IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: Blank Capital Research ("BCR") is a technology platform, not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer. The algorithmically generated signals, scores, and rankings provided on this site ("God Mode" Signals) are for informational and research purposes only and do not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to sell or solicit an offer to buy any securities.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS: The "timing scores" and "regime signals" displayed are based on quantitative models. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not actually been executed, the results may have under-or-over compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity.
RISK OF LOSS: Trading in financial markets involves a high degree of risk and may result in the loss of your entire investment. Data provided by third-party sources (Intrinio, Snowflake) is believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
© 2026 Blank Capital Research. All rights reserved. System Version: Aegis V8 (God Mode).
Verdict
Quantitative factor alignment verified for current market regime.
Quant Score
Rank
#2664
Positioning
Market Dominance
Manufacturing
Chemicals
$4.6B
Lori J. Ryerkerk
Celanese Corporation manufactures and sells high performance engineered polymers in the United States and internationally. The company operates through three segments: Engineered Materials, Acetate Tow, and Acetyl Chain. It also offers acesulfame potassium, a sweetener for use in various beverages, confections, and dairy products.
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Dates updated upon official exchange announcement.
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
| Stock | Rating | Score▼ | Quality | Value | Momentum | P/E | EV/EBITDA | ROE | ROA | Gross Mgn | Op Mgn | Net Mgn | Rev Growth | Div Yield | D/E | Mkt Cap | AUDIT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$UL UNILEVER PLC | 78 | 96 | 98 | 59 | - | - | 28.5% | 8.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 10.4% | -4.6% | 3.3% | 0.0x | $141.8B | VS | |
$ASML ASML HOLDING NV | 77 | 89 | 86 | 83 | - | - | 46.1% | 16.6% | 51.3% | 31.9% | 26.8% | -4.0% | 1.0% | 25.0x | $272.1B | VS | |
$ESLT ELBIT SYSTEMS LTD | 76 | 81 | 87 | 85 | - | - | 10.3% | 3.1% | 24.1% | 7.2% | 4.7% | 14.3% | 0.8% | 25.0x | $11.4B | VS | |
$MT ArcelorMittal | 75 | 71 | 98 | 85 | - | - | 2.2% | 1.5% | 9.3% | 5.3% | 2.2% | -8.5% | 2.2% | 16.0x | $18.9B | VS | |
$AMAT APPLIED MATERIALS INC /DE | 75 | 85 | 87 | 84 | 20.9x | 13.6x | 35.5% | 19.8% | 48.7% | 29.2% | 24.7% | 4.4% | 0.8% | 32.0x | $181.9B | VS | |
$SIMO Silicon Motion Technology CORP | 75 | 84 | 86 | 85 | - | - | 11.8% | 8.8% | 45.9% | 11.3% | 11.1% | 25.7% | 3.7% | 0.0x | $1.8B | VS | |
$CODA Coda Octopus Group, Inc. | 74 | 83 | 90 | 79 | 16.3x | 11.9x | 7.6% | 7.0% | 66.5% | 17.1% | 15.6% | 39.0% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $115M | VS | |
$GSK GSK plc | 74 | 84 | 90 | 70 | - | - | 22.6% | 4.9% | 71.2% | 12.8% | 9.4% | 1.7% | 5.9% | 124.0x | $72.1B | VS | |
$EFXT Enerflex Ltd. | 74 | 80 | 91 | 83 | - | - | 3.0% | 1.1% | 20.9% | 7.3% | 1.3% | 3.0% | 0.9% | 67.0x | $1.2B | VS | |
$BUD Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV | 74 | 84 | 97 | 63 | - | - | 8.2% | 3.5% | 55.3% | 25.9% | 12.4% | 0.7% | 1.7% | 0.0x | $87.0B | VS | |
$CE Celanese Corp | 46 | 33 | 41 | 44 | - | - | -23.9% | -4.7% | 21.5% | -6.8% | -11.0% | -8.8% | 1.9% | 292.0x | $4.6B | ||
| SECTOR BENCH | - | - | - | - | - | 22.3x | 11.5x | -2.5% | -0.1% | 42.5% | 1.3% | -0.2% | 5.9% | 0.0% | 0.2x | - | REF |
Celanese Corp (CE) receives a "Reduce" rating with a composite score of 45.8/100. It ranks #2664 out of 7,333 stocks in our coverage universe and carries a 2-star rating. Ratings are driven by a 6-factor quantitative model measuring quality, value, momentum, investment, stability, and short interest.
Sign in to join the discussion.
YOY expansion rate
Core pricing power
Operating efficiency
Bottom-line conversion
Equity capital efficiency
Asset base utilization
Financial leverage load
Direct cash return
Lori J. Ryerkerk
Chief Executive Officer
Labor Force
13,300
33
33
43
Audit Verdict: Lower quality and stability scores may indicate governance concerns.
No recent insider transactions available for CE
In-line with peers — no strong momentum signal
Fair valuation relative to peers
Weak fundamentals — higher risk of value trap
Average volatility — neutral timing signal
Aggressive spending — empire-building risk, dilutive growth
Mid-range overall rating
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Relative valuation derived from Manufacturing sector benchmarks. Model weights: EV/EBITDA (40%), P/B (35%), P/S (25%). Re-calculated daily.
No analyst ratings for CE.
View All RatingsMaterial decline in asset turnover efficiency detected
High margin volatility — erratic forensic earnings quality
| Factor | Global | Sector | Tilt |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROFITABILITY | 33 | 12 | +21ALPHA |
| MOMENTUM | 44 | 28 | +16ALPHA |
| VALUATION | 41 | 20 | +21ALPHA |
| INVESTMENT | 33 | 49 | -16DRAG |
| STABILITY | 43 | 23 | +20ALPHA |
| SHORT INT | 50 | 50 | 0NEUTRAL |
Global = full universe. Sector = relative to industry peers. Positive tilt indicates idiosyncratic strength.
ROIC -8.9% vs WACC 3.8% (spread -12.7%)
GM 22% vs sector 43%, OM -7% vs sector 1%
Capital turnover 0.21x, R&D intensity 1.3%
Rev growth -9%, 10yr history
Interest coverage -7.2x
Composite assessment of profitability, capital efficiency, and financial strength. Top-tier entities demonstrate sustainable cash flow generation and elite competitive moats.
Profit generated per dollar of shareholder equity
Efficiency of asset utilization
Pricing power and cost efficiency
Core business profitability
Bottom-line profitability
The Quality factor evaluates the persistence and magnitude of realized cash flows. Companies with scores >70 exhibit superior pricing power and structural financial resilience through diverse economic regimes.
Our uncertainty rating tracks the predictability of future cash flows and potential for permanent capital loss. Moderate visibility with standard industry cyclicality.
Celanese Corp receives a Reduce rating from our analysis, with a composite score of 45.8/100 and 2 out of 5 stars, ranking #2664 out of 7,333 stocks. CE's factor profile shows weakness across multiple dimensions, suggesting the stock may underperform going forward. Existing holders may want to consider trimming positions or tightening stop-losses.
CE's quality score of 33/100 is below average, suggesting challenges with profitability or capital efficiency. The company reports a return on equity of -23.9% (sector avg: -2.5%), gross margins of 21.5% (sector avg: 42.5%), net margins of -11.0% (sector avg: -0.2%). Investors should examine whether management is actively addressing these weaknesses or if they reflect structural industry headwinds.
With a value score of 41/100, CE appears somewhat expensive relative to its fundamentals. Key valuation metrics include a P/B ratio of 1.35x. Investors paying a premium here are likely betting on above-average growth or margin expansion to justify current prices.
Celanese Corp's investment score of 33/100 suggests limited reinvestment activity. Key growth metrics include revenue growth of -8.8% vs. a sector average of 5.9% and a return on assets of -4.7% (sector: -0.1%). While this can be positive for mature, cash-generative businesses returning capital to shareholders, it may also signal a lack of growth opportunities or management conservatism.
CE is currently showing below-average momentum at 44/100, which may indicate weakening institutional interest or negative sentiment shifts. Revenue growth stands at -8.8% year-over-year, while a beta of 1.88 reflects its sensitivity to broader market moves. Investors should note that declining momentum can precede further price weakness, though contrarian opportunities sometimes emerge at these levels.
CE's stability score of 43/100 signals elevated volatility and/or leverage concerns. Key stability metrics include a beta of 1.88 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 292.00x (sector avg: 0.2x). Investors should be prepared for wider-than-average price swings and consider position sizing accordingly to manage portfolio risk.
The short interest score of 50/100 for CE suggests somewhat elevated bearish positioning by institutional traders. Specific risk factors include high market sensitivity (beta: 1.88), elevated leverage (D/E: 292.00x). With a $4.6B market cap (mid-cap), Celanese Corp may experience above-average volatility. Investors should consider whether the short thesis has merit or if it creates a potential short-squeeze opportunity.
CE offers a modest dividend yield of 1.9%. While the income contribution is relatively small, even a small dividend signals management's commitment to shareholder returns and can serve as a signal of financial discipline.
Celanese Corp is a mid-cap company in the Manufacturing sector, ranked #0 of 50 in its sector (100th percentile) and #2664 of 7,333 overall (64th percentile). Key comparisons include ROE of -23.9% trailing the -2.5% sector median and operating margins of -6.8% below the 1.3% sector average. This top-quartile standing reflects exceptional competitive strength relative to Manufacturing peers.
While CE currently exhibits a REDUCE profile, superior opportunities exist within the MANUFACTURING sector. Our model identifies several "Strong Buy" candidates with higher quality scores and more attractive valuations among direct industry competitors.
View Top Manufacturing Alpha →Quant Factor Profile
Upgrade catalyst
Improvement in Quality (33) would have the largest impact on the composite score.
ROE 865% ABOVE SECTOR MEDIAN (FAVORABLE)
Gross Margin 49% BELOW SECTOR MEDIAN
Op. Margin 625% BELOW SECTOR MEDIAN
AUDIT DATA AS OF SEP 30, 2025 (Q2 FY2025)
We rate Celanese Corp (CE) as a Reduce with a composite score of 45.8/100 at a current price of $53.11. The quantitative profile shows weakness across multiple dimensions, suggesting limited upside potential and elevated risk of underperformance relative to peers over the next 12 months.
The rating is primarily driven by strength in momentum (44th percentile) and stability (43th percentile), which together account for the majority of the composite score. Offsetting weakness in quality (33th percentile) and investment (33th percentile) tempers our overall conviction. We assign a No Moat rating (18/100), Very High uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation.
Key items to watch: balance sheet deleveraging progress; the path to profitability. Any material change in these dynamics could warrant a reassessment of our rating. The moat trend is stable, which suggests the competitive landscape is stable for now.
Celanese Corp holds a top-quartile position (#0 of 50) within the Manufacturing sector, based on our composite quantitative scoring across quality, value, momentum, and stability factors. The composite score of 45.8/100 places it at rank #2664 in our full 7,333-stock universe. At $4.6B in market capitalization, Celanese Corp is a mid-cap player in the Manufacturing space, which limits certain scale advantages but may allow for more agile strategic execution.
Revenue contraction of -9% combined with momentum at the 44th percentile paints a cautious picture of the near-term business outlook. The market appears to be pricing in continued challenges, and a catalyst for reversal is not clearly visible from current data.
The margin cascade tells an important story: gross margins of 22% (-21.0pp vs sector) narrow to operating margins of -7% (-8.1pp vs sector) and net margins of -11.0%, yielding a gross-to-net conversion rate of -51%. The significant margin erosion from gross to net suggests elevated operating expenses, high interest costs, or other structural drags that warrant monitoring.
At a current price of $53.11, Celanese Corp is trading near fair value based on current fundamentals. Our value factor score of 41/100 reflects a composite assessment across multiple valuation metrics including price-to-earnings, price-to-book, EV/EBITDA, and price-to-sales ratios relative to both sector peers and the broader market. Valuation metrics are mixed, with no strong signal of mispricing in either direction.
The stock currently trades at P/B of 1.4x, P/S of 0.6x. We evaluate these multiples in the context of both absolute levels and sector-relative positioning to form our valuation view.
The stock may offer contrarian value if near-term headwinds prove transitory — the current weakness in factor scores may reverse if business fundamentals stabilize.
The Reduce rating (composite 45.8/100) reflects multi-factor weakness, and historically, stocks in this scoring range have underperformed the market by a meaningful margin.
Elevated leverage (292% D/E) amplifies downside risk and limits management's financial flexibility in adverse scenarios.
Revenue decline of -9% signals business deterioration — declining revenues make it difficult to grow into the current valuation and often precede further negative revisions.
Thin net margins of -11.0% provide limited cushion against cost pressures, competitive pricing, or macroeconomic headwinds — even small changes in costs could swing the company to a loss.
We assign a Very High uncertainty rating to Celanese Corp. The stock exhibits multiple compounding risk factors: elevated market sensitivity (beta of 1.88), significant leverage (292% debt-to-equity), current negative profitability (net margin -11.0%). The extreme uncertainty around future cash flows makes precise valuation difficult, and the range of outcomes is exceptionally wide. Only investors with high risk tolerance and extended time horizons should consider this name.
Specific risk factors that inform our assessment include: elevated market sensitivity (beta of 1.88); significant leverage (292% debt-to-equity); current negative profitability (net margin -11.0%); weak quality scores (33th percentile). Each of these factors independently widens the distribution of potential outcomes, and in combination they create a risk profile that demands careful position sizing. The stability factor at the 43th percentile and quality factor at the 33th percentile provide a quantitative summary of the overall risk landscape.
We identify limited risk mitigants at this time, which contributes to our very high uncertainty assessment. Investors should monitor for improvement in balance sheet metrics, margin stability, and business predictability that could warrant a downgrade in our risk assessment over time.
We rate Celanese Corp's capital allocation as Poor. Key concerns include low returns on equity (-23.9%), elevated leverage (292% D/E), negative profitability, weak asset returns (ROA -4.7%). Exemplary capital allocators generate ROE above 20% and maintain conservative leverage — Celanese Corp significantly underperforms these benchmarks, raising questions about management's ability to create shareholder value.
Investors should scrutinize management's reinvestment decisions and balance sheet trajectory before committing capital. Poor capital allocation often compounds over time: overlevered balance sheets limit strategic flexibility, while low returns on capital destroy shareholder value. We would need to see sustained improvement in profitability metrics and balance sheet discipline before considering an upgrade.
In summary, Celanese Corp receives a Reduce rating with a composite score of 45.8/100 (rank #2664 of 7,333). Our quantitative framework assigns a No Moat (18/100, trend: stable), Very High uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation. The average factor score across quality, value, momentum, stability, and investment is 39/100.
Our analysis does not support a constructive view on Celanese Corp at this time. The combination of limited competitive advantages, very high uncertainty, and poor capital allocation suggests unfavorable risk-reward at current levels. We recommend investors avoid new positions and existing holders consider reducing exposure.
Analysis derived from Blank Capital Research quantitative terminal. For informational purposes only. No trade solicitation. Past performance not indicative of future results. Consult a qualified advisor.
We do not assign Celanese Corp a meaningful economic moat, scoring 18/100 on our composite assessment. The ROIC-WACC spread of -12.7% is the primary signal of economic value creation. Current fundamentals do not demonstrate the kind of durable competitive advantages — such as superior returns on invested capital, margin superiority, or reinvestment efficiency — that would protect the company from competitive erosion over the long term. The highest-scoring pillar, margin superiority, reached only 8.1/20.
The strongest moat sources are margin superiority (8.1/20) and financial resilience (4.3/20). GM 22% vs sector 43%, OM -7% vs sector 1%. Interest coverage -7.2x. These pillars form the core of Celanese Corp's competitive identity and are the primary drivers of excess returns in our framework.
Areas of relative weakness include reinvestment efficiency (0.4/20) and economic value creation (1.5/20). Capital turnover 0.21x, R&D intensity 1.3%. Improvement in these areas could meaningfully widen the moat over time, while deterioration would be an early warning of competitive erosion.
Our moat trend assessment is Stable. Multi-year ROIC and operating margin trajectories show neither meaningful improvement nor deterioration, suggesting the competitive position is steady. We expect Celanese Corp's moat profile to remain largely unchanged absent a material shift in return on capital or industry dynamics.
Key profit drivers include declining revenues (-9%) that pressure the earnings outlook. The margin cascade from 22% gross to -7% operating to -11.0% net reveals the company's cost structure and reinvestment intensity. Our analysis indicates that profit quality raises some durability concerns, with the quality factor at the 33th percentile.
The margin profile shows gross margins of 22%, operating margins of -7%, net margins of -11.0%. Return metrics include ROE of -23.9% and ROA of -4.7%. Relative to the Manufacturing sector, gross margins are 21.0 percentage points below the sector median of 43%, and ROE of -23.9% compares to a sector median of -2.5%.
The balance sheet reflects high leverage with D/E of 292%, which may limit financial flexibility, a dividend yield of 1.88%, revenue growth of -9%. The sector median D/E is 0%, putting Celanese Corp at higher leverage than the typical peer. Elevated leverage in combination with the current margin profile warrants close monitoring for any deterioration in debt-servicing capacity.
Below-average quality (33th percentile) raises durability concerns about the fundamental profile and increases the risk of negative earnings surprises.
Above 50MA
37.18%
Net New Highs
+51081

U.S. stock futures rose on Wednesday with the Dow Jones, S&P 500, and Nasdaq 100 all posting gains. Investors await January FOMC minutes and Friday's PCE index release. Key movers include Ovintiv surging 4.17% after announcing a $3 billion asset sale, Tactile Systems jumping 23.53% on strong guidance, Celanese rising 5.94% despite earnings miss, and Palo Alto Networks falling 7.34% after lowering profit guidance.

DuPont agreed to sell its Aramids business, including Kevlar and Nomex brands, to Arclin for $1.8 billion. The transaction will provide $1.2 billion in cash, a $300 million note, and a 17.5% equity stake, aligning with DuPont's strategy to streamline operations.

U.S. stocks rallied on hopes of progress in trade negotiations, with semiconductor stocks leading the charge. However, Bitcoin lagged behind the broader market recovery.

Celanese, a chemical company, reported better-than-expected Q1 results despite a decline in sales and profits. The company's stock surged almost 10% as it sounded an optimistic note on the impact of the tariff war, indicating it has taken mitigation measures to manage the direct cost impacts.

Celanese, a chemicals and specialty materials company, saw its stock drop 22.7% due to weak demand in its end markets, such as automotive and consumer electronics, and disappointing guidance for 2025.