IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: Blank Capital Research ("BCR") is a technology platform, not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer. The algorithmically generated signals, scores, and rankings provided on this site ("God Mode" Signals) are for informational and research purposes only and do not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to sell or solicit an offer to buy any securities.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS: The "timing scores" and "regime signals" displayed are based on quantitative models. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not actually been executed, the results may have under-or-over compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity.
RISK OF LOSS: Trading in financial markets involves a high degree of risk and may result in the loss of your entire investment. Data provided by third-party sources (Intrinio, Snowflake) is believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
© 2026 Blank Capital Research. All rights reserved. System Version: Aegis V8 (God Mode).
Verdict
Quantitative factor alignment verified for current market regime.
Quant Score
Rank
#4548
Positioning
Market Dominance
Construction
Construction
$47M
Chi Ming Lam
Our mission is to become the leading wet trades works services provider in Hong Kong. Our principal executive office is located in San Po Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong. Our agent for service of process in the United States is Cogency Global Inc., located at 122 East 42nd Street, 18th Floor, New York, NY.
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
X-AXIS: EV/EBITDA (LOWER = CHEAPER) | Y-AXIS: ROE (HIGHER = ELITE) | RED CIRCLE = MSW ANALYSIS TARGET
| Stock | Rating | Score▼ | Quality | Value | Momentum | P/E | EV/EBITDA | ROE | ROA | Gross Mgn | Op Mgn | Net Mgn | Rev Growth | Div Yield | D/E | Mkt Cap | AUDIT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$FER Ferrovial SE | 76 | 89 | 94 | 72 | - | - | 162.2% | 12.2% | 87.8% | 88.9% | 38.1% | 0.5% | 2.1% | - | $30.3B | VS | |
$CX CEMEX SAB DE CV | 74 | 81 | 87 | 87 | - | - | 7.8% | 3.5% | 33.6% | 11.2% | 5.9% | -2.1% | 1.1% | 60.0x | $32.6B | VS | |
$MWA Mueller Water Products, Inc. | 69 | 85 | 87 | 57 | 17.9x | 11.0x | 21.4% | 11.0% | 36.1% | 18.2% | 13.4% | 8.8% | 1.1% | 46.0x | $4.0B | VS | |
$TOL Toll Brothers, Inc. | 69 | 83 | 92 | 63 | 7.9x | 5.6x | 16.9% | 9.7% | 25.1% | 15.7% | 12.3% | 1.1% | 0.7% | 34.0x | $13.0B | VS | |
$GFF GRIFFON CORP | 68 | 86 | 82 | 60 | - | - | 34.2% | 2.3% | 42.0% | 8.2% | 2.0% | -4.0% | 0.9% | 1909.0x | $3.5B | VS | |
$FIX COMFORT SYSTEMS USA INC | 68 | 80 | 43 | 97 | 25.0x | 18.1x | 52.7% | 19.4% | 24.8% | 15.5% | 11.9% | 35.2% | 0.2% | 6.0x | $29.1B | VS | |
$BBU Brookfield Business Partners L.P. | 66 | 63 | 94 | 68 | - | - | 5.0% | 1.1% | 14.1% | 7.2% | 2.2% | -26.2% | 1.1% | 1081.0x | $1.7B | VS | |
$PHOE Phoenix Asia Holdings Ltd | 64 | 95 | 97 | 40 | - | - | 42.6% | 22.6% | 29.5% | 17.6% | 13.9% | 28.1% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $6M | VS | |
$EME EMCOR Group, Inc. | 64 | 75 | 42 | 80 | 24.6x | 16.0x | 36.5% | 14.0% | 19.4% | 9.4% | 6.9% | 16.4% | 0.1% | 3.0x | $29.1B | VS | |
$DY DYCOM INDUSTRIES INC | 64 | 68 | 58 | 89 | 19.9x | 9.7x | 29.4% | 11.8% | 22.1% | 10.4% | 7.3% | 14.1% | 0.0% | 63.0x | $8.5B | VS | |
$MSW Ming Shing Group Holdings Ltd | 30 | 9 | 11 | 7 | - | - | -2329.6% | -170.8% | -3.9% | -15.8% | -16.9% | 22.8% | 0.0% | 775.0x | $47M | ||
| SECTOR BENCH | - | - | - | - | - | 19.1x | 10.7x | 14.2% | 5.9% | 23.7% | 7.3% | 5.4% | 1.9% | 0.0% | 0.4x | - | REF |
Ming Shing Group Holdings Ltd (MSW) receives a "Avoid" rating with a composite score of 29.6/100. It ranks #4548 out of 7,333 stocks in our coverage universe and carries a 1-star rating. Ratings are driven by a 6-factor quantitative model measuring quality, value, momentum, investment, stability, and short interest.
Sign in to join the discussion.
YOY expansion rate
Core pricing power
Operating efficiency
Bottom-line conversion
Equity capital efficiency
Asset base utilization
Financial leverage load
Direct cash return
Chi Ming Lam
Chief Executive Officer
9
57
31
Audit Verdict: Lower quality and stability scores may indicate governance concerns.
No recent insider transactions available for MSW
Lagging peers — losers tend to keep underperforming
Expensive relative to fundamentals — limited margin of safety
Weak fundamentals — higher risk of value trap
High volatility — wider range of outcomes increases timing risk
Moderate investment profile
Below-average composite — caution warranted
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Relative valuation derived from Construction sector benchmarks. Model weights: EV/EBITDA (40%), P/B (35%), P/S (25%). Re-calculated daily.
No analyst ratings for MSW.
View All RatingsInsufficient data for Financial Analysis
| Factor | Global | Sector | Tilt |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROFITABILITY | 9 | 2 | +7ALPHA |
| MOMENTUM | 7 | 3 | +4NEUTRAL |
| VALUATION | 11 | 6 | +5NEUTRAL |
| INVESTMENT | 57 | 94 | -37DRAG |
| STABILITY | 31 | 23 | +8ALPHA |
| SHORT INT | 92 | 98 | -6DRAG |
Global = full universe. Sector = relative to industry peers. Positive tilt indicates idiosyncratic strength.
ROIC -57.3% vs WACC 8.3% (spread -65.7%)
GM -4% vs sector 24%, OM -16% vs sector 7%
Capital turnover 4.59x
Rev growth 23%, 2yr history
Interest coverage -10.5x
Composite assessment of profitability, capital efficiency, and financial strength. Top-tier entities demonstrate sustainable cash flow generation and elite competitive moats.
Profit generated per dollar of shareholder equity
Efficiency of asset utilization
Pricing power and cost efficiency
Core business profitability
Bottom-line profitability
The Quality factor evaluates the persistence and magnitude of realized cash flows. Companies with scores >70 exhibit superior pricing power and structural financial resilience through diverse economic regimes.
Our uncertainty rating tracks the predictability of future cash flows and potential for permanent capital loss. Moderate visibility with standard industry cyclicality.
Our quantitative model flags Ming Shing Group Holdings Ltd with an Avoid rating, assigning a composite score of 29.6/100 and 1 out of 5 stars. Ranked #4548 of 7,333 stocks, MSW falls in the bottom tier across key factors. Historically, stocks with this profile have faced elevated risk of underperformance and capital loss.
Ming Shing Group Holdings Ltd registers a weak quality score of just 9/100, indicating significant profitability challenges. The company reports a return on equity of -2329.6% (sector avg: 14.2%), gross margins of -3.9% (sector avg: 23.7%), net margins of -16.9% (sector avg: 5.4%). Low quality scores are often associated with businesses in turnaround mode, early-stage growth, or structurally challenged industries.
MSW registers a value score of just 11/100, suggesting the stock trades at a significant premium to its fundamental metrics. Key valuation metrics include a P/B ratio of 16.48x. High-premium valuations like this require strong future execution to avoid multiple compression, and downside risk is elevated if growth disappoints.
With an investment score of 57/100, MSW exhibits moderate growth-oriented spending. Key growth metrics include revenue growth of 22.8% vs. a sector average of 1.9% and a return on assets of -170.8% (sector: 5.9%). The company appears to be balancing growth investments with capital returns, though the pace of investment may not be enough to accelerate top-line growth meaningfully.
Ming Shing Group Holdings Ltd is experiencing notably weak momentum with a score of just 7/100. The stock has underperformed its peers and is trending below major moving averages. Revenue growth stands at 22.8% year-over-year, while a beta of 0.45 reflects its sensitivity to broader market moves. While deep momentum weakness can occasionally present value opportunities, it often reflects deteriorating fundamentals or structural headwinds that may persist.
MSW's stability score of 31/100 signals elevated volatility and/or leverage concerns. Key stability metrics include a beta of 0.45 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 775.00x (sector avg: 0.4x). Investors should be prepared for wider-than-average price swings and consider position sizing accordingly to manage portfolio risk.
MSW's short interest factor score of 92/100 indicates very low short selling activity relative to peers — a positive signal suggesting institutional investors see limited near-term downside. Specific risk factors include elevated leverage (D/E: 775.00x), micro-cap liquidity risk. As a micro-cap company with a market capitalization of $47M, Ming Shing Group Holdings Ltd benefits from the generally lower volatility and deeper liquidity associated with its size class.
Ming Shing Group Holdings Ltd is a micro-cap company in the Construction sector, ranked #0 of 50 in its sector (100th percentile) and #4548 of 7,333 overall (38th percentile). Key comparisons include ROE of -2329.6% trailing the 14.2% sector median and operating margins of -15.8% below the 7.3% sector average. This top-quartile standing reflects exceptional competitive strength relative to Construction peers.
While MSW currently exhibits a AVOID profile, superior opportunities exist within the CONSTRUCTION sector. Our model identifies several "Strong Buy" candidates with higher quality scores and more attractive valuations among direct industry competitors.
View Top Construction Alpha →Quant Factor Profile
Upgrade catalyst
Improvement in Momentum (7) would have the largest impact on the composite score.
ROE 16564% BELOW SECTOR MEDIAN
Gross Margin 116% BELOW SECTOR MEDIAN
Op. Margin 315% BELOW SECTOR MEDIAN
AUDIT DATA AS OF MAR 31, 2025 (Q4 FY2024)
We rate Ming Shing Group Holdings Ltd (MSW) as Avoid with a composite score of 29.6/100 at a current price of $1.10. The stock falls in the bottom quintile of our universe across key quantitative factors, and the multi-factor weakness suggests a high probability of continued underperformance.
The rating is primarily driven by strength in investment (57th percentile) and stability (31th percentile), which together account for the majority of the composite score. Offsetting weakness in momentum (7th percentile) and quality (9th percentile) tempers our overall conviction. We assign a No Moat rating (25/100), Very High uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation.
Key items to watch: momentum to confirm whether the current price trend has legs; balance sheet deleveraging progress; sustainability of the current growth rate. Any material change in these dynamics could warrant a reassessment of our rating. The moat trend is stable, which suggests the competitive landscape is stable for now.
Ming Shing Group Holdings Ltd holds a top-quartile position (#0 of 50) within the Construction sector, based on our composite quantitative scoring across quality, value, momentum, and stability factors. The composite score of 29.6/100 places it at rank #4548 in our full 7,333-stock universe. At $47M in market capitalization, Ming Shing Group Holdings Ltd is a small-cap player in the Construction space, which limits certain scale advantages but may allow for more agile strategic execution.
Revenue is growing at 23%, though momentum at the 7th percentile suggests the market has not yet fully recognized this trajectory. This potential disconnect between fundamental improvement and market recognition could represent an opportunity for patient investors if the growth trend persists.
The margin cascade tells an important story: gross margins of -4% (-27.6pp vs sector) narrow to operating margins of -16% (-23.2pp vs sector) and net margins of -16.9%, yielding a gross-to-net conversion rate of N/A%. The significant margin erosion from gross to net suggests elevated operating expenses, high interest costs, or other structural drags that warrant monitoring.
At a current price of $1.10, Ming Shing Group Holdings Ltd is trading at a premium to fundamental value. Our value factor score of 11/100 reflects a composite assessment across multiple valuation metrics including price-to-earnings, price-to-book, EV/EBITDA, and price-to-sales ratios relative to both sector peers and the broader market. The premium valuation implies the market is pricing in significant future growth or quality improvements that are not yet fully reflected in current fundamentals.
The stock currently trades at P/B of 16.5x, P/S of 0.1x. We evaluate these multiples in the context of both absolute levels and sector-relative positioning to form our valuation view.
Revenue growth of 23% confirms the business is expanding its addressable market — growth at this level typically supports multiple expansion and attracts institutional capital.
The Avoid rating (composite 29.6/100) reflects multi-factor weakness, and historically, stocks in this scoring range have underperformed the market by a meaningful margin.
Elevated leverage (775% D/E) amplifies downside risk and limits management's financial flexibility in adverse scenarios.
Thin net margins of -16.9% provide limited cushion against cost pressures, competitive pricing, or macroeconomic headwinds — even small changes in costs could swing the company to a loss.
Weak momentum (7th percentile) suggests institutional selling pressure and unfavorable technical dynamics that may persist.
We assign a Very High uncertainty rating to Ming Shing Group Holdings Ltd. The stock exhibits multiple compounding risk factors: significant leverage (775% debt-to-equity), current negative profitability (net margin -16.9%), below-average price stability (31th percentile). The extreme uncertainty around future cash flows makes precise valuation difficult, and the range of outcomes is exceptionally wide. Only investors with high risk tolerance and extended time horizons should consider this name.
Specific risk factors that inform our assessment include: significant leverage (775% debt-to-equity); current negative profitability (net margin -16.9%); below-average price stability (31th percentile); weak quality scores (9th percentile). Each of these factors independently widens the distribution of potential outcomes, and in combination they create a risk profile that demands careful position sizing. The stability factor at the 31th percentile and quality factor at the 9th percentile provide a quantitative summary of the overall risk landscape.
We identify limited risk mitigants at this time, which contributes to our very high uncertainty assessment. Investors should monitor for improvement in balance sheet metrics, margin stability, and business predictability that could warrant a downgrade in our risk assessment over time.
We rate Ming Shing Group Holdings Ltd's capital allocation as Poor. Key concerns include low returns on equity (-2329.6%), elevated leverage (775% D/E), negative profitability, weak asset returns (ROA -170.8%). Exemplary capital allocators generate ROE above 20% and maintain conservative leverage — Ming Shing Group Holdings Ltd significantly underperforms these benchmarks, raising questions about management's ability to create shareholder value.
Investors should scrutinize management's reinvestment decisions and balance sheet trajectory before committing capital. Poor capital allocation often compounds over time: overlevered balance sheets limit strategic flexibility, while low returns on capital destroy shareholder value. We would need to see sustained improvement in profitability metrics and balance sheet discipline before considering an upgrade.
In summary, Ming Shing Group Holdings Ltd receives a Avoid rating with a composite score of 29.6/100 (rank #4548 of 7,333). Our quantitative framework assigns a No Moat (25/100, trend: stable), Very High uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation. The average factor score across quality, value, momentum, stability, and investment is 23/100.
Our analysis does not support a constructive view on Ming Shing Group Holdings Ltd at this time. The combination of limited competitive advantages, very high uncertainty, and poor capital allocation suggests unfavorable risk-reward at current levels. We recommend investors avoid new positions and existing holders consider reducing exposure.
Analysis derived from Blank Capital Research quantitative terminal. For informational purposes only. No trade solicitation. Past performance not indicative of future results. Consult a qualified advisor.
We do not assign Ming Shing Group Holdings Ltd a meaningful economic moat, scoring 25/100 on our composite assessment. The ROIC-WACC spread of -65.7% is the primary signal of economic value creation. Current fundamentals do not demonstrate the kind of durable competitive advantages — such as superior returns on invested capital, margin superiority, or reinvestment efficiency — that would protect the company from competitive erosion over the long term. The highest-scoring pillar, growth durability, reached only 12.6/20.
The strongest moat sources are growth durability (12.6/20) and reinvestment efficiency (10/20). Rev growth 23%, 2yr history. Capital turnover 4.59x. These pillars form the core of Ming Shing Group Holdings Ltd's competitive identity and are the primary drivers of excess returns in our framework.
Areas of relative weakness include economic value creation (0/20) and margin superiority (1.1/20). ROIC -57.3% vs WACC 8.3% (spread -65.7%). Improvement in these areas could meaningfully widen the moat over time, while deterioration would be an early warning of competitive erosion.
Our moat trend assessment is Stable. Multi-year ROIC and operating margin trajectories show neither meaningful improvement nor deterioration, suggesting the competitive position is steady. We expect Ming Shing Group Holdings Ltd's moat profile to remain largely unchanged absent a material shift in return on capital or industry dynamics.
Key profit drivers include robust top-line growth of 23% expanding the revenue base. The margin cascade from -4% gross to -16% operating to -16.9% net reveals the company's cost structure and reinvestment intensity. Our analysis indicates that profit quality raises some durability concerns, with the quality factor at the 9th percentile.
The margin profile shows gross margins of -4%, operating margins of -16%, net margins of -16.9%. Return metrics include ROE of -2329.6% and ROA of -170.8%. Relative to the Construction sector, gross margins are 27.6 percentage points below the sector median of 24%, and ROE of -2329.6% compares to a sector median of 14.2%.
The balance sheet reflects high leverage with D/E of 775%, which may limit financial flexibility, revenue growth of 23%. The sector median D/E is 0%, putting Ming Shing Group Holdings Ltd at higher leverage than the typical peer. Elevated leverage in combination with the current margin profile warrants close monitoring for any deterioration in debt-servicing capacity.
Below-average quality (9th percentile) raises durability concerns about the fundamental profile and increases the risk of negative earnings surprises.
Above 50MA
37.18%
Net New Highs
+51081
Hong Kong, Dec. 03, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (the “Company” or “Ming Shing”) (NASDAQ: MSW), a Hong Kong-based company mainly engaged in wet trades works whose mission it is to become the leading wet trades works service provider in Hong Kong, announces a significant update in its board of directors (the “Board of Directors”). Ming Shing announces the resignation of Wai Chun Chik as an independent director. Ms. Chik has indicated her resignation is for personal r