IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: Blank Capital Research ("BCR") is a technology platform, not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer. The algorithmically generated signals, scores, and rankings provided on this site ("God Mode" Signals) are for informational and research purposes only and do not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to sell or solicit an offer to buy any securities.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS: The "timing scores" and "regime signals" displayed are based on quantitative models. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not actually been executed, the results may have under-or-over compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity.
RISK OF LOSS: Trading in financial markets involves a high degree of risk and may result in the loss of your entire investment. Data provided by third-party sources (Intrinio, Snowflake) is believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
© 2026 Blank Capital Research. All rights reserved. System Version: Aegis V8 (God Mode).
Verdict
Quantitative factor alignment verified for current market regime.
Quant Score
Rank
#3196
Positioning
Market Dominance
Services
Business Services
$549M
Thomas C. Priore
Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. operates as a payment technology company in the United States. It operates through three segments: Small and Medium-Sized Businesses (SMB) Payments, Business-To-Business Payments, and Enterprise Payments. The company also offers CPX platform that offers accounts payable automation solutions, including virtual card, purchase card, ACH +, dynamic discounting, or check.
Headcount
790
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
X-AXIS: EV/EBITDA (LOWER = CHEAPER) | Y-AXIS: ROE (HIGHER = ELITE) | RED CIRCLE = PRTH ANALYSIS TARGET
| Stock | Rating | Score▼ | Quality | Value | Momentum | P/E | EV/EBITDA | ROE | ROA | Gross Mgn | Op Mgn | Net Mgn | Rev Growth | Div Yield | D/E | Mkt Cap | AUDIT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$YALA Yalla Group Ltd | 75 | 89 | 99 | 80 | - | - | 21.3% | 18.6% | 64.5% | 35.7% | 39.5% | 6.5% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $644M | VS | |
$GRVY GRAVITY Co., Ltd. | 75 | 82 | 96 | 71 | - | - | 15.4% | 12.6% | 38.7% | 17.1% | 17.0% | -39.7% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $439M | VS | |
$ISSC INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS & SUPPORT INC | 73 | 81 | 88 | 94 | 25.0x | 14.1x | 28.1% | 16.8% | 48.1% | 23.8% | 18.5% | 78.6% | 0.0% | 37.0x | $220M | VS | |
$AER AerCap Holdings N.V. | 72 | 60 | 87 | 84 | - | - | 12.4% | 2.9% | 100.0% | 28.2% | 26.2% | 5.5% | 0.8% | 264.0x | $19.4B | VS | |
$HCSG HEALTHCARE SERVICES GROUP INC | 72 | 74 | 88 | 88 | 7.1x | 6.1x | 28.9% | 20.8% | 20.8% | 9.9% | 9.3% | 8.5% | 0.0% | 1.0x | $1.2B | VS | |
$LQDT LIQUIDITY SERVICES INC | 72 | 90 | 88 | 68 | 24.9x | 14.3x | 14.6% | 7.8% | 43.8% | 7.4% | 5.9% | 31.2% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $857M | VS | |
$TRTNpA Triton International Ltd | 71 | 70 | 89 | 70 | - | 1.7x | 18.0% | 4.6% | 97.3% | 52.2% | 32.7% | -3.4% | 0.0% | 271.0x | $8.0B | VS | |
$EDU New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. | 71 | 83 | 52 | 77 | - | - | 9.4% | 4.9% | 55.5% | 8.7% | 7.7% | 13.6% | 1.3% | 7.0x | $78.0B | VS | |
$NTES NetEase, Inc. | 71 | 88 | 93 | 68 | - | - | 22.1% | 15.6% | 62.5% | 28.1% | 28.7% | -1.0% | 2.8% | 9.0x | $56.6B | VS | |
$UTI UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC | 70 | 86 | 86 | 72 | 43.2x | 16.0x | 21.4% | 8.0% | 100.0% | 10.0% | 7.5% | 14.1% | 0.0% | 27.0x | $1.8B | VS | |
$PRTH Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. | 43 | 34 | 77 | 33 | 7.9x | 7.2x | -515.8% | 2.6% | 28.0% | 15.6% | 6.1% | 9.8% | 0.0% | - | $549M | ||
| SECTOR BENCH | - | - | - | - | - | 23.7x | 11.7x | 5.3% | 1.9% | 59.6% | 3.5% | 2.3% | 7.8% | 0.0% | 0.3x | - | REF |
Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH) receives a "Reduce" rating with a composite score of 42.5/100. It ranks #3196 out of 7,333 stocks in our coverage universe and carries a 2-star rating. Ratings are driven by a 6-factor quantitative model measuring quality, value, momentum, investment, stability, and short interest.
Sign in to join the discussion.
YOY expansion rate
Core pricing power
Operating efficiency
Bottom-line conversion
Equity capital efficiency
Asset base utilization
Direct cash return
Thomas C. Priore
Chief Executive Officer
Labor Force
790
34
46
42
Audit Verdict: Lower quality and stability scores may indicate governance concerns.
No recent insider transactions available for PRTH
HQ Base
Pending Verification
Lagging peers — losers tend to keep underperforming
Trading at a discount to fundamentals — favorable entry valuation
Weak fundamentals — higher risk of value trap
Average volatility — neutral timing signal
Moderate investment profile
Mid-range overall rating
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Relative valuation derived from Services sector benchmarks. Model weights: EV/EBITDA (40%), P/B (35%), P/S (25%). Re-calculated daily.
Projection based on user-defined inputs. Re-calculated daily against current market data.
Reverse DCF Framework — Mauboussin Methodology
Institutional-grade Reverse DCF analysis. This model identifies the growth hurdles embedded in current market prices. When implied growth is significantly lower than historical or projected rates, a margin of safety may exist. Re-audited daily.
No analyst ratings for PRTH.
View All RatingsNet income exceeding cash flow (Accrual bloat detected)
Material decline in asset turnover efficiency detected
High margin volatility — erratic forensic earnings quality
| Factor | Global | Sector | Tilt |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROFITABILITY | 34 | 23 | +11ALPHA |
| MOMENTUM | 33 | 27 | +6ALPHA |
| VALUATION | 77 | 88 | -11DRAG |
| INVESTMENT | 46 | 82 | -36DRAG |
| STABILITY | 42 | 41 | +1NEUTRAL |
| SHORT INT | 33 | 22 | +11ALPHA |
Global = full universe. Sector = relative to industry peers. Positive tilt indicates idiosyncratic strength.
ROIC 4.0% vs WACC 4.6% (spread -0.6%)
GM 28% vs sector 60%, OM 16% vs sector 4%
Capital turnover 0.26x
Rev growth 10%, 9yr history
Interest coverage 1.7x, Net debt/EBITDA 17.8x
Composite assessment of profitability, capital efficiency, and financial strength. Top-tier entities demonstrate sustainable cash flow generation and elite competitive moats.
Profit generated per dollar of shareholder equity
Efficiency of asset utilization
Pricing power and cost efficiency
Core business profitability
Bottom-line profitability
The Quality factor evaluates the persistence and magnitude of realized cash flows. Companies with scores >70 exhibit superior pricing power and structural financial resilience through diverse economic regimes.
Our uncertainty rating tracks the predictability of future cash flows and potential for permanent capital loss. Moderate visibility with standard industry cyclicality.
Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. receives a Reduce rating from our analysis, with a composite score of 42.5/100 and 2 out of 5 stars, ranking #3196 out of 7,333 stocks. PRTH's factor profile shows weakness across multiple dimensions, suggesting the stock may underperform going forward. Existing holders may want to consider trimming positions or tightening stop-losses.
PRTH's quality score of 34/100 is below average, suggesting challenges with profitability or capital efficiency. The company reports a return on equity of -515.8% (sector avg: 5.3%), gross margins of 28.0% (sector avg: 59.6%), net margins of 6.1% (sector avg: 2.3%). Investors should examine whether management is actively addressing these weaknesses or if they reflect structural industry headwinds.
PRTH carries a solid value score of 77/100, pointing to an attractively priced stock relative to peers. Key valuation metrics include a P/E ratio of 7.87x, an EV/EBITDA of 7.15x. This score suggests reasonable compensation for the risks involved, with potential upside if the market recognizes the stock's underlying worth.
With an investment score of 46/100, PRTH exhibits moderate growth-oriented spending. Key growth metrics include revenue growth of 9.8% vs. a sector average of 7.8% and a return on assets of 2.6% (sector: 1.9%). The company appears to be balancing growth investments with capital returns, though the pace of investment may not be enough to accelerate top-line growth meaningfully.
PRTH is currently showing below-average momentum at 33/100, which may indicate weakening institutional interest or negative sentiment shifts. Revenue growth stands at 9.8% year-over-year, while a beta of 1.72 reflects its sensitivity to broader market moves. Investors should note that declining momentum can precede further price weakness, though contrarian opportunities sometimes emerge at these levels.
PRTH's stability score of 42/100 signals elevated volatility and/or leverage concerns. Key stability metrics include a beta of 1.72. Investors should be prepared for wider-than-average price swings and consider position sizing accordingly to manage portfolio risk.
Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.'s short interest score of 33/100 reveals significant bearish positioning, suggesting institutional investors are actively betting against the stock. Specific risk factors include high market sensitivity (beta: 1.72), small-cap liquidity risk. At $549M (small-cap), PRTH carries meaningful risk and is best suited for investors with high risk tolerance who have thoroughly evaluated the bear thesis.
Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. is a small-cap company in the Services sector, ranked #0 of 50 in its sector (100th percentile) and #3196 of 7,333 overall (56th percentile). Key comparisons include ROE of -515.8% trailing the 5.3% sector median and operating margins of 15.6% above the 3.5% sector average. This top-quartile standing reflects exceptional competitive strength relative to Services peers.
While PRTH currently exhibits a REDUCE profile, superior opportunities exist within the SERVICES sector. Our model identifies several "Strong Buy" candidates with higher quality scores and more attractive valuations among direct industry competitors.
View Top Services Alpha →Quant Factor Profile
Upgrade catalyst
Improvement in Momentum (33) would have the largest impact on the composite score.
EV/EBITDA 39% BELOW SECTOR MEDIAN (FAVORABLE)
ROE 9813% BELOW SECTOR MEDIAN
Gross Margin 53% BELOW SECTOR MEDIAN
AUDIT DATA AS OF SEP 30, 2025 (Q2 FY2025)
We rate Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH) as a Reduce with a composite score of 42.5/100 at a current price of $5.60. The quantitative profile shows weakness across multiple dimensions, suggesting limited upside potential and elevated risk of underperformance relative to peers over the next 12 months.
The rating is primarily driven by strength in value (77th percentile) and investment (46th percentile), which together account for the majority of the composite score. Offsetting weakness in momentum (33th percentile) and quality (34th percentile) tempers our overall conviction. We assign a No Moat rating (23/100), High uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation.
Key items to watch: momentum to confirm whether the current price trend has legs. Any material change in these dynamics could warrant a reassessment of our rating. The moat trend is stable, which suggests the competitive landscape is stable for now.
Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. holds a top-quartile position (#0 of 50) within the Services sector, based on our composite quantitative scoring across quality, value, momentum, and stability factors. The composite score of 42.5/100 places it at rank #3196 in our full 7,333-stock universe. At $549M in market capitalization, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. is a small-cap player in the Services space, which limits certain scale advantages but may allow for more agile strategic execution.
Revenue is growing at 10%, though momentum at the 33th percentile suggests the market has not yet fully recognized this trajectory. This potential disconnect between fundamental improvement and market recognition could represent an opportunity for patient investors if the growth trend persists.
The margin cascade tells an important story: gross margins of 28% (-31.6pp vs sector) narrow to operating margins of 16% (+12.1pp vs sector) and net margins of 6.1%, yielding a gross-to-net conversion rate of 22%. This conversion rate is typical for the sector, suggesting a standard cost structure without notable efficiency advantages or disadvantages.
At a current price of $5.60, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. appears undervalued relative to its fundamentals. Our value factor score of 77/100 reflects a composite assessment across multiple valuation metrics including price-to-earnings, price-to-book, EV/EBITDA, and price-to-sales ratios relative to both sector peers and the broader market. The stock screens as attractively priced on a majority of these measures, suggesting the market may be underappreciating the underlying fundamentals.
The stock currently trades at a P/E of 7.9x (a 67% discount to the sector median of 23.7x), EV/EBITDA of 7.2x (discounted to peers), P/S of 0.5x. The below-sector P/E suggests possible undervaluation or the market pricing in near-term headwinds.
A value factor score of 77/100 suggests the market is underpricing these fundamentals, creating a potential margin of safety for new investors.
The Reduce rating (composite 42.5/100) reflects multi-factor weakness, and historically, stocks in this scoring range have underperformed the market by a meaningful margin.
Weak momentum (33th percentile) suggests institutional selling pressure and unfavorable technical dynamics that may persist.
Below-average quality (34th percentile) raises durability concerns about the fundamental profile and increases the risk of negative earnings surprises.
High beta of 1.72 means amplified losses in market selloffs — in a broad market correction, this stock would likely decline more than the index.
We assign a High uncertainty rating to Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.. Key risk factors include elevated market sensitivity (beta of 1.72), weak quality scores (34th percentile). The wide range of potential outcomes widens our fair value estimate and increases the possibility of permanent capital impairment. Investors considering this name should size positions accordingly and demand a meaningful margin of safety before initiating.
Specific risk factors that inform our assessment include: elevated market sensitivity (beta of 1.72); weak quality scores (34th percentile). Each of these factors independently widens the distribution of potential outcomes, and in combination they create a risk profile that demands careful position sizing. The stability factor at the 42th percentile and quality factor at the 34th percentile provide a quantitative summary of the overall risk landscape.
We identify limited risk mitigants at this time, which contributes to our high uncertainty assessment. Investors should monitor for improvement in balance sheet metrics, margin stability, and business predictability that could warrant a downgrade in our risk assessment over time.
We rate Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.'s capital allocation as Poor. Key concerns include low returns on equity (-515.8%). Exemplary capital allocators generate ROE above 20% and maintain conservative leverage — Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. significantly underperforms these benchmarks, raising questions about management's ability to create shareholder value.
Investors should scrutinize management's reinvestment decisions and balance sheet trajectory before committing capital. Poor capital allocation often compounds over time: overlevered balance sheets limit strategic flexibility, while low returns on capital destroy shareholder value. We would need to see sustained improvement in profitability metrics and balance sheet discipline before considering an upgrade.
In summary, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. receives a Reduce rating with a composite score of 42.5/100 (rank #3196 of 7,333). Our quantitative framework assigns a No Moat (23/100, trend: stable), High uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation. The average factor score across quality, value, momentum, stability, and investment is 47/100.
Our analysis does not support a constructive view on Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. at this time. The combination of limited competitive advantages, high uncertainty, and poor capital allocation suggests unfavorable risk-reward at current levels. We recommend investors avoid new positions and existing holders consider reducing exposure.
Analysis derived from Blank Capital Research quantitative terminal. For informational purposes only. No trade solicitation. Past performance not indicative of future results. Consult a qualified advisor.
We do not assign Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. a meaningful economic moat, scoring 23/100 on our composite assessment. The ROIC-WACC spread of -0.6% is the primary signal of economic value creation. Current fundamentals do not demonstrate the kind of durable competitive advantages — such as superior returns on invested capital, margin superiority, or reinvestment efficiency — that would protect the company from competitive erosion over the long term. The highest-scoring pillar, growth durability, reached only 12.4/20.
The strongest moat sources are growth durability (12.4/20) and margin superiority (6.3/20). Rev growth 10%, 9yr history. GM 28% vs sector 60%, OM 16% vs sector 4%. These pillars form the core of Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.'s competitive identity and are the primary drivers of excess returns in our framework.
Areas of relative weakness include reinvestment efficiency (0/20) and financial resilience (1.6/20). Capital turnover 0.26x. Improvement in these areas could meaningfully widen the moat over time, while deterioration would be an early warning of competitive erosion.
Our moat trend assessment is Stable. Multi-year ROIC and operating margin trajectories show neither meaningful improvement nor deterioration, suggesting the competitive position is steady. We expect Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.'s moat profile to remain largely unchanged absent a material shift in return on capital or industry dynamics.
Key profit drivers include operating margins of 16% reflecting effective cost management, moderate revenue growth of 10%. The margin cascade from 28% gross to 16% operating to 6.1% net reveals the company's cost structure and reinvestment intensity. Our analysis indicates that profit quality raises some durability concerns, with the quality factor at the 34th percentile.
The margin profile shows gross margins of 28%, operating margins of 16%, net margins of 6.1%. Return metrics include ROE of -515.8% and ROA of 2.6%. Relative to the Services sector, gross margins are 31.6 percentage points below the sector median of 60%, and ROE of -515.8% compares to a sector median of 5.3%.
The balance sheet reflects revenue growth of 10%. Overall balance sheet health is adequate for the current business environment.
NEW YORK, February 03, 2026--Axos Bank, the nationwide bank subsidiary of Axos Financial, Inc. (NYSE: AX), and Priority Rollfi, a subsidiary of Priority Technology Holdings, Inc., (NASDAQ: PRTH), today announced a new partnership following a competitive RFP process. Rollfi was selected to supply its embedded and white-label payroll and benefits technology infrastructure to enhance Axos’s business banking platform.
The latest update on Priority Technology Holdings centers on a reset in the stock’s price target to US$11, even as the model’s fair value estimate stays unchanged at US$10.20. That mix of a steady fair value figure and refreshed assumptions on revenue growth and required return reflects how analysts are trying to balance a recent Q3 miss with an ongoing positive view on the company’s execution and ownership developments. Stay tuned to see how you can keep on top of these shifting inputs and...
ALPHARETTA, Ga., December 08, 2025--Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (the "Company" or "Priority") (NASDAQ: PRTH) announced that a committee of independent and disinterested directors of the Company’s Board of Directors (the "Special Committee") has retained Barclays to act as its financial advisor and Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP to act as its independent legal counsel in connection with the Special Committee’s evaluation of the preliminary, non-binding proposal, dated Novembe

Upgrades Scotiabank upgraded the previous rating for Alliant Energy Corp (NASDAQ:LNT) from Sector Perform to Sector Outperform. In the second quarter, Alliant Energy showed an EPS of $0.64, compared to $0.63 from the year-ago quarter. At the moment, the stock has a 52-week-high of $57.52 and a 52-week-low of $45.15. Alliant Energy closed at $49.75 at the end of the last trading period. HSBC upgraded the previous rating for Dollar General Corp (NYSE:DG) from Reduce to Hold. In the second quarter, Dollar Gen showed an EPS of $2.13, compared to $2.98 from the year-ago quarter. The stock has a 52-week-high of $261.57 and a 52-week-low of $101.09. At the end of the last trading period, Dollar Gen closed at $111.16. For FMC Corp (NYSE:FMC), Vertical Research upgraded the previous rating of Hold to Buy. For the second quarter, FMC had an EPS of $0.50, compared to year-ago quarter EPS of $1.93. At the moment, the stock has a 52-week-high of $134.38 and a 52-week-low of $61.50. FMC closed at $62.41 at the end of the last trading period. For Veralto Corp (NYSE:VLTO), Vertical Research upgraded the previous rating of Hold to Buy. At the moment, the stock has a 52-week-high of $89.00 and a 52-week-low of $70.47. Veralto closed at $71.85 at the end of the last trading period. Exane BNP Paribas upgraded the previous rating for Planet Fitness Inc (NYSE:PLNT) from Underperform to Neutral. For the second quarter, Planet Fitness had an EPS of $0.65, compared to year-ago quarter EPS of $0.38. At the moment, the stock has a 52-week-high of $85.91 and a 52-week-low of $44.13. Planet Fitness closed at $50.98 at the end of the last trading period. JP Morgan upgraded the previous rating for Allison Transmission Holdings Inc (NYSE:ALSN) from Underweight to Neutral. Allison Transmission earned $1.92 in the second quarter, compared to $1.26 in the year-ago quarter. The stock has a 52-week-high of $61.53 and a 52-week-low of $35.06. At the end of the last trading period, Allison Transmission closed at $58.57. JP Morgan upgraded the previous rating for Nucor Corp (NYSE:NUE) from Underweight to Neutral. For the second quarter, Nucor had an EPS of $5.81, compared to year-ago quarter EPS of $9.67. The stock has a 52-week-high of $182.68 and a 52-week-low of $114.88. At the end of the last trading period, Nucor closed at $147.06. For Southern Co (NYSE:SO), Scotiabank upgraded the previous rating of Sector Perform to Sector Outperform. In the second quarter, Southern showed an EPS of $0.79, compared to $1.07 from the year-ago quarter. The current stock performance of Southern shows a 52-week-high of $75.80 and a 52-week-low of $58.85. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $66.55. Citigroup upgraded the previous rating for Embraer SA (NYSE:ERJ) from Neutral to Buy. For the second quarter, Embraer had an EPS of $0.32, compared to year-ago quarter EPS of $0.25. The stock has a 52-week-high of $17.14 and a 52-week-low of $8.52. At the end of the last trading period, Embraer closed at $13.41. For Patterson-UTI Energy Inc (NASDAQ:PTEN), B of A Securities upgraded the previous rating of Neutral to Buy. In the second quarter, Patterson-UTI Energy showed an EPS of $0.43, compared to $0.05 from the year-ago quarter. At the moment, the stock has a 52-week-high of $19.81 and a 52-week-low of $9.70. Patterson-UTI Energy closed at $13.78 at the end of the last trading period. According to UBS, the prior rating for TAL Education Group (NYSE:TAL) was changed from Neutral to Buy. For the first quarter, TAL Education had an EPS of $0.03, compared to year-ago quarter EPS of $0.03. The current stock performance of TAL Education shows a 52-week-high of $10.45 and a 52-week-low of $2.82. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $8.91. For Trinity Industries Inc (NYSE:TRN), Susquehanna upgraded the previous rating of Neutral to Positive. Trinity Industries earned $0.23 in the second quarter, compared to $0.14 in the year-ago quarter. The stock has a 52-week-high of $31.68 and a 52-week-low of $20.07. At the end of the last trading period, Trinity Industries closed at $21.91. According to Susquehanna, the prior rating for Greenbrier Companies Inc (NYSE:GBX) was changed from Neutral to Positive. Greenbrier Companies earned $1.02 in the third quarter, compared to $0.09 in the year-ago quarter. The current stock performance of Greenbrier Companies shows a 52-week-high of $48.21 and a 52-week-low of $23.97. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $40.39. According to Wells Fargo, the prior rating for Chesapeake Utilities Corp (NYSE:CPK) was changed from Underweight to Equal-Weight. Chesapeake Utilities earned $0.90 in the second quarter, compared to $0.88 in the year-ago quarter. The current stock performance of Chesapeake Utilities shows a 52-week-high of $132.91 and a 52-week-low of $89.00. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $91.80. Wells Fargo upgraded the previous rating for Sabra Health Care REIT Inc (NASDAQ:SBRA) from Underweight to Equal-Weight. In the second quarter, Sabra Health Care REIT showed an EPS of $0.33, compared to $0.39 from the year-ago quarter. The stock has a 52-week-high of $14.50 and a 52-week-low of $10.08. At the end of the last trading period, Sabra Health Care REIT closed at $14.23. For Pfizer Inc (NYSE:PFE), Jefferies upgraded the previous rating of Hold to Buy. For the second quarter, Pfizer had an EPS of $0.67, compared to year-ago quarter EPS of $2.04. The current stock performance of Pfizer shows a 52-week-high of $54.93 and a 52-week-low of $31.77. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $32.11. According to Loop Capital, the prior rating for Wayfair Inc (NYSE:W) was changed from Sell to Hold. For the second quarter, Wayfair had an EPS of $0.21, compared to year-ago quarter EPS of $1.94. At the moment, the stock has a 52-week-high of $90.71 and a 52-week-low of $28.13. Wayfair closed at $47.31 at the end of the last trading period. According to Stifel, the prior rating for Colgate-Palmolive Co (NYSE:CL) was changed from Hold to Buy. In the second quarter, Colgate-Palmolive showed an EPS of $0.77, compared to $0.72 from the year-ago quarter. The stock has a 52-week-high of $82.09 and a 52-week-low of $67.62. At the end of the last trading period, Colgate-Palmolive closed at $70.95. For UnitedHealth Group Inc (NYSE:UNH), UBS upgraded the previous rating of Neutral to Buy. In the third quarter, UnitedHealth Group showed an EPS of $6.56, compared to $5.79 from the year-ago quarter. At the moment, the stock has a 52-week-high of $557.99 and a 52-week-low of $445.68. UnitedHealth Group closed at $539.40 at the end of the last trading period. According to Morgan Stanley, the prior rating for NICE Ltd (NASDAQ:NICE) was changed from Equal-Weight to Overweight. In the second quarter, NICE showed an EPS of $2.13, compared to $1.86 from the year-ago quarter. At the moment, the stock has a 52-week-high of $231.54 and a 52-week-low of $158.29. NICE closed at $158.70 at the end of the last trading period. Morgan Stanley upgraded the previous rating for Varonis Systems Inc (NASDAQ:VRNS) from Equal-Weight to Overweight. Varonis Systems earned $0.01 in the second quarter, compared to $0.00 in the year-ago quarter. The current stock performance of Varonis Systems shows a 52-week-high of $32.64 and a 52-week-low of $15.61. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $30.58. According to Morgan Stanley, the prior rating for Check Point Software Technologies Ltd (NASDAQ:CHKP) was changed from Underweight to Equal-Weight. Check Point Software earned $2.00 in the second quarter, compared to $1.64 in the year-ago quarter. The stock has a 52-week-high of $138.60 and a 52-week-low of $107.54. At the end of the last trading period, Check Point Software closed at $134.31. For Alignment Healthcare Inc (NASDAQ:ALHC), Raymond James upgraded the previous rating of Outperform to Strong Buy. Alignment Healthcare earned $0.15 in the second quarter, compared to $0.06 in the year-ago quarter. The stock has a 52-week-high of $13.92 and a 52-week-low of $4.88. At the end of the ...Full story available on Benzinga.com

Upgrades For Sea Ltd (NYSE:SE), UBS upgraded the previous rating of Neutral to Buy. For the first quarter, Sea had an EPS of $0.35, compared to year-ago quarter EPS of $0.80. The current stock performance of Sea shows a 52-week-high of $93.68 and a 52-week-low of $40.66. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $63.72. According to CL King, the prior rating for Minerals Technologies Inc (NYSE:MTX) was changed from Neutral to Buy. In the second quarter, Minerals Technologies showed an EPS of $1.31, compared to $1.50 from the year-ago quarter. The current stock performance of Minerals Technologies shows a 52-week-high of $73.57 and a 52-week-low of $49.39. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $59.46. Tudor Pickering upgraded the previous rating for Valero Energy Corp (NYSE:VLO) from Hold to Buy. Valero Energy earned $5.40 in the second quarter, compared to $11.36 in the year-ago quarter. The current stock performance of Valero Energy shows a 52-week-high of $160.16 and a 52-week-low of $97.76. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $129.07. According to Zelman & Assoc, the prior rating for Beazer Homes USA Inc (NYSE:BZH) was changed from Hold to Buy. In the third quarter, Beazer Homes USA showed an EPS of $1.42, compared to $1.76 from the year-ago quarter. At the moment, the stock has a 52-week-high of $35.48 and a 52-week-low of $9.48. Beazer Homes USA closed at $35.43 at the end of the last trading period. For Nutrien Ltd (NYSE:NTR), TD Cowen upgraded the previous rating of Hold to Buy. In the first quarter, Nutrien showed an EPS of $1.11, compared to $2.70 from the year-ago quarter. The current stock performance of Nutrien shows a 52-week-high of $102.70 and a 52-week-low of $52.23. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $67.74. According to Deutsche Bank, the prior rating for Verra Mobility Corp (NASDAQ:VRRM) was changed from Hold to Buy. For the first quarter, Verra Mobility had an EPS of $0.26, compared to year-ago quarter EPS of $0.20. The current stock performance of Verra Mobility shows a 52-week-high of $20.95 and a 52-week-low of $12.76. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $20.38. Wedbush upgraded the previous rating for Corsair Gaming Inc (NASDAQ:CRSR) from Neutral to Outperform. Corsair Gaming earned $0.11 in the first quarter, compared to $0.09 in the year-ago quarter. The stock has a 52-week-high of $20.72 and a 52-week-low of $10.97. At the end of the last trading period, Corsair Gaming closed at $17.44. According to Evercore ISI Group, the prior rating for NovoCure Ltd (NASDAQ:NVCR) was changed from Underperform to In-Line. In the second quarter, NovoCure showed an EPS of $0.54, compared to $0.23 from the year-ago quarter. The stock has a 52-week-high of $120.03 and a 52-week-low of $32.51. At the end of the last trading period, NovoCure closed at $33.32. Deutsche Bank upgraded the previous rating for New York Community Bancorp Inc (NYSE:NYCB) from Hold to Buy. New York Community earned $0.47 in the second quarter, compared to $0.35 in the year-ago quarter. The current stock performance of New York Community shows a 52-week-high of $14.22 and a 52-week-low of $5.81. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $13.66. According to TD Cowen, the prior rating for GoodRx Holdings Inc (NASDAQ:GDRX) was changed from Market Perform to Outperform. In the first quarter, GoodRx Holdings showed an EPS of $0.07, compared to $0.10 from the year-ago quarter. The current stock performance of GoodRx Holdings shows a 52-week-high of $10.36 and a 52-week-low of $3.83. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $6.75. According to Wells Fargo, the prior rating for Blueprint Medicines Corp (NASDAQ:BPMC) was changed from Equal-Weight to Overweight. In the first quarter, Blueprint Medicines showed an EPS of $2.15, compared to $1.79 from the year-ago quarter. At the moment, the stock has a 52-week-high of $79.40 and a 52-week-low of $37.82. Blueprint Medicines closed at $63.12 at the end of the last trading period. B of A Securities upgraded the previous rating for Hasbro Inc (NASDAQ:HAS) from Neutral to Buy. In the first quarter, Hasbro showed an EPS of $0.01, compared to $0.57 from the year-ago quarter. The stock has a 52-week-high of $84.19 and a 52-week-low of $45.75. At the end of the last trading period, Hasbro closed at $62.70. Piper Sandler upgraded the previous rating for Sweetgreen Inc (NYSE:SG) from Neutral to Overweight. For the second quarter, Sweetgreen had an EPS of $0.20, compared to year-ago quarter EPS of $0.36. The stock has a 52-week-high of $21.65 and a 52-week-low of $6.10. At the end of the last trading period, Sweetgreen closed at $14.10. Raymond James upgraded the previous rating for SmartFinancial Inc (NASDAQ:SMBK) from Market Perform to Strong Buy. SmartFinancial earned $0.52 in the second quarter, compared to $0.61 in the year-ago quarter. At the moment, the stock has a 52-week-high of $30.50 and a 52-week-low of $18.86. SmartFinancial closed at $24.45 at the end of the last trading period. According to Raymond James, the prior rating for ConnectOne Bancorp Inc (NASDAQ:CNOB) was changed from Market Perform to Strong Buy. ConnectOne Bancorp earned $0.51 in the second quarter, compared to $0.78 in the year-ago quarter. The stock has a 52-week-high of $28.68 and a 52-week-low of $13.11. At the end of the last trading period, ConnectOne Bancorp closed at $20.06. According to Morgan Stanley, the prior rating for Adobe Inc (NASDAQ:ADBE) was changed from Equal-Weight to Overweight. In the second quarter, Adobe showed an EPS of $3.91, compared to $3.35 from the year-ago quarter. At the moment, the stock has a 52-week-high of $539.00 and a 52-week-low of $274.80. Adobe closed at $528.87 at the end of the last trading period. For Wayfair Inc (NYSE:W), Piper Sandler upgraded the previous rating of Neutral to Overweight. In the first quarter, Wayfair showed an EPS of $1.13, compared to $1.96 from the year-ago quarter. The stock has a 52-week-high of $76.28 and a 52-week-low of $28.13. At the end of the last trading period, Wayfair closed at $73.09. For Ryder System Inc (NYSE:R), Baird upgraded the previous rating of Neutral to Outperform. In the second quarter, Ryder System showed an EPS of $3.61, compared to $4.43 from the year-ago quarter. The current stock performance of Ryder System shows a 52-week-high of $102.36 and a 52-week-low of $65.75. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $101.13. According to Citigroup, the prior rating for Ionis Pharmaceuticals Inc (NASDAQ:IONS) was changed from Neutral to Buy. In the first quarter, Ionis Pharmaceuticals showed an EPS of $0.68, compared to $0.27 from the year-ago quarter. At the moment, the stock has a 52-week-high of $48.82 and a 52-week-low of $32.69. Ionis Pharmaceuticals closed at $39.79 at the end of the last trading period. According to Goldman Sachs, the prior rating for Chevron Corp (NYSE:CVX) was changed from Neutral to Buy. In the second ...Full story available on Benzinga.com
Above 50MA
37.18%
Net New Highs
+51081