IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: Blank Capital Research ("BCR") is a technology platform, not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer. The algorithmically generated signals, scores, and rankings provided on this site ("God Mode" Signals) are for informational and research purposes only and do not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to sell or solicit an offer to buy any securities.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS: The "timing scores" and "regime signals" displayed are based on quantitative models. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not actually been executed, the results may have under-or-over compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity.
RISK OF LOSS: Trading in financial markets involves a high degree of risk and may result in the loss of your entire investment. Data provided by third-party sources (Intrinio, Snowflake) is believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
© 2026 Blank Capital Research. All rights reserved. System Version: Aegis V8 (God Mode).
Verdict
Quantitative factor alignment verified for current market regime.
Quant Score
Rank
#2674
Positioning
Market Dominance
Retail Trade
Retail
$0
Mark Walsh
We are the largest for-profit thrift operator in the United States and Canada based on number of stores. Our principal executive offices are located at 11400 S.E. 6th Street, Suite 125, Bellevue, WA.
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
X-AXIS: EV/EBITDA (LOWER = CHEAPER) | Y-AXIS: ROE (HIGHER = ELITE) | RED CIRCLE = SVV ANALYSIS TARGET
| Stock | Rating | Score▼ | Quality | Value | Momentum | P/E | EV/EBITDA | ROE | ROA | Gross Mgn | Op Mgn | Net Mgn | Rev Growth | Div Yield | D/E | Mkt Cap | AUDIT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$ARCO Arcos Dorados Holdings Inc. | 73 | 85 | 89 | 65 | - | - | 29.1% | 5.1% | 46.8% | 7.3% | 3.3% | 3.2% | 3.4% | 153.0x | $1.5B | VS | |
$IMKTA INGLES MARKETS INC | 70 | 73 | 89 | 76 | 11.3x | 4.1x | 5.3% | 3.3% | 23.9% | 2.2% | 1.6% | -5.4% | 1.0% | 32.0x | $1.3B | VS | |
$SGU STAR GROUP, L.P. | 69 | 82 | 79 | 63 | - | - | 26.2% | 7.8% | 31.5% | 6.4% | 4.1% | 1.0% | 6.1% | 63.0x | $399M | VS | |
$EZPW EZCORP INC | 68 | 77 | 82 | 89 | 7.2x | 4.2x | 12.0% | 6.4% | 58.6% | 11.7% | 8.6% | 9.7% | 0.0% | 51.0x | $1.2B | VS | |
$HTHT H World Group Ltd | 68 | 91 | 44 | 84 | - | - | 24.9% | 4.9% | 100.0% | 21.8% | 13.0% | 6.2% | 2.9% | 45.0x | $101.1B | VS | |
$DDL Dingdong (Cayman) Ltd | 68 | 86 | 82 | 57 | - | - | 42.4% | 4.0% | 100.0% | 0.9% | 1.3% | 12.3% | 0.0% | 201.0x | $1.2B | VS | |
$SBH Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. | 68 | 83 | 92 | 77 | 5.1x | 2.3x | 27.5% | 6.9% | 51.6% | 8.9% | 5.3% | -0.4% | 0.0% | 177.0x | $1.6B | VS | |
$SPH SUBURBAN PROPANE PARTNERS LP | 67 | 80 | 90 | 53 | - | 13.0x | 18.6% | 4.7% | 60.7% | 14.4% | 7.4% | 7.9% | 7.1% | 202.0x | $1.2B | VS | |
$IHG INTERCONTINENTAL HOTELS GROUP PLC /NEW/ | 67 | 63 | 81 | 67 | - | - | -29.5% | 13.1% | 58.6% | 40.7% | 27.4% | 6.8% | 1.3% | - | $21.5B | VS | |
$ROST ROSS STORES, INC. | 67 | 63 | 55 | 83 | 25.2x | 16.5x | 34.8% | 13.3% | 28.0% | 11.6% | 9.1% | 10.4% | 1.0% | 26.0x | $51.6B | VS | |
$SVV Savers Value Village, Inc. | 46 | 46 | 25 | 55 | 166.3x | 12.6x | 2.3% | 0.5% | 35.2% | 8.3% | 0.6% | 15.3% | 0.0% | 168.0x | $0 | ||
| SECTOR BENCH | - | - | - | - | - | 21.4x | 9.1x | 8.9% | 2.9% | 36.2% | 3.9% | 1.6% | 3.8% | 0.0% | 0.6x | - | REF |
Savers Value Village, Inc. (SVV) receives a "Reduce" rating with a composite score of 45.8/100. It ranks #2674 out of 7,333 stocks in our coverage universe and carries a 2-star rating. Ratings are driven by a 6-factor quantitative model measuring quality, value, momentum, investment, stability, and short interest.
Sign in to join the discussion.
YOY expansion rate
Core pricing power
Operating efficiency
Bottom-line conversion
Equity capital efficiency
Asset base utilization
Financial leverage load
Direct cash return
Mark Walsh
Chief Executive Officer
46
36
51
Audit Verdict: Lower quality and stability scores may indicate governance concerns.
No recent insider transactions available for SVV
In-line with peers — no strong momentum signal
Expensive relative to fundamentals — limited margin of safety
Average quality profile
Average volatility — neutral timing signal
Moderate investment profile
Mid-range overall rating
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Relative valuation derived from Retail Trade sector benchmarks. Model weights: EV/EBITDA (40%), P/B (35%), P/S (25%). Re-calculated daily.
Projection based on user-defined inputs. Re-calculated daily against current market data.
Reverse DCF Framework — Mauboussin Methodology
Institutional-grade Reverse DCF analysis. This model identifies the growth hurdles embedded in current market prices. When implied growth is significantly lower than historical or projected rates, a margin of safety may exist. Re-audited daily.
No analyst ratings for SVV.
View All RatingsMaterial decline in asset turnover efficiency detected
High margin volatility — erratic forensic earnings quality
| Factor | Global | Sector | Tilt |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROFITABILITY | 46 | 47 | -1NEUTRAL |
| MOMENTUM | 55 | 56 | -1NEUTRAL |
| VALUATION | 25 | 14 | +11ALPHA |
| INVESTMENT | 36 | 62 | -26DRAG |
| STABILITY | 51 | 53 | -2NEUTRAL |
| SHORT INT | 21 | 8 | +13ALPHA |
Global = full universe. Sector = relative to industry peers. Positive tilt indicates idiosyncratic strength.
ROE proxy 2.3% (sector 8.9%)
GM 35% vs sector 36%, OM 8% vs sector 4%
Capital turnover N/A
Rev growth 15%, 4yr history
Interest coverage N/A
Composite assessment of profitability, capital efficiency, and financial strength. Top-tier entities demonstrate sustainable cash flow generation and elite competitive moats.
Profit generated per dollar of shareholder equity
Efficiency of asset utilization
Pricing power and cost efficiency
Core business profitability
Bottom-line profitability
The Quality factor evaluates the persistence and magnitude of realized cash flows. Companies with scores >70 exhibit superior pricing power and structural financial resilience through diverse economic regimes.
Our uncertainty rating tracks the predictability of future cash flows and potential for permanent capital loss. Moderate visibility with standard industry cyclicality.
Savers Value Village, Inc. receives a Reduce rating from our analysis, with a composite score of 45.8/100 and 2 out of 5 stars, ranking #2674 out of 7,333 stocks. SVV's factor profile shows weakness across multiple dimensions, suggesting the stock may underperform going forward. Existing holders may want to consider trimming positions or tightening stop-losses.
With a quality score of 46/100, SVV shows adequate but unremarkable business quality. The company reports a return on equity of 2.3% (sector avg: 8.9%), gross margins of 35.2% (sector avg: 36.2%), net margins of 0.6% (sector avg: 1.6%). This suggests the company generates acceptable returns but may lack the competitive positioning or operational efficiency to stand out from peers.
SVV registers a value score of just 25/100, suggesting the stock trades at a significant premium to its fundamental metrics. Key valuation metrics include a P/E ratio of 166.27x, an EV/EBITDA of 12.61x, a P/B ratio of 3.75x. High-premium valuations like this require strong future execution to avoid multiple compression, and downside risk is elevated if growth disappoints.
Savers Value Village, Inc.'s investment score of 36/100 suggests limited reinvestment activity. Key growth metrics include revenue growth of 15.3% vs. a sector average of 3.8% and a return on assets of 0.5% (sector: 2.9%). While this can be positive for mature, cash-generative businesses returning capital to shareholders, it may also signal a lack of growth opportunities or management conservatism.
SVV demonstrates moderate momentum with a score of 55/100, suggesting a neutral price trend without strong directional conviction. Revenue growth stands at 15.3% year-over-year, while a beta of 0.74 reflects its sensitivity to broader market moves. Moderate momentum may indicate the stock is consolidating or transitioning between trends, warranting close monitoring of upcoming catalysts.
With a stability score of 51/100, SVV exhibits average financial resilience. Key stability metrics include a beta of 0.74 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 168.00x (sector avg: 0.6x). While the balance sheet is not a major concern, the stock is subject to typical market volatility and may experience sharper drawdowns during risk-off episodes.
Savers Value Village, Inc.'s short interest score of 21/100 reveals significant bearish positioning, suggesting institutional investors are actively betting against the stock. Specific risk factors include elevated leverage (D/E: 168.00x), micro-cap liquidity risk. At $0 (micro-cap), SVV carries meaningful risk and is best suited for investors with high risk tolerance who have thoroughly evaluated the bear thesis.
Savers Value Village, Inc. is a micro-cap company in the Retail Trade sector, ranked #0 of 50 in its sector (100th percentile) and #2674 of 7,333 overall (64th percentile). Key comparisons include ROE of 2.3% trailing the 8.9% sector median and operating margins of 8.3% above the 3.9% sector average. This top-quartile standing reflects exceptional competitive strength relative to Retail Trade peers.
While SVV currently exhibits a REDUCE profile, superior opportunities exist within the RETAIL TRADE sector. Our model identifies several "Strong Buy" candidates with higher quality scores and more attractive valuations among direct industry competitors.
View Top Retail Trade Alpha →Quant Factor Profile
Upgrade catalyst
Improvement in Short Int. (21) would have the largest impact on the composite score.
EV/EBITDA 38% ABOVE SECTOR MEDIAN
ROE 75% BELOW SECTOR MEDIAN
Gross Margin IN LINE WITH SECTOR BENCHMARKS
AUDIT DATA AS OF SEP 27, 2025 (Q2 FY2025)
We rate Savers Value Village, Inc. (SVV) as a Reduce with a composite score of 45.8/100 at a current price of $9.35. The quantitative profile shows weakness across multiple dimensions, suggesting limited upside potential and elevated risk of underperformance relative to peers over the next 12 months.
The rating is primarily driven by strength in momentum (55th percentile) and stability (51th percentile), which together account for the majority of the composite score. Offsetting weakness in value (25th percentile) and investment (36th percentile) tempers our overall conviction. We assign a No Moat rating (28/100), Medium uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation.
Key items to watch: balance sheet deleveraging progress; valuation compression risk if growth disappoints. Any material change in these dynamics could warrant a reassessment of our rating. The moat trend is stable, which suggests the competitive landscape is stable for now.
Savers Value Village, Inc. holds a top-quartile position (#0 of 50) within the Retail Trade sector, based on our composite quantitative scoring across quality, value, momentum, and stability factors. The composite score of 45.8/100 places it at rank #2674 in our full 7,333-stock universe. At N/A in market capitalization, Savers Value Village, Inc. is a small-cap player in the Retail Trade space, which limits certain scale advantages but may allow for more agile strategic execution.
Revenue is growing at 15%, though momentum at the 55th percentile suggests the market has not yet fully recognized this trajectory. This potential disconnect between fundamental improvement and market recognition could represent an opportunity for patient investors if the growth trend persists.
The margin cascade tells an important story: gross margins of 35% (-1.0pp vs sector) narrow to operating margins of 8% (+4.4pp vs sector) and net margins of 0.6%, yielding a gross-to-net conversion rate of 2%. The significant margin erosion from gross to net suggests elevated operating expenses, high interest costs, or other structural drags that warrant monitoring.
At a current price of $9.35, Savers Value Village, Inc. is trading at a premium to fundamental value. Our value factor score of 25/100 reflects a composite assessment across multiple valuation metrics including price-to-earnings, price-to-book, EV/EBITDA, and price-to-sales ratios relative to both sector peers and the broader market. The premium valuation implies the market is pricing in significant future growth or quality improvements that are not yet fully reflected in current fundamentals.
The stock currently trades at a P/E of 166.3x (a 676% premium to the sector median of 21.4x), EV/EBITDA of 12.6x (at a premium), P/B of 3.8x, P/S of 1.0x. The above-sector P/E multiple suggests the market is pricing in superior growth or quality, which our analysis finds only partially justified by current fundamentals.
Revenue growth of 15% confirms the business is expanding its addressable market — growth at this level typically supports multiple expansion and attracts institutional capital.
The Reduce rating (composite 45.8/100) reflects multi-factor weakness, and historically, stocks in this scoring range have underperformed the market by a meaningful margin.
A P/E of 166.3x leaves little room for execution misses — any earnings disappointment could trigger a sharp multiple compression.
Elevated leverage (168% D/E) amplifies downside risk and limits management's financial flexibility in adverse scenarios.
Thin net margins of 0.6% provide limited cushion against cost pressures, competitive pricing, or macroeconomic headwinds — even small changes in costs could swing the company to a loss.
We assign a Medium uncertainty rating to Savers Value Village, Inc.. The stock presents a balanced risk profile: significant leverage (168% debt-to-equity) and elevated valuation multiple (P/E 166.3x) that leaves limited margin for error. While not risk-free, the core business fundamentals are adequate to withstand moderate economic stress, and the range of potential outcomes around our fair value estimate is manageable.
Specific risk factors that inform our assessment include: significant leverage (168% debt-to-equity); elevated valuation multiple (P/E 166.3x) that leaves limited margin for error; the combination of leverage (168% D/E) and thin margins (0.6% net) amplifies downside risk. Each of these factors independently widens the distribution of potential outcomes, and in combination they create a risk profile that demands careful position sizing. The stability factor at the 51th percentile and quality factor at the 46th percentile provide a quantitative summary of the overall risk landscape.
We identify limited risk mitigants at this time, which contributes to our medium uncertainty assessment. Investors should monitor for improvement in balance sheet metrics, margin stability, and business predictability that could warrant a downgrade in our risk assessment over time.
We rate Savers Value Village, Inc.'s capital allocation as Poor. Key concerns include low returns on equity (2.3%), elevated leverage (168% D/E), weak asset returns (ROA 0.5%). Exemplary capital allocators generate ROE above 20% and maintain conservative leverage — Savers Value Village, Inc. significantly underperforms these benchmarks, raising questions about management's ability to create shareholder value.
Investors should scrutinize management's reinvestment decisions and balance sheet trajectory before committing capital. Poor capital allocation often compounds over time: overlevered balance sheets limit strategic flexibility, while low returns on capital destroy shareholder value. We would need to see sustained improvement in profitability metrics and balance sheet discipline before considering an upgrade.
In summary, Savers Value Village, Inc. receives a Reduce rating with a composite score of 45.8/100 (rank #2674 of 7,333). Our quantitative framework assigns a No Moat (28/100, trend: stable), Medium uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation. The average factor score across quality, value, momentum, stability, and investment is 42/100.
Our analysis does not support a constructive view on Savers Value Village, Inc. at this time. The combination of limited competitive advantages, medium uncertainty, and poor capital allocation suggests unfavorable risk-reward at current levels. We recommend investors avoid new positions and existing holders consider reducing exposure.
Analysis derived from Blank Capital Research quantitative terminal. For informational purposes only. No trade solicitation. Past performance not indicative of future results. Consult a qualified advisor.
We do not assign Savers Value Village, Inc. a meaningful economic moat, scoring 28/100 on our composite assessment. Current fundamentals do not demonstrate the kind of durable competitive advantages — such as superior returns on invested capital, margin superiority, or reinvestment efficiency — that would protect the company from competitive erosion over the long term. The highest-scoring pillar, margin superiority, reached only 10.8/20.
The strongest moat sources are margin superiority (10.8/20) and growth durability (9.3/20). GM 35% vs sector 36%, OM 8% vs sector 4%. Rev growth 15%, 4yr history. These pillars form the core of Savers Value Village, Inc.'s competitive identity and are the primary drivers of excess returns in our framework.
Areas of relative weakness include reinvestment efficiency (0/20) and financial resilience (3.6/20). Capital turnover N/A. Improvement in these areas could meaningfully widen the moat over time, while deterioration would be an early warning of competitive erosion.
Our moat trend assessment is Stable. Multi-year ROIC and operating margin trajectories show neither meaningful improvement nor deterioration, suggesting the competitive position is steady. We expect Savers Value Village, Inc.'s moat profile to remain largely unchanged absent a material shift in return on capital or industry dynamics.
Key profit drivers include gross margins of 35% providing a solid profitability foundation, robust top-line growth of 15% expanding the revenue base. The margin cascade from 35% gross to 8% operating to 0.6% net reveals the company's cost structure and reinvestment intensity. Our analysis indicates that profit quality is adequate though not exceptional, with the quality factor at the 46th percentile.
The margin profile shows gross margins of 35%, operating margins of 8%, net margins of 0.6%. Return metrics include ROE of 2.3% and ROA of 0.5%. Relative to the Retail Trade sector, gross margins are 1.0 percentage points below the sector median of 36%, and ROE of 2.3% compares to a sector median of 8.9%.
The balance sheet reflects high leverage with D/E of 168%, which may limit financial flexibility, revenue growth of 15%. The sector median D/E is 1%, putting Savers Value Village, Inc. at higher leverage than the typical peer. Elevated leverage in combination with the current margin profile warrants close monitoring for any deterioration in debt-servicing capacity.

Four analysts have provided a mix of bullish and bearish perspectives on Savers Value Village (SVV), with an average 12-month price target of $18.75, down from the prior average of $23.25. The company's financials show positive revenue growth, strong profitability, and efficient use of assets, but also a higher debt-to-equity ratio compared to industry peers.

Renowned U.S. discount retailers Dollar Tree, Inc. (NASDAQ:DLTR) and Dollar General Corporation (NYSE:DG) are expected to report their quarterly earnings results on March 13th and 14th, respectively. Piper Sandler analyst Peter J. Keith presented a placer foot traffic analysis of these companies to assess directional movements in traffic, which can be insightful. For Dollar General, the analyst sees a solid improvement in foot traffic on a quarter-to-date basis in the first quarter versus the fourth quarter. However, Dollar Tree’s first-quarter analysis deciphers a slight downtick from the fourth quarter. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or SNAP benefits represent ~7.5% of sales at both Dollar General and Dollar Tree’s Family Dollar, the analyst notes. However, while Dollar Tree’s management called out declining SNAP benefits as a headwind to Family Dollar in the third quarter, Dollar General didn’t cite SNAP headwinds ...Full story available on Benzinga.com

The average of price targets set by Wall Street analysts indicates a potential upside of 69.3% in Savers Value (SVV). While the effectiveness of this highly sought-after metric is questionable, the positive trend in earnings estimate revisions might translate into an upside in the stock.
Above 50MA
37.18%
Net New Highs
+51081