IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: Blank Capital Research ("BCR") is a technology platform, not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer. The algorithmically generated signals, scores, and rankings provided on this site ("God Mode" Signals) are for informational and research purposes only and do not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to sell or solicit an offer to buy any securities.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS: The "timing scores" and "regime signals" displayed are based on quantitative models. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not actually been executed, the results may have under-or-over compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity.
RISK OF LOSS: Trading in financial markets involves a high degree of risk and may result in the loss of your entire investment. Data provided by third-party sources (Intrinio, Snowflake) is believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
© 2026 Blank Capital Research. All rights reserved. System Version: Aegis V8 (God Mode).
Verdict
Quantitative factor alignment verified for current market regime.
Quant Score
Rank
#3697
Positioning
Market Dominance
Services
Business Services
$108M
Holger Bartel
Travelzoo provides travel, entertainment, and local deals from travel and entertainment companies in Asia and Europe. Its publications and products include travelzoo Website, iPhone and Android apps, and TravelZoo Top 20 email newsletter. It serves airlines, hotels, cruise lines, vacation packagers, tour operators, destinations, car rental companies, travel agents, and restaurants.
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
X-AXIS: EV/EBITDA (LOWER = CHEAPER) | Y-AXIS: ROE (HIGHER = ELITE) | RED CIRCLE = TZOO ANALYSIS TARGET
| Stock | Rating | Score▼ | Quality | Value | Momentum | P/E | EV/EBITDA | ROE | ROA | Gross Mgn | Op Mgn | Net Mgn | Rev Growth | Div Yield | D/E | Mkt Cap | AUDIT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$YALA Yalla Group Ltd | 75 | 89 | 99 | 80 | - | - | 21.3% | 18.6% | 64.5% | 35.7% | 39.5% | 6.5% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $644M | VS | |
$GRVY GRAVITY Co., Ltd. | 75 | 82 | 96 | 71 | - | - | 15.4% | 12.6% | 38.7% | 17.1% | 17.0% | -39.7% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $439M | VS | |
$ISSC INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS & SUPPORT INC | 73 | 81 | 88 | 94 | 25.0x | 14.1x | 28.1% | 16.8% | 48.1% | 23.8% | 18.5% | 78.6% | 0.0% | 37.0x | $220M | VS | |
$AER AerCap Holdings N.V. | 72 | 60 | 87 | 84 | - | - | 12.4% | 2.9% | 100.0% | 28.2% | 26.2% | 5.5% | 0.8% | 264.0x | $19.4B | VS | |
$HCSG HEALTHCARE SERVICES GROUP INC | 72 | 74 | 88 | 88 | 7.1x | 6.1x | 28.9% | 20.8% | 20.8% | 9.9% | 9.3% | 8.5% | 0.0% | 1.0x | $1.2B | VS | |
$LQDT LIQUIDITY SERVICES INC | 72 | 90 | 88 | 68 | 24.9x | 14.3x | 14.6% | 7.8% | 43.8% | 7.4% | 5.9% | 31.2% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $857M | VS | |
$TRTNpA Triton International Ltd | 71 | 70 | 89 | 70 | - | 1.7x | 18.0% | 4.6% | 97.3% | 52.2% | 32.7% | -3.4% | 0.0% | 271.0x | $8.0B | VS | |
$EDU New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. | 71 | 83 | 52 | 77 | - | - | 9.4% | 4.9% | 55.5% | 8.7% | 7.7% | 13.6% | 1.3% | 7.0x | $78.0B | VS | |
$NTES NetEase, Inc. | 71 | 88 | 93 | 68 | - | - | 22.1% | 15.6% | 62.5% | 28.1% | 28.7% | -1.0% | 2.8% | 9.0x | $56.6B | VS | |
$UTI UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC | 70 | 86 | 86 | 72 | 43.2x | 16.0x | 21.4% | 8.0% | 100.0% | 10.0% | 7.5% | 14.1% | 0.0% | 27.0x | $1.8B | VS | |
$TZOO TRAVELZOO | 39 | 54 | 54 | 16 | 7.2x | 5.5x | -2913.3% | 17.7% | 81.8% | 11.8% | 9.3% | 5.0% | 0.0% | - | $108M | ||
| SECTOR BENCH | - | - | - | - | - | 23.7x | 11.7x | 5.3% | 1.9% | 59.6% | 3.5% | 2.3% | 7.8% | 0.0% | 0.3x | - | REF |
TRAVELZOO (TZOO) receives a "Avoid" rating with a composite score of 38.8/100. It ranks #3697 out of 7,333 stocks in our coverage universe and carries a 1-star rating. Ratings are driven by a 6-factor quantitative model measuring quality, value, momentum, investment, stability, and short interest.
Sign in to join the discussion.
YOY expansion rate
Core pricing power
Operating efficiency
Bottom-line conversion
Equity capital efficiency
Asset base utilization
Direct cash return
Holger Bartel
Chief Executive Officer
Labor Force
210
54
28
38
Audit Verdict: Lower quality and stability scores may indicate governance concerns.
No recent insider transactions available for TZOO
Lagging peers — losers tend to keep underperforming
Fair valuation relative to peers
Average quality profile
Average volatility — neutral timing signal
Aggressive spending — empire-building risk, dilutive growth
Below-average composite — caution warranted
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Relative valuation derived from Services sector benchmarks. Model weights: EV/EBITDA (40%), P/B (35%), P/S (25%). Re-calculated daily.
Projection based on user-defined inputs. Re-calculated daily against current market data.
Reverse DCF Framework — Mauboussin Methodology
Institutional-grade Reverse DCF analysis. This model identifies the growth hurdles embedded in current market prices. When implied growth is significantly lower than historical or projected rates, a margin of safety may exist. Re-audited daily.
No analyst ratings for TZOO.
View All RatingsConservative accounting — High cash conversion efficiency
Material decline in asset turnover efficiency detected
High margin volatility — erratic forensic earnings quality
| Factor | Global | Sector | Tilt |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROFITABILITY | 54 | 66 | -12DRAG |
| MOMENTUM | 16 | 10 | +6ALPHA |
| VALUATION | 54 | 59 | -5NEUTRAL |
| INVESTMENT | 28 | 25 | +3NEUTRAL |
| STABILITY | 38 | 34 | +4NEUTRAL |
| SHORT INT | 25 | 10 | +15ALPHA |
Global = full universe. Sector = relative to industry peers. Positive tilt indicates idiosyncratic strength.
ROE proxy -2913.3% (sector 5.3%)
GM 82% vs sector 60%, OM 12% vs sector 4%
Capital turnover N/A, R&D intensity 2.8%
Rev growth 5%, 10yr history
Interest coverage N/A, Net debt/EBITDA -7.3x
Composite assessment of profitability, capital efficiency, and financial strength. Top-tier entities demonstrate sustainable cash flow generation and elite competitive moats.
Profit generated per dollar of shareholder equity
Efficiency of asset utilization
Pricing power and cost efficiency
Core business profitability
Bottom-line profitability
The Quality factor evaluates the persistence and magnitude of realized cash flows. Companies with scores >70 exhibit superior pricing power and structural financial resilience through diverse economic regimes.
Our uncertainty rating tracks the predictability of future cash flows and potential for permanent capital loss. Moderate visibility with standard industry cyclicality.
Our quantitative model flags TRAVELZOO with an Avoid rating, assigning a composite score of 38.8/100 and 1 out of 5 stars. Ranked #3697 of 7,333 stocks, TZOO falls in the bottom tier across key factors. Historically, stocks with this profile have faced elevated risk of underperformance and capital loss.
With a quality score of 54/100, TZOO shows adequate but unremarkable business quality. The company reports a return on equity of -2913.3% (sector avg: 5.3%), gross margins of 81.8% (sector avg: 59.6%), net margins of 9.3% (sector avg: 2.3%). This suggests the company generates acceptable returns but may lack the competitive positioning or operational efficiency to stand out from peers.
TZOO's value score of 54/100 indicates the stock is fairly valued based on its current fundamentals. Key valuation metrics include a P/E ratio of 7.22x, an EV/EBITDA of 5.46x. At this level, neither a clear bargain nor overpriced, the stock's attractiveness depends more on forward growth expectations and qualitative factors.
TRAVELZOO's investment score of 28/100 suggests limited reinvestment activity. Key growth metrics include revenue growth of 5.0% vs. a sector average of 7.8% and a return on assets of 17.7% (sector: 1.9%). While this can be positive for mature, cash-generative businesses returning capital to shareholders, it may also signal a lack of growth opportunities or management conservatism.
TRAVELZOO is experiencing notably weak momentum with a score of just 16/100. The stock has underperformed its peers and is trending below major moving averages. Revenue growth stands at 5.0% year-over-year, while a beta of 1.18 reflects its sensitivity to broader market moves. While deep momentum weakness can occasionally present value opportunities, it often reflects deteriorating fundamentals or structural headwinds that may persist.
TZOO's stability score of 38/100 signals elevated volatility and/or leverage concerns. Key stability metrics include a beta of 1.18. Investors should be prepared for wider-than-average price swings and consider position sizing accordingly to manage portfolio risk.
TRAVELZOO's short interest score of 25/100 reveals significant bearish positioning, suggesting institutional investors are actively betting against the stock. Specific risk factors include micro-cap liquidity risk. At $108M (micro-cap), TZOO carries meaningful risk and is best suited for investors with high risk tolerance who have thoroughly evaluated the bear thesis.
TRAVELZOO is a micro-cap company in the Services sector, ranked #0 of 50 in its sector (100th percentile) and #3697 of 7,333 overall (50th percentile). Key comparisons include ROE of -2913.3% trailing the 5.3% sector median and operating margins of 11.8% above the 3.5% sector average. This top-quartile standing reflects exceptional competitive strength relative to Services peers.
While TZOO currently exhibits a AVOID profile, superior opportunities exist within the SERVICES sector. Our model identifies several "Strong Buy" candidates with higher quality scores and more attractive valuations among direct industry competitors.
View Top Services Alpha →Quant Factor Profile
Upgrade catalyst
Improvement in Momentum (16) would have the largest impact on the composite score.
EV/EBITDA 53% BELOW SECTOR MEDIAN (FAVORABLE)
ROE 54965% BELOW SECTOR MEDIAN
Gross Margin 37% ABOVE SECTOR MEDIAN (FAVORABLE)
AUDIT DATA AS OF SEP 30, 2025 (Q2 FY2025)
We rate TRAVELZOO (TZOO) as Avoid with a composite score of 38.8/100 at a current price of $5.96. The stock falls in the bottom quintile of our universe across key quantitative factors, and the multi-factor weakness suggests a high probability of continued underperformance.
The rating is primarily driven by strength in quality (54th percentile) and value (54th percentile), which together account for the majority of the composite score. Offsetting weakness in momentum (16th percentile) and investment (28th percentile) tempers our overall conviction. We assign a Narrow Moat rating (41/100), Medium uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation.
Key items to watch: momentum to confirm whether the current price trend has legs. Any material change in these dynamics could warrant a reassessment of our rating. The moat trend is stable, which suggests the competitive landscape is stable for now.
TRAVELZOO holds a top-quartile position (#0 of 50) within the Services sector, based on our composite quantitative scoring across quality, value, momentum, and stability factors. The composite score of 38.8/100 places it at rank #3697 in our full 7,333-stock universe. At $108M in market capitalization, TRAVELZOO is a small-cap player in the Services space, which limits certain scale advantages but may allow for more agile strategic execution.
Revenue is growing at 5%, though momentum at the 16th percentile suggests the market has not yet fully recognized this trajectory. This potential disconnect between fundamental improvement and market recognition could represent an opportunity for patient investors if the growth trend persists.
The margin cascade tells an important story: gross margins of 82% (+22.3pp vs sector) narrow to operating margins of 12% (+8.3pp vs sector) and net margins of 9.3%, yielding a gross-to-net conversion rate of 11%. The significant margin erosion from gross to net suggests elevated operating expenses, high interest costs, or other structural drags that warrant monitoring.
At a current price of $5.96, TRAVELZOO is trading near fair value based on current fundamentals. Our value factor score of 54/100 reflects a composite assessment across multiple valuation metrics including price-to-earnings, price-to-book, EV/EBITDA, and price-to-sales ratios relative to both sector peers and the broader market. Valuation metrics are mixed, with no strong signal of mispricing in either direction.
The stock currently trades at a P/E of 7.2x (a 70% discount to the sector median of 23.7x), EV/EBITDA of 5.5x (discounted to peers), P/S of 0.7x. The below-sector P/E suggests possible undervaluation or the market pricing in near-term headwinds.
Gross margins of 82% signal strong pricing power and brand/IP advantages — businesses with margins above 40% have historically demonstrated more resilient earnings through economic cycles.
Return on assets of 17.7% indicates efficient deployment of the full asset base, not just equity capital.
The Avoid rating (composite 38.8/100) reflects multi-factor weakness, and historically, stocks in this scoring range have underperformed the market by a meaningful margin.
Weak momentum (16th percentile) suggests institutional selling pressure and unfavorable technical dynamics that may persist.
We assign a Medium uncertainty rating to TRAVELZOO. The stock presents a balanced risk profile: below-average price stability (38th percentile). While not risk-free, the core business fundamentals are adequate to withstand moderate economic stress, and the range of potential outcomes around our fair value estimate is manageable.
Specific risk factors that inform our assessment include: below-average price stability (38th percentile). Each of these factors independently widens the distribution of potential outcomes, and in combination they create a risk profile that demands careful position sizing. The stability factor at the 38th percentile and quality factor at the 54th percentile provide a quantitative summary of the overall risk landscape.
Key risk mitigants include: healthy gross margins of 82% provide a buffer against cost pressures. These factors partially offset the identified risks and provide downside protection in adverse scenarios. On balance, the risk-reward profile is favorable for long-term investors.
We rate TRAVELZOO's capital allocation as Poor. Key concerns include low returns on equity (-2913.3%). Exemplary capital allocators generate ROE above 20% and maintain conservative leverage — TRAVELZOO significantly underperforms these benchmarks, raising questions about management's ability to create shareholder value.
Investors should scrutinize management's reinvestment decisions and balance sheet trajectory before committing capital. Poor capital allocation often compounds over time: overlevered balance sheets limit strategic flexibility, while low returns on capital destroy shareholder value. We would need to see sustained improvement in profitability metrics and balance sheet discipline before considering an upgrade.
In summary, TRAVELZOO receives a Avoid rating with a composite score of 38.8/100 (rank #3697 of 7,333). Our quantitative framework assigns a Narrow Moat (41/100, trend: stable), Medium uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation. The average factor score across quality, value, momentum, stability, and investment is 38/100.
Our analysis does not support a constructive view on TRAVELZOO at this time. The combination of the current quantitative profile, medium uncertainty, and poor capital allocation suggests unfavorable risk-reward at current levels. We recommend investors avoid new positions and existing holders consider reducing exposure.
Analysis derived from Blank Capital Research quantitative terminal. For informational purposes only. No trade solicitation. Past performance not indicative of future results. Consult a qualified advisor.
We assign TRAVELZOO a Narrow Moat rating with a composite moat score of 41/100. The company possesses identifiable competitive advantages, though they are less entrenched than those of wide-moat peers. Our analysis indicates that TRAVELZOO can sustain above-average returns on invested capital for at least 10 years, with the strongest contributor being margin superiority at 17.1/20.
The strongest moat sources are margin superiority (17.1/20) and financial resilience (12/20). GM 82% vs sector 60%, OM 12% vs sector 4%. Interest coverage N/A, Net debt/EBITDA -7.3x. These pillars form the core of TRAVELZOO's competitive identity and are the primary drivers of excess returns in our framework.
Areas of relative weakness include reinvestment efficiency (1/20) and economic value creation (2.5/20). Capital turnover N/A, R&D intensity 2.8%. Improvement in these areas could meaningfully widen the moat over time, while deterioration would be an early warning of competitive erosion.
Our moat trend assessment is Stable. Multi-year ROIC and operating margin trajectories show neither meaningful improvement nor deterioration, suggesting the competitive position is steady. We expect TRAVELZOO's moat profile to remain largely unchanged absent a material shift in return on capital or industry dynamics.
Key profit drivers include gross margins of 82% providing a solid profitability foundation, operating margins of 12% reflecting effective cost management. The margin cascade from 82% gross to 12% operating to 9.3% net reveals the company's cost structure and reinvestment intensity. Our analysis indicates that profit quality is adequate though not exceptional, with the quality factor at the 54th percentile.
The margin profile shows gross margins of 82%, operating margins of 12%, net margins of 9.3%. Return metrics include ROE of -2913.3% and ROA of 17.7%. Relative to the Services sector, gross margins are 22.3 percentage points above the sector median of 60%, and ROE of -2913.3% compares to a sector median of 5.3%.
The balance sheet reflects revenue growth of 5%. Overall balance sheet health is adequate for the current business environment.
Above 50MA
37.18%
Net New Highs
+51081

The article discusses three small-cap stocks that are poised for significant growth due to the Federal Reserve's recent interest rate cuts, which are expected to benefit small-cap companies that rely heavily on debt to fuel their growth.
Travelzoo (TZOO) reports a 9% revenue increase in Q4 2025, but faces profit declines due to rising marketing expenses and soft advertising revenue.
Travelzoo (TZOO) Q4 2025 earnings call highlights: revenue up 9%, ad softness, rising marketing spend, and growing Club fees.

Travelzoo reported Q2 2025 revenue of $23.9 million, a 13% increase, with a focus on aggressive member acquisition in the UK and North America. The company prioritized subscriber growth despite near-term margin compression, expecting long-term profitability from recurring membership fees.
Travelzoo® (NASDAQ: TZOO), the club for travel enthusiasts, announces three of many new Club Offers for Club Members in Canada.