IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: Blank Capital Research ("BCR") is a technology platform, not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer. The algorithmically generated signals, scores, and rankings provided on this site ("God Mode" Signals) are for informational and research purposes only and do not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to sell or solicit an offer to buy any securities.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS: The "timing scores" and "regime signals" displayed are based on quantitative models. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not actually been executed, the results may have under-or-over compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity.
RISK OF LOSS: Trading in financial markets involves a high degree of risk and may result in the loss of your entire investment. Data provided by third-party sources (Intrinio, Snowflake) is believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
© 2026 Blank Capital Research. All rights reserved. System Version: Aegis V8 (God Mode).
Verdict
Quantitative factor alignment verified for current market regime.
Quant Score
Rank
#1208
Positioning
Market Dominance
Services
Entertainment
$5.5B
Andrew S. Lustgarten
Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. operates as a professional sports company. The company owns and operates a portfolio of assets consists of the New York Knickerbockers of the National Basketball Association NBA and New York Rangers of the NHL. It also owns Knicks Gaming, an esports franchise that competes in the NBA 2K League.
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
X-AXIS: EV/EBITDA (LOWER = CHEAPER) | Y-AXIS: ROE (HIGHER = ELITE) | RED CIRCLE = MSGS ANALYSIS TARGET
| Stock | Rating | Score▼ | Quality | Value | Momentum | P/E | EV/EBITDA | ROE | ROA | Gross Mgn | Op Mgn | Net Mgn | Rev Growth | Div Yield | D/E | Mkt Cap | AUDIT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$YALA Yalla Group Ltd | 75 | 89 | 99 | 80 | - | - | 21.3% | 18.6% | 64.5% | 35.7% | 39.5% | 6.5% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $644M | VS | |
$GRVY GRAVITY Co., Ltd. | 75 | 82 | 96 | 71 | - | - | 15.4% | 12.6% | 38.7% | 17.1% | 17.0% | -39.7% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $439M | VS | |
$ISSC INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS & SUPPORT INC | 73 | 81 | 88 | 94 | 25.0x | 14.1x | 28.1% | 16.8% | 48.1% | 23.8% | 18.5% | 78.6% | 0.0% | 37.0x | $220M | VS | |
$AER AerCap Holdings N.V. | 72 | 60 | 87 | 84 | - | - | 12.4% | 2.9% | 100.0% | 28.2% | 26.2% | 5.5% | 0.8% | 264.0x | $19.4B | VS | |
$HCSG HEALTHCARE SERVICES GROUP INC | 72 | 74 | 88 | 88 | 7.1x | 6.1x | 28.9% | 20.8% | 20.8% | 9.9% | 9.3% | 8.5% | 0.0% | 1.0x | $1.2B | VS | |
$LQDT LIQUIDITY SERVICES INC | 72 | 90 | 88 | 68 | 24.9x | 14.3x | 14.6% | 7.8% | 43.8% | 7.4% | 5.9% | 31.2% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $857M | VS | |
$TRTNpA Triton International Ltd | 71 | 70 | 89 | 70 | - | 1.7x | 18.0% | 4.6% | 97.3% | 52.2% | 32.7% | -3.4% | 0.0% | 271.0x | $8.0B | VS | |
$EDU New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. | 71 | 83 | 52 | 77 | - | - | 9.4% | 4.9% | 55.5% | 8.7% | 7.7% | 13.6% | 1.3% | 7.0x | $78.0B | VS | |
$NTES NetEase, Inc. | 71 | 88 | 93 | 68 | - | - | 22.1% | 15.6% | 62.5% | 28.1% | 28.7% | -1.0% | 2.8% | 9.0x | $56.6B | VS | |
$UTI UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC | 70 | 86 | 86 | 72 | 43.2x | 16.0x | 21.4% | 8.0% | 100.0% | 10.0% | 7.5% | 14.1% | 0.0% | 27.0x | $1.8B | VS | |
$MSGS Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. | 56 | 26 | 39 | 89 | 923.8x | 435.1x | 8.3% | -1.5% | 56.8% | -31.5% | -11.5% | -6.2% | 0.0% | - | $5.5B | ||
| SECTOR BENCH | - | - | - | - | - | 23.7x | 11.7x | 5.3% | 1.9% | 59.6% | 3.5% | 2.3% | 7.8% | 0.0% | 0.3x | - | REF |
Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. (MSGS) receives a "Hold" rating with a composite score of 55.5/100. It ranks #1208 out of 7,333 stocks in our coverage universe and carries a 3-star rating. Ratings are driven by a 6-factor quantitative model measuring quality, value, momentum, investment, stability, and short interest.
Sign in to join the discussion.
YOY expansion rate
Core pricing power
Operating efficiency
Bottom-line conversion
Equity capital efficiency
Asset base utilization
Direct cash return
Andrew S. Lustgarten
Chief Executive Officer
Labor Force
890
26
35
79
Audit Verdict: Lower quality and stability scores may indicate governance concerns.
No recent insider transactions available for MSGS
Outperforming peers — winners tend to keep winning over 3-12 months
Fair valuation relative to peers
Weak fundamentals — higher risk of value trap
Low volatility — smoother ride and historically better risk-adjusted returns
Moderate investment profile
Mid-range overall rating
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Relative valuation derived from Services sector benchmarks. Model weights: EV/EBITDA (40%), P/B (35%), P/S (25%). Re-calculated daily.
Projection based on user-defined inputs. Re-calculated daily against current market data.
Reverse DCF Framework — Mauboussin Methodology
Institutional-grade Reverse DCF analysis. This model identifies the growth hurdles embedded in current market prices. When implied growth is significantly lower than historical or projected rates, a margin of safety may exist. Re-audited daily.
No analyst ratings for MSGS.
View All RatingsMaterial decline in asset turnover efficiency detected
High margin volatility — erratic forensic earnings quality
| Factor | Global | Sector | Tilt |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROFITABILITY | 26 | 11 | +15ALPHA |
| MOMENTUM | 89 | 96 | -7DRAG |
| VALUATION | 39 | 35 | +4NEUTRAL |
| INVESTMENT | 35 | 56 | -21DRAG |
| STABILITY | 79 | 87 | -8DRAG |
| SHORT INT | 60 | 75 | -15DRAG |
Global = full universe. Sector = relative to industry peers. Positive tilt indicates idiosyncratic strength.
ROE proxy 8.3% (sector 5.3%)
GM 57% vs sector 60%, OM -31% vs sector 4%
Capital turnover N/A
Rev growth -6%, 11yr history
Interest coverage N/A
Composite assessment of profitability, capital efficiency, and financial strength. Top-tier entities demonstrate sustainable cash flow generation and elite competitive moats.
Profit generated per dollar of shareholder equity
Efficiency of asset utilization
Pricing power and cost efficiency
Core business profitability
Bottom-line profitability
The Quality factor evaluates the persistence and magnitude of realized cash flows. Companies with scores >70 exhibit superior pricing power and structural financial resilience through diverse economic regimes.
Our uncertainty rating tracks the predictability of future cash flows and potential for permanent capital loss. Moderate visibility with standard industry cyclicality.
Our model assigns Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. a Hold rating, with a composite score of 55.5/100 and 3 out of 5 stars. Ranked #1208 of 7,333 stocks, MSGS presents a mixed quantitative picture — neither compelling enough to initiate new positions nor weak enough to warrant selling. Investors already holding may consider maintaining their position while monitoring for changes in the factor profile.
MSGS's quality score of 26/100 is below average, suggesting challenges with profitability or capital efficiency. The company reports a return on equity of 8.3% (sector avg: 5.3%), gross margins of 56.8% (sector avg: 59.6%), net margins of -11.5% (sector avg: 2.3%). Investors should examine whether management is actively addressing these weaknesses or if they reflect structural industry headwinds.
With a value score of 39/100, MSGS appears somewhat expensive relative to its fundamentals. Key valuation metrics include a P/E ratio of 923.79x, an EV/EBITDA of 435.13x. Investors paying a premium here are likely betting on above-average growth or margin expansion to justify current prices.
Madison Square Garden Sports Corp.'s investment score of 35/100 suggests limited reinvestment activity. Key growth metrics include revenue growth of -6.2% vs. a sector average of 7.8% and a return on assets of -1.5% (sector: 1.9%). While this can be positive for mature, cash-generative businesses returning capital to shareholders, it may also signal a lack of growth opportunities or management conservatism.
MSGS shows strong momentum characteristics with a score of 89/100. The stock has been trending above key moving averages, indicating solid demand from institutional buyers. Revenue growth stands at -6.2% year-over-year, while a beta of 0.67 reflects its sensitivity to broader market moves. This level of momentum typically signals sustained investor confidence and favorable near-term price action.
MSGS shows good financial stability with a score of 79/100. Key stability metrics include a beta of 0.67. This suggests manageable leverage and moderate price volatility, making it appropriate for investors seeking a balance between growth potential and capital preservation.
MSGS carries a short interest score of 60/100, indicating moderate short selling activity. This is a neutral reading — not enough to signal systemic bearishness, but worth monitoring. At $5.5B market cap (mid-cap), Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. offers reasonable institutional liquidity.
Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. is a mid-cap company in the Services sector, ranked #0 of 50 in its sector (100th percentile) and #1208 of 7,333 overall (84th percentile). Key comparisons include ROE of 8.3% exceeding the 5.3% sector median and operating margins of -31.5% below the 3.5% sector average. This top-quartile standing reflects exceptional competitive strength relative to Services peers.
While MSGS currently exhibits a HOLD profile, superior opportunities exist within the SERVICES sector. Our model identifies several "Strong Buy" candidates with higher quality scores and more attractive valuations among direct industry competitors.
View Top Services Alpha →Quant Factor Profile
Key factor gap
Momentum (89) vs Quality (26) — closing this gap could shift the rating.
EV/EBITDA 3610% ABOVE SECTOR MEDIAN
ROE 56% ABOVE SECTOR MEDIAN (FAVORABLE)
Gross Margin IN LINE WITH SECTOR BENCHMARKS
AUDIT DATA AS OF DEC 31, 2025 (Q3 FY2025)
We rate Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. (MSGS) as a Hold with a composite score of 55.5/100 at a current price of $314.31. The stock presents a mixed quantitative picture — neither compelling enough to warrant new accumulation nor weak enough to justify selling for existing holders. Our factors are split, and the overall profile suggests patience is warranted.
The rating is primarily driven by strength in momentum (89th percentile) and stability (79th percentile), which together account for the majority of the composite score. Offsetting weakness in quality (26th percentile) and investment (35th percentile) tempers our overall conviction. We assign a No Moat rating (22/100), Medium uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation.
Key items to watch: whether strong momentum is fundamentally supported by revenue trends; the path to profitability. Any material change in these dynamics could warrant a reassessment of our rating. The moat trend is stable, which suggests the competitive landscape is stable for now.
Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. holds a top-quartile position (#0 of 50) within the Services sector, based on our composite quantitative scoring across quality, value, momentum, and stability factors. The composite score of 55.5/100 places it at rank #1208 in our full 7,333-stock universe. At $5.5B in market capitalization, Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. is a mid-cap player in the Services space, which limits certain scale advantages but may allow for more agile strategic execution.
Despite positive momentum (89th percentile), revenue contraction of -6% creates a divergence between price action and fundamental trajectory. This divergence suggests either that the market is looking through near-term weakness or that technical factors are temporarily inflating the stock. Investors should assess whether the revenue decline reflects cyclical weakness or structural challenges.
The margin cascade tells an important story: gross margins of 57% (-2.8pp vs sector) narrow to operating margins of -31% (-35.0pp vs sector) and net margins of -11.5%, yielding a gross-to-net conversion rate of -20%. The significant margin erosion from gross to net suggests elevated operating expenses, high interest costs, or other structural drags that warrant monitoring.
At a current price of $314.31, Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. is trading at a premium to fundamental value. Our value factor score of 39/100 reflects a composite assessment across multiple valuation metrics including price-to-earnings, price-to-book, EV/EBITDA, and price-to-sales ratios relative to both sector peers and the broader market. The premium valuation implies the market is pricing in significant future growth or quality improvements that are not yet fully reflected in current fundamentals.
The stock currently trades at a P/E of 923.8x (a 3791% premium to the sector median of 23.7x), EV/EBITDA of 435.1x (at a premium), P/S of 8.6x. The above-sector P/E multiple suggests the market is pricing in superior growth or quality, which our analysis finds only partially justified by current fundamentals.
Gross margins of 57% signal strong pricing power and brand/IP advantages — businesses with margins above 40% have historically demonstrated more resilient earnings through economic cycles.
Positive momentum (89th percentile) indicates institutional accumulation and favorable technical dynamics that tend to persist in the intermediate term.
A P/E of 923.8x leaves little room for execution misses — any earnings disappointment could trigger a sharp multiple compression.
Revenue decline of -6% signals business deterioration — declining revenues make it difficult to grow into the current valuation and often precede further negative revisions.
Thin net margins of -11.5% provide limited cushion against cost pressures, competitive pricing, or macroeconomic headwinds — even small changes in costs could swing the company to a loss.
We assign a Medium uncertainty rating to Madison Square Garden Sports Corp.. The stock presents a balanced risk profile: current negative profitability (net margin -11.5%) and weak quality scores (26th percentile). While not risk-free, the core business fundamentals are adequate to withstand moderate economic stress, and the range of potential outcomes around our fair value estimate is manageable.
Specific risk factors that inform our assessment include: current negative profitability (net margin -11.5%); weak quality scores (26th percentile); low beta of 0.67 — while defensive, this may indicate limited upside participation in bull markets; elevated valuation multiple (P/E 923.8x) that leaves limited margin for error. Each of these factors independently widens the distribution of potential outcomes, and in combination they create a risk profile that demands careful position sizing. The stability factor at the 79th percentile and quality factor at the 26th percentile provide a quantitative summary of the overall risk landscape.
Key risk mitigants include: healthy gross margins of 57% provide a buffer against cost pressures; above-average stability (79th percentile) suggests predictable business dynamics. These factors partially offset the identified risks and provide downside protection in adverse scenarios. On balance, the risk-reward profile is favorable for long-term investors.
We rate Madison Square Garden Sports Corp.'s capital allocation as Poor. Key concerns include negative profitability, weak asset returns (ROA -1.5%). Exemplary capital allocators generate ROE above 20% and maintain conservative leverage — Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. significantly underperforms these benchmarks, raising questions about management's ability to create shareholder value.
Investors should scrutinize management's reinvestment decisions and balance sheet trajectory before committing capital. Poor capital allocation often compounds over time: overlevered balance sheets limit strategic flexibility, while low returns on capital destroy shareholder value. We would need to see sustained improvement in profitability metrics and balance sheet discipline before considering an upgrade.
In summary, Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. receives a Hold rating with a composite score of 55.5/100 (rank #1208 of 7,333). Our quantitative framework assigns a No Moat (22/100, trend: stable), Medium uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation. The average factor score across quality, value, momentum, stability, and investment is 54/100.
Our analysis supports a neutral stance on Madison Square Garden Sports Corp.. While the quantitative profile is not weak enough to warrant selling, it lacks the multi-factor strength required for a buy recommendation. Existing holders should maintain positions and monitor for catalysts — either fundamental improvement or valuation compression — that would shift the risk-reward balance.
Analysis derived from Blank Capital Research quantitative terminal. For informational purposes only. No trade solicitation. Past performance not indicative of future results. Consult a qualified advisor.
We do not assign Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. a meaningful economic moat, scoring 22/100 on our composite assessment. Current fundamentals do not demonstrate the kind of durable competitive advantages — such as superior returns on invested capital, margin superiority, or reinvestment efficiency — that would protect the company from competitive erosion over the long term. The highest-scoring pillar, growth durability, reached only 12.1/20.
The strongest moat sources are growth durability (12.1/20) and margin superiority (5/20). Rev growth -6%, 11yr history. GM 57% vs sector 60%, OM -31% vs sector 4%. These pillars form the core of Madison Square Garden Sports Corp.'s competitive identity and are the primary drivers of excess returns in our framework.
Areas of relative weakness include reinvestment efficiency (0/20) and financial resilience (2.1/20). Capital turnover N/A. Improvement in these areas could meaningfully widen the moat over time, while deterioration would be an early warning of competitive erosion.
Our moat trend assessment is Stable. Multi-year ROIC and operating margin trajectories show neither meaningful improvement nor deterioration, suggesting the competitive position is steady. We expect Madison Square Garden Sports Corp.'s moat profile to remain largely unchanged absent a material shift in return on capital or industry dynamics.
Key profit drivers include gross margins of 57% providing a solid profitability foundation, declining revenues (-6%) that pressure the earnings outlook. The margin cascade from 57% gross to -31% operating to -11.5% net reveals the company's cost structure and reinvestment intensity. Our analysis indicates that profit quality raises some durability concerns, with the quality factor at the 26th percentile.
The margin profile shows gross margins of 57%, operating margins of -31%, net margins of -11.5%. Return metrics include ROE of 8.3% and ROA of -1.5%. Relative to the Services sector, gross margins are 2.8 percentage points below the sector median of 60%, and ROE of 8.3% compares to a sector median of 5.3%.
The balance sheet reflects revenue growth of -6%. Overall balance sheet health is adequate for the current business environment.
Below-average quality (26th percentile) raises durability concerns about the fundamental profile and increases the risk of negative earnings surprises.
Above 50MA
37.18%
Net New Highs
+51081

Royal Caribbean Cruises, Carnival Corporation and Madison Square Garden Sports have been highlighted in this Industry Outlook article.

The Leisure & Recreation Services industry benefits from optimizing business processes and robust demand for cruising. RCL, CCL and MSGS are well-positioned to capitalize on these.