margin of safety may exist. Re-audited daily.
No analyst ratings for PFGC.
View All RatingsMaterial decline in asset turnover efficiency detected
| Factor | Global | Sector | Tilt |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROFITABILITY | 43 | 41 | +2NEUTRAL |
| MOMENTUM | 56 | 64 | -8DRAG |
| VALUATION | 27 | 22 | +5NEUTRAL |
| INVESTMENT | 19 | 1 | +18ALPHA |
| STABILITY | 74 | 84 | -10DRAG |
| SHORT INT | 43 | 35 | +8ALPHA |
Global = full universe. Sector = relative to industry peers. Positive tilt indicates idiosyncratic strength.
ROE proxy 5.5% (sector 8.6%)
GM 12% vs sector 22%, OM 1% vs sector 3%
Capital turnover N/A
Rev growth 7%, 11yr history
Interest coverage 1.8x
Composite assessment of profitability, capital efficiency, and financial strength. Top-tier entities demonstrate sustainable cash flow generation and elite competitive moats.
Profit generated per dollar of shareholder equity
Efficiency of asset utilization
Pricing power and cost efficiency
Core business profitability
Bottom-line profitability
The Quality factor evaluates the persistence and magnitude of realized cash flows. Companies with scores >70 exhibit superior pricing power and structural financial resilience through diverse economic regimes.
Our uncertainty rating tracks the predictability of future cash flows and potential for permanent capital loss. Moderate visibility with standard industry cyclicality.
Performance Food Group Co receives a Reduce rating from our analysis, with a composite score of 47.2/100 and 2 out of 5 stars, ranking #2459 out of 7,333 stocks. PFGC's factor profile shows weakness across multiple dimensions, suggesting the stock may underperform going forward. Existing holders may want to consider trimming positions or tightening stop-losses.
PFGC's quality score of 43/100 is below average, suggesting challenges with profitability or capital efficiency. The company reports a return on equity of 5.5% (sector avg: 8.6%), gross margins of 11.8% (sector avg: 22.5%), net margins of 0.4% (sector avg: 1.4%). Investors should examine whether management is actively addressing these weaknesses or if they reflect structural industry headwinds.
PFGC registers a value score of just 27/100, suggesting the stock trades at a significant premium to its fundamental metrics. Key valuation metrics include a P/E ratio of 60.05x, an EV/EBITDA of 13.65x, a P/B ratio of 3.31x. High-premium valuations like this require strong future execution to avoid multiple compression, and downside risk is elevated if growth disappoints.
Performance Food Group Co's investment score of 19/100 suggests limited reinvestment activity. Key growth metrics include revenue growth of 6.7% vs. a sector average of 3.3% and a return on assets of 1.4% (sector: 2.7%). While this can be positive for mature, cash-generative businesses returning capital to shareholders, it may also signal a lack of growth opportunities or management conservatism.
PFGC demonstrates moderate momentum with a score of 56/100, suggesting a neutral price trend without strong directional conviction. Revenue growth stands at 6.7% year-over-year, while a beta of 0.72 reflects its sensitivity to broader market moves. Moderate momentum may indicate the stock is consolidating or transitioning between trends, warranting close monitoring of upcoming catalysts.
PFGC shows good financial stability with a score of 74/100. Key stability metrics include a beta of 0.72 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 113.00x (sector avg: 0.5x). This suggests manageable leverage and moderate price volatility, making it appropriate for investors seeking a balance between growth potential and capital preservation.
The short interest score of 43/100 for PFGC suggests somewhat elevated bearish positioning by institutional traders. Specific risk factors include elevated leverage (D/E: 113.00x). With a $16.3B market cap (large-cap), Performance Food Group Co may experience above-average volatility. Investors should consider whether the short thesis has merit or if it creates a potential short-squeeze opportunity.
Performance Food Group Co is a large-cap company in the Wholesale Trade sector, ranked #0 of 50 in its sector (100th percentile) and #2459 of 7,333 overall (66th percentile). Key comparisons include ROE of 5.5% trailing the 8.6% sector median and operating margins of 1.2% below the 3.3% sector average. This top-quartile standing reflects exceptional competitive strength relative to Wholesale Trade peers.
While PFGC currently exhibits a REDUCE profile, superior opportunities exist within the WHOLESALE TRADE sector. Our model identifies several "Strong Buy" candidates with higher quality scores and more attractive valuations among direct industry competitors.
View Top Wholesale Trade Alpha →Quant Factor Profile
Upgrade catalyst
Improvement in Investment (19) would have the largest impact on the composite score.
EV/EBITDA 67% ABOVE SECTOR MEDIAN
ROE 36% BELOW SECTOR MEDIAN
Gross Margin 47% BELOW SECTOR MEDIAN
AUDIT DATA AS OF DEC 27, 2025 (Q3 FY2025)
We rate Performance Food Group Co (PFGC) as a Reduce with a composite score of 47.2/100 at a current price of $97.28. The quantitative profile shows weakness across multiple dimensions, suggesting limited upside potential and elevated risk of underperformance relative to peers over the next 12 months.
The rating is primarily driven by strength in stability (74th percentile) and momentum (56th percentile), which together account for the majority of the composite score. Offsetting weakness in investment (19th percentile) and value (27th percentile) tempers our overall conviction. We assign a No Moat rating (32/100), Medium uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation.
Key items to watch: balance sheet deleveraging progress; valuation compression risk if growth disappoints. Any material change in these dynamics could warrant a reassessment of our rating. The moat trend is stable, which suggests the competitive landscape is stable for now.
Performance Food Group Co holds a top-quartile position (#0 of 50) within the Wholesale Trade sector, based on our composite quantitative scoring across quality, value, momentum, and stability factors. The composite score of 47.2/100 places it at rank #2459 in our full 7,333-stock universe. With a $16.3B market capitalization, Performance Food Group Co operates at meaningful scale within the Wholesale Trade sector, providing competitive advantages in distribution, procurement, and customer reach.
Revenue is growing at 7%, though momentum at the 56th percentile suggests the market has not yet fully recognized this trajectory. This potential disconnect between fundamental improvement and market recognition could represent an opportunity for patient investors if the growth trend persists.
The margin cascade tells an important story: gross margins of 12% (-10.6pp vs sector) narrow to operating margins of 1% (-2.1pp vs sector) and net margins of 0.4%, yielding a gross-to-net conversion rate of 3%. The significant margin erosion from gross to net suggests elevated operating expenses, high interest costs, or other structural drags that warrant monitoring.
At a current price of $97.28, Performance Food Group Co is trading at a premium to fundamental value. Our value factor score of 27/100 reflects a composite assessment across multiple valuation metrics including price-to-earnings, price-to-book, EV/EBITDA, and price-to-sales ratios relative to both sector peers and the broader market. The premium valuation implies the market is pricing in significant future growth or quality improvements that are not yet fully reflected in current fundamentals.
The stock currently trades at a P/E of 60.0x (a 215% premium to the sector median of 19.1x), EV/EBITDA of 13.7x (at a premium), P/B of 3.3x, P/S of 0.2x. The above-sector P/E multiple suggests the market is pricing in superior growth or quality, which our analysis finds only partially justified by current fundamentals.
The stock may offer contrarian value if near-term headwinds prove transitory — the current weakness in factor scores may reverse if business fundamentals stabilize.
The Reduce rating (composite 47.2/100) reflects multi-factor weakness, and historically, stocks in this scoring range have underperformed the market by a meaningful margin.
A P/E of 60.0x leaves little room for execution misses — any earnings disappointment could trigger a sharp multiple compression.
Elevated leverage (113% D/E) amplifies downside risk and limits management's financial flexibility in adverse scenarios.
Thin net margins of 0.4% provide limited cushion against cost pressures, competitive pricing, or macroeconomic headwinds — even small changes in costs could swing the company to a loss.
We assign a Medium uncertainty rating to Performance Food Group Co. The stock presents a balanced risk profile: significant leverage (113% debt-to-equity) and elevated valuation multiple (P/E 60.0x) that leaves limited margin for error. While not risk-free, the core business fundamentals are adequate to withstand moderate economic stress, and the range of potential outcomes around our fair value estimate is manageable.
Specific risk factors that inform our assessment include: significant leverage (113% debt-to-equity); elevated valuation multiple (P/E 60.0x) that leaves limited margin for error; the combination of leverage (113% D/E) and thin margins (0.4% net) amplifies downside risk. Each of these factors independently widens the distribution of potential outcomes, and in combination they create a risk profile that demands careful position sizing. The stability factor at the 74th percentile and quality factor at the 43th percentile provide a quantitative summary of the overall risk landscape.
Key risk mitigants include: above-average stability (74th percentile) suggests predictable business dynamics. These factors partially offset the identified risks and provide downside protection in adverse scenarios. On balance, the risk-reward profile is favorable for long-term investors.
We rate Performance Food Group Co's capital allocation as Poor. Key concerns include weak asset returns (ROA 1.4%). Exemplary capital allocators generate ROE above 20% and maintain conservative leverage — Performance Food Group Co significantly underperforms these benchmarks, raising questions about management's ability to create shareholder value.
Investors should scrutinize management's reinvestment decisions and balance sheet trajectory before committing capital. Poor capital allocation often compounds over time: overlevered balance sheets limit strategic flexibility, while low returns on capital destroy shareholder value. We would need to see sustained improvement in profitability metrics and balance sheet discipline before considering an upgrade.
In summary, Performance Food Group Co receives a Reduce rating with a composite score of 47.2/100 (rank #2459 of 7,333). Our quantitative framework assigns a No Moat (32/100, trend: stable), Medium uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation. The average factor score across quality, value, momentum, stability, and investment is 44/100.
Our analysis does not support a constructive view on Performance Food Group Co at this time. The combination of limited competitive advantages, medium uncertainty, and poor capital allocation suggests unfavorable risk-reward at current levels. We recommend investors avoid new positions and existing holders consider reducing exposure.
Analysis derived from Blank Capital Research quantitative terminal. For informational purposes only. No trade solicitation. Past performance not indicative of future results. Consult a qualified advisor.
We do not assign Performance Food Group Co a meaningful economic moat, scoring 32/100 on our composite assessment. Current fundamentals do not demonstrate the kind of durable competitive advantages — such as superior returns on invested capital, margin superiority, or reinvestment efficiency — that would protect the company from competitive erosion over the long term. The highest-scoring pillar, growth durability, reached only 13.8/20.
The strongest moat sources are growth durability (13.8/20) and margin superiority (10.4/20). Rev growth 7%, 11yr history. GM 12% vs sector 22%, OM 1% vs sector 3%. These pillars form the core of Performance Food Group Co's competitive identity and are the primary drivers of excess returns in our framework.
Areas of relative weakness include reinvestment efficiency (0/20) and economic value creation (2/20). Capital turnover N/A. Improvement in these areas could meaningfully widen the moat over time, while deterioration would be an early warning of competitive erosion.
Our moat trend assessment is Stable. Multi-year ROIC and operating margin trajectories show neither meaningful improvement nor deterioration, suggesting the competitive position is steady. We expect Performance Food Group Co's moat profile to remain largely unchanged absent a material shift in return on capital or industry dynamics.
Key profit drivers include moderate revenue growth of 7%. The margin cascade from 12% gross to 1% operating to 0.4% net reveals the company's cost structure and reinvestment intensity. Our analysis indicates that profit quality is adequate though not exceptional, with the quality factor at the 43th percentile.
The margin profile shows gross margins of 12%, operating margins of 1%, net margins of 0.4%. Return metrics include ROE of 5.5% and ROA of 1.4%. Relative to the Wholesale Trade sector, gross margins are 10.6 percentage points below the sector median of 22%, and ROE of 5.5% compares to a sector median of 8.6%.
The balance sheet reflects above-average leverage with D/E of 113%, revenue growth of 7%. The sector median D/E is 1%, putting Performance Food Group Co at higher leverage than the typical peer. Overall balance sheet health is adequate for the current business environment.
Above 50MA
37.18%
Net New Highs
+51081

US Foods (USFD) is set to report its Q4 earnings on Thursday. Analysts anticipate a 4.3% year-on-year revenue growth to $9.90 billion and adjusted earnings of $1.01 per share. The company's stock is up 17.3% over the last month, heading into earnings with an average analyst price target of $91.63.

Performance Food Group (PFG) reported its Q2 2026 earnings, missing both EPS and revenue forecasts, leading to a 15.07% drop in pre-market trading. The company posted an adjusted EPS of $0.98 against a forecast of $1.09, and revenue of $16.4 billion, slightly below the anticipated $16.54 billion. Despite the miss, PFG achieved a 5.2% increase in total net sales and a 45.5% rise in net income year-over-year, driven by market share gains and expansion in its private brand portfolio and convenience store segment, while facing challenges from the Cheney Brothers acquisition costs and deflation in certain commodities.
Quarterly miss, integration costs and deflation in focus Performance Food Group (PFGC) recently reported quarterly results where profit fell short of market expectations as Cheney Brothers integration costs and deflation in categories like cheese and poultry pressured margins, even as revenue continued to grow. Management reaffirmed revenue guidance for the upcoming quarter and maintained a positive longer term growth outlook. Analysts noted that higher operating expenses and acquisition...
In early February 2026, Performance Food Group reported higher quarterly and six‑month sales and earnings, modestly narrowed its full‑year 2026 net sales guidance to about US$67.25–68.25 billion, detailed no share repurchases under its latest authorization, and confirmed that it is actively pursuing acquisitions while refinancing its 2027 senior notes with new 2034 debt. The company’s explanation that profit pressure stemmed from higher‑than‑expected Cheney Brothers integration costs,...
Performance Food Group’s latest quarter was met with a significant negative reaction from the market, following results that fell short of Wall Street’s profit expectations, despite meeting revenue consensus. Management attributed the shortfall largely to higher-than-anticipated integration costs from the Cheney Brothers acquisition and persistent deflation in key categories like cheese and poultry. CEO Scott McPherson highlighted, “Expenses are running a little bit higher than we anticipated,” particularly with new facilities coming online. The company also faced softer sales volumes, with consumer traffic impacted by macroeconomic headwinds and weather disruptions. While Performance Food Group continued to gain market share, especially in its independent restaurant and convenience segments, the combination of increased operating expenses and lower sales per location weighed on profitability.