IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: Blank Capital Research ("BCR") is a technology platform, not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer. The algorithmically generated signals, scores, and rankings provided on this site ("God Mode" Signals) are for informational and research purposes only and do not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to sell or solicit an offer to buy any securities.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS: The "timing scores" and "regime signals" displayed are based on quantitative models. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not actually been executed, the results may have under-or-over compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity.
RISK OF LOSS: Trading in financial markets involves a high degree of risk and may result in the loss of your entire investment. Data provided by third-party sources (Intrinio, Snowflake) is believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
© 2026 Blank Capital Research. All rights reserved. System Version: Aegis V8 (God Mode).
Verdict
Quantitative factor alignment verified for current market regime.
Quant Score
Rank
#414
Positioning
Market Dominance
Manufacturing
Automobiles And Trucks
$75.9B
Mary T. Barra
General Motors Company designs, builds, and sells trucks, crossovers, cars, and automobile parts and accessories. The company operates through GM North America, GM International, Cruise, and GM Financial segments. It offers safety and security services for retail and fleet customers, including automatic crash response, emergency services, roadside assistance, crisis assist, stolen vehicle assistance, and turn-by-turn navigation.
Headcount
167.0K
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Dates updated upon official exchange announcement.
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
X-AXIS: EV/EBITDA (LOWER = CHEAPER) | Y-AXIS: ROE (HIGHER = ELITE) | RED CIRCLE = GM ANALYSIS TARGET
| Stock | Rating | Score▼ | Quality | Value | Momentum | P/E | EV/EBITDA | ROE | ROA | Gross Mgn | Op Mgn | Net Mgn | Rev Growth | Div Yield | D/E | Mkt Cap | AUDIT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$UL UNILEVER PLC | 78 | 96 | 98 | 59 | - | - | 28.5% | 8.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 10.4% | -4.6% | 3.3% | 0.0x | $141.8B | VS | |
$ASML ASML HOLDING NV | 77 | 89 | 86 | 83 | - | - | 46.1% | 16.6% | 51.3% | 31.9% | 26.8% | -4.0% | 1.0% | 25.0x | $272.1B | VS | |
$ESLT ELBIT SYSTEMS LTD | 76 | 81 | 87 | 85 | - | - | 10.3% | 3.1% | 24.1% | 7.2% | 4.7% | 14.3% | 0.8% | 25.0x | $11.4B | VS | |
$MT ArcelorMittal | 75 | 71 | 98 | 85 | - | - | 2.2% | 1.5% | 9.3% | 5.3% | 2.2% | -8.5% | 2.2% | 16.0x | $18.9B | VS | |
$AMAT APPLIED MATERIALS INC /DE | 75 | 85 | 87 | 84 | 20.9x | 13.6x | 35.5% | 19.8% | 48.7% | 29.2% | 24.7% | 4.4% | 0.8% | 32.0x | $181.9B | VS | |
$SIMO Silicon Motion Technology CORP | 75 | 84 | 86 | 85 | - | - | 11.8% | 8.8% | 45.9% | 11.3% | 11.1% | 25.7% | 3.7% | 0.0x | $1.8B | VS | |
$CODA Coda Octopus Group, Inc. | 74 | 83 | 90 | 79 | 16.3x | 11.9x | 7.6% | 7.0% | 66.5% | 17.1% | 15.6% | 39.0% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $115M | VS | |
$GSK GSK plc | 74 | 84 | 90 | 70 | - | - | 22.6% | 4.9% | 71.2% | 12.8% | 9.4% | 1.7% | 5.9% | 124.0x | $72.1B | VS | |
$EFXT Enerflex Ltd. | 74 | 80 | 91 | 83 | - | - | 3.0% | 1.1% | 20.9% | 7.3% | 1.3% | 3.0% | 0.9% | 67.0x | $1.2B | VS | |
$BUD Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV | 74 | 84 | 97 | 63 | - | - | 8.2% | 3.5% | 55.3% | 25.9% | 12.4% | 0.7% | 1.7% | 0.0x | $87.0B | VS | |
$GM General Motors Co | 63 | 59 | 82 | 73 | 8.1x | 7.2x | 14.3% | 3.2% | 14.0% | 5.5% | 4.8% | 1.3% | 0.7% | 345.0x | $75.9B | ||
| SECTOR BENCH | - | - | - | - | - | 22.3x | 11.5x | -2.5% | -0.1% | 42.5% | 1.3% | -0.2% | 5.9% | 0.0% | 0.2x | - | REF |
General Motors Co (GM) receives a "Hold" rating with a composite score of 63.1/100. It ranks #414 out of 7,333 stocks in our coverage universe and carries a 3-star rating. Ratings are driven by a 6-factor quantitative model measuring quality, value, momentum, investment, stability, and short interest.
Sign in to join the discussion.
YOY expansion rate
Core pricing power
Operating efficiency
Bottom-line conversion
Equity capital efficiency
Asset base utilization
Financial leverage load
Direct cash return
Mary T. Barra
Chief Executive Officer
Labor Force
167,000
59
40
77
Audit Verdict: Average governance indicators based on financial metrics.
No recent insider transactions available for GM
HQ Base
Wilmington, Michigan
Outperforming peers — winners tend to keep winning over 3-12 months
Trading at a discount to fundamentals — favorable entry valuation
Average quality profile
Low volatility — smoother ride and historically better risk-adjusted returns
Moderate investment profile
Mid-range overall rating
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Relative valuation derived from Manufacturing sector benchmarks. Model weights: EV/EBITDA (40%), P/B (35%), P/S (25%). Re-calculated daily.
Projection based on user-defined inputs. Re-calculated daily against current market data.
Reverse DCF Framework — Mauboussin Methodology
Institutional-grade Reverse DCF analysis. This model identifies the growth hurdles embedded in current market prices. When implied growth is significantly lower than historical or projected rates, a margin of safety may exist. Re-audited daily.
No analyst ratings for GM.
View All RatingsConservative accounting — High cash conversion efficiency
Material decline in asset turnover efficiency detected
High margin volatility — erratic forensic earnings quality
| Factor | Global | Sector | Tilt |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROFITABILITY | 59 | 54 | +5NEUTRAL |
| MOMENTUM | 73 | 75 | -2NEUTRAL |
| VALUATION | 82 | 84 | -2NEUTRAL |
| INVESTMENT | 40 | 72 | -32DRAG |
| STABILITY | 77 | 78 | -1NEUTRAL |
| SHORT INT | 67 | 78 | -11DRAG |
Global = full universe. Sector = relative to industry peers. Positive tilt indicates idiosyncratic strength.
ROIC 2.2% vs WACC 3.8% (spread -1.6%)
GM 14% vs sector 43%, OM 5% vs sector 1%
Capital turnover 1.69x
Rev growth 1%, 10yr history
Interest coverage 4.0x, Net debt/EBITDA 37.6x
Composite assessment of profitability, capital efficiency, and financial strength. Top-tier entities demonstrate sustainable cash flow generation and elite competitive moats.
Profit generated per dollar of shareholder equity
Efficiency of asset utilization
Pricing power and cost efficiency
Core business profitability
Bottom-line profitability
The Quality factor evaluates the persistence and magnitude of realized cash flows. Companies with scores >70 exhibit superior pricing power and structural financial resilience through diverse economic regimes.
Our uncertainty rating tracks the predictability of future cash flows and potential for permanent capital loss. Moderate visibility with standard industry cyclicality.
Our model assigns General Motors Co a Hold rating, with a composite score of 63.1/100 and 3 out of 5 stars. Ranked #414 of 7,333 stocks, GM presents a mixed quantitative picture — neither compelling enough to initiate new positions nor weak enough to warrant selling. Investors already holding may consider maintaining their position while monitoring for changes in the factor profile.
With a quality score of 59/100, GM shows adequate but unremarkable business quality. The company reports a return on equity of 14.3% (sector avg: -2.5%), gross margins of 14.0% (sector avg: 42.5%), net margins of 4.8% (sector avg: -0.2%). This suggests the company generates acceptable returns but may lack the competitive positioning or operational efficiency to stand out from peers.
GM carries a solid value score of 82/100, pointing to an attractively priced stock relative to peers. Key valuation metrics include a P/E ratio of 8.14x, an EV/EBITDA of 7.22x, a P/B ratio of 1.17x. This score suggests reasonable compensation for the risks involved, with potential upside if the market recognizes the stock's underlying worth.
With an investment score of 40/100, GM exhibits moderate growth-oriented spending. Key growth metrics include revenue growth of 1.3% vs. a sector average of 5.9% and a return on assets of 3.2% (sector: -0.1%). The company appears to be balancing growth investments with capital returns, though the pace of investment may not be enough to accelerate top-line growth meaningfully.
GM shows strong momentum characteristics with a score of 73/100. The stock has been trending above key moving averages, indicating solid demand from institutional buyers. Revenue growth stands at 1.3% year-over-year, while a beta of 0.88 reflects its sensitivity to broader market moves. This level of momentum typically signals sustained investor confidence and favorable near-term price action.
GM shows good financial stability with a score of 77/100. Key stability metrics include a beta of 0.88 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 345.00x (sector avg: 0.2x). This suggests manageable leverage and moderate price volatility, making it appropriate for investors seeking a balance between growth potential and capital preservation.
GM carries a short interest score of 67/100, indicating moderate short selling activity. This is a neutral reading — not enough to signal systemic bearishness, but worth monitoring. Specific risk factors include elevated leverage (D/E: 345.00x). At $75.9B market cap (large-cap), General Motors Co offers reasonable institutional liquidity.
GM offers a modest dividend yield of 0.7%. While the income contribution is relatively small, even a small dividend signals management's commitment to shareholder returns and can serve as a signal of financial discipline.
General Motors Co is a large-cap company in the Manufacturing sector, ranked #0 of 50 in its sector (100th percentile) and #414 of 7,333 overall (94th percentile). Key comparisons include ROE of 14.3% exceeding the -2.5% sector median and operating margins of 5.5% above the 1.3% sector average. This top-quartile standing reflects exceptional competitive strength relative to Manufacturing peers.
While GM currently exhibits a HOLD profile, superior opportunities exist within the MANUFACTURING sector. Our model identifies several "Strong Buy" candidates with higher quality scores and more attractive valuations among direct industry competitors.
View Top Manufacturing Alpha →Quant Factor Profile
Key factor gap
Value (82) vs Investment (40) — closing this gap could shift the rating.
EV/EBITDA 37% BELOW SECTOR MEDIAN (FAVORABLE)
ROE 677% BELOW SECTOR MEDIAN
Gross Margin 67% BELOW SECTOR MEDIAN
AUDIT DATA AS OF SEP 30, 2025 (Q2 FY2025)
We rate General Motors Co (GM) as a Hold with a composite score of 63.1/100 at a current price of $81.43. The stock presents a mixed quantitative picture — neither compelling enough to warrant new accumulation nor weak enough to justify selling for existing holders. Our factors are split, and the overall profile suggests patience is warranted.
The rating is primarily driven by strength in value (82th percentile) and stability (77th percentile), which together account for the majority of the composite score. Offsetting weakness in investment (40th percentile) and quality (59th percentile) tempers our overall conviction. We assign a No Moat rating (34/100), High uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation.
Key items to watch: whether strong momentum is fundamentally supported by revenue trends; balance sheet deleveraging progress. Any material change in these dynamics could warrant a reassessment of our rating. The moat trend is stable, which suggests the competitive landscape is stable for now.
General Motors Co holds a top-quartile position (#0 of 50) within the Manufacturing sector, based on our composite quantitative scoring across quality, value, momentum, and stability factors. The composite score of 63.1/100 places it at rank #414 in our full 7,333-stock universe. With a $75.9B market capitalization, General Motors Co operates at meaningful scale within the Manufacturing sector, providing competitive advantages in distribution, procurement, and customer reach.
The outlook is moderately positive, with revenue expanding at 1% and favorable momentum (73th percentile) reflecting constructive market sentiment. The business shows steady execution, though the growth rate is below the levels typically associated with high-conviction growth stories. Momentum confirmation provides support for the current price level.
The margin cascade tells an important story: gross margins of 14% (-28.5pp vs sector) narrow to operating margins of 5% (+4.2pp vs sector) and net margins of 4.8%, yielding a gross-to-net conversion rate of 35%. This efficient conversion suggests well-controlled operating costs and limited margin leakage between the gross and net levels.
At a current price of $81.43, General Motors Co appears undervalued relative to its fundamentals. Our value factor score of 82/100 reflects a composite assessment across multiple valuation metrics including price-to-earnings, price-to-book, EV/EBITDA, and price-to-sales ratios relative to both sector peers and the broader market. The stock screens as attractively priced on a majority of these measures, suggesting the market may be underappreciating the underlying fundamentals.
The stock currently trades at a P/E of 8.1x (a 63% discount to the sector median of 22.3x), EV/EBITDA of 7.2x (discounted to peers), P/B of 1.2x, P/S of 0.4x. The below-sector P/E suggests possible undervaluation or the market pricing in near-term headwinds.
A value factor score of 82/100 suggests the market is underpricing these fundamentals, creating a potential margin of safety for new investors.
Positive momentum (73th percentile) indicates institutional accumulation and favorable technical dynamics that tend to persist in the intermediate term.
Elevated leverage (345% D/E) amplifies downside risk and limits management's financial flexibility in adverse scenarios.
We assign a High uncertainty rating to General Motors Co. Key risk factors include significant leverage (345% debt-to-equity), the combination of leverage (345% D/E) and thin margins (4.8% net) amplifies downside risk. The wide range of potential outcomes widens our fair value estimate and increases the possibility of permanent capital impairment. Investors considering this name should size positions accordingly and demand a meaningful margin of safety before initiating.
Specific risk factors that inform our assessment include: significant leverage (345% debt-to-equity); the combination of leverage (345% D/E) and thin margins (4.8% net) amplifies downside risk. Each of these factors independently widens the distribution of potential outcomes, and in combination they create a risk profile that demands careful position sizing. The stability factor at the 77th percentile and quality factor at the 59th percentile provide a quantitative summary of the overall risk landscape.
Key risk mitigants include: above-average stability (77th percentile) suggests predictable business dynamics; large-cap scale ($75.9B) provides resilience. These factors partially offset the identified risks and provide downside protection in adverse scenarios. On balance, the risk-reward profile warrants caution and disciplined position management.
We rate General Motors Co's capital allocation as Poor. Key concerns include elevated leverage (345% D/E). Exemplary capital allocators generate ROE above 20% and maintain conservative leverage — General Motors Co significantly underperforms these benchmarks, raising questions about management's ability to create shareholder value.
Investors should scrutinize management's reinvestment decisions and balance sheet trajectory before committing capital. Poor capital allocation often compounds over time: overlevered balance sheets limit strategic flexibility, while low returns on capital destroy shareholder value. We would need to see sustained improvement in profitability metrics and balance sheet discipline before considering an upgrade.
In summary, General Motors Co receives a Hold rating with a composite score of 63.1/100 (rank #414 of 7,333). Our quantitative framework assigns a No Moat (34/100, trend: stable), High uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation. The average factor score across quality, value, momentum, stability, and investment is 66/100.
Our analysis supports a neutral stance on General Motors Co. While the quantitative profile is not weak enough to warrant selling, it lacks the multi-factor strength required for a buy recommendation. Existing holders should maintain positions and monitor for catalysts — either fundamental improvement or valuation compression — that would shift the risk-reward balance.
Analysis derived from Blank Capital Research quantitative terminal. For informational purposes only. No trade solicitation. Past performance not indicative of future results. Consult a qualified advisor.
We do not assign General Motors Co a meaningful economic moat, scoring 34/100 on our composite assessment. The ROIC-WACC spread of -1.6% is the primary signal of economic value creation. Current fundamentals do not demonstrate the kind of durable competitive advantages — such as superior returns on invested capital, margin superiority, or reinvestment efficiency — that would protect the company from competitive erosion over the long term. The highest-scoring pillar, margin superiority, reached only 10.1/20.
The strongest moat sources are margin superiority (10.1/20) and growth durability (8.2/20). GM 14% vs sector 43%, OM 5% vs sector 1%. Rev growth 1%, 10yr history. These pillars form the core of General Motors Co's competitive identity and are the primary drivers of excess returns in our framework.
Areas of relative weakness include financial resilience (4.1/20) and reinvestment efficiency (4.8/20). Interest coverage 4.0x, Net debt/EBITDA 37.6x. Improvement in these areas could meaningfully widen the moat over time, while deterioration would be an early warning of competitive erosion.
Our moat trend assessment is Stable. Multi-year ROIC and operating margin trajectories show neither meaningful improvement nor deterioration, suggesting the competitive position is steady. We expect General Motors Co's moat profile to remain largely unchanged absent a material shift in return on capital or industry dynamics.
Key profit drivers are not clearly identifiable from current fundamentals. This may reflect a company in transition, a cyclical downturn, or structural challenges in the business model. We assign a quality factor of 59/100 which provides some comfort regarding earnings sustainability.
The margin profile shows gross margins of 14%, operating margins of 5%, net margins of 4.8%. Return metrics include ROE of 14.3% and ROA of 3.2%. Relative to the Manufacturing sector, gross margins are 28.5 percentage points below the sector median of 43%, and ROE of 14.3% compares to a sector median of -2.5%.
The balance sheet reflects high leverage with D/E of 345%, which may limit financial flexibility, a dividend yield of 0.70%, revenue growth of 1%. The sector median D/E is 0%, putting General Motors Co at higher leverage than the typical peer. Elevated leverage in combination with the current margin profile warrants close monitoring for any deterioration in debt-servicing capacity.
Above 50MA
37.18%
Net New Highs
+51081

Ford is pursuing a potential partnership with China's Geely to strengthen its struggling European operations. The deal would involve Ford producing vehicles for Geely using excess capacity while gaining access to shared technology, including autonomous driving capabilities. This partnership could help Ford learn cost and manufacturing efficiencies from Chinese competitors, similar to Volkswagen's successful collaboration with Xpeng, which has enabled faster and cheaper vehicle development.
The company has made deals with some 20 different self-driving startups around the world. But can it catch Waymo?
The global Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle (PHEV) market is projected to grow from US$ 113.28 billion in 2025 to US$ 258.22 billion by 2033, with a CAGR of 10.84%. PHEVs, which combine an internal combustion engine, electric motor, and rechargeable battery, offer increased fuel efficiency and lower emissions. Factors driving market growth include rising environmental concerns, government incentives, and advancements in battery technology. Leading companies like Tesla, BMW, BYD, Ford, and General

General Motors is showing early signs of recovery in China after restructuring its operations and taking a $1.1 billion charge. The company achieved growth in retail sales and market share in 2025, with new-energy vehicle (NEV) sales jumping 22.6% and accounting for over half of total China sales. GM's ability to compete in China's advanced EV market will be crucial for its profitability and prepare it for competition from Chinese automakers entering the U.S. market.
Lamborghini canceled plans for an upcoming electric vehicle launch due to a lack of consumer demand and will replace it with a plug-in hybrid instead, CEO Stephan Winkelmann said.