IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: Blank Capital Research ("BCR") is a technology platform, not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer. The algorithmically generated signals, scores, and rankings provided on this site ("God Mode" Signals) are for informational and research purposes only and do not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to sell or solicit an offer to buy any securities.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS: The "timing scores" and "regime signals" displayed are based on quantitative models. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not actually been executed, the results may have under-or-over compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity.
RISK OF LOSS: Trading in financial markets involves a high degree of risk and may result in the loss of your entire investment. Data provided by third-party sources (Intrinio, Snowflake) is believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
© 2026 Blank Capital Research. All rights reserved. System Version: Aegis V8 (God Mode).
Verdict
Quantitative factor alignment verified for current market regime.
Quant Score
Rank
#3193
Positioning
Market Dominance
Services
Computer Software
$24.0B
Jeffrey T. Green
Trade Desk, Inc. operates as a technology company in the United States and internationally. The company operates a self-service cloud-based platform that allows buyers to create, manage, and optimize data-driven digital advertising campaigns. Trade Desk was incorporated in 2009 and is headquartered in Ventura, California.
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
X-AXIS: EV/EBITDA (LOWER = CHEAPER) | Y-AXIS: ROE (HIGHER = ELITE) | RED CIRCLE = TTD ANALYSIS TARGET
| Stock | Rating | Score▼ | Quality | Value | Momentum | P/E | EV/EBITDA | ROE | ROA | Gross Mgn | Op Mgn | Net Mgn | Rev Growth | Div Yield | D/E | Mkt Cap | AUDIT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$YALA Yalla Group Ltd | 75 | 89 | 99 | 80 | - | - | 21.3% | 18.6% | 64.5% | 35.7% | 39.5% | 6.5% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $644M | VS | |
$GRVY GRAVITY Co., Ltd. | 75 | 82 | 96 | 71 | - | - | 15.4% | 12.6% | 38.7% | 17.1% | 17.0% | -39.7% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $439M | VS | |
$ISSC INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS & SUPPORT INC | 73 | 81 | 88 | 94 | 25.0x | 14.1x | 28.1% | 16.8% | 48.1% | 23.8% | 18.5% | 78.6% | 0.0% | 37.0x | $220M | VS | |
$AER AerCap Holdings N.V. | 72 | 60 | 87 | 84 | - | - | 12.4% | 2.9% | 100.0% | 28.2% | 26.2% | 5.5% | 0.8% | 264.0x | $19.4B | VS | |
$HCSG HEALTHCARE SERVICES GROUP INC | 72 | 74 | 88 | 88 | 7.1x | 6.1x | 28.9% | 20.8% | 20.8% | 9.9% | 9.3% | 8.5% | 0.0% | 1.0x | $1.2B | VS | |
$LQDT LIQUIDITY SERVICES INC | 72 | 90 | 88 | 68 | 24.9x | 14.3x | 14.6% | 7.8% | 43.8% | 7.4% | 5.9% | 31.2% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $857M | VS | |
$TRTNpA Triton International Ltd | 71 | 70 | 89 | 70 | - | 1.7x | 18.0% | 4.6% | 97.3% | 52.2% | 32.7% | -3.4% | 0.0% | 271.0x | $8.0B | VS | |
$EDU New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. | 71 | 83 | 52 | 77 | - | - | 9.4% | 4.9% | 55.5% | 8.7% | 7.7% | 13.6% | 1.3% | 7.0x | $78.0B | VS | |
$NTES NetEase, Inc. | 71 | 88 | 93 | 68 | - | - | 22.1% | 15.6% | 62.5% | 28.1% | 28.7% | -1.0% | 2.8% | 9.0x | $56.6B | VS | |
$UTI UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC | 70 | 86 | 86 | 72 | 43.2x | 16.0x | 21.4% | 8.0% | 100.0% | 10.0% | 7.5% | 14.1% | 0.0% | 27.0x | $1.8B | VS | |
$TTD Trade Desk, Inc. | 43 | 65 | 53 | 11 | 34.6x | 27.5x | 13.5% | 5.9% | 78.4% | 16.2% | 13.0% | 26.5% | 0.0% | 128.0x | $24.0B | ||
| SECTOR BENCH | - | - | - | - | - | 23.7x | 11.7x | 5.3% | 1.9% | 59.6% | 3.5% | 2.3% | 7.8% | 0.0% | 0.3x | - | REF |
Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD) receives a "Reduce" rating with a composite score of 42.5/100. It ranks #3193 out of 7,333 stocks in our coverage universe and carries a 2-star rating. Ratings are driven by a 6-factor quantitative model measuring quality, value, momentum, investment, stability, and short interest.
Sign in to join the discussion.
YOY expansion rate
Core pricing power
Operating efficiency
Bottom-line conversion
Equity capital efficiency
Asset base utilization
Financial leverage load
Direct cash return
Jeffrey T. Green
Chief Executive Officer
Labor Force
2,770
65
43
33
Audit Verdict: Lower quality and stability scores may indicate governance concerns.
No recent insider transactions available for TTD
Lagging peers — losers tend to keep underperforming
Fair valuation relative to peers
High profitability & efficiency — strong quality floor supports entry
High volatility — wider range of outcomes increases timing risk
Moderate investment profile
Mid-range overall rating
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Relative valuation derived from Services sector benchmarks. Model weights: EV/EBITDA (40%), P/B (35%), P/S (25%). Re-calculated daily.
Projection based on user-defined inputs. Re-calculated daily against current market data.
Reverse DCF Framework — Mauboussin Methodology
Institutional-grade Reverse DCF analysis. This model identifies the growth hurdles embedded in current market prices. When implied growth is significantly lower than historical or projected rates, a margin of safety may exist. Re-audited daily.
No analyst ratings for TTD.
View All RatingsEarnings well-supported by fundamental cash flows
Material decline in asset turnover efficiency detected
High margin volatility — erratic forensic earnings quality
| Factor | Global | Sector | Tilt |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROFITABILITY | 65 | 80 | -15DRAG |
| MOMENTUM | 11 | 6 | +5NEUTRAL |
| VALUATION | 53 | 58 | -5NEUTRAL |
| INVESTMENT | 43 | 74 | -31DRAG |
| STABILITY | 33 | 26 | +7ALPHA |
| SHORT INT | 44 | 40 | +4NEUTRAL |
Global = full universe. Sector = relative to industry peers. Positive tilt indicates idiosyncratic strength.
ROE proxy 13.5% (sector 5.3%)
GM 78% vs sector 60%, OM 16% vs sector 4%
Capital turnover N/A, R&D intensity 19.3%
Rev growth 27%, 10yr history
Interest coverage N/A, Net debt/EBITDA -4.1x
Composite assessment of profitability, capital efficiency, and financial strength. Top-tier entities demonstrate sustainable cash flow generation and elite competitive moats.
Profit generated per dollar of shareholder equity
Efficiency of asset utilization
Pricing power and cost efficiency
Core business profitability
Bottom-line profitability
The Quality factor evaluates the persistence and magnitude of realized cash flows. Companies with scores >70 exhibit superior pricing power and structural financial resilience through diverse economic regimes.
Our uncertainty rating tracks the predictability of future cash flows and potential for permanent capital loss. Moderate visibility with standard industry cyclicality.
Trade Desk, Inc. receives a Reduce rating from our analysis, with a composite score of 42.5/100 and 2 out of 5 stars, ranking #3193 out of 7,333 stocks. TTD's factor profile shows weakness across multiple dimensions, suggesting the stock may underperform going forward. Existing holders may want to consider trimming positions or tightening stop-losses.
TTD earns a quality score of 65/100, indicating above-average business quality. The company reports a return on equity of 13.5% (sector avg: 5.3%), gross margins of 78.4% (sector avg: 59.6%), net margins of 13.0% (sector avg: 2.3%). Companies in this tier generally demonstrate consistent profitability and efficient capital deployment, though they may face some competitive pressure.
TTD's value score of 53/100 indicates the stock is fairly valued based on its current fundamentals. Key valuation metrics include a P/E ratio of 34.63x, an EV/EBITDA of 27.53x, a P/B ratio of 4.67x. At this level, neither a clear bargain nor overpriced, the stock's attractiveness depends more on forward growth expectations and qualitative factors.
With an investment score of 43/100, TTD exhibits moderate growth-oriented spending. Key growth metrics include revenue growth of 26.5% vs. a sector average of 7.8% and a return on assets of 5.9% (sector: 1.9%). The company appears to be balancing growth investments with capital returns, though the pace of investment may not be enough to accelerate top-line growth meaningfully.
Trade Desk, Inc. is experiencing notably weak momentum with a score of just 11/100. The stock has underperformed its peers and is trending below major moving averages. Revenue growth stands at 26.5% year-over-year, while a beta of 1.64 reflects its sensitivity to broader market moves. While deep momentum weakness can occasionally present value opportunities, it often reflects deteriorating fundamentals or structural headwinds that may persist.
TTD's stability score of 33/100 signals elevated volatility and/or leverage concerns. Key stability metrics include a beta of 1.64 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 128.00x (sector avg: 0.3x). Investors should be prepared for wider-than-average price swings and consider position sizing accordingly to manage portfolio risk.
The short interest score of 44/100 for TTD suggests somewhat elevated bearish positioning by institutional traders. Specific risk factors include high market sensitivity (beta: 1.64), elevated leverage (D/E: 128.00x). With a $24.0B market cap (large-cap), Trade Desk, Inc. may experience above-average volatility. Investors should consider whether the short thesis has merit or if it creates a potential short-squeeze opportunity.
Trade Desk, Inc. is a large-cap company in the Services sector, ranked #0 of 50 in its sector (100th percentile) and #3193 of 7,333 overall (56th percentile). Key comparisons include ROE of 13.5% exceeding the 5.3% sector median and operating margins of 16.2% above the 3.5% sector average. This top-quartile standing reflects exceptional competitive strength relative to Services peers.
While TTD currently exhibits a REDUCE profile, superior opportunities exist within the SERVICES sector. Our model identifies several "Strong Buy" candidates with higher quality scores and more attractive valuations among direct industry competitors.
View Top Services Alpha →Quant Factor Profile
Upgrade catalyst
Improvement in Momentum (11) would have the largest impact on the composite score.
EV/EBITDA 135% ABOVE SECTOR MEDIAN
ROE 154% ABOVE SECTOR MEDIAN (FAVORABLE)
Gross Margin 32% ABOVE SECTOR MEDIAN (FAVORABLE)
AUDIT DATA AS OF SEP 30, 2025 (Q2 FY2025)
We rate Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD) as a Reduce with a composite score of 42.5/100 at a current price of $24.91. The quantitative profile shows weakness across multiple dimensions, suggesting limited upside potential and elevated risk of underperformance relative to peers over the next 12 months.
The rating is primarily driven by strength in quality (65th percentile) and value (53th percentile), which together account for the majority of the composite score. Offsetting weakness in momentum (11th percentile) and stability (33th percentile) tempers our overall conviction. We assign a Narrow Moat rating (58/100), High uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation.
Key items to watch: momentum to confirm whether the current price trend has legs; balance sheet deleveraging progress; sustainability of the current growth rate. Any material change in these dynamics could warrant a reassessment of our rating. The moat trend is stable, which suggests the competitive landscape is stable for now.
Trade Desk, Inc. holds a top-quartile position (#0 of 50) within the Services sector, based on our composite quantitative scoring across quality, value, momentum, and stability factors. The composite score of 42.5/100 places it at rank #3193 in our full 7,333-stock universe. With a $24.0B market capitalization, Trade Desk, Inc. operates at meaningful scale within the Services sector, providing competitive advantages in distribution, procurement, and customer reach.
Revenue is growing at 27%, though momentum at the 11th percentile suggests the market has not yet fully recognized this trajectory. This potential disconnect between fundamental improvement and market recognition could represent an opportunity for patient investors if the growth trend persists.
The margin cascade tells an important story: gross margins of 78% (+18.8pp vs sector) narrow to operating margins of 16% (+12.7pp vs sector) and net margins of 13.0%, yielding a gross-to-net conversion rate of 17%. This conversion rate is typical for the sector, suggesting a standard cost structure without notable efficiency advantages or disadvantages.
At a current price of $24.91, Trade Desk, Inc. is trading near fair value based on current fundamentals. Our value factor score of 53/100 reflects a composite assessment across multiple valuation metrics including price-to-earnings, price-to-book, EV/EBITDA, and price-to-sales ratios relative to both sector peers and the broader market. Valuation metrics are mixed, with no strong signal of mispricing in either direction.
The stock currently trades at a P/E of 34.6x (a 46% premium to the sector median of 23.7x), EV/EBITDA of 27.5x (at a premium), P/B of 4.7x, P/S of 4.5x. The above-sector P/E multiple suggests the market is pricing in superior growth or quality, which our analysis partially supports given strong quality metrics.
Gross margins of 78% signal strong pricing power and brand/IP advantages — businesses with margins above 40% have historically demonstrated more resilient earnings through economic cycles.
Revenue growth of 27% confirms the business is expanding its addressable market — growth at this level typically supports multiple expansion and attracts institutional capital.
The Reduce rating (composite 42.5/100) reflects multi-factor weakness, and historically, stocks in this scoring range have underperformed the market by a meaningful margin.
Elevated leverage (128% D/E) amplifies downside risk and limits management's financial flexibility in adverse scenarios.
Weak momentum (11th percentile) suggests institutional selling pressure and unfavorable technical dynamics that may persist.
We assign a High uncertainty rating to Trade Desk, Inc.. Key risk factors include elevated market sensitivity (beta of 1.64), significant leverage (128% debt-to-equity), below-average price stability (33th percentile). The wide range of potential outcomes widens our fair value estimate and increases the possibility of permanent capital impairment. Investors considering this name should size positions accordingly and demand a meaningful margin of safety before initiating.
Specific risk factors that inform our assessment include: elevated market sensitivity (beta of 1.64); significant leverage (128% debt-to-equity); below-average price stability (33th percentile). Each of these factors independently widens the distribution of potential outcomes, and in combination they create a risk profile that demands careful position sizing. The stability factor at the 33th percentile and quality factor at the 65th percentile provide a quantitative summary of the overall risk landscape.
Key risk mitigants include: healthy gross margins of 78% provide a buffer against cost pressures. These factors partially offset the identified risks and provide downside protection in adverse scenarios. On balance, the risk-reward profile warrants caution and disciplined position management.
We rate Trade Desk, Inc.'s capital allocation as Poor. Key concerns include suboptimal returns on capital. Exemplary capital allocators generate ROE above 20% and maintain conservative leverage — Trade Desk, Inc. significantly underperforms these benchmarks, raising questions about management's ability to create shareholder value.
Investors should scrutinize management's reinvestment decisions and balance sheet trajectory before committing capital. Poor capital allocation often compounds over time: overlevered balance sheets limit strategic flexibility, while low returns on capital destroy shareholder value. We would need to see sustained improvement in profitability metrics and balance sheet discipline before considering an upgrade.
In summary, Trade Desk, Inc. receives a Reduce rating with a composite score of 42.5/100 (rank #3193 of 7,333). Our quantitative framework assigns a Narrow Moat (58/100, trend: stable), High uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation. The average factor score across quality, value, momentum, stability, and investment is 41/100.
Our analysis does not support a constructive view on Trade Desk, Inc. at this time. The combination of the current quantitative profile, high uncertainty, and poor capital allocation suggests unfavorable risk-reward at current levels. We recommend investors avoid new positions and existing holders consider reducing exposure.
Analysis derived from Blank Capital Research quantitative terminal. For informational purposes only. No trade solicitation. Past performance not indicative of future results. Consult a qualified advisor.
We assign Trade Desk, Inc. a Narrow Moat rating with a composite moat score of 58/100. The company possesses identifiable competitive advantages, though they are less entrenched than those of wide-moat peers. Our analysis indicates that Trade Desk, Inc. can sustain above-average returns on invested capital for at least 10 years, with the strongest contributor being margin superiority at 17.4/20.
The strongest moat sources are margin superiority (17.4/20) and growth durability (16.3/20). GM 78% vs sector 60%, OM 16% vs sector 4%. Rev growth 27%, 10yr history. These pillars form the core of Trade Desk, Inc.'s competitive identity and are the primary drivers of excess returns in our framework.
Areas of relative weakness include reinvestment efficiency (6.7/20) and economic value creation (8.5/20). Capital turnover N/A, R&D intensity 19.3%. Improvement in these areas could meaningfully widen the moat over time, while deterioration would be an early warning of competitive erosion.
Our moat trend assessment is Stable. Multi-year ROIC and operating margin trajectories show neither meaningful improvement nor deterioration, suggesting the competitive position is steady. We expect Trade Desk, Inc.'s moat profile to remain largely unchanged absent a material shift in return on capital or industry dynamics.
Key profit drivers include gross margins of 78% providing a solid profitability foundation, operating margins of 16% reflecting effective cost management, robust top-line growth of 27% expanding the revenue base. The margin cascade from 78% gross to 16% operating to 13.0% net reveals the company's cost structure and reinvestment intensity. Our analysis indicates that the profit engine is high-quality and likely sustainable, with the quality factor at the 65th percentile.
The margin profile shows gross margins of 78%, operating margins of 16%, net margins of 13.0%. Return metrics include ROE of 13.5% and ROA of 5.9%. Relative to the Services sector, gross margins are 18.8 percentage points above the sector median of 60%, and ROE of 13.5% compares to a sector median of 5.3%.
The balance sheet reflects above-average leverage with D/E of 128%, revenue growth of 27%. The sector median D/E is 0%, putting Trade Desk, Inc. at higher leverage than the typical peer. Overall balance sheet health is adequate for the current business environment.
High beta of 1.64 means amplified losses in market selloffs — in a broad market correction, this stock would likely decline more than the index.
Above 50MA
37.18%
Net New Highs
+51081

Ten large-cap stocks experienced significant declines during the week of January 26-30, 2026. Unity Software fell 31.63% following CEO comments about world models amid competition from Google's Project Genie. Precious metals stocks including Hecla Mining (down 33.33%) and Coeur Mining (down 26.13%) declined after President Trump's nomination of Kevin Warsh for Fed Chair strengthened the dollar. Healthcare stocks UnitedHealth (down 17.87%) and Humana (down 26.07%) fell after analyst downgrades. Other notable losers included The Trade Desk (down 16.61%), First Majestic Silver (down 22.86%), Axon Enterprise (down 20.88%), Reddit (down 16.79%), and Regencell Bioscience (down 13.38%).

Philippe Laffont's Coatue Management hedge fund completely exited its position in The Trade Desk during Q4 2025 while increasing its Netflix stake 17-fold. The moves reflect confidence in Netflix's potential despite a 43% stock decline following its controversial acquisition agreement for HBO Max, while The Trade Desk faces AI disruption threats and valuation compression.

The Trade Desk, a buy-side programmatic advertising platform, is trading at a significant discount after an 80% decline from its highs. Despite competition from Amazon's advertising business, the company maintains double-digit revenue growth (18% last quarter, 16% projected for 2026), positioning it as a potential market outperformer in 2026 at current valuations.

The Trade Desk stock has plummeted 80% from its all-time highs despite maintaining strong 18% revenue growth. Trading at less than 15x forward earnings, the article argues the stock is undervalued and presents a buying opportunity, though growth has slowed due to increased competition from Amazon and clients moving ad placement in-house.
The Trade Desk (NASDAQ:TTD) is set to report its fourth quarter results on Wednesday, and analysts at Wedbush say the company is likely to post continued growth while facing mounting competitive pressures. The firm maintained a ‘Neutral’ rating on the stock and lowered its 12-month price...