IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: Blank Capital Research ("BCR") is a technology platform, not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer. The algorithmically generated signals, scores, and rankings provided on this site ("God Mode" Signals) are for informational and research purposes only and do not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to sell or solicit an offer to buy any securities.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS: The "timing scores" and "regime signals" displayed are based on quantitative models. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not actually been executed, the results may have under-or-over compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity.
RISK OF LOSS: Trading in financial markets involves a high degree of risk and may result in the loss of your entire investment. Data provided by third-party sources (Intrinio, Snowflake) is believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
© 2026 Blank Capital Research. All rights reserved. System Version: Aegis V8 (God Mode).
Verdict
Quantitative factor alignment verified for current market regime.
Quant Score
Rank
#1324
Positioning
Market Dominance
Manufacturing
Chemicals
$9.5B
Jerry K. Masters
Albemarle Corporation develops, manufactures, and markets engineered specialty chemicals. It operates through three segments: Lithium, Bromine, and Catalysts. The Lithium segment offers lithium compounds, including lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide, lithium chloride, and lithium specialties. The Bromine segment offers bromine and bomine-based fire safety solutions; specialty chemicals for use in chemical synthesis, oil and gas well drilling and completion fluids, mercury control, water purification, beef and poultry processing.
Headcount
7.4K
HQ Base
CHARLOTTE, North Carolina
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Dates updated upon official exchange announcement.
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
| Stock | Rating | Score▼ | Quality | Value | Momentum | P/E | EV/EBITDA | ROE | ROA | Gross Mgn | Op Mgn | Net Mgn | Rev Growth | Div Yield | D/E | Mkt Cap | AUDIT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$UL UNILEVER PLC | 78 | 96 | 98 | 59 | - | - | 28.5% | 8.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 10.4% | -4.6% | 3.3% | 0.0x | $141.8B | VS | |
$ASML ASML HOLDING NV | 77 | 89 | 86 | 83 | - | - | 46.1% | 16.6% | 51.3% | 31.9% | 26.8% | -4.0% | 1.0% | 25.0x | $272.1B | VS | |
$ESLT ELBIT SYSTEMS LTD | 76 | 81 | 87 | 85 | - | - | 10.3% | 3.1% | 24.1% | 7.2% | 4.7% | 14.3% | 0.8% | 25.0x | $11.4B | VS | |
$MT ArcelorMittal | 75 | 71 | 98 | 85 | - | - | 2.2% | 1.5% | 9.3% | 5.3% | 2.2% | -8.5% | 2.2% | 16.0x | $18.9B | VS | |
$AMAT APPLIED MATERIALS INC /DE | 75 | 85 | 87 | 84 | 20.9x | 13.6x | 35.5% | 19.8% | 48.7% | 29.2% | 24.7% | 4.4% | 0.8% | 32.0x | $181.9B | VS | |
$SIMO Silicon Motion Technology CORP | 75 | 84 | 86 | 85 | - | - | 11.8% | 8.8% | 45.9% | 11.3% | 11.1% | 25.7% | 3.7% | 0.0x | $1.8B | VS | |
$CODA Coda Octopus Group, Inc. | 74 | 83 | 90 | 79 | 16.3x | 11.9x | 7.6% | 7.0% | 66.5% | 17.1% | 15.6% | 39.0% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $115M | VS | |
$GSK GSK plc | 74 | 84 | 90 | 70 | - | - | 22.6% | 4.9% | 71.2% | 12.8% | 9.4% | 1.7% | 5.9% | 124.0x | $72.1B | VS | |
$EFXT Enerflex Ltd. | 74 | 80 | 91 | 83 | - | - | 3.0% | 1.1% | 20.9% | 7.3% | 1.3% | 3.0% | 0.9% | 67.0x | $1.2B | VS | |
$BUD Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV | 74 | 84 | 97 | 63 | - | - | 8.2% | 3.5% | 55.3% | 25.9% | 12.4% | 0.7% | 1.7% | 0.0x | $87.0B | VS | |
$ALB ALBEMARLE CORP | 55 | 41 | 49 | 87 | - | - | -11.5% | -6.9% | 7.7% | -23.3% | -20.6% | -8.6% | 2.0% | 33.0x | $9.5B | ||
| SECTOR BENCH | - | - | - | - | - | 22.3x | 11.5x | -2.5% | -0.1% | 42.5% | 1.3% | -0.2% | 5.9% | 0.0% | 0.2x | - | REF |
ALBEMARLE CORP (ALB) receives a "Hold" rating with a composite score of 54.6/100. It ranks #1324 out of 7,333 stocks in our coverage universe and carries a 3-star rating. Ratings are driven by a 6-factor quantitative model measuring quality, value, momentum, investment, stability, and short interest.
Sign in to join the discussion.
YOY expansion rate
Core pricing power
Operating efficiency
Bottom-line conversion
Equity capital efficiency
Asset base utilization
Financial leverage load
Direct cash return
Jerry K. Masters
Chief Executive Officer
Labor Force
7,400
41
32
47
Audit Verdict: Lower quality and stability scores may indicate governance concerns.
No recent insider transactions available for ALB
Outperforming peers — winners tend to keep winning over 3-12 months
Fair valuation relative to peers
Average quality profile
Average volatility — neutral timing signal
Aggressive spending — empire-building risk, dilutive growth
Mid-range overall rating
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Relative valuation derived from Manufacturing sector benchmarks. Model weights: EV/EBITDA (40%), P/B (35%), P/S (25%). Re-calculated daily.
No analyst ratings for ALB.
View All RatingsMaterial decline in asset turnover efficiency detected
High margin volatility — erratic forensic earnings quality
| Factor | Global | Sector | Tilt |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROFITABILITY | 41 | 17 | +24ALPHA |
| MOMENTUM | 87 | 91 | -4NEUTRAL |
| VALUATION | 49 | 28 | +21ALPHA |
| INVESTMENT | 32 | 43 | -11DRAG |
| STABILITY | 47 | 29 | +18ALPHA |
| SHORT INT | 69 | 80 | -11DRAG |
Global = full universe. Sector = relative to industry peers. Positive tilt indicates idiosyncratic strength.
ROIC -23.0% vs WACC 11.7% (spread -34.7%)
GM 8% vs sector 43%, OM -23% vs sector 1%
Capital turnover 4.08x, R&D intensity 1.0%
Rev growth -9%, 10yr history
Interest coverage -7.2x
Composite assessment of profitability, capital efficiency, and financial strength. Top-tier entities demonstrate sustainable cash flow generation and elite competitive moats.
Profit generated per dollar of shareholder equity
Efficiency of asset utilization
Pricing power and cost efficiency
Core business profitability
Bottom-line profitability
The Quality factor evaluates the persistence and magnitude of realized cash flows. Companies with scores >70 exhibit superior pricing power and structural financial resilience through diverse economic regimes.
Our uncertainty rating tracks the predictability of future cash flows and potential for permanent capital loss. Moderate visibility with standard industry cyclicality.
Our model assigns ALBEMARLE CORP a Hold rating, with a composite score of 54.6/100 and 3 out of 5 stars. Ranked #1324 of 7,333 stocks, ALB presents a mixed quantitative picture — neither compelling enough to initiate new positions nor weak enough to warrant selling. Investors already holding may consider maintaining their position while monitoring for changes in the factor profile.
ALB's quality score of 41/100 is below average, suggesting challenges with profitability or capital efficiency. The company reports a return on equity of -11.5% (sector avg: -2.5%), gross margins of 7.7% (sector avg: 42.5%), net margins of -20.6% (sector avg: -0.2%). Investors should examine whether management is actively addressing these weaknesses or if they reflect structural industry headwinds.
With a value score of 49/100, ALB appears somewhat expensive relative to its fundamentals. Key valuation metrics include a P/B ratio of 2.03x. Investors paying a premium here are likely betting on above-average growth or margin expansion to justify current prices.
ALBEMARLE CORP's investment score of 32/100 suggests limited reinvestment activity. Key growth metrics include revenue growth of -8.6% vs. a sector average of 5.9% and a return on assets of -6.9% (sector: -0.1%). While this can be positive for mature, cash-generative businesses returning capital to shareholders, it may also signal a lack of growth opportunities or management conservatism.
ALB shows strong momentum characteristics with a score of 87/100. The stock has been trending above key moving averages, indicating solid demand from institutional buyers. Revenue growth stands at -8.6% year-over-year, while a beta of 1.66 reflects its sensitivity to broader market moves. This level of momentum typically signals sustained investor confidence and favorable near-term price action.
With a stability score of 47/100, ALB exhibits average financial resilience. Key stability metrics include a beta of 1.66 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 33.00x (sector avg: 0.2x). While the balance sheet is not a major concern, the stock is subject to typical market volatility and may experience sharper drawdowns during risk-off episodes.
ALB carries a short interest score of 69/100, indicating moderate short selling activity. This is a neutral reading — not enough to signal systemic bearishness, but worth monitoring. Specific risk factors include high market sensitivity (beta: 1.66), elevated leverage (D/E: 33.00x). At $9.5B market cap (mid-cap), ALBEMARLE CORP offers reasonable institutional liquidity.
ALB pays a solid dividend yield of 2.0%, contributing an income component to total returns. This moderate yield suggests a balance between returning capital to shareholders and retaining earnings for reinvestment — a common profile among quality compounders.
ALBEMARLE CORP is a mid-cap company in the Manufacturing sector, ranked #0 of 50 in its sector (100th percentile) and #1324 of 7,333 overall (82nd percentile). Key comparisons include ROE of -11.5% trailing the -2.5% sector median and operating margins of -23.3% below the 1.3% sector average. This top-quartile standing reflects exceptional competitive strength relative to Manufacturing peers.
While ALB currently exhibits a HOLD profile, superior opportunities exist within the MANUFACTURING sector. Our model identifies several "Strong Buy" candidates with higher quality scores and more attractive valuations among direct industry competitors.
View Top Manufacturing Alpha →Quant Factor Profile
Key factor gap
Momentum (87) vs Investment (32) — closing this gap could shift the rating.
ROE 363% ABOVE SECTOR MEDIAN (FAVORABLE)
Gross Margin 82% BELOW SECTOR MEDIAN
Op. Margin 1903% BELOW SECTOR MEDIAN
AUDIT DATA AS OF SEP 30, 2025 (Q2 FY2025)
We rate ALBEMARLE CORP (ALB) as a Hold with a composite score of 54.6/100 at a current price of $187.31. The stock presents a mixed quantitative picture — neither compelling enough to warrant new accumulation nor weak enough to justify selling for existing holders. Our factors are split, and the overall profile suggests patience is warranted.
The rating is primarily driven by strength in momentum (87th percentile) and value (49th percentile), which together account for the majority of the composite score. Offsetting weakness in investment (32th percentile) and quality (41th percentile) tempers our overall conviction. We assign a No Moat rating (20/100), High uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation.
Key items to watch: whether strong momentum is fundamentally supported by revenue trends; the path to profitability. Any material change in these dynamics could warrant a reassessment of our rating. The moat trend is stable, which suggests the competitive landscape is stable for now.
ALBEMARLE CORP holds a top-quartile position (#0 of 50) within the Manufacturing sector, based on our composite quantitative scoring across quality, value, momentum, and stability factors. The composite score of 54.6/100 places it at rank #1324 in our full 7,333-stock universe. At $9.5B in market capitalization, ALBEMARLE CORP is a mid-cap player in the Manufacturing space, which limits certain scale advantages but may allow for more agile strategic execution.
Despite positive momentum (87th percentile), revenue contraction of -9% creates a divergence between price action and fundamental trajectory. This divergence suggests either that the market is looking through near-term weakness or that technical factors are temporarily inflating the stock. Investors should assess whether the revenue decline reflects cyclical weakness or structural challenges.
The margin cascade tells an important story: gross margins of 8% (-34.8pp vs sector) narrow to operating margins of -23% (-24.5pp vs sector) and net margins of -20.6%, yielding a gross-to-net conversion rate of -269%. The significant margin erosion from gross to net suggests elevated operating expenses, high interest costs, or other structural drags that warrant monitoring.
At a current price of $187.31, ALBEMARLE CORP is trading near fair value based on current fundamentals. Our value factor score of 49/100 reflects a composite assessment across multiple valuation metrics including price-to-earnings, price-to-book, EV/EBITDA, and price-to-sales ratios relative to both sector peers and the broader market. Valuation metrics are mixed, with no strong signal of mispricing in either direction.
The stock currently trades at P/B of 2.0x, P/S of 3.9x. We evaluate these multiples in the context of both absolute levels and sector-relative positioning to form our valuation view.
Positive momentum (87th percentile) indicates institutional accumulation and favorable technical dynamics that tend to persist in the intermediate term.
Revenue decline of -9% signals business deterioration — declining revenues make it difficult to grow into the current valuation and often precede further negative revisions.
Thin net margins of -20.6% provide limited cushion against cost pressures, competitive pricing, or macroeconomic headwinds — even small changes in costs could swing the company to a loss.
High beta of 1.66 means amplified losses in market selloffs — in a broad market correction, this stock would likely decline more than the index.
We assign a High uncertainty rating to ALBEMARLE CORP. Key risk factors include elevated market sensitivity (beta of 1.66), current negative profitability (net margin -20.6%). The wide range of potential outcomes widens our fair value estimate and increases the possibility of permanent capital impairment. Investors considering this name should size positions accordingly and demand a meaningful margin of safety before initiating.
Specific risk factors that inform our assessment include: elevated market sensitivity (beta of 1.66); current negative profitability (net margin -20.6%). Each of these factors independently widens the distribution of potential outcomes, and in combination they create a risk profile that demands careful position sizing. The stability factor at the 47th percentile and quality factor at the 41th percentile provide a quantitative summary of the overall risk landscape.
We identify limited risk mitigants at this time, which contributes to our high uncertainty assessment. Investors should monitor for improvement in balance sheet metrics, margin stability, and business predictability that could warrant a downgrade in our risk assessment over time.
We rate ALBEMARLE CORP's capital allocation as Poor. Key concerns include low returns on equity (-11.5%), negative profitability, weak asset returns (ROA -6.9%). Exemplary capital allocators generate ROE above 20% and maintain conservative leverage — ALBEMARLE CORP significantly underperforms these benchmarks, raising questions about management's ability to create shareholder value.
Investors should scrutinize management's reinvestment decisions and balance sheet trajectory before committing capital. Poor capital allocation often compounds over time: overlevered balance sheets limit strategic flexibility, while low returns on capital destroy shareholder value. We would need to see sustained improvement in profitability metrics and balance sheet discipline before considering an upgrade.
In summary, ALBEMARLE CORP receives a Hold rating with a composite score of 54.6/100 (rank #1324 of 7,333). Our quantitative framework assigns a No Moat (20/100, trend: stable), High uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation. The average factor score across quality, value, momentum, stability, and investment is 51/100.
Our analysis supports a neutral stance on ALBEMARLE CORP. While the quantitative profile is not weak enough to warrant selling, it lacks the multi-factor strength required for a buy recommendation. Existing holders should maintain positions and monitor for catalysts — either fundamental improvement or valuation compression — that would shift the risk-reward balance.
Analysis derived from Blank Capital Research quantitative terminal. For informational purposes only. No trade solicitation. Past performance not indicative of future results. Consult a qualified advisor.
We do not assign ALBEMARLE CORP a meaningful economic moat, scoring 20/100 on our composite assessment. The ROIC-WACC spread of -34.7% is the primary signal of economic value creation. Current fundamentals do not demonstrate the kind of durable competitive advantages — such as superior returns on invested capital, margin superiority, or reinvestment efficiency — that would protect the company from competitive erosion over the long term. The highest-scoring pillar, financial resilience, reached only 7.3/20.
The strongest moat sources are financial resilience (7.3/20) and reinvestment efficiency (6.3/20). Interest coverage -7.2x. Capital turnover 4.08x, R&D intensity 1.0%. These pillars form the core of ALBEMARLE CORP's competitive identity and are the primary drivers of excess returns in our framework.
Areas of relative weakness include economic value creation (0.4/20) and margin superiority (1.5/20). ROIC -23.0% vs WACC 11.7% (spread -34.7%). Improvement in these areas could meaningfully widen the moat over time, while deterioration would be an early warning of competitive erosion.
Our moat trend assessment is Stable. Multi-year ROIC and operating margin trajectories show neither meaningful improvement nor deterioration, suggesting the competitive position is steady. We expect ALBEMARLE CORP's moat profile to remain largely unchanged absent a material shift in return on capital or industry dynamics.
Key profit drivers include declining revenues (-9%) that pressure the earnings outlook. The margin cascade from 8% gross to -23% operating to -20.6% net reveals the company's cost structure and reinvestment intensity. Our analysis indicates that profit quality is adequate though not exceptional, with the quality factor at the 41th percentile.
The margin profile shows gross margins of 8%, operating margins of -23%, net margins of -20.6%. Return metrics include ROE of -11.5% and ROA of -6.9%. Relative to the Manufacturing sector, gross margins are 34.8 percentage points below the sector median of 43%, and ROE of -11.5% compares to a sector median of -2.5%.
The balance sheet reflects moderate leverage with D/E of 33%, a dividend yield of 2.00%, revenue growth of -9%. The sector median D/E is 0%, putting ALBEMARLE CORP at higher leverage than the typical peer. Overall balance sheet health is adequate for the current business environment.
Above 50MA
37.18%
Net New Highs
+51081

Albemarle Corp. beat Q4 revenue forecasts at $1.43B and returned to year-over-year growth after four consecutive quarters of declines, though earnings missed expectations. Despite a 3% post-earnings decline and 11% pullback since late January, the long-term outlook remains bullish driven by surging lithium demand (14.5% CAGR through 2030) from EV adoption and energy storage. The company is optimizing production through capacity management and received a $90M DOE grant to reactivate its Kings Mountain mine, positioning it to benefit from the projected lithium market growth from $32.38B in 2025 to $96.45B by 2033.

Motley Fool contributors analyze the lithium industry's recovery prospects, examining both bullish and bearish cases for major lithium producers. While long-term demand fundamentals appear strong, the sector faces challenges from volatile pricing cycles that could create bumpy near-term performance for investors.

Freeport-McMoRan and Albemarle are presented as undervalued mining stocks with asymmetric upside potential. Freeport benefits from attractive copper valuations, production ramp-ups in Indonesia, and expanding leaching initiatives. Albemarle, recovering from lithium price declines, is positioned to benefit from recent price recovery and growing EV and battery storage demand.