IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: Blank Capital Research ("BCR") is a technology platform, not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer. The algorithmically generated signals, scores, and rankings provided on this site ("God Mode" Signals) are for informational and research purposes only and do not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to sell or solicit an offer to buy any securities.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS: The "timing scores" and "regime signals" displayed are based on quantitative models. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not actually been executed, the results may have under-or-over compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity.
RISK OF LOSS: Trading in financial markets involves a high degree of risk and may result in the loss of your entire investment. Data provided by third-party sources (Intrinio, Snowflake) is believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
© 2026 Blank Capital Research. All rights reserved. System Version: Aegis V8 (God Mode).
Verdict
Quantitative factor alignment verified for current market regime.
Quant Score
Rank
#3111
Positioning
Market Dominance
Services
Computer Software
$4.5B
Matthew P. Flake
Q2 Holdings, Inc. provides cloud-based digital banking solutions to regional and community financial institutions in the United States. The company offers Q2 Consumer Banking, a browser-based. banking solution and comprehensive financial institution branded digital banking capabilities. In addition, Q2 Gro, a digital account opening, and digital sales and marketing platform; Q2 Biller Direct, a bill payment solution.
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
X-AXIS: EV/EBITDA (LOWER = CHEAPER) | Y-AXIS: ROE (HIGHER = ELITE) | RED CIRCLE = QTWO ANALYSIS TARGET
| Stock | Rating | Score▼ | Quality | Value | Momentum | P/E | EV/EBITDA | ROE | ROA | Gross Mgn | Op Mgn | Net Mgn | Rev Growth | Div Yield | D/E | Mkt Cap | AUDIT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$YALA Yalla Group Ltd | 75 | 89 | 99 | 80 | - | - | 21.3% | 18.6% | 64.5% | 35.7% | 39.5% | 6.5% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $644M | VS | |
$GRVY GRAVITY Co., Ltd. | 75 | 82 | 96 | 71 | - | - | 15.4% | 12.6% | 38.7% | 17.1% | 17.0% | -39.7% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $439M | VS | |
$ISSC INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS & SUPPORT INC | 73 | 81 | 88 | 94 | 25.0x | 14.1x | 28.1% | 16.8% | 48.1% | 23.8% | 18.5% | 78.6% | 0.0% | 37.0x | $220M | VS | |
$AER AerCap Holdings N.V. | 72 | 60 | 87 | 84 | - | - | 12.4% | 2.9% | 100.0% | 28.2% | 26.2% | 5.5% | 0.8% | 264.0x | $19.4B | VS | |
$HCSG HEALTHCARE SERVICES GROUP INC | 72 | 74 | 88 | 88 | 7.1x | 6.1x | 28.9% | 20.8% | 20.8% | 9.9% | 9.3% | 8.5% | 0.0% | 1.0x | $1.2B | VS | |
$LQDT LIQUIDITY SERVICES INC | 72 | 90 | 88 | 68 | 24.9x | 14.3x | 14.6% | 7.8% | 43.8% | 7.4% | 5.9% | 31.2% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $857M | VS | |
$TRTNpA Triton International Ltd | 71 | 70 | 89 | 70 | - | 1.7x | 18.0% | 4.6% | 97.3% | 52.2% | 32.7% | -3.4% | 0.0% | 271.0x | $8.0B | VS | |
$EDU New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. | 71 | 83 | 52 | 77 | - | - | 9.4% | 4.9% | 55.5% | 8.7% | 7.7% | 13.6% | 1.3% | 7.0x | $78.0B | VS | |
$NTES NetEase, Inc. | 71 | 88 | 93 | 68 | - | - | 22.1% | 15.6% | 62.5% | 28.1% | 28.7% | -1.0% | 2.8% | 9.0x | $56.6B | VS | |
$UTI UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC | 70 | 86 | 86 | 72 | 43.2x | 16.0x | 21.4% | 8.0% | 100.0% | 10.0% | 7.5% | 14.1% | 0.0% | 27.0x | $1.8B | VS | |
$QTWO Q2 Holdings, Inc. | 43 | 44 | 49 | 34 | 160.3x | 309.7x | 3.0% | 1.6% | 52.9% | 1.1% | 2.3% | 16.7% | 0.0% | 93.0x | $4.5B | ||
| SECTOR BENCH | - | - | - | - | - | 23.7x | 11.7x | 5.3% | 1.9% | 59.6% | 3.5% | 2.3% | 7.8% | 0.0% | 0.3x | - | REF |
Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO) receives a "Reduce" rating with a composite score of 43.1/100. It ranks #3111 out of 7,333 stocks in our coverage universe and carries a 2-star rating. Ratings are driven by a 6-factor quantitative model measuring quality, value, momentum, investment, stability, and short interest.
Sign in to join the discussion.
YOY expansion rate
Core pricing power
Operating efficiency
Bottom-line conversion
Equity capital efficiency
Asset base utilization
Financial leverage load
Direct cash return
Matthew P. Flake
Chief Executive Officer
Labor Force
2,250
44
26
62
Audit Verdict: Lower quality and stability scores may indicate governance concerns.
No recent insider transactions available for QTWO
Lagging peers — losers tend to keep underperforming
Fair valuation relative to peers
Average quality profile
Low volatility — smoother ride and historically better risk-adjusted returns
Aggressive spending — empire-building risk, dilutive growth
Mid-range overall rating
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Relative valuation derived from Services sector benchmarks. Model weights: EV/EBITDA (40%), P/B (35%), P/S (25%). Re-calculated daily.
Projection based on user-defined inputs. Re-calculated daily against current market data.
Reverse DCF Framework — Mauboussin Methodology
Institutional-grade Reverse DCF analysis. This model identifies the growth hurdles embedded in current market prices. When implied growth is significantly lower than historical or projected rates, a margin of safety may exist. Re-audited daily.
No analyst ratings for QTWO.
View All RatingsEarnings well-supported by fundamental cash flows
Material decline in asset turnover efficiency detected
High margin volatility — erratic forensic earnings quality
| Factor | Global | Sector | Tilt |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROFITABILITY | 44 | 41 | +3NEUTRAL |
| MOMENTUM | 34 | 29 | +5NEUTRAL |
| VALUATION | 49 | 51 | -2NEUTRAL |
| INVESTMENT | 26 | 19 | +7ALPHA |
| STABILITY | 62 | 67 | -5NEUTRAL |
| SHORT INT | 54 | 64 | -10DRAG |
Global = full universe. Sector = relative to industry peers. Positive tilt indicates idiosyncratic strength.
ROIC 172.6% vs WACC 9.1% (spread +163.5%)
GM 53% vs sector 60%, OM 1% vs sector 4%
Capital turnover 36.90x, R&D intensity 19.4%
Rev growth 17%, 10yr history
Interest coverage N/A, Net debt/EBITDA 0.5x
Composite assessment of profitability, capital efficiency, and financial strength. Top-tier entities demonstrate sustainable cash flow generation and elite competitive moats.
Profit generated per dollar of shareholder equity
Efficiency of asset utilization
Pricing power and cost efficiency
Core business profitability
Bottom-line profitability
The Quality factor evaluates the persistence and magnitude of realized cash flows. Companies with scores >70 exhibit superior pricing power and structural financial resilience through diverse economic regimes.
Our uncertainty rating tracks the predictability of future cash flows and potential for permanent capital loss. Moderate visibility with standard industry cyclicality.
Q2 Holdings, Inc. receives a Reduce rating from our analysis, with a composite score of 43.1/100 and 2 out of 5 stars, ranking #3111 out of 7,333 stocks. QTWO's factor profile shows weakness across multiple dimensions, suggesting the stock may underperform going forward. Existing holders may want to consider trimming positions or tightening stop-losses.
QTWO's quality score of 44/100 is below average, suggesting challenges with profitability or capital efficiency. The company reports a return on equity of 3.0% (sector avg: 5.3%), gross margins of 52.9% (sector avg: 59.6%), net margins of 2.3% (sector avg: 2.3%). Investors should examine whether management is actively addressing these weaknesses or if they reflect structural industry headwinds.
With a value score of 49/100, QTWO appears somewhat expensive relative to its fundamentals. Key valuation metrics include a P/E ratio of 160.30x, an EV/EBITDA of 309.67x, a P/B ratio of 4.79x. Investors paying a premium here are likely betting on above-average growth or margin expansion to justify current prices.
Q2 Holdings, Inc.'s investment score of 26/100 suggests limited reinvestment activity. Key growth metrics include revenue growth of 16.7% vs. a sector average of 7.8% and a return on assets of 1.6% (sector: 1.9%). While this can be positive for mature, cash-generative businesses returning capital to shareholders, it may also signal a lack of growth opportunities or management conservatism.
QTWO is currently showing below-average momentum at 34/100, which may indicate weakening institutional interest or negative sentiment shifts. Revenue growth stands at 16.7% year-over-year, while a beta of 1.31 reflects its sensitivity to broader market moves. Investors should note that declining momentum can precede further price weakness, though contrarian opportunities sometimes emerge at these levels.
With a stability score of 62/100, QTWO exhibits average financial resilience. Key stability metrics include a beta of 1.31 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 93.00x (sector avg: 0.3x). While the balance sheet is not a major concern, the stock is subject to typical market volatility and may experience sharper drawdowns during risk-off episodes.
The short interest score of 54/100 for QTWO suggests somewhat elevated bearish positioning by institutional traders. Specific risk factors include above-average market sensitivity (beta: 1.31), elevated leverage (D/E: 93.00x). With a $4.5B market cap (mid-cap), Q2 Holdings, Inc. may experience above-average volatility. Investors should consider whether the short thesis has merit or if it creates a potential short-squeeze opportunity.
Q2 Holdings, Inc. is a mid-cap company in the Services sector, ranked #0 of 50 in its sector (100th percentile) and #3111 of 7,333 overall (58th percentile). Key comparisons include ROE of 3.0% trailing the 5.3% sector median and operating margins of 1.1% below the 3.5% sector average. This top-quartile standing reflects exceptional competitive strength relative to Services peers.
While QTWO currently exhibits a REDUCE profile, superior opportunities exist within the SERVICES sector. Our model identifies several "Strong Buy" candidates with higher quality scores and more attractive valuations among direct industry competitors.
View Top Services Alpha →Quant Factor Profile
Upgrade catalyst
Improvement in Investment (26) would have the largest impact on the composite score.
EV/EBITDA 2540% ABOVE SECTOR MEDIAN
ROE 44% BELOW SECTOR MEDIAN
Gross Margin 11% BELOW SECTOR MEDIAN
AUDIT DATA AS OF SEP 30, 2025 (Q2 FY2025)
We rate Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO) as a Reduce with a composite score of 43.1/100 at a current price of $47.29. The quantitative profile shows weakness across multiple dimensions, suggesting limited upside potential and elevated risk of underperformance relative to peers over the next 12 months.
The rating is primarily driven by strength in stability (62th percentile) and value (49th percentile), which together account for the majority of the composite score. Offsetting weakness in investment (26th percentile) and momentum (34th percentile) tempers our overall conviction. We assign a Narrow Moat rating (57/100), Medium uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation.
Key items to watch: momentum to confirm whether the current price trend has legs. Any material change in these dynamics could warrant a reassessment of our rating. The moat trend is stable, which suggests the competitive landscape is stable for now.
Q2 Holdings, Inc. holds a top-quartile position (#0 of 50) within the Services sector, based on our composite quantitative scoring across quality, value, momentum, and stability factors. The composite score of 43.1/100 places it at rank #3111 in our full 7,333-stock universe. At $4.5B in market capitalization, Q2 Holdings, Inc. is a mid-cap player in the Services space, which limits certain scale advantages but may allow for more agile strategic execution.
Revenue is growing at 17%, though momentum at the 34th percentile suggests the market has not yet fully recognized this trajectory. This potential disconnect between fundamental improvement and market recognition could represent an opportunity for patient investors if the growth trend persists.
The margin cascade tells an important story: gross margins of 53% (-6.7pp vs sector) narrow to operating margins of 1% (-2.4pp vs sector) and net margins of 2.3%, yielding a gross-to-net conversion rate of 4%. The significant margin erosion from gross to net suggests elevated operating expenses, high interest costs, or other structural drags that warrant monitoring.
At a current price of $47.29, Q2 Holdings, Inc. is trading near fair value based on current fundamentals. Our value factor score of 49/100 reflects a composite assessment across multiple valuation metrics including price-to-earnings, price-to-book, EV/EBITDA, and price-to-sales ratios relative to both sector peers and the broader market. Valuation metrics are mixed, with no strong signal of mispricing in either direction.
The stock currently trades at a P/E of 160.3x (a 575% premium to the sector median of 23.7x), EV/EBITDA of 309.7x (at a premium), P/B of 4.8x, P/S of 4.2x. The above-sector P/E multiple suggests the market is pricing in superior growth or quality, which our analysis finds only partially justified by current fundamentals.
Gross margins of 53% signal strong pricing power and brand/IP advantages — businesses with margins above 40% have historically demonstrated more resilient earnings through economic cycles.
Revenue growth of 17% confirms the business is expanding its addressable market — growth at this level typically supports multiple expansion and attracts institutional capital.
The Reduce rating (composite 43.1/100) reflects multi-factor weakness, and historically, stocks in this scoring range have underperformed the market by a meaningful margin.
A P/E of 160.3x leaves little room for execution misses — any earnings disappointment could trigger a sharp multiple compression.
Thin net margins of 2.3% provide limited cushion against cost pressures, competitive pricing, or macroeconomic headwinds — even small changes in costs could swing the company to a loss.
We assign a Medium uncertainty rating to Q2 Holdings, Inc.. The stock presents a balanced risk profile: elevated market sensitivity (beta of 1.31) and elevated valuation multiple (P/E 160.3x) that leaves limited margin for error. While not risk-free, the core business fundamentals are adequate to withstand moderate economic stress, and the range of potential outcomes around our fair value estimate is manageable.
Specific risk factors that inform our assessment include: elevated market sensitivity (beta of 1.31); elevated valuation multiple (P/E 160.3x) that leaves limited margin for error; the combination of leverage (93% D/E) and thin margins (2.3% net) amplifies downside risk. Each of these factors independently widens the distribution of potential outcomes, and in combination they create a risk profile that demands careful position sizing. The stability factor at the 62th percentile and quality factor at the 44th percentile provide a quantitative summary of the overall risk landscape.
Key risk mitigants include: healthy gross margins of 53% provide a buffer against cost pressures; above-average stability (62th percentile) suggests predictable business dynamics. These factors partially offset the identified risks and provide downside protection in adverse scenarios. On balance, the risk-reward profile is favorable for long-term investors.
We rate Q2 Holdings, Inc.'s capital allocation as Poor. Key concerns include low returns on equity (3.0%), weak asset returns (ROA 1.6%). Exemplary capital allocators generate ROE above 20% and maintain conservative leverage — Q2 Holdings, Inc. significantly underperforms these benchmarks, raising questions about management's ability to create shareholder value.
Investors should scrutinize management's reinvestment decisions and balance sheet trajectory before committing capital. Poor capital allocation often compounds over time: overlevered balance sheets limit strategic flexibility, while low returns on capital destroy shareholder value. We would need to see sustained improvement in profitability metrics and balance sheet discipline before considering an upgrade.
In summary, Q2 Holdings, Inc. receives a Reduce rating with a composite score of 43.1/100 (rank #3111 of 7,333). Our quantitative framework assigns a Narrow Moat (57/100, trend: stable), Medium uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation. The average factor score across quality, value, momentum, stability, and investment is 43/100.
Our analysis does not support a constructive view on Q2 Holdings, Inc. at this time. The combination of the current quantitative profile, medium uncertainty, and poor capital allocation suggests unfavorable risk-reward at current levels. We recommend investors avoid new positions and existing holders consider reducing exposure.
Analysis derived from Blank Capital Research quantitative terminal. For informational purposes only. No trade solicitation. Past performance not indicative of future results. Consult a qualified advisor.
We assign Q2 Holdings, Inc. a Narrow Moat rating with a composite moat score of 57/100. The ROIC-WACC spread of +163.5% is the primary signal of economic value creation. The company possesses identifiable competitive advantages, though they are less entrenched than those of wide-moat peers. Our analysis indicates that Q2 Holdings, Inc. can sustain above-average returns on invested capital for at least 10 years, with the strongest contributor being economic value creation at 15/20.
The strongest moat sources are economic value creation (15/20) and reinvestment efficiency (12.8/20). ROIC 172.6% vs WACC 9.1% (spread +163.5%). Capital turnover 36.90x, R&D intensity 19.4%. These pillars form the core of Q2 Holdings, Inc.'s competitive identity and are the primary drivers of excess returns in our framework.
Areas of relative weakness include financial resilience (6.2/20) and margin superiority (10.9/20). Interest coverage N/A, Net debt/EBITDA 0.5x. Improvement in these areas could meaningfully widen the moat over time, while deterioration would be an early warning of competitive erosion.
Our moat trend assessment is Stable. Multi-year ROIC and operating margin trajectories show neither meaningful improvement nor deterioration, suggesting the competitive position is steady. We expect Q2 Holdings, Inc.'s moat profile to remain largely unchanged absent a material shift in return on capital or industry dynamics.
Key profit drivers include gross margins of 53% providing a solid profitability foundation, robust top-line growth of 17% expanding the revenue base. The margin cascade from 53% gross to 1% operating to 2.3% net reveals the company's cost structure and reinvestment intensity. Our analysis indicates that profit quality is adequate though not exceptional, with the quality factor at the 44th percentile.
The margin profile shows gross margins of 53%, operating margins of 1%, net margins of 2.3%. Return metrics include ROE of 3.0% and ROA of 1.6%. Relative to the Services sector, gross margins are 6.7 percentage points below the sector median of 60%, and ROE of 3.0% compares to a sector median of 5.3%.
The balance sheet reflects above-average leverage with D/E of 93%, revenue growth of 17%. The sector median D/E is 0%, putting Q2 Holdings, Inc. at higher leverage than the typical peer. Overall balance sheet health is adequate for the current business environment.
Weak momentum (34th percentile) suggests institutional selling pressure and unfavorable technical dynamics that may persist.
Above 50MA
37.18%
Net New Highs
+51081

Smart Beta ETF report for WCLD

Sector ETF report for WCLD

Hecla Mining experienced a 42% stock price surge in September, driven by its inclusion in the S&P SmallCap 600 index and a 50% price target increase by RBC Capital analyst Michael Siperco.

Lithium spot prices were generally flat the past month. Click here for the lithium junior miners news for April 2024.