IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: Blank Capital Research ("BCR") is a technology platform, not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer. The algorithmically generated signals, scores, and rankings provided on this site ("God Mode" Signals) are for informational and research purposes only and do not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to sell or solicit an offer to buy any securities.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS: The "timing scores" and "regime signals" displayed are based on quantitative models. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not actually been executed, the results may have under-or-over compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity.
RISK OF LOSS: Trading in financial markets involves a high degree of risk and may result in the loss of your entire investment. Data provided by third-party sources (Intrinio, Snowflake) is believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
© 2026 Blank Capital Research. All rights reserved. System Version: Aegis V8 (God Mode).
Verdict
Quantitative factor alignment verified for current market regime.
Quant Score
Rank
#1150
Positioning
Market Dominance
Services
Business Services
$247M
Paul S. Walker
Franklin Covey Co. provides training and consulting services in the areas of execution, sales performance, productivity, customer loyalty, and educational improvement. It also provides a suite of individual-effectiveness and leadership-development training and products. The company was incorporated in 1983 and is headquartered in Salt Lake City, Utah.
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
X-AXIS: EV/EBITDA (LOWER = CHEAPER) | Y-AXIS: ROE (HIGHER = ELITE) | RED CIRCLE = FC ANALYSIS TARGET
| Stock | Rating | Score▼ | Quality | Value | Momentum | P/E | EV/EBITDA | ROE | ROA | Gross Mgn | Op Mgn | Net Mgn | Rev Growth | Div Yield | D/E | Mkt Cap | AUDIT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$YALA Yalla Group Ltd | 75 | 89 | 99 | 80 | - | - | 21.3% | 18.6% | 64.5% | 35.7% | 39.5% | 6.5% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $644M | VS | |
$GRVY GRAVITY Co., Ltd. | 75 | 82 | 96 | 71 | - | - | 15.4% | 12.6% | 38.7% | 17.1% | 17.0% | -39.7% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $439M | VS | |
$ISSC INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS & SUPPORT INC | 73 | 81 | 88 | 94 | 25.0x | 14.1x | 28.1% | 16.8% | 48.1% | 23.8% | 18.5% | 78.6% | 0.0% | 37.0x | $220M | VS | |
$AER AerCap Holdings N.V. | 72 | 60 | 87 | 84 | - | - | 12.4% | 2.9% | 100.0% | 28.2% | 26.2% | 5.5% | 0.8% | 264.0x | $19.4B | VS | |
$HCSG HEALTHCARE SERVICES GROUP INC | 72 | 74 | 88 | 88 | 7.1x | 6.1x | 28.9% | 20.8% | 20.8% | 9.9% | 9.3% | 8.5% | 0.0% | 1.0x | $1.2B | VS | |
$LQDT LIQUIDITY SERVICES INC | 72 | 90 | 88 | 68 | 24.9x | 14.3x | 14.6% | 7.8% | 43.8% | 7.4% | 5.9% | 31.2% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $857M | VS | |
$TRTNpA Triton International Ltd | 71 | 70 | 89 | 70 | - | 1.7x | 18.0% | 4.6% | 97.3% | 52.2% | 32.7% | -3.4% | 0.0% | 271.0x | $8.0B | VS | |
$EDU New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. | 71 | 83 | 52 | 77 | - | - | 9.4% | 4.9% | 55.5% | 8.7% | 7.7% | 13.6% | 1.3% | 7.0x | $78.0B | VS | |
$NTES NetEase, Inc. | 71 | 88 | 93 | 68 | - | - | 22.1% | 15.6% | 62.5% | 28.1% | 28.7% | -1.0% | 2.8% | 9.0x | $56.6B | VS | |
$UTI UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC | 70 | 86 | 86 | 72 | 43.2x | 16.0x | 21.4% | 8.0% | 100.0% | 10.0% | 7.5% | 14.1% | 0.0% | 27.0x | $1.8B | VS | |
$FC FRANKLIN COVEY CO | 56 | 84 | 79 | 38 | - | 68.4x | -8.5% | -2.1% | 76.3% | -2.3% | -1.8% | -12.7% | 0.0% | 310.0x | $247M | ||
| SECTOR BENCH | - | - | - | - | - | 23.7x | 11.7x | 5.3% | 1.9% | 59.6% | 3.5% | 2.3% | 7.8% | 0.0% | 0.3x | - | REF |
FRANKLIN COVEY CO (FC) receives a "Hold" rating with a composite score of 56.0/100. It ranks #1150 out of 7,333 stocks in our coverage universe and carries a 3-star rating. Ratings are driven by a 6-factor quantitative model measuring quality, value, momentum, investment, stability, and short interest.
Sign in to join the discussion.
YOY expansion rate
Core pricing power
Operating efficiency
Bottom-line conversion
Equity capital efficiency
Asset base utilization
Financial leverage load
Direct cash return
Paul S. Walker
Chief Executive Officer
Labor Force
1,150
84
55
54
Audit Verdict: Average governance indicators based on financial metrics.
No recent insider transactions available for FC
Headcount
1.1K
HQ Base
SALT LAKE CITY, Utah
Lagging peers — losers tend to keep underperforming
Trading at a discount to fundamentals — favorable entry valuation
High profitability & efficiency — strong quality floor supports entry
Average volatility — neutral timing signal
Moderate investment profile
Mid-range overall rating
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Relative valuation derived from Services sector benchmarks. Model weights: EV/EBITDA (40%), P/B (35%), P/S (25%). Re-calculated daily.
No analyst ratings for FC.
View All RatingsMaterial decline in asset turnover efficiency detected
High margin volatility — erratic forensic earnings quality
| Factor | Global | Sector | Tilt |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROFITABILITY | 84 | 97 | -13DRAG |
| MOMENTUM | 38 | 35 | +3NEUTRAL |
| VALUATION | 79 | 90 | -11DRAG |
| INVESTMENT | 55 | 91 | -36DRAG |
| STABILITY | 54 | 58 | -4NEUTRAL |
| SHORT INT | 17 | 3 | +14ALPHA |
Global = full universe. Sector = relative to industry peers. Positive tilt indicates idiosyncratic strength.
ROE proxy -8.5% (sector 5.3%)
GM 76% vs sector 60%, OM -2% vs sector 4%
Capital turnover N/A
Rev growth -13%, 11yr history
Interest coverage -38.4x
Composite assessment of profitability, capital efficiency, and financial strength. Top-tier entities demonstrate sustainable cash flow generation and elite competitive moats.
Profit generated per dollar of shareholder equity
Efficiency of asset utilization
Pricing power and cost efficiency
Core business profitability
Bottom-line profitability
The Quality factor evaluates the persistence and magnitude of realized cash flows. Companies with scores >70 exhibit superior pricing power and structural financial resilience through diverse economic regimes.
Our uncertainty rating tracks the predictability of future cash flows and potential for permanent capital loss. Moderate visibility with standard industry cyclicality.
Our model assigns FRANKLIN COVEY CO a Hold rating, with a composite score of 56.0/100 and 3 out of 5 stars. Ranked #1150 of 7,333 stocks, FC presents a mixed quantitative picture — neither compelling enough to initiate new positions nor weak enough to warrant selling. Investors already holding may consider maintaining their position while monitoring for changes in the factor profile.
FC earns a quality score of 84/100, indicating above-average business quality. The company reports a return on equity of -8.5% (sector avg: 5.3%), gross margins of 76.3% (sector avg: 59.6%), net margins of -1.8% (sector avg: 2.3%). Companies in this tier generally demonstrate consistent profitability and efficient capital deployment, though they may face some competitive pressure.
FC carries a solid value score of 79/100, pointing to an attractively priced stock relative to peers. Key valuation metrics include an EV/EBITDA of 68.39x, a P/B ratio of 3.19x. This score suggests reasonable compensation for the risks involved, with potential upside if the market recognizes the stock's underlying worth.
With an investment score of 55/100, FC exhibits moderate growth-oriented spending. Key growth metrics include revenue growth of -12.7% vs. a sector average of 7.8% and a return on assets of -2.1% (sector: 1.9%). The company appears to be balancing growth investments with capital returns, though the pace of investment may not be enough to accelerate top-line growth meaningfully.
FC is currently showing below-average momentum at 38/100, which may indicate weakening institutional interest or negative sentiment shifts. Revenue growth stands at -12.7% year-over-year, while a beta of 1.26 reflects its sensitivity to broader market moves. Investors should note that declining momentum can precede further price weakness, though contrarian opportunities sometimes emerge at these levels.
With a stability score of 54/100, FC exhibits average financial resilience. Key stability metrics include a beta of 1.26 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 310.00x (sector avg: 0.3x). While the balance sheet is not a major concern, the stock is subject to typical market volatility and may experience sharper drawdowns during risk-off episodes.
FRANKLIN COVEY CO's short interest score of 17/100 reveals significant bearish positioning, suggesting institutional investors are actively betting against the stock. Specific risk factors include above-average market sensitivity (beta: 1.26), elevated leverage (D/E: 310.00x), micro-cap liquidity risk. At $247M (micro-cap), FC carries meaningful risk and is best suited for investors with high risk tolerance who have thoroughly evaluated the bear thesis.
FRANKLIN COVEY CO is a micro-cap company in the Services sector, ranked #0 of 50 in its sector (100th percentile) and #1150 of 7,333 overall (84th percentile). Key comparisons include ROE of -8.5% trailing the 5.3% sector median and operating margins of -2.3% below the 3.5% sector average. This top-quartile standing reflects exceptional competitive strength relative to Services peers.
While FC currently exhibits a HOLD profile, superior opportunities exist within the SERVICES sector. Our model identifies several "Strong Buy" candidates with higher quality scores and more attractive valuations among direct industry competitors.
View Top Services Alpha →Quant Factor Profile
Key factor gap
Quality (84) vs Short Int. (17) — closing this gap could shift the rating.
EV/EBITDA 483% ABOVE SECTOR MEDIAN
ROE 260% BELOW SECTOR MEDIAN
Gross Margin 28% ABOVE SECTOR MEDIAN (FAVORABLE)
AUDIT DATA AS OF NOV 30, 2025 (Q3 FY2025)
We rate FRANKLIN COVEY CO (FC) as a Hold with a composite score of 56.0/100 at a current price of $13.66. The stock presents a mixed quantitative picture — neither compelling enough to warrant new accumulation nor weak enough to justify selling for existing holders. Our factors are split, and the overall profile suggests patience is warranted.
The rating is primarily driven by strength in quality (84th percentile) and value (79th percentile), which together account for the majority of the composite score. Offsetting weakness in momentum (38th percentile) and stability (54th percentile) tempers our overall conviction. We assign a No Moat rating (29/100), Very High uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation.
Key items to watch: momentum to confirm whether the current price trend has legs; balance sheet deleveraging progress; the path to profitability. Any material change in these dynamics could warrant a reassessment of our rating. The moat trend is stable, which suggests the competitive landscape is stable for now.
FRANKLIN COVEY CO holds a top-quartile position (#0 of 50) within the Services sector, based on our composite quantitative scoring across quality, value, momentum, and stability factors. The composite score of 56.0/100 places it at rank #1150 in our full 7,333-stock universe. At $247M in market capitalization, FRANKLIN COVEY CO is a small-cap player in the Services space, which limits certain scale advantages but may allow for more agile strategic execution.
Revenue contraction of -13% combined with momentum at the 38th percentile paints a cautious picture of the near-term business outlook. The market appears to be pricing in continued challenges, and a catalyst for reversal is not clearly visible from current data.
The margin cascade tells an important story: gross margins of 76% (+16.7pp vs sector) narrow to operating margins of -2% (-5.8pp vs sector) and net margins of -1.8%, yielding a gross-to-net conversion rate of -2%. The significant margin erosion from gross to net suggests elevated operating expenses, high interest costs, or other structural drags that warrant monitoring.
At a current price of $13.66, FRANKLIN COVEY CO appears undervalued relative to its fundamentals. Our value factor score of 79/100 reflects a composite assessment across multiple valuation metrics including price-to-earnings, price-to-book, EV/EBITDA, and price-to-sales ratios relative to both sector peers and the broader market. The stock screens as attractively priced on a majority of these measures, suggesting the market may be underappreciating the underlying fundamentals.
The stock currently trades at EV/EBITDA of 68.4x (at a premium), P/B of 3.2x, P/S of 0.7x. We evaluate these multiples in the context of both absolute levels and sector-relative positioning to form our valuation view.
Gross margins of 76% signal strong pricing power and brand/IP advantages — businesses with margins above 40% have historically demonstrated more resilient earnings through economic cycles.
A value factor score of 79/100 suggests the market is underpricing these fundamentals, creating a potential margin of safety for new investors.
Elevated leverage (310% D/E) amplifies downside risk and limits management's financial flexibility in adverse scenarios.
Revenue decline of -13% signals business deterioration — declining revenues make it difficult to grow into the current valuation and often precede further negative revisions.
Thin net margins of -1.8% provide limited cushion against cost pressures, competitive pricing, or macroeconomic headwinds — even small changes in costs could swing the company to a loss.
We assign a Very High uncertainty rating to FRANKLIN COVEY CO. The stock exhibits multiple compounding risk factors: significant leverage (310% debt-to-equity), current negative profitability (net margin -1.8%), the combination of leverage (310% D/E) and thin margins (-1.8% net) amplifies downside risk. The extreme uncertainty around future cash flows makes precise valuation difficult, and the range of outcomes is exceptionally wide. Only investors with high risk tolerance and extended time horizons should consider this name.
Specific risk factors that inform our assessment include: significant leverage (310% debt-to-equity); current negative profitability (net margin -1.8%); the combination of leverage (310% D/E) and thin margins (-1.8% net) amplifies downside risk. Each of these factors independently widens the distribution of potential outcomes, and in combination they create a risk profile that demands careful position sizing. The stability factor at the 54th percentile and quality factor at the 84th percentile provide a quantitative summary of the overall risk landscape.
Key risk mitigants include: healthy gross margins of 76% provide a buffer against cost pressures. These factors partially offset the identified risks and provide downside protection in adverse scenarios. On balance, the risk-reward profile warrants caution and disciplined position management.
We rate FRANKLIN COVEY CO's capital allocation as Poor. Key concerns include low returns on equity (-8.5%), elevated leverage (310% D/E), negative profitability, weak asset returns (ROA -2.1%). Exemplary capital allocators generate ROE above 20% and maintain conservative leverage — FRANKLIN COVEY CO significantly underperforms these benchmarks, raising questions about management's ability to create shareholder value.
Investors should scrutinize management's reinvestment decisions and balance sheet trajectory before committing capital. Poor capital allocation often compounds over time: overlevered balance sheets limit strategic flexibility, while low returns on capital destroy shareholder value. We would need to see sustained improvement in profitability metrics and balance sheet discipline before considering an upgrade.
In summary, FRANKLIN COVEY CO receives a Hold rating with a composite score of 56.0/100 (rank #1150 of 7,333). Our quantitative framework assigns a No Moat (29/100, trend: stable), Very High uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation. The average factor score across quality, value, momentum, stability, and investment is 62/100.
Our analysis supports a neutral stance on FRANKLIN COVEY CO. While the quantitative profile is not weak enough to warrant selling, it lacks the multi-factor strength required for a buy recommendation. Existing holders should maintain positions and monitor for catalysts — either fundamental improvement or valuation compression — that would shift the risk-reward balance.
Analysis derived from Blank Capital Research quantitative terminal. For informational purposes only. No trade solicitation. Past performance not indicative of future results. Consult a qualified advisor.
We do not assign FRANKLIN COVEY CO a meaningful economic moat, scoring 29/100 on our composite assessment. Current fundamentals do not demonstrate the kind of durable competitive advantages — such as superior returns on invested capital, margin superiority, or reinvestment efficiency — that would protect the company from competitive erosion over the long term. The highest-scoring pillar, margin superiority, reached only 13.7/20.
The strongest moat sources are margin superiority (13.7/20) and growth durability (10.1/20). GM 76% vs sector 60%, OM -2% vs sector 4%. Rev growth -13%, 11yr history. These pillars form the core of FRANKLIN COVEY CO's competitive identity and are the primary drivers of excess returns in our framework.
Areas of relative weakness include reinvestment efficiency (0/20) and economic value creation (0.8/20). Capital turnover N/A. Improvement in these areas could meaningfully widen the moat over time, while deterioration would be an early warning of competitive erosion.
Our moat trend assessment is Stable. Multi-year ROIC and operating margin trajectories show neither meaningful improvement nor deterioration, suggesting the competitive position is steady. We expect FRANKLIN COVEY CO's moat profile to remain largely unchanged absent a material shift in return on capital or industry dynamics.
Key profit drivers include gross margins of 76% providing a solid profitability foundation, declining revenues (-13%) that pressure the earnings outlook. The margin cascade from 76% gross to -2% operating to -1.8% net reveals the company's cost structure and reinvestment intensity. Our analysis indicates that the profit engine is high-quality and likely sustainable, with the quality factor at the 84th percentile.
The margin profile shows gross margins of 76%, operating margins of -2%, net margins of -1.8%. Return metrics include ROE of -8.5% and ROA of -2.1%. Relative to the Services sector, gross margins are 16.7 percentage points above the sector median of 60%, and ROE of -8.5% compares to a sector median of 5.3%.
The balance sheet reflects high leverage with D/E of 310%, which may limit financial flexibility, revenue growth of -13%. The sector median D/E is 0%, putting FRANKLIN COVEY CO at higher leverage than the typical peer. Elevated leverage in combination with the current margin profile warrants close monitoring for any deterioration in debt-servicing capacity.
Above 50MA
37.18%
Net New Highs
+51081

Recently, Zacks.com users have been paying close attention to Franklin Covey (FC). This makes it worthwhile to examine what the stock has in store.

According to the average brokerage recommendation (ABR), one should invest in Franklin Covey (FC). It is debatable whether this highly sought-after metric is effective because Wall Street analysts' recommendations tend to be overly optimistic. Would it be worth investing in the stock?

Franklin Covey (FC) delivered earnings and revenue surprises of 10.26% and 1.74%, respectively, for the quarter ended May 2024. Do the numbers hold clues to what lies ahead for the stock?

Accenture (ACN) delivered earnings and revenue surprises of -0.32% and 0.35%, respectively, for the quarter ended May 2024. Do the numbers hold clues to what lies ahead for the stock?

Franklin Covey (FC) delivered earnings and revenue surprises of 20% and 1.11%, respectively, for the quarter ended February 2024. Do the numbers hold clues to what lies ahead for the stock?