IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: Blank Capital Research ("BCR") is a technology platform, not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer. The algorithmically generated signals, scores, and rankings provided on this site ("God Mode" Signals) are for informational and research purposes only and do not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to sell or solicit an offer to buy any securities.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS: The "timing scores" and "regime signals" displayed are based on quantitative models. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not actually been executed, the results may have under-or-over compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity.
RISK OF LOSS: Trading in financial markets involves a high degree of risk and may result in the loss of your entire investment. Data provided by third-party sources (Intrinio, Snowflake) is believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
© 2026 Blank Capital Research. All rights reserved. System Version: Aegis V8 (God Mode).
Verdict
Quantitative factor alignment verified for current market regime.
Quant Score
Rank
#3957
Positioning
Market Dominance
Services
Entertainment
$2.2B
Richard A. Zimmerman
Six Flags Entertainment Corporation operates amusement-resort in North America. Its amusement-resort consists of amusement parks, water parks, and resort properties across 17 states in the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. The company provides fun, experiences to various guests with coasters, themed rides, water parks, resorts, and a portfolio of intellectual property, such as Looney Tunes, DC Comics, and PEANUTS. Six Flags Entertainment Corporation was founded in 1983 and is based in Charlotte, North Carolina.
Headcount
3.4K
HQ Base
ARLINGTON, North Carolina
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
X-AXIS: EV/EBITDA (LOWER = CHEAPER) | Y-AXIS: ROE (HIGHER = ELITE) | RED CIRCLE = FUN ANALYSIS TARGET
| Stock | Rating | Score▼ | Quality | Value | Momentum | P/E | EV/EBITDA | ROE | ROA | Gross Mgn | Op Mgn | Net Mgn | Rev Growth | Div Yield | D/E | Mkt Cap | AUDIT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$YALA Yalla Group Ltd | 75 | 89 | 99 | 80 | - | - | 21.3% | 18.6% | 64.5% | 35.7% | 39.5% | 6.5% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $644M | VS | |
$GRVY GRAVITY Co., Ltd. | 75 | 82 | 96 | 71 | - | - | 15.4% | 12.6% | 38.7% | 17.1% | 17.0% | -39.7% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $439M | VS | |
$ISSC INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS & SUPPORT INC | 73 | 81 | 88 | 94 | 25.0x | 14.1x | 28.1% | 16.8% | 48.1% | 23.8% | 18.5% | 78.6% | 0.0% | 37.0x | $220M | VS | |
$AER AerCap Holdings N.V. | 72 | 60 | 87 | 84 | - | - | 12.4% | 2.9% | 100.0% | 28.2% | 26.2% | 5.5% | 0.8% | 264.0x | $19.4B | VS | |
$HCSG HEALTHCARE SERVICES GROUP INC | 72 | 74 | 88 | 88 | 7.1x | 6.1x | 28.9% | 20.8% | 20.8% | 9.9% | 9.3% | 8.5% | 0.0% | 1.0x | $1.2B | VS | |
$LQDT LIQUIDITY SERVICES INC | 72 | 90 | 88 | 68 | 24.9x | 14.3x | 14.6% | 7.8% | 43.8% | 7.4% | 5.9% | 31.2% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $857M | VS | |
$TRTNpA Triton International Ltd | 71 | 70 | 89 | 70 | - | 1.7x | 18.0% | 4.6% | 97.3% | 52.2% | 32.7% | -3.4% | 0.0% | 271.0x | $8.0B | VS | |
$EDU New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. | 71 | 83 | 52 | 77 | - | - | 9.4% | 4.9% | 55.5% | 8.7% | 7.7% | 13.6% | 1.3% | 7.0x | $78.0B | VS | |
$NTES NetEase, Inc. | 71 | 88 | 93 | 68 | - | - | 22.1% | 15.6% | 62.5% | 28.1% | 28.7% | -1.0% | 2.8% | 9.0x | $56.6B | VS | |
$UTI UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC | 70 | 86 | 86 | 72 | 43.2x | 16.0x | 21.4% | 8.0% | 100.0% | 10.0% | 7.5% | 14.1% | 0.0% | 27.0x | $1.8B | VS | |
$FUN Six Flags Entertainment Corporation/NEW | 37 | 34 | 29 | 34 | - | - | -215.1% | -16.8% | 91.0% | -53.8% | -48.7% | 130.5% | 0.0% | 816.0x | $2.2B | ||
| SECTOR BENCH | - | - | - | - | - | 23.7x | 11.7x | 5.3% | 1.9% | 59.6% | 3.5% | 2.3% | 7.8% | 0.0% | 0.3x | - | REF |
Six Flags Entertainment Corporation/NEW (FUN) receives a "Avoid" rating with a composite score of 36.6/100. It ranks #3957 out of 7,333 stocks in our coverage universe and carries a 1-star rating. Ratings are driven by a 6-factor quantitative model measuring quality, value, momentum, investment, stability, and short interest.
Sign in to join the discussion.
YOY expansion rate
Core pricing power
Operating efficiency
Bottom-line conversion
Equity capital efficiency
Asset base utilization
Financial leverage load
Direct cash return
Richard A. Zimmerman
Chief Executive Officer
Labor Force
3,350
34
33
37
Audit Verdict: Lower quality and stability scores may indicate governance concerns.
No recent insider transactions available for FUN
Lagging peers — losers tend to keep underperforming
Expensive relative to fundamentals — limited margin of safety
Weak fundamentals — higher risk of value trap
Average volatility — neutral timing signal
Aggressive spending — empire-building risk, dilutive growth
Below-average composite — caution warranted
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Relative valuation derived from Services sector benchmarks. Model weights: EV/EBITDA (40%), P/B (35%), P/S (25%). Re-calculated daily.
No analyst ratings for FUN.
View All RatingsMaterial decline in asset turnover efficiency detected
High margin volatility — erratic forensic earnings quality
| Factor | Global | Sector | Tilt |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROFITABILITY | 34 | 24 | +10ALPHA |
| MOMENTUM | 34 | 28 | +6ALPHA |
| VALUATION | 29 | 21 | +8ALPHA |
| INVESTMENT | 33 | 45 | -12DRAG |
| STABILITY | 37 | 31 | +6ALPHA |
| SHORT INT | 27 | 13 | +14ALPHA |
Global = full universe. Sector = relative to industry peers. Positive tilt indicates idiosyncratic strength.
ROIC -17.6% vs WACC 5.5% (spread -23.2%)
GM 91% vs sector 60%, OM -54% vs sector 4%
Capital turnover 0.27x
Rev growth 131%, 4yr history
Interest coverage N/A
Composite assessment of profitability, capital efficiency, and financial strength. Top-tier entities demonstrate sustainable cash flow generation and elite competitive moats.
Profit generated per dollar of shareholder equity
Efficiency of asset utilization
Pricing power and cost efficiency
Core business profitability
Bottom-line profitability
The Quality factor evaluates the persistence and magnitude of realized cash flows. Companies with scores >70 exhibit superior pricing power and structural financial resilience through diverse economic regimes.
Our uncertainty rating tracks the predictability of future cash flows and potential for permanent capital loss. Moderate visibility with standard industry cyclicality.
Our quantitative model flags Six Flags Entertainment Corporation/NEW with an Avoid rating, assigning a composite score of 36.6/100 and 1 out of 5 stars. Ranked #3957 of 7,333 stocks, FUN falls in the bottom tier across key factors. Historically, stocks with this profile have faced elevated risk of underperformance and capital loss.
FUN's quality score of 34/100 is below average, suggesting challenges with profitability or capital efficiency. The company reports a return on equity of -215.1% (sector avg: 5.3%), gross margins of 91.0% (sector avg: 59.6%), net margins of -48.7% (sector avg: 2.3%). Investors should examine whether management is actively addressing these weaknesses or if they reflect structural industry headwinds.
FUN registers a value score of just 29/100, suggesting the stock trades at a significant premium to its fundamental metrics. Key valuation metrics include a P/B ratio of 3.01x. High-premium valuations like this require strong future execution to avoid multiple compression, and downside risk is elevated if growth disappoints.
Six Flags Entertainment Corporation/NEW's investment score of 33/100 suggests limited reinvestment activity. Key growth metrics include revenue growth of 130.5% vs. a sector average of 7.8% and a return on assets of -16.8% (sector: 1.9%). While this can be positive for mature, cash-generative businesses returning capital to shareholders, it may also signal a lack of growth opportunities or management conservatism.
FUN is currently showing below-average momentum at 34/100, which may indicate weakening institutional interest or negative sentiment shifts. Revenue growth stands at 130.5% year-over-year, while a beta of 1.69 reflects its sensitivity to broader market moves. Investors should note that declining momentum can precede further price weakness, though contrarian opportunities sometimes emerge at these levels.
FUN's stability score of 37/100 signals elevated volatility and/or leverage concerns. Key stability metrics include a beta of 1.69 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 816.00x (sector avg: 0.3x). Investors should be prepared for wider-than-average price swings and consider position sizing accordingly to manage portfolio risk.
Six Flags Entertainment Corporation/NEW's short interest score of 27/100 reveals significant bearish positioning, suggesting institutional investors are actively betting against the stock. Specific risk factors include high market sensitivity (beta: 1.69), elevated leverage (D/E: 816.00x). At $2.2B (mid-cap), FUN carries meaningful risk and is best suited for investors with high risk tolerance who have thoroughly evaluated the bear thesis.
Six Flags Entertainment Corporation/NEW is a mid-cap company in the Services sector, ranked #0 of 50 in its sector (100th percentile) and #3957 of 7,333 overall (46th percentile). Key comparisons include ROE of -215.1% trailing the 5.3% sector median and operating margins of -53.8% below the 3.5% sector average. This top-quartile standing reflects exceptional competitive strength relative to Services peers.
While FUN currently exhibits a AVOID profile, superior opportunities exist within the SERVICES sector. Our model identifies several "Strong Buy" candidates with higher quality scores and more attractive valuations among direct industry competitors.
View Top Services Alpha →Quant Factor Profile
Upgrade catalyst
Improvement in Short Int. (27) would have the largest impact on the composite score.
ROE 4152% BELOW SECTOR MEDIAN
Gross Margin 53% ABOVE SECTOR MEDIAN (FAVORABLE)
Op. Margin 1632% BELOW SECTOR MEDIAN
AUDIT DATA AS OF SEP 28, 2025 (Q2 FY2025)
We rate Six Flags Entertainment Corporation/NEW (FUN) as Avoid with a composite score of 36.6/100 at a current price of $16.60. The stock falls in the bottom quintile of our universe across key quantitative factors, and the multi-factor weakness suggests a high probability of continued underperformance.
The rating is primarily driven by strength in stability (37th percentile) and quality (34th percentile), which together account for the majority of the composite score. Offsetting weakness in value (29th percentile) and investment (33th percentile) tempers our overall conviction. We assign a No Moat rating (25/100), Very High uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation.
Key items to watch: momentum to confirm whether the current price trend has legs; balance sheet deleveraging progress; sustainability of the current growth rate. Any material change in these dynamics could warrant a reassessment of our rating. The moat trend is stable, which suggests the competitive landscape is stable for now.
Six Flags Entertainment Corporation/NEW holds a top-quartile position (#0 of 50) within the Services sector, based on our composite quantitative scoring across quality, value, momentum, and stability factors. The composite score of 36.6/100 places it at rank #3957 in our full 7,333-stock universe. At $2.2B in market capitalization, Six Flags Entertainment Corporation/NEW is a mid-cap player in the Services space, which limits certain scale advantages but may allow for more agile strategic execution.
Revenue is growing at 131%, though momentum at the 34th percentile suggests the market has not yet fully recognized this trajectory. This potential disconnect between fundamental improvement and market recognition could represent an opportunity for patient investors if the growth trend persists.
The margin cascade tells an important story: gross margins of 91% (+31.4pp vs sector) narrow to operating margins of -54% (-57.3pp vs sector) and net margins of -48.7%, yielding a gross-to-net conversion rate of -54%. The significant margin erosion from gross to net suggests elevated operating expenses, high interest costs, or other structural drags that warrant monitoring.
At a current price of $16.60, Six Flags Entertainment Corporation/NEW is trading at a premium to fundamental value. Our value factor score of 29/100 reflects a composite assessment across multiple valuation metrics including price-to-earnings, price-to-book, EV/EBITDA, and price-to-sales ratios relative to both sector peers and the broader market. The premium valuation implies the market is pricing in significant future growth or quality improvements that are not yet fully reflected in current fundamentals.
The stock currently trades at P/B of 3.0x, P/S of 0.5x. We evaluate these multiples in the context of both absolute levels and sector-relative positioning to form our valuation view.
Gross margins of 91% signal strong pricing power and brand/IP advantages — businesses with margins above 40% have historically demonstrated more resilient earnings through economic cycles.
Revenue growth of 131% confirms the business is expanding its addressable market — growth at this level typically supports multiple expansion and attracts institutional capital.
The Avoid rating (composite 36.6/100) reflects multi-factor weakness, and historically, stocks in this scoring range have underperformed the market by a meaningful margin.
Elevated leverage (816% D/E) amplifies downside risk and limits management's financial flexibility in adverse scenarios.
Thin net margins of -48.7% provide limited cushion against cost pressures, competitive pricing, or macroeconomic headwinds — even small changes in costs could swing the company to a loss.
We assign a Very High uncertainty rating to Six Flags Entertainment Corporation/NEW. The stock exhibits multiple compounding risk factors: elevated market sensitivity (beta of 1.69), significant leverage (816% debt-to-equity), current negative profitability (net margin -48.7%). The extreme uncertainty around future cash flows makes precise valuation difficult, and the range of outcomes is exceptionally wide. Only investors with high risk tolerance and extended time horizons should consider this name.
Specific risk factors that inform our assessment include: elevated market sensitivity (beta of 1.69); significant leverage (816% debt-to-equity); current negative profitability (net margin -48.7%); below-average price stability (37th percentile). Each of these factors independently widens the distribution of potential outcomes, and in combination they create a risk profile that demands careful position sizing. The stability factor at the 37th percentile and quality factor at the 34th percentile provide a quantitative summary of the overall risk landscape.
Key risk mitigants include: healthy gross margins of 91% provide a buffer against cost pressures. These factors partially offset the identified risks and provide downside protection in adverse scenarios. On balance, the risk-reward profile warrants caution and disciplined position management.
We rate Six Flags Entertainment Corporation/NEW's capital allocation as Poor. Key concerns include low returns on equity (-215.1%), elevated leverage (816% D/E), negative profitability, weak asset returns (ROA -16.8%). Exemplary capital allocators generate ROE above 20% and maintain conservative leverage — Six Flags Entertainment Corporation/NEW significantly underperforms these benchmarks, raising questions about management's ability to create shareholder value.
Investors should scrutinize management's reinvestment decisions and balance sheet trajectory before committing capital. Poor capital allocation often compounds over time: overlevered balance sheets limit strategic flexibility, while low returns on capital destroy shareholder value. We would need to see sustained improvement in profitability metrics and balance sheet discipline before considering an upgrade.
In summary, Six Flags Entertainment Corporation/NEW receives a Avoid rating with a composite score of 36.6/100 (rank #3957 of 7,333). Our quantitative framework assigns a No Moat (25/100, trend: stable), Very High uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation. The average factor score across quality, value, momentum, stability, and investment is 33/100.
Our analysis does not support a constructive view on Six Flags Entertainment Corporation/NEW at this time. The combination of limited competitive advantages, very high uncertainty, and poor capital allocation suggests unfavorable risk-reward at current levels. We recommend investors avoid new positions and existing holders consider reducing exposure.
Analysis derived from Blank Capital Research quantitative terminal. For informational purposes only. No trade solicitation. Past performance not indicative of future results. Consult a qualified advisor.
We do not assign Six Flags Entertainment Corporation/NEW a meaningful economic moat, scoring 25/100 on our composite assessment. The ROIC-WACC spread of -23.2% is the primary signal of economic value creation. Current fundamentals do not demonstrate the kind of durable competitive advantages — such as superior returns on invested capital, margin superiority, or reinvestment efficiency — that would protect the company from competitive erosion over the long term. The highest-scoring pillar, margin superiority, reached only 10/20.
The strongest moat sources are margin superiority (10/20) and growth durability (9.5/20). GM 91% vs sector 60%, OM -54% vs sector 4%. Rev growth 131%, 4yr history. These pillars form the core of Six Flags Entertainment Corporation/NEW's competitive identity and are the primary drivers of excess returns in our framework.
Areas of relative weakness include reinvestment efficiency (0/20) and financial resilience (2.5/20). Capital turnover 0.27x. Improvement in these areas could meaningfully widen the moat over time, while deterioration would be an early warning of competitive erosion.
Our moat trend assessment is Stable. Multi-year ROIC and operating margin trajectories show neither meaningful improvement nor deterioration, suggesting the competitive position is steady. We expect Six Flags Entertainment Corporation/NEW's moat profile to remain largely unchanged absent a material shift in return on capital or industry dynamics.
Key profit drivers include gross margins of 91% providing a solid profitability foundation, robust top-line growth of 131% expanding the revenue base. The margin cascade from 91% gross to -54% operating to -48.7% net reveals the company's cost structure and reinvestment intensity. Our analysis indicates that profit quality raises some durability concerns, with the quality factor at the 34th percentile.
The margin profile shows gross margins of 91%, operating margins of -54%, net margins of -48.7%. Return metrics include ROE of -215.1% and ROA of -16.8%. Relative to the Services sector, gross margins are 31.4 percentage points above the sector median of 60%, and ROE of -215.1% compares to a sector median of 5.3%.
The balance sheet reflects high leverage with D/E of 816%, which may limit financial flexibility, revenue growth of 131%. The sector median D/E is 0%, putting Six Flags Entertainment Corporation/NEW at higher leverage than the typical peer. Elevated leverage in combination with the current margin profile warrants close monitoring for any deterioration in debt-servicing capacity.
Weak momentum (34th percentile) suggests institutional selling pressure and unfavorable technical dynamics that may persist.
Below-average quality (34th percentile) raises durability concerns about the fundamental profile and increases the risk of negative earnings surprises.
Above 50MA
37.18%
Net New Highs
+51081

Theme park stocks suffered significant declines in 2025 despite favorable conditions. Comcast's Epic Universe opened to mixed reviews, Six Flags struggled post-merger with Cedar Fair, and United Parks faced attendance challenges. Disney was the only gainer but underperformed the broader market. However, attractive valuations and operational improvements suggest potential recovery in 2026.

Six Flags Entertainment faces a securities fraud class action lawsuit with a January 5, 2026 deadline for lead plaintiff participation. The lawsuit alleges that the company made materially false statements in its merger registration statement with Cedar Fair, failing to disclose chronic underinvestment in parks and massive undisclosed capital needs. Following poor Q2 2025 results and a 64% stock decline from $55 to $20 per share, the CEO resigned and the company slashed EBITDA guidance by $215 million.
The new roller coaster will replace the New Jersey park’s beloved Kingda Ka, which was demolished last February

Analyst Matt DiLallo predicts Realty Income (O) will outperform the market in 2026, driven by fading interest rate headwinds and three key developments: continued international expansion into Europe and potentially Asia, further portfolio diversification into new property types like experiential real estate, and possible large-scale transactions such as partnerships with companies like Six Flags.
If you are wondering whether Six Flags Entertainment shares are now pricing in too much pessimism or offering value, you are not alone. That is exactly what this breakdown will tackle. The stock recently closed at US$16.60, with a 7 day return of 4.4%, a 30 day return of a 4.1% decline, a year to date return of 7.2%, and a 1 year return of a 64.0% decline. Taken together, these figures indicate that sentiment around the name has shifted more than once over different time frames. Recent...