IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: Blank Capital Research ("BCR") is a technology platform, not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer. The algorithmically generated signals, scores, and rankings provided on this site ("God Mode" Signals) are for informational and research purposes only and do not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to sell or solicit an offer to buy any securities.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS: The "timing scores" and "regime signals" displayed are based on quantitative models. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not actually been executed, the results may have under-or-over compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity.
RISK OF LOSS: Trading in financial markets involves a high degree of risk and may result in the loss of your entire investment. Data provided by third-party sources (Intrinio, Snowflake) is believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
© 2026 Blank Capital Research. All rights reserved. System Version: Aegis V8 (God Mode).
Verdict
Quantitative factor alignment verified for current market regime.
Quant Score
Rank
#2862
Positioning
Market Dominance
Services
Business Services
$1.0B
Hervé Sedky
Emerald Holding, Inc. operates business-to-business (B2B) trade shows in the United States. The company operates shows in various industry sectors, including retail, design and construction, technology, equipment, and safety and security. Emerald Expositions Events was incorporated in 2013 and is based in New York, New York.
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Dates updated upon official exchange announcement.
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
X-AXIS: EV/EBITDA (LOWER = CHEAPER) | Y-AXIS: ROE (HIGHER = ELITE) | RED CIRCLE = EEX ANALYSIS TARGET
| Stock | Rating | Score▼ | Quality | Value | Momentum | P/E | EV/EBITDA | ROE | ROA | Gross Mgn | Op Mgn | Net Mgn | Rev Growth | Div Yield | D/E | Mkt Cap | AUDIT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$YALA Yalla Group Ltd | 75 | 89 | 99 | 80 | - | - | 21.3% | 18.6% | 64.5% | 35.7% | 39.5% | 6.5% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $644M | VS | |
$GRVY GRAVITY Co., Ltd. | 75 | 82 | 96 | 71 | - | - | 15.4% | 12.6% | 38.7% | 17.1% | 17.0% | -39.7% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $439M | VS | |
$ISSC INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS & SUPPORT INC | 73 | 81 | 88 | 94 | 25.0x | 14.1x | 28.1% | 16.8% | 48.1% | 23.8% | 18.5% | 78.6% | 0.0% | 37.0x | $220M | VS | |
$AER AerCap Holdings N.V. | 72 | 60 | 87 | 84 | - | - | 12.4% | 2.9% | 100.0% | 28.2% | 26.2% | 5.5% | 0.8% | 264.0x | $19.4B | VS | |
$HCSG HEALTHCARE SERVICES GROUP INC | 72 | 74 | 88 | 88 | 7.1x | 6.1x | 28.9% | 20.8% | 20.8% | 9.9% | 9.3% | 8.5% | 0.0% | 1.0x | $1.2B | VS | |
$LQDT LIQUIDITY SERVICES INC | 72 | 90 | 88 | 68 | 24.9x | 14.3x | 14.6% | 7.8% | 43.8% | 7.4% | 5.9% | 31.2% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $857M | VS | |
$TRTNpA Triton International Ltd | 71 | 70 | 89 | 70 | - | 1.7x | 18.0% | 4.6% | 97.3% | 52.2% | 32.7% | -3.4% | 0.0% | 271.0x | $8.0B | VS | |
$EDU New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. | 71 | 83 | 52 | 77 | - | - | 9.4% | 4.9% | 55.5% | 8.7% | 7.7% | 13.6% | 1.3% | 7.0x | $78.0B | VS | |
$NTES NetEase, Inc. | 71 | 88 | 93 | 68 | - | - | 22.1% | 15.6% | 62.5% | 28.1% | 28.7% | -1.0% | 2.8% | 9.0x | $56.6B | VS | |
$UTI UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC | 70 | 86 | 86 | 72 | 43.2x | 16.0x | 21.4% | 8.0% | 100.0% | 10.0% | 7.5% | 14.1% | 0.0% | 27.0x | $1.8B | VS | |
$EEX Emerald Holding, Inc. | 45 | 27 | 28 | 72 | - | 27.6x | -3.1% | -0.9% | 67.0% | 4.3% | -6.2% | -9.9% | 1.2% | 229.0x | $1.0B | ||
| SECTOR BENCH | - | - | - | - | - | 23.7x | 11.7x | 5.3% | 1.9% | 59.6% | 3.5% | 2.3% | 7.8% | 0.0% | 0.3x | - | REF |
Emerald Holding, Inc. (EEX) receives a "Reduce" rating with a composite score of 44.7/100. It ranks #2862 out of 7,333 stocks in our coverage universe and carries a 2-star rating. Ratings are driven by a 6-factor quantitative model measuring quality, value, momentum, investment, stability, and short interest.
Sign in to join the discussion.
YOY expansion rate
Core pricing power
Operating efficiency
Bottom-line conversion
Equity capital efficiency
Asset base utilization
Financial leverage load
Direct cash return
Hervé Sedky
Chief Executive Officer
Labor Force
600
27
30
49
Audit Verdict: Lower quality and stability scores may indicate governance concerns.
No recent insider transactions available for EEX
Outperforming peers — winners tend to keep winning over 3-12 months
Expensive relative to fundamentals — limited margin of safety
Weak fundamentals — higher risk of value trap
Average volatility — neutral timing signal
Aggressive spending — empire-building risk, dilutive growth
Mid-range overall rating
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Relative valuation derived from Services sector benchmarks. Model weights: EV/EBITDA (40%), P/B (35%), P/S (25%). Re-calculated daily.
No analyst ratings for EEX.
View All RatingsMaterial decline in asset turnover efficiency detected
High margin volatility — erratic forensic earnings quality
| Factor | Global | Sector | Tilt |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROFITABILITY | 27 | 12 | +15ALPHA |
| MOMENTUM | 72 | 81 | -9DRAG |
| VALUATION | 28 | 21 | +7ALPHA |
| INVESTMENT | 30 | 34 | -4NEUTRAL |
| STABILITY | 49 | 49 | 0NEUTRAL |
| SHORT INT | 42 | 37 | +5NEUTRAL |
Global = full universe. Sector = relative to industry peers. Positive tilt indicates idiosyncratic strength.
ROIC -1.5% vs WACC 6.9% (spread -8.4%)
GM 67% vs sector 60%, OM 4% vs sector 4%
Capital turnover 0.19x
Rev growth -10%, 9yr history
Interest coverage -0.7x
Composite assessment of profitability, capital efficiency, and financial strength. Top-tier entities demonstrate sustainable cash flow generation and elite competitive moats.
Profit generated per dollar of shareholder equity
Efficiency of asset utilization
Pricing power and cost efficiency
Core business profitability
Bottom-line profitability
The Quality factor evaluates the persistence and magnitude of realized cash flows. Companies with scores >70 exhibit superior pricing power and structural financial resilience through diverse economic regimes.
Our uncertainty rating tracks the predictability of future cash flows and potential for permanent capital loss. Moderate visibility with standard industry cyclicality.
Emerald Holding, Inc. receives a Reduce rating from our analysis, with a composite score of 44.7/100 and 2 out of 5 stars, ranking #2862 out of 7,333 stocks. EEX's factor profile shows weakness across multiple dimensions, suggesting the stock may underperform going forward. Existing holders may want to consider trimming positions or tightening stop-losses.
EEX's quality score of 27/100 is below average, suggesting challenges with profitability or capital efficiency. The company reports a return on equity of -3.1% (sector avg: 5.3%), gross margins of 67.0% (sector avg: 59.6%), net margins of -6.2% (sector avg: 2.3%). Investors should examine whether management is actively addressing these weaknesses or if they reflect structural industry headwinds.
EEX registers a value score of just 28/100, suggesting the stock trades at a significant premium to its fundamental metrics. Key valuation metrics include an EV/EBITDA of 27.63x, a P/B ratio of 2.51x. High-premium valuations like this require strong future execution to avoid multiple compression, and downside risk is elevated if growth disappoints.
Emerald Holding, Inc.'s investment score of 30/100 suggests limited reinvestment activity. Key growth metrics include revenue growth of -9.9% vs. a sector average of 7.8% and a return on assets of -0.9% (sector: 1.9%). While this can be positive for mature, cash-generative businesses returning capital to shareholders, it may also signal a lack of growth opportunities or management conservatism.
EEX shows strong momentum characteristics with a score of 72/100. The stock has been trending above key moving averages, indicating solid demand from institutional buyers. Revenue growth stands at -9.9% year-over-year, while a beta of 1.14 reflects its sensitivity to broader market moves. This level of momentum typically signals sustained investor confidence and favorable near-term price action.
With a stability score of 49/100, EEX exhibits average financial resilience. Key stability metrics include a beta of 1.14 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 229.00x (sector avg: 0.3x). While the balance sheet is not a major concern, the stock is subject to typical market volatility and may experience sharper drawdowns during risk-off episodes.
The short interest score of 42/100 for EEX suggests somewhat elevated bearish positioning by institutional traders. Specific risk factors include elevated leverage (D/E: 229.00x), small-cap liquidity risk. With a $1.0B market cap (small-cap), Emerald Holding, Inc. may experience above-average volatility. Investors should consider whether the short thesis has merit or if it creates a potential short-squeeze opportunity.
EEX offers a modest dividend yield of 1.2%. While the income contribution is relatively small, even a small dividend signals management's commitment to shareholder returns and can serve as a signal of financial discipline.
Emerald Holding, Inc. is a small-cap company in the Services sector, ranked #0 of 50 in its sector (100th percentile) and #2862 of 7,333 overall (61st percentile). Key comparisons include ROE of -3.1% trailing the 5.3% sector median and operating margins of 4.3% above the 3.5% sector average. This top-quartile standing reflects exceptional competitive strength relative to Services peers.
While EEX currently exhibits a REDUCE profile, superior opportunities exist within the SERVICES sector. Our model identifies several "Strong Buy" candidates with higher quality scores and more attractive valuations among direct industry competitors.
View Top Services Alpha →Quant Factor Profile
Upgrade catalyst
Improvement in Quality (27) would have the largest impact on the composite score.
EV/EBITDA 136% ABOVE SECTOR MEDIAN
ROE 159% BELOW SECTOR MEDIAN
Gross Margin 12% ABOVE SECTOR MEDIAN (FAVORABLE)
AUDIT DATA AS OF SEP 30, 2025 (Q2 FY2025)
We rate Emerald Holding, Inc. (EEX) as a Reduce with a composite score of 44.7/100 at a current price of $4.28. The quantitative profile shows weakness across multiple dimensions, suggesting limited upside potential and elevated risk of underperformance relative to peers over the next 12 months.
The rating is primarily driven by strength in momentum (72th percentile) and stability (49th percentile), which together account for the majority of the composite score. Offsetting weakness in quality (27th percentile) and value (28th percentile) tempers our overall conviction. We assign a No Moat rating (28/100), Very High uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation.
Key items to watch: whether strong momentum is fundamentally supported by revenue trends; balance sheet deleveraging progress; the path to profitability. Any material change in these dynamics could warrant a reassessment of our rating. The moat trend is stable, which suggests the competitive landscape is stable for now.
Emerald Holding, Inc. holds a top-quartile position (#0 of 50) within the Services sector, based on our composite quantitative scoring across quality, value, momentum, and stability factors. The composite score of 44.7/100 places it at rank #2862 in our full 7,333-stock universe. At $1.0B in market capitalization, Emerald Holding, Inc. is a small-cap player in the Services space, which limits certain scale advantages but may allow for more agile strategic execution.
Despite positive momentum (72th percentile), revenue contraction of -10% creates a divergence between price action and fundamental trajectory. This divergence suggests either that the market is looking through near-term weakness or that technical factors are temporarily inflating the stock. Investors should assess whether the revenue decline reflects cyclical weakness or structural challenges.
The margin cascade tells an important story: gross margins of 67% (+7.4pp vs sector) narrow to operating margins of 4% (+0.8pp vs sector) and net margins of -6.2%, yielding a gross-to-net conversion rate of -9%. The significant margin erosion from gross to net suggests elevated operating expenses, high interest costs, or other structural drags that warrant monitoring.
At a current price of $4.28, Emerald Holding, Inc. is trading at a premium to fundamental value. Our value factor score of 28/100 reflects a composite assessment across multiple valuation metrics including price-to-earnings, price-to-book, EV/EBITDA, and price-to-sales ratios relative to both sector peers and the broader market. The premium valuation implies the market is pricing in significant future growth or quality improvements that are not yet fully reflected in current fundamentals.
The stock currently trades at EV/EBITDA of 27.6x (at a premium), P/B of 2.5x, P/S of 2.3x. We evaluate these multiples in the context of both absolute levels and sector-relative positioning to form our valuation view.
Gross margins of 67% signal strong pricing power and brand/IP advantages — businesses with margins above 40% have historically demonstrated more resilient earnings through economic cycles.
Positive momentum (72th percentile) indicates institutional accumulation and favorable technical dynamics that tend to persist in the intermediate term.
The Reduce rating (composite 44.7/100) reflects multi-factor weakness, and historically, stocks in this scoring range have underperformed the market by a meaningful margin.
Elevated leverage (229% D/E) amplifies downside risk and limits management's financial flexibility in adverse scenarios.
Revenue decline of -10% signals business deterioration — declining revenues make it difficult to grow into the current valuation and often precede further negative revisions.
We assign a Very High uncertainty rating to Emerald Holding, Inc.. The stock exhibits multiple compounding risk factors: significant leverage (229% debt-to-equity), current negative profitability (net margin -6.2%), weak quality scores (27th percentile). The extreme uncertainty around future cash flows makes precise valuation difficult, and the range of outcomes is exceptionally wide. Only investors with high risk tolerance and extended time horizons should consider this name.
Specific risk factors that inform our assessment include: significant leverage (229% debt-to-equity); current negative profitability (net margin -6.2%); weak quality scores (27th percentile); the combination of leverage (229% D/E) and thin margins (-6.2% net) amplifies downside risk. Each of these factors independently widens the distribution of potential outcomes, and in combination they create a risk profile that demands careful position sizing. The stability factor at the 49th percentile and quality factor at the 27th percentile provide a quantitative summary of the overall risk landscape.
Key risk mitigants include: healthy gross margins of 67% provide a buffer against cost pressures. These factors partially offset the identified risks and provide downside protection in adverse scenarios. On balance, the risk-reward profile warrants caution and disciplined position management.
We rate Emerald Holding, Inc.'s capital allocation as Poor. Key concerns include low returns on equity (-3.1%), elevated leverage (229% D/E), negative profitability, weak asset returns (ROA -0.9%). Exemplary capital allocators generate ROE above 20% and maintain conservative leverage — Emerald Holding, Inc. significantly underperforms these benchmarks, raising questions about management's ability to create shareholder value.
Investors should scrutinize management's reinvestment decisions and balance sheet trajectory before committing capital. Poor capital allocation often compounds over time: overlevered balance sheets limit strategic flexibility, while low returns on capital destroy shareholder value. We would need to see sustained improvement in profitability metrics and balance sheet discipline before considering an upgrade.
In summary, Emerald Holding, Inc. receives a Reduce rating with a composite score of 44.7/100 (rank #2862 of 7,333). Our quantitative framework assigns a No Moat (28/100, trend: stable), Very High uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation. The average factor score across quality, value, momentum, stability, and investment is 41/100.
Our analysis does not support a constructive view on Emerald Holding, Inc. at this time. The combination of limited competitive advantages, very high uncertainty, and poor capital allocation suggests unfavorable risk-reward at current levels. We recommend investors avoid new positions and existing holders consider reducing exposure.
Analysis derived from Blank Capital Research quantitative terminal. For informational purposes only. No trade solicitation. Past performance not indicative of future results. Consult a qualified advisor.
We do not assign Emerald Holding, Inc. a meaningful economic moat, scoring 28/100 on our composite assessment. The ROIC-WACC spread of -8.4% is the primary signal of economic value creation. Current fundamentals do not demonstrate the kind of durable competitive advantages — such as superior returns on invested capital, margin superiority, or reinvestment efficiency — that would protect the company from competitive erosion over the long term. The highest-scoring pillar, margin superiority, reached only 13.9/20.
The strongest moat sources are margin superiority (13.9/20) and growth durability (8.6/20). GM 67% vs sector 60%, OM 4% vs sector 4%. Rev growth -10%, 9yr history. These pillars form the core of Emerald Holding, Inc.'s competitive identity and are the primary drivers of excess returns in our framework.
Areas of relative weakness include reinvestment efficiency (0/20) and economic value creation (1.5/20). Capital turnover 0.19x. Improvement in these areas could meaningfully widen the moat over time, while deterioration would be an early warning of competitive erosion.
Our moat trend assessment is Stable. Multi-year ROIC and operating margin trajectories show neither meaningful improvement nor deterioration, suggesting the competitive position is steady. We expect Emerald Holding, Inc.'s moat profile to remain largely unchanged absent a material shift in return on capital or industry dynamics.
Key profit drivers include gross margins of 67% providing a solid profitability foundation, declining revenues (-10%) that pressure the earnings outlook. The margin cascade from 67% gross to 4% operating to -6.2% net reveals the company's cost structure and reinvestment intensity. Our analysis indicates that profit quality raises some durability concerns, with the quality factor at the 27th percentile.
The margin profile shows gross margins of 67%, operating margins of 4%, net margins of -6.2%. Return metrics include ROE of -3.1% and ROA of -0.9%. Relative to the Services sector, gross margins are 7.4 percentage points above the sector median of 60%, and ROE of -3.1% compares to a sector median of 5.3%.
The balance sheet reflects high leverage with D/E of 229%, which may limit financial flexibility, a dividend yield of 1.18%, revenue growth of -10%. The sector median D/E is 0%, putting Emerald Holding, Inc. at higher leverage than the typical peer. Elevated leverage in combination with the current margin profile warrants close monitoring for any deterioration in debt-servicing capacity.
Thin net margins of -6.2% provide limited cushion against cost pressures, competitive pricing, or macroeconomic headwinds — even small changes in costs could swing the company to a loss.
Below-average quality (27th percentile) raises durability concerns about the fundamental profile and increases the risk of negative earnings surprises.
Above 50MA
37.18%
Net New Highs
+51081

Upgrades Northcoast Research upgraded the previous rating for Camping World Holdings Inc (NYSE:CWH) from Neutral to Buy. For the first quarter, Camping World Holdings had an EPS of $0.14, compared to year-ago quarter EPS of $1.15. The current stock performance of Camping World Holdings shows a 52-week-high of $33.98 and a 52-week-low of $18.69. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $31.32. According to New Street Research, the prior rating for Meta Platforms Inc (NASDAQ:META) was changed from Neutral to Buy. In the first quarter, Meta Platforms showed an EPS of $2.20, compared to $2.72 from the year-ago quarter. At the moment, the stock has a 52-week-high of $318.68 and a 52-week-low of $88.10. Meta Platforms closed at $291.61 at the end of the last trading period. BTIG upgraded the previous rating for Zscaler Inc (NASDAQ:ZS) from Neutral to Buy. Zscaler earned $0.48 in the third quarter, compared to $0.17 in the year-ago quarter. The current stock performance of Zscaler shows a 52-week-high of $194.07 and a 52-week-low of $84.93. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $148.33. For Verrica Pharmaceuticals Inc (NASDAQ:VRCA), Needham upgraded the previous rating of Hold to Buy. Verrica Pharmaceuticals earned $0.13 in the first quarter, compared to $0.25 in the year-ago quarter. The current stock performance of Verrica Pharmaceuticals shows a 52-week-high of $8.70 and a 52-week-low of $2.05. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $5.11. According to JP Morgan, the prior rating for Huntington Bancshares Inc (NASDAQ:HBAN) was changed from Underweight to Neutral. In the second quarter, Huntington Bancshares showed an EPS of $0.35, compared to $0.36 from the year-ago quarter. The current stock performance of Huntington Bancshares shows a 52-week-high of $15.74 and a 52-week-low of $9.13. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $12.11. According to Wolfe Research, the prior rating for Datadog Inc (NASDAQ:DDOG) was changed from Peer Perform to Outperform. Datadog earned $0.28 in the first quarter, compared to $0.24 in the year-ago quarter. The current stock performance of Datadog shows a 52-week-high of $120.71 and a 52-week-low of $61.34. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $111.49. For Walmart Inc (NYSE:WMT), Piper Sandler upgraded the previous rating of Neutral to Overweight. For the first quarter, Walmart had an EPS of $1.47, compared to year-ago quarter EPS of $1.30. At the moment, the stock has a 52-week-high of $159.88 and a 52-week-low of $120.07. Walmart closed at $159.30 at the end of the last trading period. See all analyst ratings upgrades. Downgrades Stephens & Co. downgraded the previous rating for MainStreet Bancshares Inc (NASDAQ:MNSB) from Overweight to Equal-Weight. MainStreet Bancshares earned $0.85 in the second quarter, compared to $0.71 in the year-ago quarter. At the moment, the stock has a 52-week-high of $29.93 and a 52-week-low of $19.43. MainStreet Bancshares closed at $24.08 at the end of the last trading period. According to Capital One, the prior rating for Denbury Inc (NYSE:DEN) was changed from Overweight to Equal-Weight. Denbury earned $1.36 in the first quarter, compared to $1.69 in the year-ago quarter. At the moment, the stock has a 52-week-high of $104.05 and a 52-week-low of $59.00. Denbury closed at $86.53 at the end of the last trading period. According to Chardan Capital, the prior rating for Kodiak Sciences Inc (NASDAQ:KOD) was changed from Buy to Neutral. Kodiak Sciences earned $1.35 in the first quarter, compared to $1.83 in the year-ago quarter. The stock has a 52-week-high of $12.76 and a 52-week-low of $2.77. At the end of the last trading period, Kodiak Sciences closed at $3.94. According to RBC Capital, the prior rating for United States Steel Corp (NYSE:X) was changed from Outperform to Sector Perform. United States Steel earned $0.77 in the first quarter, compared to $3.05 in the year-ago quarter. The stock has a 52-week-high of $31.55 and a 52-week-low of $17.89. At the end of the last trading period, United States Steel closed at $24.71. For Bank of Hawaii Corp (NYSE:BOH), Keefe, Bruyette & Woods downgraded the previous rating of Market Perform to Underperform. For the second quarter, Bank of Hawaii had an EPS of $1.12, compared to year-ago quarter EPS of $1.38. The current stock performance of Bank of Hawaii shows a 52-week-high of $85.38 and a 52-week-low of $30.83. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $57.21. Citigroup downgraded the previous rating for CI&T Inc (NYSE:CINT) from Buy to Neutral. In the first quarter, CI&T showed an EPS of $0.09, compared to $0.10 from the year-ago quarter. The current stock performance of CI&T shows a 52-week-high of $15.08 and a 52-week-low of $3.34. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $6.48. According to B of A Securities, the prior rating for Tractor Supply Co (NASDAQ:TSCO) was changed from Buy to Neutral. In the first quarter, Tractor Supply showed an EPS of $1.65, compared to $1.65 from the year-ago quarter. At the moment, the stock has a 52-week-high of $251.17 and a 52-week-low of $181.52. Tractor Supply closed at $214.66 at the end of the last trading period. According to Deutsche Bank, the prior rating for Sprouts Farmers Market Inc (NASDAQ:SFM) was changed from Buy to Hold. Sprouts Farmers Market earned $0.98 in the first quarter, compared to $0.79 in the year-ago quarter. The current stock performance of Sprouts Farmers Market shows a 52-week-high of $40.39 and a 52-week-low of $26.20. Moreover, ...Full story available on Benzinga.com

Upgrades According to Huber Research, the prior rating for Meta Platforms Inc (NASDAQ:META) was changed from Neutral to Overweight. Meta Platforms earned $2.20 in the first quarter, compared to $2.72 in the year-ago quarter. At the moment, the stock has a 52-week-high of $222.11 and a 52-week-low of $88.10. Meta Platforms closed at $209.40 at the end of the last trading period. According to TD Securities, the prior rating for FirstService Corp (NASDAQ:FSV) was changed from Hold to Buy. For the first quarter, FirstService had an EPS of $0.85, compared to year-ago quarter EPS of $0.73. The stock has a 52-week-high of $148.70 and a 52-week-low of $112.48. At the end of the last trading period, FirstService closed at $145.13. Morgan Stanley upgraded the previous rating for Elevance Health Inc (NYSE:ELV) from Equal-Weight to Overweight. Elevance Health earned $9.46 in the first quarter, compared to $8.19 in the year-ago quarter. The current stock performance of Elevance Health shows a 52-week-high of $549.50 and a 52-week-low of $440.31. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $452.38. For Silgan Holdings Inc (NYSE:SLGN), Citigroup upgraded the previous rating of Neutral to Buy. Silgan Hldgs earned $0.78 in the first quarter, compared to $0.78 in the year-ago quarter. The stock has a 52-week-high of $55.41 and a 52-week-low of $38.74. At the end of the last trading period, Silgan Hldgs closed at $48.53. Truist Securities upgraded the previous rating for Albany International Corp (NYSE:AIN) from Hold to Buy. Albany Intl earned $0.91 in the first quarter, compared to $0.91 in the year-ago quarter. The stock has a 52-week-high of $115.39 and a 52-week-low of $75.40. At the end of the last trading period, Albany Intl closed at $86.30. According to Cantor Fitzgerald, the prior rating for 2U Inc (NASDAQ:TWOU) was changed from Neutral to Overweight. 2U earned $0.10 in the first quarter, compared to $0.24 in the year-ago quarter. The current stock performance of 2U shows a 52-week-high of $13.15 and a 52-week-low of $4.70. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $5.09. See ...Full story available on Benzinga.com

Gainers Invitae Corporation (NYSE: NVTA) surged 278.5% to close at $8.63 after the company reported better-than-expected Q2 EPS. BioAtla, Inc. (NASDAQ: BCAB) jumped 83.1% to close at $6.61 on Wednesday following Q2 results. Allego N.V. (NYSE: ALLG) gained 57.1% to settle at $5.83 amid volatility in low-float former SPAC names. Lixiang Education Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LXEH) rose 49% to close at $4.62. Velo3D, Inc. (NYSE: VLD) shares jumped 42.3% to close at $5.08 after reporting upbeat Q2 results. Amyris, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMRS) rose 41.9% to settle at $3.25. The stock may be rebounding after falling Tuesday on Q2 results. Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: INFI) rose 39.2% to close at $1.03 after the company reported better-than-expected Q2 EPS results. Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (NASDAQ: CLWT) gained 38.4% to close at $2.02. Velodyne Lidar, Inc. (NASDAQ: VLDR) gained 38.3% to close at $1.59. The company recently posted upbeat quarterly results. Liberty TripAdvisor Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: LTRPA) surged 37.9% to close at $1.27. The Trade Desk, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTD) jumped 36.2% to close at $74.24 after the company reported better-than-expected Q2 sales results and issued Q3 sales guidance above estimates. Additionally, multiple analysts raised their price target on the stock. V2X, Inc. (NYSE: VVX) jumped 34.1% to close at $39.96 following upbeat Q2 results. Stifel upgraded V2X from Hold to Buy and raised the price target from $42 to $45. Bionano Genomics, Inc. (NASDAQ: BNGO) gained 32.7% to settle at $3.00. Bionano Genomics recently posted Q2 sales of $6.70 million. OraSure Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: OSUR) shares climbed 32.3% to close at $4.22 after the company reported upbeat Q2 sales and issued strong sales outlook for the current quarter. Biora Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: BIOR) gained 31.2% to close at $1.01. Biora Therapeutics disclosed successful completion of device performance study in ulcerative colitis patients for its targeted therapeutics platform. PLx Pharma Inc. (NASDAQ: PLXP) surged 31.1% to settle at $2.57. T2 Biosystems, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTOO) gained 30.6% to close at $0.1580 after declining around 7% on Tuesday. Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment, Inc. (NASDAQ: CSSE) surged 30% to $14.75. Seer, Inc. (NASDAQ: SEER) gained 29.6% to close at $13.31 after the company reported better-than-expected Q2 EPS and sales results.. Array Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: ARRY) climbed 28.9% to close at $23.58 after the company reported better-than-expected Q2 adjusted EPS and sales results. Model N, Inc. (NYSE: MODN) jumped 28.9% to close at $33.77 after the company posted upbeat Q3 results and issued strong FY22 forecast. Gemini Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: GMTX) jumped 28.9% to settle at $2.01. Gemini Therapeutics and privately held Disc Medicine Inc have entered into a merger agreement in an all-stock transaction. CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSK) surged 27.8% to settle at $5.98 following Q3 results. LiveVox Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: LVOX) gained 27.4% to close at $2.51 following Q2 results. Performance Shipping Inc. (NASDAQ: PSHG) jumped 25.6% to close at $0.5150. Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: HYFM) surged 25.3% to close at $3.37 following Q2 results. Doma Holdings Inc. (NYSE: DOMA) gained 25% to settle at $0.8751 following Q2 results. Sunworks, Inc. (NASDAQ: SUNW) jumped 24.4% to close at $3.83. Sunworks reported better-than-expected Q2 sales results. Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: INO) gained 23.8% to close at $2.60 after the company reported better-than-expected Q2 sales results. Quanergy Systems, Inc. (NYSE: QNGY) rose 23.4% to close at $0.4076 as the company received multi-million dollar order from Prime Secured. BARK, Inc. (NYSE: BARK) gained 20.9% to settle at $2.14 following better-than-expected Q1 results. Emerald Holding, Inc. (NYSE: EEX) jumped 20.9% to close at $3.99 following Q2 results. Porch Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRCH) gained 20.5% to close at $2.88 following Q2 results. AbCellera Biologics Inc. (NASDAQ: ABCL) rose 20.1% to close at ...

MJBiz confirmed Tuesday it has been acquired by the New York-headquartered b2b event and media company Emerald Holding Inc. (NYSE: EEX) for $120 million in cash plus potential earnouts. The deal includes MJBiz Con, one of the oldest and largest cannabis-focused trade shows, as well as related media and event brands such as award-winning publications MJBizDaily, Hemp Industry Daily and MJBizMagazine. In October, MJBiz Con in Las Vegas gathered more than 1,200 exhibitors and 27,000 attendees. The acquisition also includes The Emerald Conference - a cannabis science event that MJBiz acquired in 2021. “MJBiz’s leading event and content portfolio, coupled with their 365-day engagement platform – which connects the entire cannabis supply chain – will diversify our collective product offerings, enhance our growth profile and enable us to deliver even greater value to our customers over the long term,” Hervé Sedky, Emerald’s president and CEO said. Why It Matters Through this acquisition, Emerald - whose largest shareholder is the Toronto-based investment manager Onex Corporation (TSE: ONEX) - will gain a notable presence in cannabis industry trade shows. Emerald’s popular events include Outdoor Retailer, ASD Market Week and the International Pizza Expo. The transaction also reflects the acceptance of the once-stigmatized cannabis plant – and the multibillion-dollar industry that has ...

Companies Reporting Before The Bell • O2Micro Intl (NASDAQ:OIIM) is estimated to report quarterly earnings at $0.09 per share on revenue of $23.30 million. • Twin Disc (NASDAQ:TWIN) is likely to report quarterly loss at $0.12 per share on revenue of $57.70 million. • L3Harris Technologies (NYSE:LHX) is projected to report quarterly earnings at $2.94 per share on revenue of $4.54 billion. • Shell Midstream Partners (NYSE:SHLX) is expected to report quarterly earnings at $0.34 per share on revenue of $123.97 million. • Cboe Global Markets (BATS:CBOE) is estimated to report quarterly earnings at $1.40 per share on revenue of $353.75 million. • Quhuo (NASDAQ:QH) is estimated to report quarterly earnings at $0.11 per share on revenue of $117.20 million. • Pitney Bowes (NYSE:PBI) is expected to report quarterly earnings at $0.04 per share on revenue of $873.86 million. • Weyerhaeuser (NYSE:WY) is likely to report quarterly earnings at $0.91 per share on revenue of $2.52 billion. • iRadimed (NASDAQ:IRMD) is estimated to report quarterly earnings at $0.10 per share on revenue of $8.56 million. • BeyondSpring (NASDAQ:BYSI) is projected to report earnings for its fourth quarter. • Portland General Electric (NYSE:POR) is likely to report quarterly earnings at $0.92 per share on revenue of $578.16 million. • Newell Brands (NASDAQ:NWL) is estimated to report quarterly earnings at $0.13 per share on revenue of $2.07 billion. • Carter's (NYSE:CRI) is projected to report quarterly earnings at $0.32 per share on revenue of $664.49 million. • Huntsman (NYSE:HUN) is likely to report quarterly earnings at $0.59 per share on revenue of $1.75 billion. • Clorox (NYSE:CLX) is estimated to report quarterly earnings at $1.48 per share on revenue of $1.87 billion. • Colgate-Palmolive (NYSE:CL) is expected to report quarterly earnings at $0.79 per share on revenue of $4.25 billion. • Goodyear Tire & Rubber (NASDAQ:GT) is estimated to report quarterly earnings at $0.09 per share on revenue of $3.40 billion. • Exxon Mobil (NYSE:XOM) is projected to report quarterly earnings at $0.59 per share on revenue of $54.60 billion. • AstraZeneca (NASDAQ:AZN) is estimated to report ...Full story available on Benzinga.com