IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: Blank Capital Research ("BCR") is a technology platform, not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer. The algorithmically generated signals, scores, and rankings provided on this site ("God Mode" Signals) are for informational and research purposes only and do not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to sell or solicit an offer to buy any securities.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS: The "timing scores" and "regime signals" displayed are based on quantitative models. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not actually been executed, the results may have under-or-over compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity.
RISK OF LOSS: Trading in financial markets involves a high degree of risk and may result in the loss of your entire investment. Data provided by third-party sources (Intrinio, Snowflake) is believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
© 2026 Blank Capital Research. All rights reserved. System Version: Aegis V8 (God Mode).
Verdict
Quantitative factor alignment verified for current market regime.
Quant Score
Rank
#3247
Positioning
Market Dominance
Manufacturing
Pharmaceutical Products
$108M
Diana M. Brainard
Allovir, Inc., a clinical-stage cell therapy company, engages in the research and development of allogeneic, off-the-shelf multi-virus specific T cell (VST) therapies. The company's lead product is posoleucel, which is an allogenic off the shelf VST therapy. Its preclinical and clinical development product candidates include ALVR106 for the respiratory syncytial virus, influenza, parainfluenza virus, and human metapneumovirus; ALVR109 to treat SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19.
Headcount
110
HQ Base
Pending Verification
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
| Stock | Rating | Score▼ | Quality | Value | Momentum | P/E | EV/EBITDA | ROE | ROA | Gross Mgn | Op Mgn | Net Mgn | Rev Growth | Div Yield | D/E | Mkt Cap | AUDIT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$UL UNILEVER PLC | 78 | 96 | 98 | 59 | - | - | 28.5% | 8.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 10.4% | -4.6% | 3.3% | 0.0x | $141.8B | VS | |
$ASML ASML HOLDING NV | 77 | 89 | 86 | 83 | - | - | 46.1% | 16.6% | 51.3% | 31.9% | 26.8% | -4.0% | 1.0% | 25.0x | $272.1B | VS | |
$ESLT ELBIT SYSTEMS LTD | 76 | 81 | 87 | 85 | - | - | 10.3% | 3.1% | 24.1% | 7.2% | 4.7% | 14.3% | 0.8% | 25.0x | $11.4B | VS | |
$MT ArcelorMittal | 75 | 71 | 98 | 85 | - | - | 2.2% | 1.5% | 9.3% | 5.3% | 2.2% | -8.5% | 2.2% | 16.0x | $18.9B | VS | |
$AMAT APPLIED MATERIALS INC /DE | 75 | 85 | 87 | 84 | 20.9x | 13.6x | 35.5% | 19.8% | 48.7% | 29.2% | 24.7% | 4.4% | 0.8% | 32.0x | $181.9B | VS | |
$SIMO Silicon Motion Technology CORP | 75 | 84 | 86 | 85 | - | - | 11.8% | 8.8% | 45.9% | 11.3% | 11.1% | 25.7% | 3.7% | 0.0x | $1.8B | VS | |
$CODA Coda Octopus Group, Inc. | 74 | 83 | 90 | 79 | 16.3x | 11.9x | 7.6% | 7.0% | 66.5% | 17.1% | 15.6% | 39.0% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $115M | VS | |
$GSK GSK plc | 74 | 84 | 90 | 70 | - | - | 22.6% | 4.9% | 71.2% | 12.8% | 9.4% | 1.7% | 5.9% | 124.0x | $72.1B | VS | |
$EFXT Enerflex Ltd. | 74 | 80 | 91 | 83 | - | - | 3.0% | 1.1% | 20.9% | 7.3% | 1.3% | 3.0% | 0.9% | 67.0x | $1.2B | VS | |
$BUD Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV | 74 | 84 | 97 | 63 | - | - | 8.2% | 3.5% | 55.3% | 25.9% | 12.4% | 0.7% | 1.7% | 0.0x | $87.0B | VS | |
$KLRS Allovir, Inc. | 42 | 28 | 38 | 66 | - | - | -170.8% | -88.1% | - | - | - | - | 0.0% | 94.0x | $108M | ||
| SECTOR BENCH | - | - | - | - | - | 22.3x | 11.5x | -2.5% | -0.1% | 42.5% | 1.3% | -0.2% | 5.9% | 0.0% | 0.2x | - | REF |
Allovir, Inc. (KLRS) receives a "Reduce" rating with a composite score of 42.2/100. It ranks #3247 out of 7,333 stocks in our coverage universe and carries a 2-star rating. Ratings are driven by a 6-factor quantitative model measuring quality, value, momentum, investment, stability, and short interest.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Equity capital efficiency
Asset base utilization
Financial leverage load
Direct cash return
Diana M. Brainard
Chief Executive Officer
Labor Force
110
28
25
32
Audit Verdict: Lower quality and stability scores may indicate governance concerns.
No recent insider transactions available for KLRS
Outperforming peers — winners tend to keep winning over 3-12 months
Fair valuation relative to peers
Weak fundamentals — higher risk of value trap
High volatility — wider range of outcomes increases timing risk
Aggressive spending — empire-building risk, dilutive growth
Mid-range overall rating
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Relative valuation derived from Manufacturing sector benchmarks. Model weights: EV/EBITDA (40%), P/B (35%), P/S (25%). Re-calculated daily.
No analyst ratings for KLRS.
View All RatingsInsufficient data for Financial Analysis
ROE proxy -170.8% (sector -2.5%)
GM N/A vs sector 43%, OM N/A vs sector 1%
Capital turnover N/A
Rev growth N/A, 6yr history
Interest coverage N/A
Composite assessment of profitability, capital efficiency, and financial strength. Top-tier entities demonstrate sustainable cash flow generation and elite competitive moats.
Profit generated per dollar of shareholder equity
Efficiency of asset utilization
Pricing power and cost efficiency
Core business profitability
Bottom-line profitability
The Quality factor evaluates the persistence and magnitude of realized cash flows. Companies with scores >70 exhibit superior pricing power and structural financial resilience through diverse economic regimes.
Our uncertainty rating tracks the predictability of future cash flows and potential for permanent capital loss. Moderate visibility with standard industry cyclicality.
Allovir, Inc. receives a Reduce rating from our analysis, with a composite score of 42.2/100 and 2 out of 5 stars, ranking #3247 out of 7,333 stocks. KLRS's factor profile shows weakness across multiple dimensions, suggesting the stock may underperform going forward. Existing holders may want to consider trimming positions or tightening stop-losses.
KLRS's quality score of 28/100 is below average, suggesting challenges with profitability or capital efficiency. The company reports a return on equity of -170.8% (sector avg: -2.5%). Investors should examine whether management is actively addressing these weaknesses or if they reflect structural industry headwinds.
With a value score of 38/100, KLRS appears somewhat expensive relative to its fundamentals. Key valuation metrics include a P/B ratio of 4.47x. Investors paying a premium here are likely betting on above-average growth or margin expansion to justify current prices.
Allovir, Inc.'s investment score of 25/100 suggests limited reinvestment activity. Key growth metrics include a return on assets of -88.1% (sector: -0.1%). While this can be positive for mature, cash-generative businesses returning capital to shareholders, it may also signal a lack of growth opportunities or management conservatism.
KLRS demonstrates moderate momentum with a score of 66/100, suggesting a neutral price trend without strong directional conviction. Revenue growth data is not currently available, while a beta of 0.79 reflects its sensitivity to broader market moves. Moderate momentum may indicate the stock is consolidating or transitioning between trends, warranting close monitoring of upcoming catalysts.
KLRS's stability score of 32/100 signals elevated volatility and/or leverage concerns. Key stability metrics include a beta of 0.79 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 94.00x (sector avg: 0.2x). Investors should be prepared for wider-than-average price swings and consider position sizing accordingly to manage portfolio risk.
Allovir, Inc.'s short interest score of 16/100 reveals significant bearish positioning, suggesting institutional investors are actively betting against the stock. Specific risk factors include elevated leverage (D/E: 94.00x), micro-cap liquidity risk. At $108M (micro-cap), KLRS carries meaningful risk and is best suited for investors with high risk tolerance who have thoroughly evaluated the bear thesis.
Allovir, Inc. is a micro-cap company in the Manufacturing sector, ranked #0 of 50 in its sector (100th percentile) and #3247 of 7,333 overall (56th percentile). Key comparisons include ROE of -170.8% trailing the -2.5% sector median. This top-quartile standing reflects exceptional competitive strength relative to Manufacturing peers.
While KLRS currently exhibits a REDUCE profile, superior opportunities exist within the MANUFACTURING sector. Our model identifies several "Strong Buy" candidates with higher quality scores and more attractive valuations among direct industry competitors.
View Top Manufacturing Alpha →Quant Factor Profile
Upgrade catalyst
Improvement in Short Int. (16) would have the largest impact on the composite score.
ROE 6789% ABOVE SECTOR MEDIAN (FAVORABLE)
Debt/Equity 46900% ABOVE SECTOR MEDIAN
Div. Yield NaN% BELOW SECTOR MEDIAN
AUDIT DATA AS OF SEP 30, 2025 (Q2 FY2025)
We rate Allovir, Inc. (KLRS) as a Reduce with a composite score of 42.2/100 at a current price of $10.96. The quantitative profile shows weakness across multiple dimensions, suggesting limited upside potential and elevated risk of underperformance relative to peers over the next 12 months.
The rating is primarily driven by strength in momentum (66th percentile) and value (38th percentile), which together account for the majority of the composite score. Offsetting weakness in investment (25th percentile) and quality (28th percentile) tempers our overall conviction. We assign a No Moat rating (15/100), Medium uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation.
Key items to watch: quarterly earnings execution and sector-level competitive dynamics. Any material change in these dynamics could warrant a reassessment of our rating. The moat trend is stable, which suggests the competitive landscape is stable for now.
Allovir, Inc. holds a top-quartile position (#0 of 50) within the Manufacturing sector, based on our composite quantitative scoring across quality, value, momentum, and stability factors. The composite score of 42.2/100 places it at rank #3247 in our full 7,333-stock universe. At $108M in market capitalization, Allovir, Inc. is a small-cap player in the Manufacturing space, which limits certain scale advantages but may allow for more agile strategic execution.
Momentum indicators (66th percentile) are constructive regarding the near-term price trend. Revenue growth data is unavailable, limiting our ability to confirm whether momentum is fundamentally supported.
Margin data is not available for Allovir, Inc., which limits our assessment of the company's cost structure and operating efficiency. We rely on factor-based signals to infer business quality in the absence of detailed margin data.
At a current price of $10.96, Allovir, Inc. is trading at a premium to fundamental value. Our value factor score of 38/100 reflects a composite assessment across multiple valuation metrics including price-to-earnings, price-to-book, EV/EBITDA, and price-to-sales ratios relative to both sector peers and the broader market. The premium valuation implies the market is pricing in significant future growth or quality improvements that are not yet fully reflected in current fundamentals.
The stock currently trades at P/B of 4.5x. We evaluate these multiples in the context of both absolute levels and sector-relative positioning to form our valuation view.
Positive momentum (66th percentile) indicates institutional accumulation and favorable technical dynamics that tend to persist in the intermediate term.
The Reduce rating (composite 42.2/100) reflects multi-factor weakness, and historically, stocks in this scoring range have underperformed the market by a meaningful margin.
Below-average quality (28th percentile) raises durability concerns about the fundamental profile and increases the risk of negative earnings surprises.
We assign a Medium uncertainty rating to Allovir, Inc.. The stock presents a balanced risk profile: below-average price stability (32th percentile) and weak quality scores (28th percentile). While not risk-free, the core business fundamentals are adequate to withstand moderate economic stress, and the range of potential outcomes around our fair value estimate is manageable.
Specific risk factors that inform our assessment include: below-average price stability (32th percentile); weak quality scores (28th percentile). Each of these factors independently widens the distribution of potential outcomes, and in combination they create a risk profile that demands careful position sizing. The stability factor at the 32th percentile and quality factor at the 28th percentile provide a quantitative summary of the overall risk landscape.
We identify limited risk mitigants at this time, which contributes to our medium uncertainty assessment. Investors should monitor for improvement in balance sheet metrics, margin stability, and business predictability that could warrant a downgrade in our risk assessment over time.
We rate Allovir, Inc.'s capital allocation as Poor. Key concerns include low returns on equity (-170.8%), weak asset returns (ROA -88.1%). Exemplary capital allocators generate ROE above 20% and maintain conservative leverage — Allovir, Inc. significantly underperforms these benchmarks, raising questions about management's ability to create shareholder value.
Investors should scrutinize management's reinvestment decisions and balance sheet trajectory before committing capital. Poor capital allocation often compounds over time: overlevered balance sheets limit strategic flexibility, while low returns on capital destroy shareholder value. We would need to see sustained improvement in profitability metrics and balance sheet discipline before considering an upgrade.
In summary, Allovir, Inc. receives a Reduce rating with a composite score of 42.2/100 (rank #3247 of 7,333). Our quantitative framework assigns a No Moat (15/100, trend: stable), Medium uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation. The average factor score across quality, value, momentum, stability, and investment is 38/100.
Our analysis does not support a constructive view on Allovir, Inc. at this time. The combination of limited competitive advantages, medium uncertainty, and poor capital allocation suggests unfavorable risk-reward at current levels. We recommend investors avoid new positions and existing holders consider reducing exposure.
Analysis derived from Blank Capital Research quantitative terminal. For informational purposes only. No trade solicitation. Past performance not indicative of future results. Consult a qualified advisor.
We do not assign Allovir, Inc. a meaningful economic moat, scoring 15/100 on our composite assessment. Current fundamentals do not demonstrate the kind of durable competitive advantages — such as superior returns on invested capital, margin superiority, or reinvestment efficiency — that would protect the company from competitive erosion over the long term. The highest-scoring pillar, margin superiority, reached only 10/20.
The strongest moat sources are margin superiority (10/20) and financial resilience (4.5/20). GM N/A vs sector 43%, OM N/A vs sector 1%. Interest coverage N/A. These pillars form the core of Allovir, Inc.'s competitive identity and are the primary drivers of excess returns in our framework.
Areas of relative weakness include economic value creation (0/20) and reinvestment efficiency (0/20). ROE proxy -170.8% (sector -2.5%). Improvement in these areas could meaningfully widen the moat over time, while deterioration would be an early warning of competitive erosion.
Our moat trend assessment is Stable. Multi-year ROIC and operating margin trajectories show neither meaningful improvement nor deterioration, suggesting the competitive position is steady. We expect Allovir, Inc.'s moat profile to remain largely unchanged absent a material shift in return on capital or industry dynamics.
Key profit drivers are not clearly identifiable from current fundamentals. This may reflect a company in transition, a cyclical downturn, or structural challenges in the business model. We assign a quality factor of 28/100 which further underscores our concern regarding earnings sustainability.
Return metrics include ROE of -170.8% and ROA of -88.1%. Relative to the Manufacturing sector, sector comparison data is limited, and ROE of -170.8% compares to a sector median of -2.5%.
The balance sheet reflects above-average leverage with D/E of 94%. The sector median D/E is 0%, putting Allovir, Inc. at higher leverage than the typical peer. Overall balance sheet health is adequate for the current business environment.
Above 50MA
37.18%
Net New Highs
+51081
BERKELEY HEIGHTS, N.J., Jan. 28, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Kalaris Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: KLRS) (“Kalaris”), a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company developing differentiated therapies for retinal diseases, today announced that clinical data from its Phase 1 study of TH103 will be presented at the 49th Annual Meeting of the Macula Society, taking place February 25-28 in San Diego, California. TH103 is a novel investigational therapy engineered by VEGF scientific pioneer Dr. Napoleone Ferr
TH103 showed mean 10-letter gain in visual acuity and rapid, robust anatomic improvement at Month 1, following a single injection TH103 was generally well tolerated, supporting further dose escalation beyond 2.5 mg TH103 showed a 27 to 51-fold lower plasma Cmax by pharmacokinetic analysis compared with current leading agents, indicative of increased intraocular retention Accelerating enrollment in ongoing Phase 1b/2 multi ascending dose-finding study; preliminary efficacy and safety data expecte