IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: Blank Capital Research ("BCR") is a technology platform, not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer. The algorithmically generated signals, scores, and rankings provided on this site ("God Mode" Signals) are for informational and research purposes only and do not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to sell or solicit an offer to buy any securities.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS: The "timing scores" and "regime signals" displayed are based on quantitative models. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not actually been executed, the results may have under-or-over compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity.
RISK OF LOSS: Trading in financial markets involves a high degree of risk and may result in the loss of your entire investment. Data provided by third-party sources (Intrinio, Snowflake) is believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
© 2026 Blank Capital Research. All rights reserved. System Version: Aegis V8 (God Mode).
Verdict
Quantitative factor alignment verified for current market regime.
Quant Score
Rank
#4156
Positioning
Market Dominance
Mining
Petroleum And Natural Gas
$110M
Arty Straehla
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. operates in four segments: Infrastructure Services, Well Completion Services, Natural Sand Proppant Services, and Drilling Services. The company offers high-pressure hydraulic fracturing services to enhance the production of oil and natural gas from formations having low permeability.
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
| Stock | Rating | Score▼ | Quality | Value | Momentum | P/E | EV/EBITDA | ROE | ROA | Gross Mgn | Op Mgn | Net Mgn | Rev Growth | Div Yield | D/E | Mkt Cap | AUDIT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$VALE Vale S.A. | 75 | 88 | 93 | 67 | - | - | 15.8% | 6.9% | 36.6% | 22.8% | 15.9% | -8.9% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $38.7B | VS | |
$SU SUNCOR ENERGY INC | 74 | 87 | 90 | 53 | - | - | 13.1% | 6.5% | 58.3% | 18.4% | 11.0% | -3.6% | 4.9% | 29.0x | $46.0B | VS | |
$TRX TRX GOLD Corp | 72 | 83 | 77 | 96 | - | - | 10.7% | 6.1% | 41.5% | 27.8% | 11.4% | 40.0% | 0.0% | 2.0x | $104M | VS | |
$ORLA Orla Mining Ltd. | 72 | 94 | 83 | 78 | - | - | 19.6% | 15.7% | 74.8% | 47.5% | 26.2% | 47.2% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $1.7B | VS | |
$KGC KINROSS GOLD CORP | 71 | 83 | 89 | 79 | - | - | 15.1% | 9.3% | 37.8% | 31.6% | 20.0% | 21.3% | 1.3% | 21.0x | $11.4B | VS | |
$AEM AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD | 71 | 80 | 80 | 71 | - | - | 9.4% | 6.5% | 60.5% | 36.0% | 22.9% | 25.0% | 2.0% | 6.0x | $38.9B | VS | |
$RIO RIO TINTO PLC | 70 | 76 | 84 | 64 | - | - | 20.3% | 11.2% | 23.0% | 20.1% | 23.1% | -1.3% | 11.2% | 26.0x | $93.8B | VS | |
$IAG IAMGOLD CORP | 70 | 71 | 82 | 89 | - | - | 29.9% | 17.1% | 33.7% | 57.8% | 51.9% | 65.4% | 0.0% | 34.0x | $2.5B | VS | |
$NGD New Gold Inc. /FI | 70 | 76 | 67 | 92 | - | - | 11.1% | 4.8% | 52.8% | 19.7% | 11.1% | 17.5% | 0.0% | 38.0x | $1.7B | VS | |
$PDS PRECISION DRILLING Corp | 70 | 77 | 90 | 65 | - | - | 6.6% | 3.6% | 34.4% | 11.0% | 5.9% | -10.0% | 0.0% | 52.0x | $876M | VS | |
$TUSK MAMMOTH ENERGY SERVICES, INC. | 35 | 37 | 28 | 19 | - | - | -11.4% | -8.4% | 21.2% | -79.5% | -43.3% | -71.3% | 0.0% | 35.0x | $110M | ||
| SECTOR BENCH | - | - | - | - | - | 13.7x | 5.2x | 4.0% | 3.9% | 43.2% | 12.2% | 6.2% | 2.6% | 0.0% | 0.3x | - | REF |
MAMMOTH ENERGY SERVICES, INC. (TUSK) receives a "Avoid" rating with a composite score of 34.6/100. It ranks #4156 out of 7,333 stocks in our coverage universe and carries a 1-star rating. Ratings are driven by a 6-factor quantitative model measuring quality, value, momentum, investment, stability, and short interest.
Sign in to join the discussion.
YOY expansion rate
Core pricing power
Operating efficiency
Bottom-line conversion
Equity capital efficiency
Asset base utilization
Financial leverage load
Direct cash return
Arty Straehla
Chief Executive Officer
Labor Force
1,040
37
33
43
Audit Verdict: Lower quality and stability scores may indicate governance concerns.
No recent insider transactions available for TUSK
Lagging peers — losers tend to keep underperforming
Expensive relative to fundamentals — limited margin of safety
Average quality profile
Average volatility — neutral timing signal
Aggressive spending — empire-building risk, dilutive growth
Below-average composite — caution warranted
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Relative valuation derived from Mining sector benchmarks. Model weights: EV/EBITDA (40%), P/B (35%), P/S (25%). Re-calculated daily.
No analyst ratings for TUSK.
View All RatingsMaterial decline in asset turnover efficiency detected
High margin volatility — erratic forensic earnings quality
| Factor | Global | Sector | Tilt |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROFITABILITY | 37 | 34 | +3NEUTRAL |
| MOMENTUM | 19 | 10 | +9ALPHA |
| VALUATION | 28 | 25 | +3NEUTRAL |
| INVESTMENT | 33 | 37 | -4NEUTRAL |
| STABILITY | 43 | 38 | +5NEUTRAL |
| SHORT INT | 40 | 35 | +5NEUTRAL |
Global = full universe. Sector = relative to industry peers. Positive tilt indicates idiosyncratic strength.
ROE proxy -11.4% (sector 4.0%)
GM 21% vs sector 43%, OM -79% vs sector 12%
Capital turnover N/A
Rev growth -71%, 10yr history
Interest coverage N/A
Composite assessment of profitability, capital efficiency, and financial strength. Top-tier entities demonstrate sustainable cash flow generation and elite competitive moats.
Profit generated per dollar of shareholder equity
Efficiency of asset utilization
Pricing power and cost efficiency
Core business profitability
Bottom-line profitability
The Quality factor evaluates the persistence and magnitude of realized cash flows. Companies with scores >70 exhibit superior pricing power and structural financial resilience through diverse economic regimes.
Our uncertainty rating tracks the predictability of future cash flows and potential for permanent capital loss. Moderate visibility with standard industry cyclicality.
Our quantitative model flags MAMMOTH ENERGY SERVICES, INC. with an Avoid rating, assigning a composite score of 34.6/100 and 1 out of 5 stars. Ranked #4156 of 7,333 stocks, TUSK falls in the bottom tier across key factors. Historically, stocks with this profile have faced elevated risk of underperformance and capital loss.
TUSK's quality score of 37/100 is below average, suggesting challenges with profitability or capital efficiency. The company reports a return on equity of -11.4% (sector avg: 4.0%), gross margins of 21.2% (sector avg: 43.2%), net margins of -43.3% (sector avg: 6.2%). Investors should examine whether management is actively addressing these weaknesses or if they reflect structural industry headwinds.
TUSK registers a value score of just 28/100, suggesting the stock trades at a significant premium to its fundamental metrics. Key valuation metrics include a P/B ratio of 0.44x. High-premium valuations like this require strong future execution to avoid multiple compression, and downside risk is elevated if growth disappoints.
MAMMOTH ENERGY SERVICES, INC.'s investment score of 33/100 suggests limited reinvestment activity. Key growth metrics include revenue growth of -71.3% vs. a sector average of 2.6% and a return on assets of -8.4% (sector: 3.9%). While this can be positive for mature, cash-generative businesses returning capital to shareholders, it may also signal a lack of growth opportunities or management conservatism.
MAMMOTH ENERGY SERVICES, INC. is experiencing notably weak momentum with a score of just 19/100. The stock has underperformed its peers and is trending below major moving averages. Revenue growth stands at -71.3% year-over-year, while a beta of 0.78 reflects its sensitivity to broader market moves. While deep momentum weakness can occasionally present value opportunities, it often reflects deteriorating fundamentals or structural headwinds that may persist.
TUSK's stability score of 43/100 signals elevated volatility and/or leverage concerns. Key stability metrics include a beta of 0.78 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 35.00x (sector avg: 0.3x). Investors should be prepared for wider-than-average price swings and consider position sizing accordingly to manage portfolio risk.
The short interest score of 40/100 for TUSK suggests somewhat elevated bearish positioning by institutional traders. Specific risk factors include elevated leverage (D/E: 35.00x), micro-cap liquidity risk. With a $110M market cap (micro-cap), MAMMOTH ENERGY SERVICES, INC. may experience above-average volatility. Investors should consider whether the short thesis has merit or if it creates a potential short-squeeze opportunity.
MAMMOTH ENERGY SERVICES, INC. is a micro-cap company in the Mining sector, ranked #0 of 50 in its sector (100th percentile) and #4156 of 7,333 overall (43rd percentile). Key comparisons include ROE of -11.4% trailing the 4.0% sector median and operating margins of -79.5% below the 12.2% sector average. This top-quartile standing reflects exceptional competitive strength relative to Mining peers.
While TUSK currently exhibits a AVOID profile, superior opportunities exist within the MINING sector. Our model identifies several "Strong Buy" candidates with higher quality scores and more attractive valuations among direct industry competitors.
View Top Mining Alpha →Quant Factor Profile
Upgrade catalyst
Improvement in Momentum (19) would have the largest impact on the composite score.
ROE 387% BELOW SECTOR MEDIAN
Gross Margin 51% BELOW SECTOR MEDIAN
Op. Margin 750% BELOW SECTOR MEDIAN
AUDIT DATA AS OF SEP 30, 2025 (Q2 FY2025)
We rate MAMMOTH ENERGY SERVICES, INC. (TUSK) as Avoid with a composite score of 34.6/100 at a current price of $2.28. The stock falls in the bottom quintile of our universe across key quantitative factors, and the multi-factor weakness suggests a high probability of continued underperformance.
The rating is primarily driven by strength in stability (43th percentile) and quality (37th percentile), which together account for the majority of the composite score. Offsetting weakness in momentum (19th percentile) and value (28th percentile) tempers our overall conviction. We assign a No Moat rating (15/100), Medium uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation.
Key items to watch: momentum to confirm whether the current price trend has legs; the path to profitability; valuation compression risk if growth disappoints. Any material change in these dynamics could warrant a reassessment of our rating. The moat trend is stable, which suggests the competitive landscape is stable for now.
MAMMOTH ENERGY SERVICES, INC. holds a top-quartile position (#0 of 50) within the Mining sector, based on our composite quantitative scoring across quality, value, momentum, and stability factors. The composite score of 34.6/100 places it at rank #4156 in our full 7,333-stock universe. At $110M in market capitalization, MAMMOTH ENERGY SERVICES, INC. is a small-cap player in the Mining space, which limits certain scale advantages but may allow for more agile strategic execution.
Revenue contraction of -71% combined with momentum at the 19th percentile paints a cautious picture of the near-term business outlook. The market appears to be pricing in continued challenges, and a catalyst for reversal is not clearly visible from current data.
The margin cascade tells an important story: gross margins of 21% (-22.0pp vs sector) narrow to operating margins of -79% (-91.7pp vs sector) and net margins of -43.3%, yielding a gross-to-net conversion rate of -204%. The significant margin erosion from gross to net suggests elevated operating expenses, high interest costs, or other structural drags that warrant monitoring.
At a current price of $2.28, MAMMOTH ENERGY SERVICES, INC. is trading at a premium to fundamental value. Our value factor score of 28/100 reflects a composite assessment across multiple valuation metrics including price-to-earnings, price-to-book, EV/EBITDA, and price-to-sales ratios relative to both sector peers and the broader market. The premium valuation implies the market is pricing in significant future growth or quality improvements that are not yet fully reflected in current fundamentals.
The stock currently trades at P/B of 0.4x, P/S of 1.0x. We evaluate these multiples in the context of both absolute levels and sector-relative positioning to form our valuation view.
The stock may offer contrarian value if near-term headwinds prove transitory — the current weakness in factor scores may reverse if business fundamentals stabilize.
The Avoid rating (composite 34.6/100) reflects multi-factor weakness, and historically, stocks in this scoring range have underperformed the market by a meaningful margin.
Revenue decline of -71% signals business deterioration — declining revenues make it difficult to grow into the current valuation and often precede further negative revisions.
Thin net margins of -43.3% provide limited cushion against cost pressures, competitive pricing, or macroeconomic headwinds — even small changes in costs could swing the company to a loss.
Weak momentum (19th percentile) suggests institutional selling pressure and unfavorable technical dynamics that may persist.
We assign a Medium uncertainty rating to MAMMOTH ENERGY SERVICES, INC.. The stock presents a balanced risk profile: current negative profitability (net margin -43.3%). While not risk-free, the core business fundamentals are adequate to withstand moderate economic stress, and the range of potential outcomes around our fair value estimate is manageable.
Specific risk factors that inform our assessment include: current negative profitability (net margin -43.3%). Each of these factors independently widens the distribution of potential outcomes, and in combination they create a risk profile that demands careful position sizing. The stability factor at the 43th percentile and quality factor at the 37th percentile provide a quantitative summary of the overall risk landscape.
We identify limited risk mitigants at this time, which contributes to our medium uncertainty assessment. Investors should monitor for improvement in balance sheet metrics, margin stability, and business predictability that could warrant a downgrade in our risk assessment over time.
We rate MAMMOTH ENERGY SERVICES, INC.'s capital allocation as Poor. Key concerns include low returns on equity (-11.4%), negative profitability, weak asset returns (ROA -8.4%). Exemplary capital allocators generate ROE above 20% and maintain conservative leverage — MAMMOTH ENERGY SERVICES, INC. significantly underperforms these benchmarks, raising questions about management's ability to create shareholder value.
Investors should scrutinize management's reinvestment decisions and balance sheet trajectory before committing capital. Poor capital allocation often compounds over time: overlevered balance sheets limit strategic flexibility, while low returns on capital destroy shareholder value. We would need to see sustained improvement in profitability metrics and balance sheet discipline before considering an upgrade.
In summary, MAMMOTH ENERGY SERVICES, INC. receives a Avoid rating with a composite score of 34.6/100 (rank #4156 of 7,333). Our quantitative framework assigns a No Moat (15/100, trend: stable), Medium uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation. The average factor score across quality, value, momentum, stability, and investment is 32/100.
Our analysis does not support a constructive view on MAMMOTH ENERGY SERVICES, INC. at this time. The combination of limited competitive advantages, medium uncertainty, and poor capital allocation suggests unfavorable risk-reward at current levels. We recommend investors avoid new positions and existing holders consider reducing exposure.
Analysis derived from Blank Capital Research quantitative terminal. For informational purposes only. No trade solicitation. Past performance not indicative of future results. Consult a qualified advisor.
We do not assign MAMMOTH ENERGY SERVICES, INC. a meaningful economic moat, scoring 15/100 on our composite assessment. Current fundamentals do not demonstrate the kind of durable competitive advantages — such as superior returns on invested capital, margin superiority, or reinvestment efficiency — that would protect the company from competitive erosion over the long term. The highest-scoring pillar, financial resilience, reached only 7.4/20.
The strongest moat sources are financial resilience (7.4/20) and margin superiority (4.5/20). Interest coverage N/A. GM 21% vs sector 43%, OM -79% vs sector 12%. These pillars form the core of MAMMOTH ENERGY SERVICES, INC.'s competitive identity and are the primary drivers of excess returns in our framework.
Areas of relative weakness include reinvestment efficiency (0/20) and economic value creation (0.6/20). Capital turnover N/A. Improvement in these areas could meaningfully widen the moat over time, while deterioration would be an early warning of competitive erosion.
Our moat trend assessment is Stable. Multi-year ROIC and operating margin trajectories show neither meaningful improvement nor deterioration, suggesting the competitive position is steady. We expect MAMMOTH ENERGY SERVICES, INC.'s moat profile to remain largely unchanged absent a material shift in return on capital or industry dynamics.
Key profit drivers include declining revenues (-71%) that pressure the earnings outlook. The margin cascade from 21% gross to -79% operating to -43.3% net reveals the company's cost structure and reinvestment intensity. Our analysis indicates that profit quality raises some durability concerns, with the quality factor at the 37th percentile.
The margin profile shows gross margins of 21%, operating margins of -79%, net margins of -43.3%. Return metrics include ROE of -11.4% and ROA of -8.4%. Relative to the Mining sector, gross margins are 22.0 percentage points below the sector median of 43%, and ROE of -11.4% compares to a sector median of 4.0%.
The balance sheet reflects moderate leverage with D/E of 35%, revenue growth of -71%. The sector median D/E is 0%, putting MAMMOTH ENERGY SERVICES, INC. at higher leverage than the typical peer. Overall balance sheet health is adequate for the current business environment.
Above 50MA
37.18%
Net New Highs
+51081
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) ("Mammoth" or the "Company") will host a conference call on Friday, March 6, 2026, to discuss the Company's results for the fourth quarter and full year ended December 31, 2025.
Gainers Amyris, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMRS) shares jumped 179.1% to $0.1839. Amyris shares dipped over 80% on Thursday after the company announced it filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Rigetti Computing, Inc. (NASDAQ: RGTI) shares climbed 51.2% to $2.48 following a narrower-than-expected quarterly loss. Telesat Corporation (NASDAQ: TSAT) gained 47.2% to $12.44 after the company reported second-quarter results and tapped MDA under a $2.1 billion deal as prime satellite manufacturer of advanced Telesat Lightspeed Low Earth Orbit constellation. Proterra Inc. (NASDAQ: PTRA) jumped 37% to $0.1442 on continued volatility after the company announced it filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Ouster, Inc. (NYSE: OUST) gained 28.8% to $6.57 after the company reported better-than-expected second-quarter financial results and issued Q3 revenue guidance. Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: EVLV) jumped 24.3% to $7.24 after the company reported better-than-expected second-quarter financial results and raised FY23 revenue guidance above estimates. Millennium Group International Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: MGIH) gained 24% to $3.08. Innodata Inc. (NASDAQ: INOD) shares gained 23.9% to $13.22 after the company posted a narrower quarterly loss. Apyx Medical Corporation (NASDAQ: APYX) rose 23% to $5.18 following quarterly results. IonQ, Inc. (NYSE: IONQ) climbed 22% to $17.31 after the company reported second-quarter financial results. Lottery.com Inc. (NASDAQ: LTRY) rose 21.3% to $6.15. 2U, Inc. (NASDAQ: TWOU) climbed 20.5% to $3.7615. Groupon, Inc. (NASDAQ: GRPN) rose 20% to $9.12. Goldman Sachs and Credit Suisse raised their price targets on the stock. Bitdeer Technologies Group (NASDAQ: BTDR) gained 19.8% to $ 11.12 following quarterly results. MicroCloud Hologram Inc. (NASDAQ: HOLO) climbed 19.2% to $3.2055. Tango Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: TNGX) gained 18.8% to $7.77. HC Wainwright & Co. maintained Tango Therapeutics with a Buy and raised the price target from $11 to $16. Eton Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: ETON) shares rose 17.9% to $3.0650 after posting upbeat second-quarter results. ModivCare Inc. (NASDAQ: MODV) gained 16.6% to $42.31. ModivCare Director Adam Gray acquired a total of 435,893 shares at an average price of $35.74. WeWork Inc. (NYSE: WE) shares rose 16.4% to $0.2157 after jumping 43% on Thursday. The stock has been volatile after the company recently said there was substantial doubt over its ability to stay in business. Arco Platform Limited ...
EF Hutton analyst Ignacio Bernaldez initiated coverage on Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) with a Buy rating and a $7 price target. The analyst expects the company's multi-segment energy services to benefit from ongoing growth opportunities in North America. The analyst notes that oilfield services should see ongoing revenue growth, but margins will likely compress modestly in 2023, as the company is expected to bring on an additional active ...Full story available on Benzinga.com
Upgrades Jefferies upgraded the previous rating for Relay Therapeutics Inc (NASDAQ:RLAY) from Underperform to Hold. For the fourth quarter, Relay Therapeutics had an EPS of $0.56, compared to year-ago quarter EPS of $0.62. The current stock performance of Relay Therapeutics shows a 52-week-high of $33.05 and a 52-week-low of $10.85. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $12.35. Craig-Hallum upgraded the previous rating for Chegg Inc (NYSE:CHGG) from Hold to Buy. For the fourth quarter, Chegg had an EPS of $0.40, compared to year-ago quarter EPS of $0.38. The stock has a 52-week-high of $32.64 and a 52-week-low of $15.25. At the end of the last trading period, Chegg closed at $17.63. Raymond James upgraded the previous rating for Capri Holdings Ltd (NYSE:CPRI) from Outperform to Strong Buy. Capri Holdings earned $1.84 in the third quarter, compared to $2.22 in the year-ago quarter. The stock has a 52-week-high of $69.25 and a 52-week-low of $36.91. At the end of the last trading period, Capri Holdings closed at $45.21. Jefferies upgraded the previous rating for General Electric Co (NYSE:GE) from Hold to Buy. General Electric earned $1.24 in the fourth quarter, compared to $0.92 in the year-ago quarter. The stock has a 52-week-high of $99.31 and a 52-week-low of $46.77. At the end of the last trading period, General Electric closed at $99.03. Barclays upgraded the previous rating for Enerplus Corp (NYSE:ERF) from Equal-Weight to Overweight. For the fourth quarter, Enerplus had an EPS of $0.78, compared to year-ago quarter EPS of $0.41. The stock has a 52-week-high of $19.22 and a 52-week-low of $11.00. At the end of the last trading period, Enerplus closed at $14.69. According to Stephens & Co., the prior rating for Shift4 Payments Inc (NYSE:FOUR) was changed from Equal-Weight to Overweight. Shift4 Payments earned $0.47 in the fourth quarter, compared to $0.08 in the year-ago quarter. The stock has a 52-week-high of $76.40 and a 52-week-low of $29.41. At the end of the last trading period, Shift4 Payments closed at $62.59. B of A Securities upgraded the previous rating for WestRock Co (NYSE:WRK) from Neutral to Buy. In the first quarter, WestRock showed an EPS of $0.55, compared to $0.65 from the year-ago quarter. The stock has a 52-week-high of $54.76 and a 52-week-low of $26.84. At the end of the last trading period, WestRock closed at $30.83. For The Western Union Co (NYSE:WU), Wolfe Research upgraded the previous rating of Underperform to Peer Perform. For the fourth quarter, Western Union had an EPS of $0.32, compared to year-ago quarter EPS of $0.64. The stock has a 52-week-high of $19.96 and a 52-week-low of $10.07. At the end of the last trading period, Western Union closed at $10.89. According to Wells Fargo, the prior rating for Emerson Electric Co (NYSE:EMR) was changed from Equal-Weight to Overweight. For the first quarter, Emerson Electric had an EPS of $0.78, compared to year-ago quarter EPS of $1.05. The stock has a 52-week-high of $99.65 and a 52-week-low of $72.42. At the end of the last trading period, Emerson Electric closed at $86.37. Mizuho upgraded the previous rating for Southern Co (NYSE:SO) from Neutral to Buy. Southern earned $0.26 in the fourth quarter, compared to $0.36 in the year-ago quarter. At the moment, the stock has a 52-week-high of $80.52 and a 52-week-low of $58.85. Southern closed at $72.81 at the end of the last trading period. According to Morgan Stanley, the prior rating for Fastly Inc (NYSE:FSLY) was changed from Underweight to Equal-Weight. In the fourth quarter, Fastly showed an EPS of $0.08, compared to $0.10 from the year-ago quarter. The current stock performance of Fastly shows a 52-week-high of $19.90 and a 52-week-low of $7.16. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $16.43. According to Barclays, the prior rating for Elanco Animal Health Inc (NYSE:ELAN) was changed from Equal-Weight to Overweight. For the fourth quarter, Elanco Animal Health had an EPS of $0.19, compared to year-ago quarter EPS of $0.21. The stock has a 52-week-high of $26.76 and a 52-week-low of $8.67. At the end of the last trading period, Elanco Animal Health closed at $9.46. According to Citigroup, the prior rating for Comstock Resources Inc (NYSE:CRK) was changed from Sell to Neutral. Comstock Resources earned $1.05 in the fourth quarter, compared to $0.37 in the year-ago quarter. The stock has a 52-week-high of $22.11 and a 52-week-low of $9.71. At the end of the last trading period, Comstock Resources closed at $10.94. For Coterra Energy Inc (NYSE:CTRA), Citigroup upgraded the previous rating of Sell to Neutral. For the fourth quarter, Coterra Energy had an EPS of $1.16, compared to year-ago quarter EPS of $0.83. The current stock performance of Coterra Energy shows a 52-week-high of $36.54 and a 52-week-low of $22.25. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $25.70. Keybanc upgraded the previous rating for Health Catalyst Inc (NASDAQ:HCAT) from Sector Weight to Overweight. For the fourth quarter, Health Catalyst had an EPS of $0.05, compared to year-ago quarter EPS of $0.19. The current stock performance of Health Catalyst shows a 52-week-high of $23.47 and a 52-week-low of $6.41. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $12.93. See all analyst ratings upgrades. Downgrades UBS downgraded the previous rating for Sea Ltd (NYSE:SE) from Buy to Neutral. For the fourth quarter, Sea had an EPS of $0.72, compared to year-ago quarter EPS of $0.88. The stock has a 52-week-high of $108.71 and a 52-week-low of $40.66. At the end of the last trading period, Sea closed at $81.49. For MYT Netherlands Parent BV (NYSE:MYTE), Societe Generale downgraded the previous rating of Buy to Hold. For the second quarter, MYT Netherlands Parent had an EPS of $0.13, compared to year-ago quarter EPS of $0.02. At the moment, the stock has a 52-week-high of $15.85 and a 52-week-low of $5.87. MYT Netherlands Parent closed at $6.15 at the end of the last trading period. According to Jefferies, the prior rating for Raytheon Technologies Corp (NYSE:RTX) was changed from Buy to Hold. Raytheon Technologies earned $1.27 in the fourth quarter, compared to $1.08 in the year-ago quarter. At the moment, the stock has a 52-week-high of $108.84 and a 52-week-low of $80.28. Raytheon Technologies closed at $104.09 at the end of the last trading period. For Acadia Healthcare Co Inc (NASDAQ:ACHC), Deutsche Bank downgraded the previous rating of Hold to Sell. For the ...Full story available on Benzinga.com
U.S. stocks traded higher, with the Dow Jones gaining over 300 points on Monday. Here are some big stocks recording losses in today’s session. Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: CPRX) shares dipped 29.9% to $14.59 after Teva Pharmaceuticals stated it plans to sell a generic version of Catalyst's FIRDAPSE in the United States. Eargo, Inc. (NASDAQ: EAR) dropped 15.1% to $12.35 after jumping 26% on Friday. The company recently effected a 1:20 reverse stock split. Eve ...