IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: Blank Capital Research ("BCR") is a technology platform, not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer. The algorithmically generated signals, scores, and rankings provided on this site ("God Mode" Signals) are for informational and research purposes only and do not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to sell or solicit an offer to buy any securities.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS: The "timing scores" and "regime signals" displayed are based on quantitative models. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not actually been executed, the results may have under-or-over compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity.
RISK OF LOSS: Trading in financial markets involves a high degree of risk and may result in the loss of your entire investment. Data provided by third-party sources (Intrinio, Snowflake) is believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
© 2026 Blank Capital Research. All rights reserved. System Version: Aegis V8 (God Mode).
Verdict
Quantitative factor alignment verified for current market regime.
Quant Score
Rank
#2102
Positioning
Market Dominance
Services
Business Services
$43.0B
Steven Huffman
The Power of Reddit’s Communities Reddit is a global, digital city where anyone in the world can join a community to learn from one another, engage in authentic conversations, explore passions, research new hobbies, exchange goods and services, create new communities and experiences, share a few laughs, and find belonging. Our principal executive offices are located at 303 2nd Street, South Tower, 5th Floor, San Francisco, California.
Headcount
—
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
X-AXIS: EV/EBITDA (LOWER = CHEAPER) | Y-AXIS: ROE (HIGHER = ELITE) | RED CIRCLE = RDDT ANALYSIS TARGET
| Stock | Rating | Score▼ | Quality | Value | Momentum | P/E | EV/EBITDA | ROE | ROA | Gross Mgn | Op Mgn | Net Mgn | Rev Growth | Div Yield | D/E | Mkt Cap | AUDIT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$YALA Yalla Group Ltd | 75 | 89 | 99 | 80 | - | - | 21.3% | 18.6% | 64.5% | 35.7% | 39.5% | 6.5% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $644M | VS | |
$GRVY GRAVITY Co., Ltd. | 75 | 82 | 96 | 71 | - | - | 15.4% | 12.6% | 38.7% | 17.1% | 17.0% | -39.7% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $439M | VS | |
$ISSC INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS & SUPPORT INC | 73 | 81 | 88 | 94 | 25.0x | 14.1x | 28.1% | 16.8% | 48.1% | 23.8% | 18.5% | 78.6% | 0.0% | 37.0x | $220M | VS | |
$AER AerCap Holdings N.V. | 72 | 60 | 87 | 84 | - | - | 12.4% | 2.9% | 100.0% | 28.2% | 26.2% | 5.5% | 0.8% | 264.0x | $19.4B | VS | |
$HCSG HEALTHCARE SERVICES GROUP INC | 72 | 74 | 88 | 88 | 7.1x | 6.1x | 28.9% | 20.8% | 20.8% | 9.9% | 9.3% | 8.5% | 0.0% | 1.0x | $1.2B | VS | |
$LQDT LIQUIDITY SERVICES INC | 72 | 90 | 88 | 68 | 24.9x | 14.3x | 14.6% | 7.8% | 43.8% | 7.4% | 5.9% | 31.2% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $857M | VS | |
$TRTNpA Triton International Ltd | 71 | 70 | 89 | 70 | - | 1.7x | 18.0% | 4.6% | 97.3% | 52.2% | 32.7% | -3.4% | 0.0% | 271.0x | $8.0B | VS | |
$EDU New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. | 71 | 83 | 52 | 77 | - | - | 9.4% | 4.9% | 55.5% | 8.7% | 7.7% | 13.6% | 1.3% | 7.0x | $78.0B | VS | |
$NTES NetEase, Inc. | 71 | 88 | 93 | 68 | - | - | 22.1% | 15.6% | 62.5% | 28.1% | 28.7% | -1.0% | 2.8% | 9.0x | $56.6B | VS | |
$UTI UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC | 70 | 86 | 86 | 72 | 43.2x | 16.0x | 21.4% | 8.0% | 100.0% | 10.0% | 7.5% | 14.1% | 0.0% | 27.0x | $1.8B | VS | |
$RDDT Reddit, Inc. | 49 | 70 | 46 | 50 | 93.2x | 132.2x | 10.5% | 9.5% | 90.6% | 10.1% | 15.2% | 108.0% | 0.0% | 11.0x | $43.0B | ||
| SECTOR BENCH | - | - | - | - | - | 23.7x | 11.7x | 5.3% | 1.9% | 59.6% | 3.5% | 2.3% | 7.8% | 0.0% | 0.3x | - | REF |
Reddit, Inc. (RDDT) receives a "Reduce" rating with a composite score of 49.4/100. It ranks #2102 out of 7,333 stocks in our coverage universe and carries a 2-star rating. Ratings are driven by a 6-factor quantitative model measuring quality, value, momentum, investment, stability, and short interest.
Sign in to join the discussion.
YOY expansion rate
Core pricing power
Operating efficiency
Bottom-line conversion
Equity capital efficiency
Asset base utilization
Financial leverage load
Direct cash return
Steven Huffman
Chief Executive Officer
70
31
33
Audit Verdict: Lower quality and stability scores may indicate governance concerns.
No recent insider transactions available for RDDT
HQ Base
SAN FRANCISCO, California
In-line with peers — no strong momentum signal
Fair valuation relative to peers
High profitability & efficiency — strong quality floor supports entry
High volatility — wider range of outcomes increases timing risk
Aggressive spending — empire-building risk, dilutive growth
Mid-range overall rating
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Relative valuation derived from Services sector benchmarks. Model weights: EV/EBITDA (40%), P/B (35%), P/S (25%). Re-calculated daily.
Projection based on user-defined inputs. Re-calculated daily against current market data.
Reverse DCF Framework — Mauboussin Methodology
Institutional-grade Reverse DCF analysis. This model identifies the growth hurdles embedded in current market prices. When implied growth is significantly lower than historical or projected rates, a margin of safety may exist. Re-audited daily.
No analyst ratings for RDDT.
View All RatingsMaterial decline in asset turnover efficiency detected
High margin volatility — erratic forensic earnings quality
| Factor | Global | Sector | Tilt |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROFITABILITY | 70 | 86 | -16DRAG |
| MOMENTUM | 50 | 51 | -1NEUTRAL |
| VALUATION | 46 | 46 | 0NEUTRAL |
| INVESTMENT | 31 | 35 | -4NEUTRAL |
| STABILITY | 33 | 26 | +7ALPHA |
| SHORT INT | 53 | 63 | -10DRAG |
Global = full universe. Sector = relative to industry peers. Positive tilt indicates idiosyncratic strength.
ROE proxy 10.5% (sector 5.3%)
GM 91% vs sector 60%, OM 10% vs sector 4%
Capital turnover N/A, R&D intensity 35.6%
Rev growth 108%, 2yr history
Interest coverage N/A, Net debt/EBITDA -2.1x
Composite assessment of profitability, capital efficiency, and financial strength. Top-tier entities demonstrate sustainable cash flow generation and elite competitive moats.
Profit generated per dollar of shareholder equity
Efficiency of asset utilization
Pricing power and cost efficiency
Core business profitability
Bottom-line profitability
The Quality factor evaluates the persistence and magnitude of realized cash flows. Companies with scores >70 exhibit superior pricing power and structural financial resilience through diverse economic regimes.
Our uncertainty rating tracks the predictability of future cash flows and potential for permanent capital loss. Moderate visibility with standard industry cyclicality.
Reddit, Inc. receives a Reduce rating from our analysis, with a composite score of 49.4/100 and 2 out of 5 stars, ranking #2102 out of 7,333 stocks. RDDT's factor profile shows weakness across multiple dimensions, suggesting the stock may underperform going forward. Existing holders may want to consider trimming positions or tightening stop-losses.
RDDT earns a quality score of 70/100, indicating above-average business quality. The company reports a return on equity of 10.5% (sector avg: 5.3%), gross margins of 90.6% (sector avg: 59.6%), net margins of 15.2% (sector avg: 2.3%). Companies in this tier generally demonstrate consistent profitability and efficient capital deployment, though they may face some competitive pressure.
With a value score of 46/100, RDDT appears somewhat expensive relative to its fundamentals. Key valuation metrics include a P/E ratio of 93.15x, an EV/EBITDA of 132.20x, a P/B ratio of 9.79x. Investors paying a premium here are likely betting on above-average growth or margin expansion to justify current prices.
Reddit, Inc.'s investment score of 31/100 suggests limited reinvestment activity. Key growth metrics include revenue growth of 108.0% vs. a sector average of 7.8% and a return on assets of 9.5% (sector: 1.9%). While this can be positive for mature, cash-generative businesses returning capital to shareholders, it may also signal a lack of growth opportunities or management conservatism.
RDDT demonstrates moderate momentum with a score of 50/100, suggesting a neutral price trend without strong directional conviction. Revenue growth stands at 108.0% year-over-year, while a beta of 2.06 reflects its sensitivity to broader market moves. Moderate momentum may indicate the stock is consolidating or transitioning between trends, warranting close monitoring of upcoming catalysts.
RDDT's stability score of 33/100 signals elevated volatility and/or leverage concerns. Key stability metrics include a beta of 2.06 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 11.00x (sector avg: 0.3x). Investors should be prepared for wider-than-average price swings and consider position sizing accordingly to manage portfolio risk.
The short interest score of 53/100 for RDDT suggests somewhat elevated bearish positioning by institutional traders. Specific risk factors include high market sensitivity (beta: 2.06), elevated leverage (D/E: 11.00x). With a $43.0B market cap (large-cap), Reddit, Inc. may experience above-average volatility. Investors should consider whether the short thesis has merit or if it creates a potential short-squeeze opportunity.
Reddit, Inc. is a large-cap company in the Services sector, ranked #0 of 50 in its sector (100th percentile) and #2102 of 7,333 overall (71st percentile). Key comparisons include ROE of 10.5% exceeding the 5.3% sector median and operating margins of 10.1% above the 3.5% sector average. This top-quartile standing reflects exceptional competitive strength relative to Services peers.
While RDDT currently exhibits a REDUCE profile, superior opportunities exist within the SERVICES sector. Our model identifies several "Strong Buy" candidates with higher quality scores and more attractive valuations among direct industry competitors.
View Top Services Alpha →Quant Factor Profile
Upgrade catalyst
Improvement in Investment (31) would have the largest impact on the composite score.
EV/EBITDA 1027% ABOVE SECTOR MEDIAN
ROE 98% ABOVE SECTOR MEDIAN (FAVORABLE)
Gross Margin 52% ABOVE SECTOR MEDIAN (FAVORABLE)
AUDIT DATA AS OF SEP 30, 2025 (Q2 FY2025)
We rate Reddit, Inc. (RDDT) as a Reduce with a composite score of 49.4/100 at a current price of $142.00. The quantitative profile shows weakness across multiple dimensions, suggesting limited upside potential and elevated risk of underperformance relative to peers over the next 12 months.
The rating is primarily driven by strength in quality (70th percentile) and momentum (50th percentile), which together account for the majority of the composite score. Offsetting weakness in investment (31th percentile) and stability (33th percentile) tempers our overall conviction. We assign a Narrow Moat rating (60/100), High uncertainty, and Standard capital allocation.
Key items to watch: sustainability of the current growth rate. Any material change in these dynamics could warrant a reassessment of our rating. The moat trend is stable, which suggests the competitive landscape is stable for now.
Reddit, Inc. holds a top-quartile position (#0 of 50) within the Services sector, based on our composite quantitative scoring across quality, value, momentum, and stability factors. The composite score of 49.4/100 places it at rank #2102 in our full 7,333-stock universe. With a $43.0B market capitalization, Reddit, Inc. operates at meaningful scale within the Services sector, providing competitive advantages in distribution, procurement, and customer reach.
Revenue is growing at 108%, though momentum at the 50th percentile suggests the market has not yet fully recognized this trajectory. This potential disconnect between fundamental improvement and market recognition could represent an opportunity for patient investors if the growth trend persists.
The margin cascade tells an important story: gross margins of 91% (+31.0pp vs sector) narrow to operating margins of 10% (+6.5pp vs sector) and net margins of 15.2%, yielding a gross-to-net conversion rate of 17%. This conversion rate is typical for the sector, suggesting a standard cost structure without notable efficiency advantages or disadvantages.
At a current price of $142.00, Reddit, Inc. is trading near fair value based on current fundamentals. Our value factor score of 46/100 reflects a composite assessment across multiple valuation metrics including price-to-earnings, price-to-book, EV/EBITDA, and price-to-sales ratios relative to both sector peers and the broader market. Valuation metrics are mixed, with no strong signal of mispricing in either direction.
The stock currently trades at a P/E of 93.2x (a 292% premium to the sector median of 23.7x), EV/EBITDA of 132.2x (at a premium), P/B of 9.8x, P/S of 15.7x. The above-sector P/E multiple suggests the market is pricing in superior growth or quality, which our analysis partially supports given strong quality metrics.
Gross margins of 91% signal strong pricing power and brand/IP advantages — businesses with margins above 40% have historically demonstrated more resilient earnings through economic cycles.
Revenue growth of 108% confirms the business is expanding its addressable market — growth at this level typically supports multiple expansion and attracts institutional capital.
A conservative balance sheet (11% D/E) provides financial flexibility for acquisitions, buybacks, or weathering economic downturns without dilution.
Return on assets of 9.5% indicates efficient deployment of the full asset base, not just equity capital.
The Reduce rating (composite 49.4/100) reflects multi-factor weakness, and historically, stocks in this scoring range have underperformed the market by a meaningful margin.
We assign a High uncertainty rating to Reddit, Inc.. Key risk factors include elevated market sensitivity (beta of 2.06), below-average price stability (33th percentile), elevated valuation multiple (P/E 93.2x) that leaves limited margin for error. The wide range of potential outcomes widens our fair value estimate and increases the possibility of permanent capital impairment. Investors considering this name should size positions accordingly and demand a meaningful margin of safety before initiating.
Specific risk factors that inform our assessment include: elevated market sensitivity (beta of 2.06); below-average price stability (33th percentile); elevated valuation multiple (P/E 93.2x) that leaves limited margin for error. Each of these factors independently widens the distribution of potential outcomes, and in combination they create a risk profile that demands careful position sizing. The stability factor at the 33th percentile and quality factor at the 70th percentile provide a quantitative summary of the overall risk landscape.
Key risk mitigants include: healthy gross margins of 91% provide a buffer against cost pressures; conservative leverage (11% D/E) limits balance sheet risk. These factors partially offset the identified risks and provide downside protection in adverse scenarios. On balance, the risk-reward profile warrants caution and disciplined position management.
We rate Reddit, Inc.'s capital allocation as Standard. Management has shown adequate — though not exceptional — stewardship of shareholder capital. Returns on equity stand at 10.5%, and the balance sheet is managed within acceptable parameters (D/E: 11%). Exemplary allocators typically sustain ROE above 20% and D/E below 50%; Reddit, Inc. falls short on at least one dimension.
There is room for improvement in optimizing the capital structure or enhancing shareholder returns. Absent a dividend, the overall capital allocation framework would benefit from either higher reinvestment returns, improved balance sheet efficiency, or increased shareholder distributions. We will monitor for signs of strategic improvement that could warrant an upgrade.
In summary, Reddit, Inc. receives a Reduce rating with a composite score of 49.4/100 (rank #2102 of 7,333). Our quantitative framework assigns a Narrow Moat (60/100, trend: stable), High uncertainty, and Standard capital allocation. The average factor score across quality, value, momentum, stability, and investment is 46/100.
Our analysis does not support a constructive view on Reddit, Inc. at this time. The combination of the current quantitative profile, high uncertainty, and standard capital allocation suggests unfavorable risk-reward at current levels. We recommend investors avoid new positions and existing holders consider reducing exposure.
Analysis derived from Blank Capital Research quantitative terminal. For informational purposes only. No trade solicitation. Past performance not indicative of future results. Consult a qualified advisor.
We assign Reddit, Inc. a Narrow Moat rating with a composite moat score of 60/100. The company possesses identifiable competitive advantages, though they are less entrenched than those of wide-moat peers. Our analysis indicates that Reddit, Inc. can sustain above-average returns on invested capital for at least 10 years, with the strongest contributor being growth durability at 20/20.
The strongest moat sources are growth durability (20/20) and margin superiority (17.3/20). Rev growth 108%, 2yr history. GM 91% vs sector 60%, OM 10% vs sector 4%. These pillars form the core of Reddit, Inc.'s competitive identity and are the primary drivers of excess returns in our framework.
Areas of relative weakness include economic value creation (6/20) and reinvestment efficiency (7/20). ROE proxy 10.5% (sector 5.3%). Improvement in these areas could meaningfully widen the moat over time, while deterioration would be an early warning of competitive erosion.
Our moat trend assessment is Stable. Multi-year ROIC and operating margin trajectories show neither meaningful improvement nor deterioration, suggesting the competitive position is steady. We expect Reddit, Inc.'s moat profile to remain largely unchanged absent a material shift in return on capital or industry dynamics.
Key profit drivers include gross margins of 91% providing a solid profitability foundation, operating margins of 10% reflecting effective cost management, robust top-line growth of 108% expanding the revenue base. The margin cascade from 91% gross to 10% operating to 15.2% net reveals the company's cost structure and reinvestment intensity. Our analysis indicates that the profit engine is high-quality and likely sustainable, with the quality factor at the 70th percentile.
The margin profile shows gross margins of 91%, operating margins of 10%, net margins of 15.2%. Return metrics include ROE of 10.5% and ROA of 9.5%. Relative to the Services sector, gross margins are 31.0 percentage points above the sector median of 60%, and ROE of 10.5% compares to a sector median of 5.3%.
The balance sheet reflects a conservatively managed balance sheet with D/E of 11%, revenue growth of 108%. The sector median D/E is 0%, putting Reddit, Inc. at higher leverage than the typical peer. The combination of low leverage and healthy profitability provides significant financial resilience and strategic optionality.
A P/E of 93.2x leaves little room for execution misses — any earnings disappointment could trigger a sharp multiple compression.
High beta of 2.06 means amplified losses in market selloffs — in a broad market correction, this stock would likely decline more than the index.
Above 50MA
37.18%
Net New Highs
+51081

U.S. stock futures advanced on Friday following Thursday's sharp sell-off, with major indices showing gains. Amazon dropped 8.39% after mixed Q4 results, while Reddit surged 11.22% on strong earnings and guidance. Roblox jumped 14.41% and Strategy Inc. gained 6.98% after beating estimates. The January jobs report was delayed to next Wednesday due to a government shutdown. Markets are pricing an 81.3% likelihood of the Fed keeping rates unchanged in March.

Ten large-cap stocks experienced significant declines during the week of January 26-30, 2026. Unity Software fell 31.63% following CEO comments about world models amid competition from Google's Project Genie. Precious metals stocks including Hecla Mining (down 33.33%) and Coeur Mining (down 26.13%) declined after President Trump's nomination of Kevin Warsh for Fed Chair strengthened the dollar. Healthcare stocks UnitedHealth (down 17.87%) and Humana (down 26.07%) fell after analyst downgrades. Other notable losers included The Trade Desk (down 16.61%), First Majestic Silver (down 22.86%), Axon Enterprise (down 20.88%), Reddit (down 16.79%), and Regencell Bioscience (down 13.38%).
In recent days, Reddit reported revenue growth of 69.7% year on year, surpassing analyst forecasts by 8.7% and lifting daily active users to 52.5 million, while leadership outlined a focus on sharper execution, global expansion, and product innovation rooted in real conversations. This combination of stronger-than-expected financial performance and expanding user engagement highlights how Reddit’s community-driven model is being translated into a more scalable, monetizable platform for...

Reddit reported strong Q4 earnings with adjusted EPS of $1.24 (beating consensus of $0.94) and 70% revenue growth to $726 million. However, the stock declined despite the market rally due to concerns about slowing U.S. user growth (5%) and the company's decision to stop reporting logged-in vs. logged-out user metrics. Analysts lowered price targets, with Cantor Fitzgerald cutting its target from $240 to $170.
For potential investors or current shareholders watching closely, shares of Viasat (NASDAQ:VSAT) have climbed almost 35% year-to-date and are up 396% over the past twelve months, yet retail sentiment on Reddit sits at a neutral 42 out of 100, drifting down from a quarterly average of 47. It’s this gap between operating results and crowd ... Viasat Is Up 396% But Reddit Still Doesn’t Trust It