IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: Blank Capital Research ("BCR") is a technology platform, not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer. The algorithmically generated signals, scores, and rankings provided on this site ("God Mode" Signals) are for informational and research purposes only and do not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to sell or solicit an offer to buy any securities.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS: The "timing scores" and "regime signals" displayed are based on quantitative models. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not actually been executed, the results may have under-or-over compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity.
RISK OF LOSS: Trading in financial markets involves a high degree of risk and may result in the loss of your entire investment. Data provided by third-party sources (Intrinio, Snowflake) is believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
© 2026 Blank Capital Research. All rights reserved. System Version: Aegis V8 (God Mode).
Verdict
Quantitative factor alignment verified for current market regime.
Quant Score
Rank
#3657
Positioning
Market Dominance
Manufacturing
Medical Equipment
$252M
Andrew Stanleick
The Beauty Health Company designs, develops, manufactures, markets, and sells aesthetic technologies and products worldwide. Its flagship product includes HydraFacial that enhance the skin to cleanse, peel, exfoliate, extract, infuse, and hydrate the skin.
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
X-AXIS: EV/EBITDA (LOWER = CHEAPER) | Y-AXIS: ROE (HIGHER = ELITE) | RED CIRCLE = SKIN ANALYSIS TARGET
| Stock | Rating | Score▼ | Quality | Value | Momentum | P/E | EV/EBITDA | ROE | ROA | Gross Mgn | Op Mgn | Net Mgn | Rev Growth | Div Yield | D/E | Mkt Cap | AUDIT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$UL UNILEVER PLC | 78 | 96 | 98 | 59 | - | - | 28.5% | 8.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 10.4% | -4.6% | 3.3% | 0.0x | $141.8B | VS | |
$ASML ASML HOLDING NV | 77 | 89 | 86 | 83 | - | - | 46.1% | 16.6% | 51.3% | 31.9% | 26.8% | -4.0% | 1.0% | 25.0x | $272.1B | VS | |
$ESLT ELBIT SYSTEMS LTD | 76 | 81 | 87 | 85 | - | - | 10.3% | 3.1% | 24.1% | 7.2% | 4.7% | 14.3% | 0.8% | 25.0x | $11.4B | VS | |
$MT ArcelorMittal | 75 | 71 | 98 | 85 | - | - | 2.2% | 1.5% | 9.3% | 5.3% | 2.2% | -8.5% | 2.2% | 16.0x | $18.9B | VS | |
$AMAT APPLIED MATERIALS INC /DE | 75 | 85 | 87 | 84 | 20.9x | 13.6x | 35.5% | 19.8% | 48.7% | 29.2% | 24.7% | 4.4% | 0.8% | 32.0x | $181.9B | VS | |
$SIMO Silicon Motion Technology CORP | 75 | 84 | 86 | 85 | - | - | 11.8% | 8.8% | 45.9% | 11.3% | 11.1% | 25.7% | 3.7% | 0.0x | $1.8B | VS | |
$CODA Coda Octopus Group, Inc. | 74 | 83 | 90 | 79 | 16.3x | 11.9x | 7.6% | 7.0% | 66.5% | 17.1% | 15.6% | 39.0% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $115M | VS | |
$GSK GSK plc | 74 | 84 | 90 | 70 | - | - | 22.6% | 4.9% | 71.2% | 12.8% | 9.4% | 1.7% | 5.9% | 124.0x | $72.1B | VS | |
$EFXT Enerflex Ltd. | 74 | 80 | 91 | 83 | - | - | 3.0% | 1.1% | 20.9% | 7.3% | 1.3% | 3.0% | 0.9% | 67.0x | $1.2B | VS | |
$BUD Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV | 74 | 84 | 97 | 63 | - | - | 8.2% | 3.5% | 55.3% | 25.9% | 12.4% | 0.7% | 1.7% | 0.0x | $87.0B | VS | |
$SKIN Beauty Health Co | 39 | 49 | 58 | 25 | - | 16.5x | -30.0% | -3.9% | 62.2% | -14.2% | -7.0% | -22.0% | 0.0% | 553.0x | $252M | ||
| SECTOR BENCH | - | - | - | - | - | 22.3x | 11.5x | -2.5% | -0.1% | 42.5% | 1.3% | -0.2% | 5.9% | 0.0% | 0.2x | - | REF |
Beauty Health Co (SKIN) receives a "Avoid" rating with a composite score of 39.1/100. It ranks #3657 out of 7,333 stocks in our coverage universe and carries a 1-star rating. Ratings are driven by a 6-factor quantitative model measuring quality, value, momentum, investment, stability, and short interest.
Sign in to join the discussion.
YOY expansion rate
Core pricing power
Operating efficiency
Bottom-line conversion
Equity capital efficiency
Asset base utilization
Financial leverage load
Direct cash return
Andrew Stanleick
Chief Executive Officer
Labor Force
1,030
49
33
27
Audit Verdict: Lower quality and stability scores may indicate governance concerns.
No recent insider transactions available for SKIN
Lagging peers — losers tend to keep underperforming
Fair valuation relative to peers
Average quality profile
High volatility — wider range of outcomes increases timing risk
Aggressive spending — empire-building risk, dilutive growth
Below-average composite — caution warranted
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Relative valuation derived from Manufacturing sector benchmarks. Model weights: EV/EBITDA (40%), P/B (35%), P/S (25%). Re-calculated daily.
No analyst ratings for SKIN.
View All RatingsMaterial decline in asset turnover efficiency detected
High margin volatility — erratic forensic earnings quality
ROIC -3.4% vs WACC 3.4% (spread -6.9%)
GM 62% vs sector 43%, OM -14% vs sector 1%
Capital turnover 0.49x, R&D intensity 1.8%
Rev growth -22%, 5yr history
Interest coverage -1.0x
Composite assessment of profitability, capital efficiency, and financial strength. Top-tier entities demonstrate sustainable cash flow generation and elite competitive moats.
Profit generated per dollar of shareholder equity
Efficiency of asset utilization
Pricing power and cost efficiency
Core business profitability
Bottom-line profitability
The Quality factor evaluates the persistence and magnitude of realized cash flows. Companies with scores >70 exhibit superior pricing power and structural financial resilience through diverse economic regimes.
Our uncertainty rating tracks the predictability of future cash flows and potential for permanent capital loss. Moderate visibility with standard industry cyclicality.
Our quantitative model flags Beauty Health Co with an Avoid rating, assigning a composite score of 39.1/100 and 1 out of 5 stars. Ranked #3657 of 7,333 stocks, SKIN falls in the bottom tier across key factors. Historically, stocks with this profile have faced elevated risk of underperformance and capital loss.
With a quality score of 49/100, SKIN shows adequate but unremarkable business quality. The company reports a return on equity of -30.0% (sector avg: -2.5%), gross margins of 62.2% (sector avg: 42.5%), net margins of -7.0% (sector avg: -0.2%). This suggests the company generates acceptable returns but may lack the competitive positioning or operational efficiency to stand out from peers.
SKIN's value score of 58/100 indicates the stock is fairly valued based on its current fundamentals. Key valuation metrics include an EV/EBITDA of 16.50x, a P/B ratio of 1.83x. At this level, neither a clear bargain nor overpriced, the stock's attractiveness depends more on forward growth expectations and qualitative factors.
Beauty Health Co's investment score of 33/100 suggests limited reinvestment activity. Key growth metrics include revenue growth of -22.0% vs. a sector average of 5.9% and a return on assets of -3.9% (sector: -0.1%). While this can be positive for mature, cash-generative businesses returning capital to shareholders, it may also signal a lack of growth opportunities or management conservatism.
Beauty Health Co is experiencing notably weak momentum with a score of just 25/100. The stock has underperformed its peers and is trending below major moving averages. Revenue growth stands at -22.0% year-over-year, while a beta of 1.61 reflects its sensitivity to broader market moves. While deep momentum weakness can occasionally present value opportunities, it often reflects deteriorating fundamentals or structural headwinds that may persist.
SKIN's stability score of 27/100 signals elevated volatility and/or leverage concerns. Key stability metrics include a beta of 1.61 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 553.00x (sector avg: 0.2x). Investors should be prepared for wider-than-average price swings and consider position sizing accordingly to manage portfolio risk.
Beauty Health Co's short interest score of 27/100 reveals significant bearish positioning, suggesting institutional investors are actively betting against the stock. Specific risk factors include high market sensitivity (beta: 1.61), elevated leverage (D/E: 553.00x), micro-cap liquidity risk. At $252M (micro-cap), SKIN carries meaningful risk and is best suited for investors with high risk tolerance who have thoroughly evaluated the bear thesis.
Beauty Health Co is a micro-cap company in the Manufacturing sector, ranked #0 of 50 in its sector (100th percentile) and #3657 of 7,333 overall (50th percentile). Key comparisons include ROE of -30.0% trailing the -2.5% sector median and operating margins of -14.2% below the 1.3% sector average. This top-quartile standing reflects exceptional competitive strength relative to Manufacturing peers.
While SKIN currently exhibits a AVOID profile, superior opportunities exist within the MANUFACTURING sector. Our model identifies several "Strong Buy" candidates with higher quality scores and more attractive valuations among direct industry competitors.
View Top Manufacturing Alpha →Quant Factor Profile
Upgrade catalyst
Improvement in Momentum (25) would have the largest impact on the composite score.
EV/EBITDA 44% ABOVE SECTOR MEDIAN
ROE 1110% ABOVE SECTOR MEDIAN (FAVORABLE)
Gross Margin 46% ABOVE SECTOR MEDIAN (FAVORABLE)
AUDIT DATA AS OF SEP 30, 2025 (Q2 FY2025)
We rate Beauty Health Co (SKIN) as Avoid with a composite score of 39.1/100 at a current price of $0.89. The stock falls in the bottom quintile of our universe across key quantitative factors, and the multi-factor weakness suggests a high probability of continued underperformance.
The rating is primarily driven by strength in value (58th percentile) and quality (49th percentile), which together account for the majority of the composite score. Offsetting weakness in momentum (25th percentile) and stability (27th percentile) tempers our overall conviction. We assign a No Moat rating (24/100), Very High uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation.
Key items to watch: momentum to confirm whether the current price trend has legs; balance sheet deleveraging progress; the path to profitability. Any material change in these dynamics could warrant a reassessment of our rating. The moat trend is stable, which suggests the competitive landscape is stable for now.
Beauty Health Co holds a top-quartile position (#0 of 50) within the Manufacturing sector, based on our composite quantitative scoring across quality, value, momentum, and stability factors. The composite score of 39.1/100 places it at rank #3657 in our full 7,333-stock universe. At $252M in market capitalization, Beauty Health Co is a small-cap player in the Manufacturing space, which limits certain scale advantages but may allow for more agile strategic execution.
Revenue contraction of -22% combined with momentum at the 25th percentile paints a cautious picture of the near-term business outlook. The market appears to be pricing in continued challenges, and a catalyst for reversal is not clearly visible from current data.
The margin cascade tells an important story: gross margins of 62% (+19.7pp vs sector) narrow to operating margins of -14% (-15.5pp vs sector) and net margins of -7.0%, yielding a gross-to-net conversion rate of -11%. The significant margin erosion from gross to net suggests elevated operating expenses, high interest costs, or other structural drags that warrant monitoring.
At a current price of $0.89, Beauty Health Co is trading near fair value based on current fundamentals. Our value factor score of 58/100 reflects a composite assessment across multiple valuation metrics including price-to-earnings, price-to-book, EV/EBITDA, and price-to-sales ratios relative to both sector peers and the broader market. Valuation metrics are mixed, with no strong signal of mispricing in either direction.
The stock currently trades at EV/EBITDA of 16.5x (at a premium), P/B of 1.8x, P/S of 0.4x. We evaluate these multiples in the context of both absolute levels and sector-relative positioning to form our valuation view.
Gross margins of 62% signal strong pricing power and brand/IP advantages — businesses with margins above 40% have historically demonstrated more resilient earnings through economic cycles.
The Avoid rating (composite 39.1/100) reflects multi-factor weakness, and historically, stocks in this scoring range have underperformed the market by a meaningful margin.
Elevated leverage (553% D/E) amplifies downside risk and limits management's financial flexibility in adverse scenarios.
Revenue decline of -22% signals business deterioration — declining revenues make it difficult to grow into the current valuation and often precede further negative revisions.
Thin net margins of -7.0% provide limited cushion against cost pressures, competitive pricing, or macroeconomic headwinds — even small changes in costs could swing the company to a loss.
We assign a Very High uncertainty rating to Beauty Health Co. The stock exhibits multiple compounding risk factors: elevated market sensitivity (beta of 1.61), significant leverage (553% debt-to-equity), current negative profitability (net margin -7.0%). The extreme uncertainty around future cash flows makes precise valuation difficult, and the range of outcomes is exceptionally wide. Only investors with high risk tolerance and extended time horizons should consider this name.
Specific risk factors that inform our assessment include: elevated market sensitivity (beta of 1.61); significant leverage (553% debt-to-equity); current negative profitability (net margin -7.0%); below-average price stability (27th percentile). Each of these factors independently widens the distribution of potential outcomes, and in combination they create a risk profile that demands careful position sizing. The stability factor at the 27th percentile and quality factor at the 49th percentile provide a quantitative summary of the overall risk landscape.
Key risk mitigants include: healthy gross margins of 62% provide a buffer against cost pressures. These factors partially offset the identified risks and provide downside protection in adverse scenarios. On balance, the risk-reward profile warrants caution and disciplined position management.
We rate Beauty Health Co's capital allocation as Poor. Key concerns include low returns on equity (-30.0%), elevated leverage (553% D/E), negative profitability, weak asset returns (ROA -3.9%). Exemplary capital allocators generate ROE above 20% and maintain conservative leverage — Beauty Health Co significantly underperforms these benchmarks, raising questions about management's ability to create shareholder value.
Investors should scrutinize management's reinvestment decisions and balance sheet trajectory before committing capital. Poor capital allocation often compounds over time: overlevered balance sheets limit strategic flexibility, while low returns on capital destroy shareholder value. We would need to see sustained improvement in profitability metrics and balance sheet discipline before considering an upgrade.
In summary, Beauty Health Co receives a Avoid rating with a composite score of 39.1/100 (rank #3657 of 7,333). Our quantitative framework assigns a No Moat (24/100, trend: stable), Very High uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation. The average factor score across quality, value, momentum, stability, and investment is 38/100.
Our analysis does not support a constructive view on Beauty Health Co at this time. The combination of limited competitive advantages, very high uncertainty, and poor capital allocation suggests unfavorable risk-reward at current levels. We recommend investors avoid new positions and existing holders consider reducing exposure.
Analysis derived from Blank Capital Research quantitative terminal. For informational purposes only. No trade solicitation. Past performance not indicative of future results. Consult a qualified advisor.
We do not assign Beauty Health Co a meaningful economic moat, scoring 24/100 on our composite assessment. The ROIC-WACC spread of -6.9% is the primary signal of economic value creation. Current fundamentals do not demonstrate the kind of durable competitive advantages — such as superior returns on invested capital, margin superiority, or reinvestment efficiency — that would protect the company from competitive erosion over the long term. The highest-scoring pillar, margin superiority, reached only 12.1/20.
The strongest moat sources are margin superiority (12.1/20) and economic value creation (4.9/20). GM 62% vs sector 43%, OM -14% vs sector 1%. ROIC -3.4% vs WACC 3.4% (spread -6.9%). These pillars form the core of Beauty Health Co's competitive identity and are the primary drivers of excess returns in our framework.
Areas of relative weakness include reinvestment efficiency (0.6/20) and financial resilience (2.5/20). Capital turnover 0.49x, R&D intensity 1.8%. Improvement in these areas could meaningfully widen the moat over time, while deterioration would be an early warning of competitive erosion.
Our moat trend assessment is Stable. Multi-year ROIC and operating margin trajectories show neither meaningful improvement nor deterioration, suggesting the competitive position is steady. We expect Beauty Health Co's moat profile to remain largely unchanged absent a material shift in return on capital or industry dynamics.
Key profit drivers include gross margins of 62% providing a solid profitability foundation, declining revenues (-22%) that pressure the earnings outlook. The margin cascade from 62% gross to -14% operating to -7.0% net reveals the company's cost structure and reinvestment intensity. Our analysis indicates that profit quality is adequate though not exceptional, with the quality factor at the 49th percentile.
The margin profile shows gross margins of 62%, operating margins of -14%, net margins of -7.0%. Return metrics include ROE of -30.0% and ROA of -3.9%. Relative to the Manufacturing sector, gross margins are 19.7 percentage points above the sector median of 43%, and ROE of -30.0% compares to a sector median of -2.5%.
The balance sheet reflects high leverage with D/E of 553%, which may limit financial flexibility, revenue growth of -22%. The sector median D/E is 0%, putting Beauty Health Co at higher leverage than the typical peer. Elevated leverage in combination with the current margin profile warrants close monitoring for any deterioration in debt-servicing capacity.
Weak momentum (25th percentile) suggests institutional selling pressure and unfavorable technical dynamics that may persist.
Above 50MA
37.18%
Net New Highs
+51081
The Beauty Health Company ( NASDAQ:SKIN ) shareholders won't be pleased to see that the share price has had a very...
The Beauty Health Company ( NASDAQ:SKIN ), is not the largest company out there, but it received a lot of attention...

U.S. stocks were mixed, with the Dow Jones index gaining around 0.1% on Wednesday. Shares of Sportradar Group AG (NASDAQ: SRAD) rose sharply during Wednesday’s session after the company reported better-than-expected fourth-quarter results and authorized a $200 million share repurchase program. Sportradar posted quarterly earnings of 8 cents per share, beating market estimates of 4 cents per share. The company’s quarterly sales came in at $271.88 million, beating market expectations of $271.46 million, according to data from Benzinga Pro. Sportradar Group shares jumped 10.7% to $11.17 on Wednesday. Here are some other big stocks recording gains in today’s session. Annovis Bio, Inc. (NASDAQ: ANVS) shares surged 25.6% to $11.21 after the company announced the completion of data cleaning for its Phase 2/3 study of Buntanetap in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease, with Topline efficacy data expected in April. Taysha ...

Top Wall Street analysts changed their outlook on these top names. For a complete view of all analyst rating changes, including upgrades and downgrades, please see our analyst ratings page. B of A Securities raised the price target for UiPath Inc. (NYSE: PATH) from $26 to $30. B of A Securities analyst Brad Sills maintained a Buy rating. UiPath shares fell 0.9% to close at $24.43 on Wednesday. See how other analysts view this stock. HC Wainwright & Co. cut the price target for FTC Solar, Inc. (NASDAQ: FTCI) from $2.5 to $1.5. HC Wainwright & Co. analyst Amit Dayal maintained a Buy rating. FTC Solar shares gained 3.9% to close at $0.4747 on Wednesday. See how other analysts view this stock. Loop Capital raised SentinelOne, Inc. (NYSE: S) price target from $28 to $30. Loop Capital analyst Yun Kim maintained a Buy rating. SentinelOne shares fell 0.1% to close at $27.94 on Wednesday. See how other analysts view this ...

U.S. stocks traded mixed toward the end of trading, with the Dow Jones gaining over 100 points on Wednesday. The Dow traded up 0.28% to 39,113.63 while the NASDAQ fell 0.25% to 16,225.31. The S&P 500 also rose, gaining, 0.02% to 5,176.06. Check This Out: Top 4 Tech And Telecom Stocks That May Explode This Month Leading and Lagging Sectors Energy shares jumped by 1.7% on Wednesday. In trading on Wednesday, information technology shares fell by 0.9%. Top Headline Dollar Tree, Inc. (NASDAQ: DLTR) reported worse-than-expected fourth-quarter financial results and issued first-quarter EPS guidance below estimates. Dollar Tree reported fourth-quarter FY23 sales growth of 11.9% year-on-year to $8.63 billion, missing the analyst consensus estimate of $8.67 billion. Adjusted EPS of $2.55 missed the consensus estimate of $2.65, according to data from Benzinga Pro. Equities Trading UP Gaxos.ai Inc. (NASDAQ: GXAI) shares shot up 80% to $9.55 after the company announced it acquired the rights to use certain AI-enabled technology from Ultiself. Shares of NuCana plc (NASDAQ: NCNA) got a boost, surging 38% to $0.5390 after the company ...