IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: Blank Capital Research ("BCR") is a technology platform, not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer. The algorithmically generated signals, scores, and rankings provided on this site ("God Mode" Signals) are for informational and research purposes only and do not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to sell or solicit an offer to buy any securities.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS: The "timing scores" and "regime signals" displayed are based on quantitative models. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not actually been executed, the results may have under-or-over compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity.
RISK OF LOSS: Trading in financial markets involves a high degree of risk and may result in the loss of your entire investment. Data provided by third-party sources (Intrinio, Snowflake) is believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
© 2026 Blank Capital Research. All rights reserved. System Version: Aegis V8 (God Mode).
Verdict
Quantitative factor alignment verified for current market regime.
Quant Score
Rank
#1564
Positioning
Market Dominance
Mining
Petroleum And Natural Gas
$118.1B
Ryan M. Lance
ConocoPhillips explores for, produces, transports, and markets crude oil, bitumen, natural gas, liquefied natural gas (LNG), and natural gas liquids worldwide. The company's portfolio includes unconventional plays in North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia.
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Dates updated upon official exchange announcement.
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
| Stock | Rating | Score▼ | Quality | Value | Momentum | P/E | EV/EBITDA | ROE | ROA | Gross Mgn | Op Mgn | Net Mgn | Rev Growth | Div Yield | D/E | Mkt Cap | AUDIT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$VALE Vale S.A. | 75 | 88 | 93 | 67 | - | - | 15.8% | 6.9% | 36.6% | 22.8% | 15.9% | -8.9% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $38.7B | VS | |
$SU SUNCOR ENERGY INC | 74 | 87 | 90 | 53 | - | - | 13.1% | 6.5% | 58.3% | 18.4% | 11.0% | -3.6% | 4.9% | 29.0x | $46.0B | VS | |
$TRX TRX GOLD Corp | 72 | 83 | 77 | 96 | - | - | 10.7% | 6.1% | 41.5% | 27.8% | 11.4% | 40.0% | 0.0% | 2.0x | $104M | VS | |
$ORLA Orla Mining Ltd. | 72 | 94 | 83 | 78 | - | - | 19.6% | 15.7% | 74.8% | 47.5% | 26.2% | 47.2% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $1.7B | VS | |
$KGC KINROSS GOLD CORP | 71 | 83 | 89 | 79 | - | - | 15.1% | 9.3% | 37.8% | 31.6% | 20.0% | 21.3% | 1.3% | 21.0x | $11.4B | VS | |
$AEM AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD | 71 | 80 | 80 | 71 | - | - | 9.4% | 6.5% | 60.5% | 36.0% | 22.9% | 25.0% | 2.0% | 6.0x | $38.9B | VS | |
$RIO RIO TINTO PLC | 70 | 76 | 84 | 64 | - | - | 20.3% | 11.2% | 23.0% | 20.1% | 23.1% | -1.3% | 11.2% | 26.0x | $93.8B | VS | |
$IAG IAMGOLD CORP | 70 | 71 | 82 | 89 | - | - | 29.9% | 17.1% | 33.7% | 57.8% | 51.9% | 65.4% | 0.0% | 34.0x | $2.5B | VS | |
$NGD New Gold Inc. /FI | 70 | 76 | 67 | 92 | - | - | 11.1% | 4.8% | 52.8% | 19.7% | 11.1% | 17.5% | 0.0% | 38.0x | $1.7B | VS | |
$PDS PRECISION DRILLING Corp | 70 | 77 | 90 | 65 | - | - | 6.6% | 3.6% | 34.4% | 11.0% | 5.9% | -10.0% | 0.0% | 52.0x | $876M | VS | |
$COP CONOCOPHILLIPS | 53 | 54 | 48 | 32 | 15.7x | 13.0x | 13.3% | 7.1% | 62.7% | 22.7% | 14.6% | 10.4% | 3.3% | 89.0x | $118.1B | ||
| SECTOR BENCH | - | - | - | - | - | 13.7x | 5.2x | 4.0% | 3.9% | 43.2% | 12.2% | 6.2% | 2.6% | 0.0% | 0.3x | - | REF |
CONOCOPHILLIPS (COP) receives a "Hold" rating with a composite score of 52.8/100. It ranks #1564 out of 7,333 stocks in our coverage universe and carries a 3-star rating. Ratings are driven by a 6-factor quantitative model measuring quality, value, momentum, investment, stability, and short interest.
Sign in to join the discussion.
YOY expansion rate
Core pricing power
Operating efficiency
Bottom-line conversion
Equity capital efficiency
Asset base utilization
Financial leverage load
Direct cash return
Ryan M. Lance
Chief Executive Officer
Labor Force
9,500
54
25
79
Audit Verdict: Average governance indicators based on financial metrics.
No recent insider transactions available for COP
Lagging peers — losers tend to keep underperforming
Fair valuation relative to peers
Average quality profile
Low volatility — smoother ride and historically better risk-adjusted returns
Aggressive spending — empire-building risk, dilutive growth
Mid-range overall rating
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Relative valuation derived from Mining sector benchmarks. Model weights: EV/EBITDA (40%), P/B (35%), P/S (25%). Re-calculated daily.
Projection based on user-defined inputs. Re-calculated daily against current market data.
Reverse DCF Framework — Mauboussin Methodology
Institutional-grade Reverse DCF analysis. This model identifies the growth hurdles embedded in current market prices. When implied growth is significantly lower than historical or projected rates, a margin of safety may exist. Re-audited daily.
No analyst ratings for COP.
View All RatingsMaterial decline in asset turnover efficiency detected
High margin volatility — erratic forensic earnings quality
| Factor | Global | Sector | Tilt |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROFITABILITY | 54 | 61 | -7DRAG |
| MOMENTUM | 32 | 27 | +5NEUTRAL |
| VALUATION | 48 | 50 | -2NEUTRAL |
| INVESTMENT | 25 | 12 | +13ALPHA |
| STABILITY | 79 | 86 | -7DRAG |
| SHORT INT | 75 | 88 | -13DRAG |
Global = full universe. Sector = relative to industry peers. Positive tilt indicates idiosyncratic strength.
ROIC 43.4% vs WACC 8.4% (spread +35.0%)
GM 63% vs sector 43%, OM 23% vs sector 12%
Capital turnover 3.23x, R&D intensity 0.1%
Rev growth 10%, 10yr history
Interest coverage 56.8x, Net debt/EBITDA 1.4x
Composite assessment of profitability, capital efficiency, and financial strength. Top-tier entities demonstrate sustainable cash flow generation and elite competitive moats.
Profit generated per dollar of shareholder equity
Efficiency of asset utilization
Pricing power and cost efficiency
Core business profitability
Bottom-line profitability
The Quality factor evaluates the persistence and magnitude of realized cash flows. Companies with scores >70 exhibit superior pricing power and structural financial resilience through diverse economic regimes.
Our uncertainty rating tracks the predictability of future cash flows and potential for permanent capital loss. Moderate visibility with standard industry cyclicality.
Our model assigns CONOCOPHILLIPS a Hold rating, with a composite score of 52.8/100 and 3 out of 5 stars. Ranked #1564 of 7,333 stocks, COP presents a mixed quantitative picture — neither compelling enough to initiate new positions nor weak enough to warrant selling. Investors already holding may consider maintaining their position while monitoring for changes in the factor profile.
With a quality score of 54/100, COP shows adequate but unremarkable business quality. The company reports a return on equity of 13.3% (sector avg: 4.0%), gross margins of 62.7% (sector avg: 43.2%), net margins of 14.6% (sector avg: 6.2%). This suggests the company generates acceptable returns but may lack the competitive positioning or operational efficiency to stand out from peers.
With a value score of 48/100, COP appears somewhat expensive relative to its fundamentals. Key valuation metrics include a P/E ratio of 15.74x, an EV/EBITDA of 13.01x, a P/B ratio of 2.10x. Investors paying a premium here are likely betting on above-average growth or margin expansion to justify current prices.
CONOCOPHILLIPS's investment score of 25/100 suggests limited reinvestment activity. Key growth metrics include revenue growth of 10.4% vs. a sector average of 2.6% and a return on assets of 7.1% (sector: 3.9%). While this can be positive for mature, cash-generative businesses returning capital to shareholders, it may also signal a lack of growth opportunities or management conservatism.
COP is currently showing below-average momentum at 32/100, which may indicate weakening institutional interest or negative sentiment shifts. Revenue growth stands at 10.4% year-over-year, while a beta of 0.98 reflects its sensitivity to broader market moves. Investors should note that declining momentum can precede further price weakness, though contrarian opportunities sometimes emerge at these levels.
COP shows good financial stability with a score of 79/100. Key stability metrics include a beta of 0.98 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 89.00x (sector avg: 0.3x). This suggests manageable leverage and moderate price volatility, making it appropriate for investors seeking a balance between growth potential and capital preservation.
COP carries a short interest score of 75/100, indicating moderate short selling activity. This is a neutral reading — not enough to signal systemic bearishness, but worth monitoring. Specific risk factors include elevated leverage (D/E: 89.00x). At $118.1B market cap (large-cap), CONOCOPHILLIPS offers reasonable institutional liquidity.
COP pays a solid dividend yield of 3.3%, contributing an income component to total returns. This moderate yield suggests a balance between returning capital to shareholders and retaining earnings for reinvestment — a common profile among quality compounders.
CONOCOPHILLIPS is a large-cap company in the Mining sector, ranked #0 of 50 in its sector (100th percentile) and #1564 of 7,333 overall (79th percentile). Key comparisons include ROE of 13.3% exceeding the 4.0% sector median and operating margins of 22.7% above the 12.2% sector average. This top-quartile standing reflects exceptional competitive strength relative to Mining peers.
While COP currently exhibits a HOLD profile, superior opportunities exist within the MINING sector. Our model identifies several "Strong Buy" candidates with higher quality scores and more attractive valuations among direct industry competitors.
View Top Mining Alpha →Quant Factor Profile
Key factor gap
Stability (79) vs Investment (25) — closing this gap could shift the rating.
EV/EBITDA 149% ABOVE SECTOR MEDIAN
ROE 237% ABOVE SECTOR MEDIAN (FAVORABLE)
Gross Margin 45% ABOVE SECTOR MEDIAN (FAVORABLE)
AUDIT DATA AS OF SEP 30, 2025 (Q2 FY2025)
We rate CONOCOPHILLIPS (COP) as a Hold with a composite score of 52.8/100 at a current price of $110.47. The stock presents a mixed quantitative picture — neither compelling enough to warrant new accumulation nor weak enough to justify selling for existing holders. Our factors are split, and the overall profile suggests patience is warranted.
The rating is primarily driven by strength in stability (79th percentile) and quality (54th percentile), which together account for the majority of the composite score. Offsetting weakness in investment (25th percentile) and momentum (32th percentile) tempers our overall conviction. We assign a Narrow Moat rating (68/100), Medium uncertainty, and Standard capital allocation.
Key items to watch: momentum to confirm whether the current price trend has legs. Any material change in these dynamics could warrant a reassessment of our rating. The moat trend is stable, which suggests the competitive landscape is stable for now.
CONOCOPHILLIPS holds a top-quartile position (#0 of 50) within the Mining sector, based on our composite quantitative scoring across quality, value, momentum, and stability factors. The composite score of 52.8/100 places it at rank #1564 in our full 7,333-stock universe. With a $118.1B market capitalization, CONOCOPHILLIPS operates at meaningful scale within the Mining sector, providing competitive advantages in distribution, procurement, and customer reach.
Revenue is growing at 10%, though momentum at the 32th percentile suggests the market has not yet fully recognized this trajectory. This potential disconnect between fundamental improvement and market recognition could represent an opportunity for patient investors if the growth trend persists.
The margin cascade tells an important story: gross margins of 63% (+19.5pp vs sector) narrow to operating margins of 23% (+10.5pp vs sector) and net margins of 14.6%, yielding a gross-to-net conversion rate of 23%. This conversion rate is typical for the sector, suggesting a standard cost structure without notable efficiency advantages or disadvantages.
At a current price of $110.47, CONOCOPHILLIPS is trading near fair value based on current fundamentals. Our value factor score of 48/100 reflects a composite assessment across multiple valuation metrics including price-to-earnings, price-to-book, EV/EBITDA, and price-to-sales ratios relative to both sector peers and the broader market. Valuation metrics are mixed, with no strong signal of mispricing in either direction.
The stock currently trades at a P/E of 15.7x (roughly in line with the sector median of 13.7x), EV/EBITDA of 13.0x (at a premium), P/B of 2.1x, P/S of 2.3x. The above-sector P/E multiple suggests the market is pricing in superior growth or quality, which our analysis finds only partially justified by current fundamentals.
Gross margins of 63% signal strong pricing power and brand/IP advantages — businesses with margins above 40% have historically demonstrated more resilient earnings through economic cycles.
Revenue growth of 10% confirms the business is expanding its addressable market — growth at this level typically supports multiple expansion and attracts institutional capital.
A 3.30% dividend yield provides income while you wait, and dividends historically account for a significant portion of total equity returns.
Weak momentum (32th percentile) suggests institutional selling pressure and unfavorable technical dynamics that may persist.
Elevated short interest (75th percentile) indicates that sophisticated market participants are betting against the stock.
We assign a Medium uncertainty rating to CONOCOPHILLIPS. The stock presents a balanced risk profile: risk factors are within normal ranges. While not risk-free, the core business fundamentals are adequate to withstand moderate economic stress, and the range of potential outcomes around our fair value estimate is manageable.
We identify no major risk factors at this time. The company's stability factor sits at the 79th percentile with quality at the 54th percentile, both of which support our low-risk assessment. The absence of material leverage, profitability, or volatility concerns reduces the likelihood of a permanent capital loss scenario.
Key risk mitigants include: healthy gross margins of 63% provide a buffer against cost pressures; above-average stability (79th percentile) suggests predictable business dynamics; large-cap scale ($118.1B) provides resilience. These factors partially offset the identified risks and provide downside protection in adverse scenarios. On balance, the risk-reward profile is favorable for long-term investors.
We rate CONOCOPHILLIPS's capital allocation as Standard. Management has shown adequate — though not exceptional — stewardship of shareholder capital. Returns on equity stand at 13.3%, and the balance sheet is managed within acceptable parameters (D/E: 89%). Exemplary allocators typically sustain ROE above 20% and D/E below 50%; CONOCOPHILLIPS falls short on at least one dimension.
There is room for improvement in optimizing the capital structure or enhancing shareholder returns. The 3.30% dividend yield provides some income return, but the overall capital allocation framework would benefit from either higher reinvestment returns, improved balance sheet efficiency, or increased shareholder distributions. We will monitor for signs of strategic improvement that could warrant an upgrade.
In summary, CONOCOPHILLIPS receives a Hold rating with a composite score of 52.8/100 (rank #1564 of 7,333). Our quantitative framework assigns a Narrow Moat (68/100, trend: stable), Medium uncertainty, and Standard capital allocation. The average factor score across quality, value, momentum, stability, and investment is 47/100.
Our analysis supports a neutral stance on CONOCOPHILLIPS. While the quantitative profile is not weak enough to warrant selling, it lacks the multi-factor strength required for a buy recommendation. Existing holders should maintain positions and monitor for catalysts — either fundamental improvement or valuation compression — that would shift the risk-reward balance.
Analysis derived from Blank Capital Research quantitative terminal. For informational purposes only. No trade solicitation. Past performance not indicative of future results. Consult a qualified advisor.
We assign CONOCOPHILLIPS a Narrow Moat rating with a composite moat score of 68/100. The ROIC-WACC spread of +35.0% is the primary signal of economic value creation. The company possesses identifiable competitive advantages, though they are less entrenched than those of wide-moat peers. Our analysis indicates that CONOCOPHILLIPS can sustain above-average returns on invested capital for at least 10 years, with the strongest contributor being margin superiority at 17.2/20.
The strongest moat sources are margin superiority (17.2/20) and financial resilience (16.3/20). GM 63% vs sector 43%, OM 23% vs sector 12%. Interest coverage 56.8x, Net debt/EBITDA 1.4x. These pillars form the core of CONOCOPHILLIPS's competitive identity and are the primary drivers of excess returns in our framework.
Areas of relative weakness include reinvestment efficiency (6/20) and growth durability (13.1/20). Capital turnover 3.23x, R&D intensity 0.1%. Improvement in these areas could meaningfully widen the moat over time, while deterioration would be an early warning of competitive erosion.
Our moat trend assessment is Stable. Multi-year ROIC and operating margin trajectories show neither meaningful improvement nor deterioration, suggesting the competitive position is steady. We expect CONOCOPHILLIPS's moat profile to remain largely unchanged absent a material shift in return on capital or industry dynamics.
Key profit drivers include gross margins of 63% providing a solid profitability foundation, operating margins of 23% reflecting effective cost management, moderate revenue growth of 10%. The margin cascade from 63% gross to 23% operating to 14.6% net reveals the company's cost structure and reinvestment intensity. Our analysis indicates that profit quality is adequate though not exceptional, with the quality factor at the 54th percentile.
The margin profile shows gross margins of 63%, operating margins of 23%, net margins of 14.6%. Return metrics include ROE of 13.3% and ROA of 7.1%. Relative to the Mining sector, gross margins are 19.5 percentage points above the sector median of 43%, and ROE of 13.3% compares to a sector median of 4.0%.
The balance sheet reflects above-average leverage with D/E of 89%, a dividend yield of 3.30%, revenue growth of 10%. The sector median D/E is 0%, putting CONOCOPHILLIPS at higher leverage than the typical peer. Overall balance sheet health is adequate for the current business environment.

U.S. stocks declined midday Tuesday amid Middle East geopolitical tensions, while gold surged over 6% to its best day since November 2008, rebounding from a brutal two-day sell-off triggered by concerns over Kevin Warsh's Federal Reserve appointment. Energy stocks led gains following reports of U.S. forces downing an Iranian drone, while technology stocks weakened significantly.

The Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has surged 15% in early 2026, significantly outperforming the S&P 500's less than 1% gain. The rally is driven by a sharp rise in crude oil prices (Brent crude up 15% to over $70/barrel) due to supply disruption concerns in Venezuela and Iran. The ETF's high 19.9% weighting to energy stocks, particularly oil dividend payers like Chevron and ConocoPhillips, has fueled the outperformance. These oil companies offer high dividend yields with above-average growth rates and strong free cash flow projections through 2030.

Chevron stock has surged 18.7% year-to-date and is near all-time highs despite a 31.8% drop in diluted earnings per share in 2025. The rally is driven by the completed Hess acquisition providing access to Guyana reserves, rising oil prices, and strong downstream profits. The company maintains a reliable 3.9% dividend yield and can support payouts at $50/barrel Brent crude, making it a balanced buy even at current valuations.

Devon Energy is acquiring Coterra Energy in a $58 billion all-stock merger, creating the second-largest independent U.S. oil and gas exploration and production company. The combined entity expects to achieve $1 billion in annual pre-tax synergies by end of 2027 through operational optimization and cost reduction, enabling higher shareholder returns including a 31% dividend increase and a $5 billion share repurchase program.
Diamondback Energy Inc (NASDAQ:FANG) stock fell over 3% after missing Wall Street's fourth-quarter profit expectations, largely due to weaker crude oil prices. Despite record U.S. oil production cushioning the impact, the company reported adjusted earnings per share of $1.74, below analyst estimates of $2.08. Diamondback increased its annual base dividend by 5% and provided a 2026 net production outlook of 926,000 to 962,000 boepd.
Above 50MA
37.18%
Net New Highs
+51081