IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: Blank Capital Research ("BCR") is a technology platform, not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer. The algorithmically generated signals, scores, and rankings provided on this site ("God Mode" Signals) are for informational and research purposes only and do not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to sell or solicit an offer to buy any securities.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS: The "timing scores" and "regime signals" displayed are based on quantitative models. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not actually been executed, the results may have under-or-over compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity.
RISK OF LOSS: Trading in financial markets involves a high degree of risk and may result in the loss of your entire investment. Data provided by third-party sources (Intrinio, Snowflake) is believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
© 2026 Blank Capital Research. All rights reserved. System Version: Aegis V8 (God Mode).
Verdict
Quantitative factor alignment verified for current market regime.
Quant Score
Rank
#2417
Positioning
Market Dominance
Transportation, Communications, Electric, Gas, And Sanitary Services
Utilities
$107.3B
Lynn J. Good
Duke Energy Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, operates as an energy company in the United States. The company operates through three segments: Electric Utilities, Gas Utilities and Infrastructure, and Commercial Renewables. The Electric Utilities segment generates, transmits, distributes, and sells electricity in the Carolinas, Florida, and the Midwest. The Commercial Renewable segment acquires, develops, builds, and operates wind and solar renewable generation projects.
Headcount
27.9K
HQ Base
Charlotte, North Carolina
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Dates updated upon official exchange announcement.
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
| Stock | Rating | Score▼ | Quality | Value | Momentum | P/E | EV/EBITDA | ROE | ROA | Gross Mgn | Op Mgn | Net Mgn | Rev Growth | Div Yield | D/E | Mkt Cap | AUDIT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$UGP ULTRAPAR HOLDINGS INC | 79 | 90 | 95 | 87 | - | - | 29.5% | 5.7% | 7.3% | 3.8% | 1.9% | -16.9% | 4.9% | 22.0x | $2.8B | VS | |
$TNK TEEKAY TANKERS LTD. | 78 | 94 | 97 | 82 | - | - | 24.4% | 20.6% | 67.0% | 30.9% | 32.8% | -16.6% | 7.6% | 0.0x | $1.3B | VS | |
$DHT DHT Holdings, Inc. | 75 | 84 | 88 | 78 | - | - | 17.5% | 12.2% | 54.8% | 36.8% | 31.7% | 2.0% | 10.9% | 40.0x | $1.5B | VS | |
$STNG Scorpio Tankers Inc. | 75 | 86 | 95 | 74 | - | - | 24.7% | 16.6% | 63.1% | 61.5% | 53.8% | -7.2% | 3.3% | 30.0x | $2.6B | VS | |
$NAT NORDIC AMERICAN TANKERS Ltd | 75 | 82 | 88 | 87 | - | - | 8.9% | 5.5% | 64.4% | 22.1% | 13.3% | -10.7% | 18.0% | 53.0x | $465M | VS | |
$AMX AMERICA MOVIL SAB DE CV/ | 74 | 86 | 81 | 68 | - | - | 5.8% | 1.5% | 61.1% | 20.7% | 3.2% | -13.7% | 3.5% | 202.0x | $44.7B | VS | |
$PAC Pacific Airport Group | 73 | 94 | 80 | 78 | - | - | 35.2% | 10.8% | 84.4% | 44.8% | 26.4% | -18.0% | 5.6% | 81.0x | $8.5B | VS | |
$GSL Global Ship Lease, Inc. | 73 | 82 | 94 | 81 | - | - | 26.7% | 15.6% | 100.0% | 53.7% | 50.1% | 5.8% | 7.7% | 47.0x | $753M | VS | |
$TRMD TORM plc | 73 | 86 | 94 | 65 | - | - | 32.7% | 19.3% | 58.8% | 40.9% | 38.0% | 2.5% | 30.1% | 59.0x | $1.7B | VS | |
$VIV TELEFONICA BRASIL S.A. | 73 | 82 | 90 | 78 | - | - | 7.0% | 4.0% | 43.9% | 15.5% | 10.0% | -15.9% | 5.6% | 0.0x | $12.5B | VS | |
$DUK Duke Energy CORP | 48 | 33 | 42 | 38 | 19.0x | 11.4x | 9.8% | 2.7% | 51.0% | 26.9% | 16.1% | 17.1% | 3.4% | 265.0x | $107.3B | ||
| SECTOR BENCH | - | - | - | - | - | 16.9x | 6.1x | 11.9% | 3.5% | 55.1% | 17.6% | 10.4% | 4.0% | 1.5% | 1.0x | - | REF |
Duke Energy CORP (DUK) receives a "Reduce" rating with a composite score of 47.5/100. It ranks #2417 out of 7,333 stocks in our coverage universe and carries a 2-star rating. Ratings are driven by a 6-factor quantitative model measuring quality, value, momentum, investment, stability, and short interest.
Sign in to join the discussion.
YOY expansion rate
Core pricing power
Operating efficiency
Bottom-line conversion
Equity capital efficiency
Asset base utilization
Financial leverage load
Direct cash return
Lynn J. Good
Chief Executive Officer
Labor Force
27,900
33
40
95
Audit Verdict: Average governance indicators based on financial metrics.
No recent insider transactions available for DUK
Lagging peers — losers tend to keep underperforming
Fair valuation relative to peers
Weak fundamentals — higher risk of value trap
Low volatility — smoother ride and historically better risk-adjusted returns
Moderate investment profile
Mid-range overall rating
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Relative valuation derived from Transportation, Communications, Electric, Gas, And Sanitary Services sector benchmarks. Model weights: EV/EBITDA (40%), P/B (35%), P/S (25%). Re-calculated daily.
Projection based on user-defined inputs. Re-calculated daily against current market data.
Reverse DCF Framework — Mauboussin Methodology
Institutional-grade Reverse DCF analysis. This model identifies the growth hurdles embedded in current market prices. When implied growth is significantly lower than historical or projected rates, a margin of safety may exist. Re-audited daily.
No analyst ratings for DUK.
View All RatingsMaterial decline in asset turnover efficiency detected
High margin volatility — erratic forensic earnings quality
| Factor | Global | Sector | Tilt |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROFITABILITY | 33 | 25 | +8ALPHA |
| MOMENTUM | 38 | 30 | +8ALPHA |
| VALUATION | 42 | 43 | -1NEUTRAL |
| INVESTMENT | 40 | 64 | -24DRAG |
| STABILITY | 95 | 98 | -3NEUTRAL |
| SHORT INT | 42 | 38 | +4NEUTRAL |
Global = full universe. Sector = relative to industry peers. Positive tilt indicates idiosyncratic strength.
ROIC 2.3% vs WACC 5.6% (spread -3.2%)
GM 51% vs sector 55%, OM 27% vs sector 18%
Capital turnover 0.10x
Rev growth 17%, 10yr history
Interest coverage 2.6x, Net debt/EBITDA 37.7x
Composite assessment of profitability, capital efficiency, and financial strength. Top-tier entities demonstrate sustainable cash flow generation and elite competitive moats.
Profit generated per dollar of shareholder equity
Efficiency of asset utilization
Pricing power and cost efficiency
Core business profitability
Bottom-line profitability
The Quality factor evaluates the persistence and magnitude of realized cash flows. Companies with scores >70 exhibit superior pricing power and structural financial resilience through diverse economic regimes.
Our uncertainty rating tracks the predictability of future cash flows and potential for permanent capital loss. Moderate visibility with standard industry cyclicality.
Duke Energy CORP receives a Reduce rating from our analysis, with a composite score of 47.5/100 and 2 out of 5 stars, ranking #2417 out of 7,333 stocks. DUK's factor profile shows weakness across multiple dimensions, suggesting the stock may underperform going forward. Existing holders may want to consider trimming positions or tightening stop-losses.
DUK's quality score of 33/100 is below average, suggesting challenges with profitability or capital efficiency. The company reports a return on equity of 9.8% (sector avg: 11.9%), gross margins of 51.0% (sector avg: 55.1%), net margins of 16.1% (sector avg: 10.4%). Investors should examine whether management is actively addressing these weaknesses or if they reflect structural industry headwinds.
With a value score of 42/100, DUK appears somewhat expensive relative to its fundamentals. Key valuation metrics include a P/E ratio of 19.03x, an EV/EBITDA of 11.40x, a P/B ratio of 1.87x. Investors paying a premium here are likely betting on above-average growth or margin expansion to justify current prices.
With an investment score of 40/100, DUK exhibits moderate growth-oriented spending. Key growth metrics include revenue growth of 17.1% vs. a sector average of 4.0% and a return on assets of 2.7% (sector: 3.5%). The company appears to be balancing growth investments with capital returns, though the pace of investment may not be enough to accelerate top-line growth meaningfully.
DUK is currently showing below-average momentum at 38/100, which may indicate weakening institutional interest or negative sentiment shifts. Revenue growth stands at 17.1% year-over-year, while a beta of -0.05 reflects its sensitivity to broader market moves. Investors should note that declining momentum can precede further price weakness, though contrarian opportunities sometimes emerge at these levels.
Duke Energy CORP earns an excellent stability score of 95/100, reflecting low price volatility and a conservatively managed balance sheet. Key stability metrics include a beta of -0.05 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 265.00x (sector avg: 1.0x). Stocks with this level of stability tend to act as portfolio anchors, providing downside protection during market corrections while still participating in broad market advances.
The short interest score of 42/100 for DUK suggests somewhat elevated bearish positioning by institutional traders. Specific risk factors include elevated leverage (D/E: 265.00x). With a $107.3B market cap (large-cap), Duke Energy CORP may experience above-average volatility. Investors should consider whether the short thesis has merit or if it creates a potential short-squeeze opportunity.
DUK pays a solid dividend yield of 3.4%, contributing an income component to total returns. This compares to a sector average dividend yield of 1.5%. This moderate yield suggests a balance between returning capital to shareholders and retaining earnings for reinvestment — a common profile among quality compounders.
Duke Energy CORP is a large-cap company in the Transportation, Communications, Electric, Gas, And Sanitary Services sector, ranked #0 of 50 in its sector (100th percentile) and #2417 of 7,333 overall (67th percentile). Key comparisons include ROE of 9.8% trailing the 11.9% sector median and operating margins of 26.9% above the 17.6% sector average. This top-quartile standing reflects exceptional competitive strength relative to Transportation, Communications, Electric, Gas, And Sanitary Services peers.
While DUK currently exhibits a REDUCE profile, superior opportunities exist within the TRANSPORTATION, COMMUNICATIONS, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND SANITARY SERVICES sector. Our model identifies several "Strong Buy" candidates with higher quality scores and more attractive valuations among direct industry competitors.
View Top Transportation, Communications, Electric, Gas, And Sanitary Services Alpha →Quant Factor Profile
Upgrade catalyst
Improvement in Quality (33) would have the largest impact on the composite score.
EV/EBITDA 87% ABOVE SECTOR MEDIAN
ROE 18% BELOW SECTOR MEDIAN
Gross Margin 8% BELOW SECTOR MEDIAN
AUDIT DATA AS OF SEP 30, 2025 (Q2 FY2025)
We rate Duke Energy CORP (DUK) as a Reduce with a composite score of 47.5/100 at a current price of $128.55. The quantitative profile shows weakness across multiple dimensions, suggesting limited upside potential and elevated risk of underperformance relative to peers over the next 12 months.
The rating is primarily driven by strength in stability (95th percentile) and value (42th percentile), which together account for the majority of the composite score. Offsetting weakness in quality (33th percentile) and momentum (38th percentile) tempers our overall conviction. We assign a No Moat rating (33/100), Medium uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation.
Key items to watch: momentum to confirm whether the current price trend has legs; balance sheet deleveraging progress. Any material change in these dynamics could warrant a reassessment of our rating. The moat trend is stable, which suggests the competitive landscape is stable for now.
Duke Energy CORP holds a top-quartile position (#0 of 50) within the Transportation, Communications, Electric, Gas, And Sanitary Services sector, based on our composite quantitative scoring across quality, value, momentum, and stability factors. The composite score of 47.5/100 places it at rank #2417 in our full 7,333-stock universe. With a $107.3B market capitalization, Duke Energy CORP operates at meaningful scale within the Transportation, Communications, Electric, Gas, And Sanitary Services sector, providing competitive advantages in distribution, procurement, and customer reach.
Revenue is growing at 17%, though momentum at the 38th percentile suggests the market has not yet fully recognized this trajectory. This potential disconnect between fundamental improvement and market recognition could represent an opportunity for patient investors if the growth trend persists.
The margin cascade tells an important story: gross margins of 51% (-4.1pp vs sector) narrow to operating margins of 27% (+9.3pp vs sector) and net margins of 16.1%, yielding a gross-to-net conversion rate of 32%. This efficient conversion suggests well-controlled operating costs and limited margin leakage between the gross and net levels.
At a current price of $128.55, Duke Energy CORP is trading near fair value based on current fundamentals. Our value factor score of 42/100 reflects a composite assessment across multiple valuation metrics including price-to-earnings, price-to-book, EV/EBITDA, and price-to-sales ratios relative to both sector peers and the broader market. Valuation metrics are mixed, with no strong signal of mispricing in either direction.
The stock currently trades at a P/E of 19.0x (roughly in line with the sector median of 16.9x), EV/EBITDA of 11.4x (at a premium), P/B of 1.9x, P/S of 3.1x. The above-sector P/E multiple suggests the market is pricing in superior growth or quality, which our analysis finds only partially justified by current fundamentals.
Gross margins of 51% signal strong pricing power and brand/IP advantages — businesses with margins above 40% have historically demonstrated more resilient earnings through economic cycles.
Revenue growth of 17% confirms the business is expanding its addressable market — growth at this level typically supports multiple expansion and attracts institutional capital.
A 3.39% dividend yield provides income while you wait, and dividends historically account for a significant portion of total equity returns.
The Reduce rating (composite 47.5/100) reflects multi-factor weakness, and historically, stocks in this scoring range have underperformed the market by a meaningful margin.
Elevated leverage (265% D/E) amplifies downside risk and limits management's financial flexibility in adverse scenarios.
We assign a Medium uncertainty rating to Duke Energy CORP. The stock presents a balanced risk profile: significant leverage (265% debt-to-equity) and weak quality scores (33th percentile). While not risk-free, the core business fundamentals are adequate to withstand moderate economic stress, and the range of potential outcomes around our fair value estimate is manageable.
Specific risk factors that inform our assessment include: significant leverage (265% debt-to-equity); weak quality scores (33th percentile); low beta of -0.05 — while defensive, this may indicate limited upside participation in bull markets. Each of these factors independently widens the distribution of potential outcomes, and in combination they create a risk profile that demands careful position sizing. The stability factor at the 95th percentile and quality factor at the 33th percentile provide a quantitative summary of the overall risk landscape.
Key risk mitigants include: healthy gross margins of 51% provide a buffer against cost pressures; above-average stability (95th percentile) suggests predictable business dynamics; large-cap scale ($107.3B) provides resilience. These factors partially offset the identified risks and provide downside protection in adverse scenarios. On balance, the risk-reward profile is favorable for long-term investors.
We rate Duke Energy CORP's capital allocation as Poor. Key concerns include elevated leverage (265% D/E). Exemplary capital allocators generate ROE above 20% and maintain conservative leverage — Duke Energy CORP significantly underperforms these benchmarks, raising questions about management's ability to create shareholder value.
Investors should scrutinize management's reinvestment decisions and balance sheet trajectory before committing capital. Poor capital allocation often compounds over time: overlevered balance sheets limit strategic flexibility, while low returns on capital destroy shareholder value. We would need to see sustained improvement in profitability metrics and balance sheet discipline before considering an upgrade.
In summary, Duke Energy CORP receives a Reduce rating with a composite score of 47.5/100 (rank #2417 of 7,333). Our quantitative framework assigns a No Moat (33/100, trend: stable), Medium uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation. The average factor score across quality, value, momentum, stability, and investment is 50/100.
Our analysis does not support a constructive view on Duke Energy CORP at this time. The combination of limited competitive advantages, medium uncertainty, and poor capital allocation suggests unfavorable risk-reward at current levels. We recommend investors avoid new positions and existing holders consider reducing exposure.
Analysis derived from Blank Capital Research quantitative terminal. For informational purposes only. No trade solicitation. Past performance not indicative of future results. Consult a qualified advisor.
We do not assign Duke Energy CORP a meaningful economic moat, scoring 33/100 on our composite assessment. The ROIC-WACC spread of -3.2% is the primary signal of economic value creation. Current fundamentals do not demonstrate the kind of durable competitive advantages — such as superior returns on invested capital, margin superiority, or reinvestment efficiency — that would protect the company from competitive erosion over the long term. The highest-scoring pillar, margin superiority, reached only 13.7/20.
The strongest moat sources are margin superiority (13.7/20) and growth durability (11.7/20). GM 51% vs sector 55%, OM 27% vs sector 18%. Rev growth 17%, 10yr history. These pillars form the core of Duke Energy CORP's competitive identity and are the primary drivers of excess returns in our framework.
Areas of relative weakness include reinvestment efficiency (0/20) and economic value creation (3.7/20). Capital turnover 0.10x. Improvement in these areas could meaningfully widen the moat over time, while deterioration would be an early warning of competitive erosion.
Our moat trend assessment is Stable. Multi-year ROIC and operating margin trajectories show neither meaningful improvement nor deterioration, suggesting the competitive position is steady. We expect Duke Energy CORP's moat profile to remain largely unchanged absent a material shift in return on capital or industry dynamics.
Key profit drivers include gross margins of 51% providing a solid profitability foundation, operating margins of 27% reflecting effective cost management, robust top-line growth of 17% expanding the revenue base. The margin cascade from 51% gross to 27% operating to 16.1% net reveals the company's cost structure and reinvestment intensity. Our analysis indicates that profit quality raises some durability concerns, with the quality factor at the 33th percentile.
The margin profile shows gross margins of 51%, operating margins of 27%, net margins of 16.1%. Return metrics include ROE of 9.8% and ROA of 2.7%. Relative to the Transportation, Communications, Electric, Gas, And Sanitary Services sector, gross margins are 4.1 percentage points below the sector median of 55%, and ROE of 9.8% compares to a sector median of 11.9%.
The balance sheet reflects high leverage with D/E of 265%, which may limit financial flexibility, a dividend yield of 3.39%, revenue growth of 17%. The sector median D/E is 1%, putting Duke Energy CORP at higher leverage than the typical peer. Elevated leverage in combination with the current margin profile warrants close monitoring for any deterioration in debt-servicing capacity.
Below-average quality (33th percentile) raises durability concerns about the fundamental profile and increases the risk of negative earnings surprises.
Above 50MA
37.18%
Net New Highs
+51081

The article recommends two Vanguard ETFs for long-term investors: the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) with a 0.03% expense ratio and historical 10% annual returns, and the Vanguard Utilities Index Fund ETF (VPU) with a 0.09% expense ratio and 2.5% dividend yield. Both funds offer low fees and are suitable for investors seeking stability and passive market exposure over decades.
History shows that midterm election years aren’t always great years for the S&P 500. Are you properly protected against the full blow of a 2026 market crash? Probably not, but there are action steps you can take today to brace for the impact of a potential market collapse. Fortunately, there are safety-first exchange traded funds ... 2026 Stock Market Crash Coming? 3 Best ETFs to Protect You Now
Constellation Energy, NasdaqGS:CEG, has filed an omnibus shelf registration that would allow it to issue common and preferred stock, depositary shares, and debt securities. The filing comes shortly before the company’s upcoming Q4 earnings report. The move follows recent changes to Constellation Energy’s Board of Directors. Constellation Energy, NasdaqGS:CEG, enters this development with a current share price of $293.8 and a 1-year return of 10.4%. Over the past 3 years, the stock has...

Three major companies reported earnings this week with mixed results. Coca-Cola beat EPS expectations but missed on revenue, guiding for 4-5% organic revenue growth in 2026. Robinhood surpassed EPS estimates but fell short on quarterly revenue, though annual revenue grew 52% YOY, with strong potential from its new prediction markets initiative. Duke Energy beat on both top and bottom lines with a $16 billion increase to its five-year capital plan and extended 5-7% long-term EPS growth guidance through 2030.

Three major corporations released mixed earnings results: Coca-Cola beat EPS expectations but missed on revenue due to currency headwinds and impairment charges; Duke Energy exceeded both EPS and revenue forecasts driven by infrastructure investments; Fiserv topped EPS estimates despite a slight revenue miss, demonstrating resilience through strategic acquisitions and operational efficiency.