IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: Blank Capital Research ("BCR") is a technology platform, not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer. The algorithmically generated signals, scores, and rankings provided on this site ("God Mode" Signals) are for informational and research purposes only and do not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to sell or solicit an offer to buy any securities.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS: The "timing scores" and "regime signals" displayed are based on quantitative models. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not actually been executed, the results may have under-or-over compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity.
RISK OF LOSS: Trading in financial markets involves a high degree of risk and may result in the loss of your entire investment. Data provided by third-party sources (Intrinio, Snowflake) is believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
© 2026 Blank Capital Research. All rights reserved. System Version: Aegis V8 (God Mode).
Verdict
Quantitative factor alignment verified for current market regime.
Quant Score
Rank
#4458
Positioning
Market Dominance
Services
Computer Software
$6.6B
N/A
N/A
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
X-AXIS: EV/EBITDA (LOWER = CHEAPER) | Y-AXIS: ROE (HIGHER = ELITE) | RED CIRCLE = FLUT ANALYSIS TARGET
| Stock | Rating | Score▼ | Quality | Value | Momentum | P/E | EV/EBITDA | ROE | ROA | Gross Mgn | Op Mgn | Net Mgn | Rev Growth | Div Yield | D/E | Mkt Cap | AUDIT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$YALA Yalla Group Ltd | 75 | 89 | 99 | 80 | - | - | 21.3% | 18.6% | 64.5% | 35.7% | 39.5% | 6.5% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $644M | VS | |
$GRVY GRAVITY Co., Ltd. | 75 | 82 | 96 | 71 | - | - | 15.4% | 12.6% | 38.7% | 17.1% | 17.0% | -39.7% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $439M | VS | |
$ISSC INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS & SUPPORT INC | 73 | 81 | 88 | 94 | 25.0x | 14.1x | 28.1% | 16.8% | 48.1% | 23.8% | 18.5% | 78.6% | 0.0% | 37.0x | $220M | VS | |
$AER AerCap Holdings N.V. | 72 | 60 | 87 | 84 | - | - | 12.4% | 2.9% | 100.0% | 28.2% | 26.2% | 5.5% | 0.8% | 264.0x | $19.4B | VS | |
$HCSG HEALTHCARE SERVICES GROUP INC | 72 | 74 | 88 | 88 | 7.1x | 6.1x | 28.9% | 20.8% | 20.8% | 9.9% | 9.3% | 8.5% | 0.0% | 1.0x | $1.2B | VS | |
$LQDT LIQUIDITY SERVICES INC | 72 | 90 | 88 | 68 | 24.9x | 14.3x | 14.6% | 7.8% | 43.8% | 7.4% | 5.9% | 31.2% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $857M | VS | |
$TRTNpA Triton International Ltd | 71 | 70 | 89 | 70 | - | 1.7x | 18.0% | 4.6% | 97.3% | 52.2% | 32.7% | -3.4% | 0.0% | 271.0x | $8.0B | VS | |
$EDU New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. | 71 | 83 | 52 | 77 | - | - | 9.4% | 4.9% | 55.5% | 8.7% | 7.7% | 13.6% | 1.3% | 7.0x | $78.0B | VS | |
$NTES NetEase, Inc. | 71 | 88 | 93 | 68 | - | - | 22.1% | 15.6% | 62.5% | 28.1% | 28.7% | -1.0% | 2.8% | 9.0x | $56.6B | VS | |
$UTI UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC | 70 | 86 | 86 | 72 | 43.2x | 16.0x | 21.4% | 8.0% | 100.0% | 10.0% | 7.5% | 14.1% | 0.0% | 27.0x | $1.8B | VS | |
$FLUT Flutter Entertainment plc | 31 | 24 | 17 | 20 | - | - | -5.6% | -1.8% | 45.6% | -0.9% | -3.6% | 5.1% | 0.0% | 128.0x | $6.6B | ||
| SECTOR BENCH | - | - | - | - | - | 23.7x | 11.7x | 5.3% | 1.9% | 59.6% | 3.5% | 2.3% | 7.8% | 0.0% | 0.3x | - | REF |
Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) receives a "Avoid" rating with a composite score of 31.1/100. It ranks #4458 out of 7,333 stocks in our coverage universe and carries a 1-star rating. Ratings are driven by a 6-factor quantitative model measuring quality, value, momentum, investment, stability, and short interest.
Sign in to join the discussion.
YOY expansion rate
Core pricing power
Operating efficiency
Bottom-line conversion
Equity capital efficiency
Asset base utilization
Financial leverage load
Direct cash return
N/A
Chief Executive Officer
24
30
58
Audit Verdict: Lower quality and stability scores may indicate governance concerns.
No recent insider transactions available for FLUT
Lagging peers — losers tend to keep underperforming
Expensive relative to fundamentals — limited margin of safety
Weak fundamentals — higher risk of value trap
Average volatility — neutral timing signal
Aggressive spending — empire-building risk, dilutive growth
Below-average composite — caution warranted
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Relative valuation derived from Services sector benchmarks. Model weights: EV/EBITDA (40%), P/B (35%), P/S (25%). Re-calculated daily.
No analyst ratings for FLUT.
View All RatingsMaterial decline in asset turnover efficiency detected
High margin volatility — erratic forensic earnings quality
| Factor | Global | Sector | Tilt |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROFITABILITY | 24 | 8 | +16ALPHA |
| MOMENTUM | 20 | 13 | +7ALPHA |
| VALUATION | 17 | 8 | +9ALPHA |
| INVESTMENT | 30 | 33 | -3NEUTRAL |
| STABILITY | 58 | 63 | -5NEUTRAL |
| SHORT INT | 52 | 58 | -6DRAG |
Global = full universe. Sector = relative to industry peers. Positive tilt indicates idiosyncratic strength.
ROIC -6.4% vs WACC 7.6% (spread -14.0%)
GM 46% vs sector 60%, OM -1% vs sector 4%
Capital turnover 0.37x, R&D intensity 6.4%
Rev growth 5%, 6yr history
Interest coverage N/A
Composite assessment of profitability, capital efficiency, and financial strength. Top-tier entities demonstrate sustainable cash flow generation and elite competitive moats.
Profit generated per dollar of shareholder equity
Efficiency of asset utilization
Pricing power and cost efficiency
Core business profitability
Bottom-line profitability
The Quality factor evaluates the persistence and magnitude of realized cash flows. Companies with scores >70 exhibit superior pricing power and structural financial resilience through diverse economic regimes.
Our uncertainty rating tracks the predictability of future cash flows and potential for permanent capital loss. Moderate visibility with standard industry cyclicality.
Our quantitative model flags Flutter Entertainment plc with an Avoid rating, assigning a composite score of 31.1/100 and 1 out of 5 stars. Ranked #4458 of 7,333 stocks, FLUT falls in the bottom tier across key factors. Historically, stocks with this profile have faced elevated risk of underperformance and capital loss.
Flutter Entertainment plc registers a weak quality score of just 24/100, indicating significant profitability challenges. The company reports a return on equity of -5.6% (sector avg: 5.3%), gross margins of 45.6% (sector avg: 59.6%), net margins of -3.6% (sector avg: 2.3%). Low quality scores are often associated with businesses in turnaround mode, early-stage growth, or structurally challenged industries.
FLUT registers a value score of just 17/100, suggesting the stock trades at a significant premium to its fundamental metrics. Key valuation metrics include a P/B ratio of 2.25x. High-premium valuations like this require strong future execution to avoid multiple compression, and downside risk is elevated if growth disappoints.
Flutter Entertainment plc's investment score of 30/100 suggests limited reinvestment activity. Key growth metrics include revenue growth of 5.1% vs. a sector average of 7.8% and a return on assets of -1.8% (sector: 1.9%). While this can be positive for mature, cash-generative businesses returning capital to shareholders, it may also signal a lack of growth opportunities or management conservatism.
Flutter Entertainment plc is experiencing notably weak momentum with a score of just 20/100. The stock has underperformed its peers and is trending below major moving averages. Revenue growth stands at 5.1% year-over-year, while a beta of 1.13 reflects its sensitivity to broader market moves. While deep momentum weakness can occasionally present value opportunities, it often reflects deteriorating fundamentals or structural headwinds that may persist.
With a stability score of 58/100, FLUT exhibits average financial resilience. Key stability metrics include a beta of 1.13 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 128.00x (sector avg: 0.3x). While the balance sheet is not a major concern, the stock is subject to typical market volatility and may experience sharper drawdowns during risk-off episodes.
The short interest score of 52/100 for FLUT suggests somewhat elevated bearish positioning by institutional traders. Specific risk factors include elevated leverage (D/E: 128.00x). With a $6.6B market cap (mid-cap), Flutter Entertainment plc may experience above-average volatility. Investors should consider whether the short thesis has merit or if it creates a potential short-squeeze opportunity.
Flutter Entertainment plc is a mid-cap company in the Services sector, ranked #0 of 50 in its sector (100th percentile) and #4458 of 7,333 overall (39th percentile). Key comparisons include ROE of -5.6% trailing the 5.3% sector median and operating margins of -0.9% below the 3.5% sector average. This top-quartile standing reflects exceptional competitive strength relative to Services peers.
While FLUT currently exhibits a AVOID profile, superior opportunities exist within the SERVICES sector. Our model identifies several "Strong Buy" candidates with higher quality scores and more attractive valuations among direct industry competitors.
View Top Services Alpha →Quant Factor Profile
Upgrade catalyst
Improvement in Value (17) would have the largest impact on the composite score.
ROE 206% BELOW SECTOR MEDIAN
Gross Margin 23% BELOW SECTOR MEDIAN
Op. Margin 126% BELOW SECTOR MEDIAN
AUDIT DATA AS OF SEP 30, 2025 (Q2 FY2025)
We rate Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) as Avoid with a composite score of 31.1/100 at a current price of $118.00. The stock falls in the bottom quintile of our universe across key quantitative factors, and the multi-factor weakness suggests a high probability of continued underperformance.
The rating is primarily driven by strength in stability (58th percentile) and investment (30th percentile), which together account for the majority of the composite score. Offsetting weakness in value (17th percentile) and momentum (20th percentile) tempers our overall conviction. We assign a No Moat rating (22/100), High uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation.
Key items to watch: momentum to confirm whether the current price trend has legs; balance sheet deleveraging progress; the path to profitability. Any material change in these dynamics could warrant a reassessment of our rating. The moat trend is stable, which suggests the competitive landscape is stable for now.
Flutter Entertainment plc holds a top-quartile position (#0 of 50) within the Services sector, based on our composite quantitative scoring across quality, value, momentum, and stability factors. The composite score of 31.1/100 places it at rank #4458 in our full 7,333-stock universe. At $6.6B in market capitalization, Flutter Entertainment plc is a mid-cap player in the Services space, which limits certain scale advantages but may allow for more agile strategic execution.
Revenue is growing at 5%, though momentum at the 20th percentile suggests the market has not yet fully recognized this trajectory. This potential disconnect between fundamental improvement and market recognition could represent an opportunity for patient investors if the growth trend persists.
The margin cascade tells an important story: gross margins of 46% (-14.0pp vs sector) narrow to operating margins of -1% (-4.4pp vs sector) and net margins of -3.6%, yielding a gross-to-net conversion rate of -8%. The significant margin erosion from gross to net suggests elevated operating expenses, high interest costs, or other structural drags that warrant monitoring.
At a current price of $118.00, Flutter Entertainment plc is trading at a premium to fundamental value. Our value factor score of 17/100 reflects a composite assessment across multiple valuation metrics including price-to-earnings, price-to-book, EV/EBITDA, and price-to-sales ratios relative to both sector peers and the broader market. The premium valuation implies the market is pricing in significant future growth or quality improvements that are not yet fully reflected in current fundamentals.
The stock currently trades at P/B of 2.3x, P/S of 1.4x. We evaluate these multiples in the context of both absolute levels and sector-relative positioning to form our valuation view.
Gross margins of 46% signal strong pricing power and brand/IP advantages — businesses with margins above 40% have historically demonstrated more resilient earnings through economic cycles.
The Avoid rating (composite 31.1/100) reflects multi-factor weakness, and historically, stocks in this scoring range have underperformed the market by a meaningful margin.
Elevated leverage (128% D/E) amplifies downside risk and limits management's financial flexibility in adverse scenarios.
Thin net margins of -3.6% provide limited cushion against cost pressures, competitive pricing, or macroeconomic headwinds — even small changes in costs could swing the company to a loss.
Weak momentum (20th percentile) suggests institutional selling pressure and unfavorable technical dynamics that may persist.
We assign a High uncertainty rating to Flutter Entertainment plc. Key risk factors include significant leverage (128% debt-to-equity), current negative profitability (net margin -3.6%), weak quality scores (24th percentile). The wide range of potential outcomes widens our fair value estimate and increases the possibility of permanent capital impairment. Investors considering this name should size positions accordingly and demand a meaningful margin of safety before initiating.
Specific risk factors that inform our assessment include: significant leverage (128% debt-to-equity); current negative profitability (net margin -3.6%); weak quality scores (24th percentile); the combination of leverage (128% D/E) and thin margins (-3.6% net) amplifies downside risk. Each of these factors independently widens the distribution of potential outcomes, and in combination they create a risk profile that demands careful position sizing. The stability factor at the 58th percentile and quality factor at the 24th percentile provide a quantitative summary of the overall risk landscape.
Key risk mitigants include: healthy gross margins of 46% provide a buffer against cost pressures. These factors partially offset the identified risks and provide downside protection in adverse scenarios. On balance, the risk-reward profile warrants caution and disciplined position management.
We rate Flutter Entertainment plc's capital allocation as Poor. Key concerns include low returns on equity (-5.6%), negative profitability, weak asset returns (ROA -1.8%). Exemplary capital allocators generate ROE above 20% and maintain conservative leverage — Flutter Entertainment plc significantly underperforms these benchmarks, raising questions about management's ability to create shareholder value.
Investors should scrutinize management's reinvestment decisions and balance sheet trajectory before committing capital. Poor capital allocation often compounds over time: overlevered balance sheets limit strategic flexibility, while low returns on capital destroy shareholder value. We would need to see sustained improvement in profitability metrics and balance sheet discipline before considering an upgrade.
In summary, Flutter Entertainment plc receives a Avoid rating with a composite score of 31.1/100 (rank #4458 of 7,333). Our quantitative framework assigns a No Moat (22/100, trend: stable), High uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation. The average factor score across quality, value, momentum, stability, and investment is 30/100.
Our analysis does not support a constructive view on Flutter Entertainment plc at this time. The combination of limited competitive advantages, high uncertainty, and poor capital allocation suggests unfavorable risk-reward at current levels. We recommend investors avoid new positions and existing holders consider reducing exposure.
Analysis derived from Blank Capital Research quantitative terminal. For informational purposes only. No trade solicitation. Past performance not indicative of future results. Consult a qualified advisor.
We do not assign Flutter Entertainment plc a meaningful economic moat, scoring 22/100 on our composite assessment. The ROIC-WACC spread of -14.0% is the primary signal of economic value creation. Current fundamentals do not demonstrate the kind of durable competitive advantages — such as superior returns on invested capital, margin superiority, or reinvestment efficiency — that would protect the company from competitive erosion over the long term. The highest-scoring pillar, growth durability, reached only 7.8/20.
The strongest moat sources are growth durability (7.8/20) and margin superiority (7.5/20). Rev growth 5%, 6yr history. GM 46% vs sector 60%, OM -1% vs sector 4%. These pillars form the core of Flutter Entertainment plc's competitive identity and are the primary drivers of excess returns in our framework.
Areas of relative weakness include economic value creation (0.9/20) and reinvestment efficiency (2.2/20). ROIC -6.4% vs WACC 7.6% (spread -14.0%). Improvement in these areas could meaningfully widen the moat over time, while deterioration would be an early warning of competitive erosion.
Our moat trend assessment is Stable. Multi-year ROIC and operating margin trajectories show neither meaningful improvement nor deterioration, suggesting the competitive position is steady. We expect Flutter Entertainment plc's moat profile to remain largely unchanged absent a material shift in return on capital or industry dynamics.
Key profit drivers include gross margins of 46% providing a solid profitability foundation, moderate revenue growth of 5%. The margin cascade from 46% gross to -1% operating to -3.6% net reveals the company's cost structure and reinvestment intensity. Our analysis indicates that profit quality raises some durability concerns, with the quality factor at the 24th percentile.
The margin profile shows gross margins of 46%, operating margins of -1%, net margins of -3.6%. Return metrics include ROE of -5.6% and ROA of -1.8%. Relative to the Services sector, gross margins are 14.0 percentage points below the sector median of 60%, and ROE of -5.6% compares to a sector median of 5.3%.
The balance sheet reflects above-average leverage with D/E of 128%, revenue growth of 5%. The sector median D/E is 0%, putting Flutter Entertainment plc at higher leverage than the typical peer. Overall balance sheet health is adequate for the current business environment.
Below-average quality (24th percentile) raises durability concerns about the fundamental profile and increases the risk of negative earnings surprises.
Above 50MA
37.18%
Net New Highs
+51081

Ten large-cap stocks experienced significant declines last week. Pinterest fell 21.73% after missing Q4 earnings and issuing weak Q1 guidance with multiple downgrades. DraftKings dropped 18.65% following disappointing Q4 results and below-estimate FY26 guidance. Other major losers included Astera Labs (down 23.74%), Medpace (down 20.69%), Zillow (down 20.89%), and Flutter Entertainment (down 18.88%), driven by earnings misses, analyst downgrades, and broader tech sector concerns about AI trade profitability.

DraftKings, Flutter Entertainment, and Robinhood Markets are entering the prediction markets sector to compete with first-movers like Kalshi and Polymarket. DraftKings launched DraftKings Predicts to enter markets where sports betting is illegal, Flutter launched FanDuel Predicts through a CME partnership, and Robinhood generated $100 million in quarterly prediction market revenue by Q3 2025. These moves aim to penetrate new markets and address concerns about declining market share in traditional sports betting.

Prediction market lawsuits are targeting CFTC-registered exchanges, defending their exclusive jurisdiction over prediction markets.

While Jumia Technologies is a popular way for U.S. investors to access Africa's growth story, Super Group (SGHC) offers a compelling alternative. The sportsbook and online casino operator has surged 94% over the past year, with Africa revenue tripling since 2021 to represent 40% of total revenue. Super Group boasts no debt, $462 million in cash, and returns capital to shareholders through dividends—unlike competitors DraftKings and Flutter Entertainment.
What Flutter Entertainment’s recent share slide means for investors Flutter Entertainment (NYSE:FLUT) shares have retreated sharply in recent months, with negative returns over the past day, week, month and past 3 months, prompting investors to reassess the US$115.42 closing price. See our latest analysis for Flutter Entertainment. Beyond the recent slide, Flutter Entertainment’s share price return has weakened over both shorter and longer periods, with the year-to-date share price return of...