IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: Blank Capital Research ("BCR") is a technology platform, not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer. The algorithmically generated signals, scores, and rankings provided on this site ("God Mode" Signals) are for informational and research purposes only and do not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to sell or solicit an offer to buy any securities.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS: The "timing scores" and "regime signals" displayed are based on quantitative models. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not actually been executed, the results may have under-or-over compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity.
RISK OF LOSS: Trading in financial markets involves a high degree of risk and may result in the loss of your entire investment. Data provided by third-party sources (Intrinio, Snowflake) is believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
© 2026 Blank Capital Research. All rights reserved. System Version: Aegis V8 (God Mode).
Verdict
Quantitative factor alignment verified for current market regime.
Quant Score
Rank
#3030
Positioning
Market Dominance
Transportation, Communications, Electric, Gas, And Sanitary Services
Utilities
$28.1B
Garrick J. Rochow
CMS Energy Corporation operates through three segments: Electric Utility; Gas Utility; and Enterprises. The Electric Utility segment generates electricity through coal, wind, gas, renewable energy, oil, and nuclear sources. The Gas Utility segment engages in the purchase, transmission, storage, distribution, and sale of natural gas. It serves 1.9 million electric and 1.8 million gas customers, including residential, commercial, and diversified industrial customers.
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Dates updated upon official exchange announcement.
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
| Stock | Rating | Score▼ | Quality | Value | Momentum | P/E | EV/EBITDA | ROE | ROA | Gross Mgn | Op Mgn | Net Mgn | Rev Growth | Div Yield | D/E | Mkt Cap | AUDIT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$UGP ULTRAPAR HOLDINGS INC | 79 | 90 | 95 | 87 | - | - | 29.5% | 5.7% | 7.3% | 3.8% | 1.9% | -16.9% | 4.9% | 22.0x | $2.8B | VS | |
$TNK TEEKAY TANKERS LTD. | 78 | 94 | 97 | 82 | - | - | 24.4% | 20.6% | 67.0% | 30.9% | 32.8% | -16.6% | 7.6% | 0.0x | $1.3B | VS | |
$DHT DHT Holdings, Inc. | 75 | 84 | 88 | 78 | - | - | 17.5% | 12.2% | 54.8% | 36.8% | 31.7% | 2.0% | 10.9% | 40.0x | $1.5B | VS | |
$STNG Scorpio Tankers Inc. | 75 | 86 | 95 | 74 | - | - | 24.7% | 16.6% | 63.1% | 61.5% | 53.8% | -7.2% | 3.3% | 30.0x | $2.6B | VS | |
$NAT NORDIC AMERICAN TANKERS Ltd | 75 | 82 | 88 | 87 | - | - | 8.9% | 5.5% | 64.4% | 22.1% | 13.3% | -10.7% | 18.0% | 53.0x | $465M | VS | |
$AMX AMERICA MOVIL SAB DE CV/ | 74 | 86 | 81 | 68 | - | - | 5.8% | 1.5% | 61.1% | 20.7% | 3.2% | -13.7% | 3.5% | 202.0x | $44.7B | VS | |
$PAC Pacific Airport Group | 73 | 94 | 80 | 78 | - | - | 35.2% | 10.8% | 84.4% | 44.8% | 26.4% | -18.0% | 5.6% | 81.0x | $8.5B | VS | |
$GSL Global Ship Lease, Inc. | 73 | 82 | 94 | 81 | - | - | 26.7% | 15.6% | 100.0% | 53.7% | 50.1% | 5.8% | 7.7% | 47.0x | $753M | VS | |
$TRMD TORM plc | 73 | 86 | 94 | 65 | - | - | 32.7% | 19.3% | 58.8% | 40.9% | 38.0% | 2.5% | 30.1% | 59.0x | $1.7B | VS | |
$VIV TELEFONICA BRASIL S.A. | 73 | 82 | 90 | 78 | - | - | 7.0% | 4.0% | 43.9% | 15.5% | 10.0% | -15.9% | 5.6% | 0.0x | $12.5B | VS | |
$CMS CMS ENERGY CORP | 44 | 36 | 31 | 35 | 23.1x | 11.2x | 10.4% | 2.5% | 60.5% | 20.6% | 12.5% | 25.8% | 2.9% | 311.0x | $28.1B | ||
| SECTOR BENCH | - | - | - | - | - | 16.9x | 6.1x | 11.9% | 3.5% | 55.1% | 17.6% | 10.4% | 4.0% | 1.5% | 1.0x | - | REF |
CMS ENERGY CORP (CMS) receives a "Reduce" rating with a composite score of 43.7/100. It ranks #3030 out of 7,333 stocks in our coverage universe and carries a 2-star rating. Ratings are driven by a 6-factor quantitative model measuring quality, value, momentum, investment, stability, and short interest.
Sign in to join the discussion.
YOY expansion rate
Core pricing power
Operating efficiency
Bottom-line conversion
Equity capital efficiency
Asset base utilization
Financial leverage load
Direct cash return
Garrick J. Rochow
Chief Executive Officer
Labor Force
9,070
36
28
93
Audit Verdict: Average governance indicators based on financial metrics.
No recent insider transactions available for CMS
Lagging peers — losers tend to keep underperforming
Expensive relative to fundamentals — limited margin of safety
Average quality profile
Low volatility — smoother ride and historically better risk-adjusted returns
Aggressive spending — empire-building risk, dilutive growth
Mid-range overall rating
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Relative valuation derived from Transportation, Communications, Electric, Gas, And Sanitary Services sector benchmarks. Model weights: EV/EBITDA (40%), P/B (35%), P/S (25%). Re-calculated daily.
Projection based on user-defined inputs. Re-calculated daily against current market data.
Reverse DCF Framework — Mauboussin Methodology
Institutional-grade Reverse DCF analysis. This model identifies the growth hurdles embedded in current market prices. When implied growth is significantly lower than historical or projected rates, a margin of safety may exist. Re-audited daily.
No analyst ratings for CMS.
View All RatingsMaterial decline in asset turnover efficiency detected
| Factor | Global | Sector | Tilt |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROFITABILITY | 36 | 29 | +7ALPHA |
| MOMENTUM | 35 | 27 | +8ALPHA |
| VALUATION | 31 | 25 | +6ALPHA |
| INVESTMENT | 28 | 19 | +9ALPHA |
| STABILITY | 93 | 96 | -3NEUTRAL |
| SHORT INT | 31 | 23 | +8ALPHA |
Global = full universe. Sector = relative to industry peers. Positive tilt indicates idiosyncratic strength.
ROIC 8.2% vs WACC 5.9% (spread +2.3%)
GM 60% vs sector 55%, OM 21% vs sector 18%
Capital turnover 0.49x
Rev growth 26%, 10yr history
Interest coverage 8.5x, Net debt/EBITDA 10.2x
Composite assessment of profitability, capital efficiency, and financial strength. Top-tier entities demonstrate sustainable cash flow generation and elite competitive moats.
Profit generated per dollar of shareholder equity
Efficiency of asset utilization
Pricing power and cost efficiency
Core business profitability
Bottom-line profitability
The Quality factor evaluates the persistence and magnitude of realized cash flows. Companies with scores >70 exhibit superior pricing power and structural financial resilience through diverse economic regimes.
Our uncertainty rating tracks the predictability of future cash flows and potential for permanent capital loss. Moderate visibility with standard industry cyclicality.
CMS ENERGY CORP receives a Reduce rating from our analysis, with a composite score of 43.7/100 and 2 out of 5 stars, ranking #3030 out of 7,333 stocks. CMS's factor profile shows weakness across multiple dimensions, suggesting the stock may underperform going forward. Existing holders may want to consider trimming positions or tightening stop-losses.
CMS's quality score of 36/100 is below average, suggesting challenges with profitability or capital efficiency. The company reports a return on equity of 10.4% (sector avg: 11.9%), gross margins of 60.5% (sector avg: 55.1%), net margins of 12.5% (sector avg: 10.4%). Investors should examine whether management is actively addressing these weaknesses or if they reflect structural industry headwinds.
With a value score of 31/100, CMS appears somewhat expensive relative to its fundamentals. Key valuation metrics include a P/E ratio of 23.08x, an EV/EBITDA of 11.15x, a P/B ratio of 2.39x. Investors paying a premium here are likely betting on above-average growth or margin expansion to justify current prices.
CMS ENERGY CORP's investment score of 28/100 suggests limited reinvestment activity. Key growth metrics include revenue growth of 25.8% vs. a sector average of 4.0% and a return on assets of 2.5% (sector: 3.5%). While this can be positive for mature, cash-generative businesses returning capital to shareholders, it may also signal a lack of growth opportunities or management conservatism.
CMS is currently showing below-average momentum at 35/100, which may indicate weakening institutional interest or negative sentiment shifts. Revenue growth stands at 25.8% year-over-year, while a beta of 0.09 reflects its sensitivity to broader market moves. Investors should note that declining momentum can precede further price weakness, though contrarian opportunities sometimes emerge at these levels.
CMS ENERGY CORP earns an excellent stability score of 93/100, reflecting low price volatility and a conservatively managed balance sheet. Key stability metrics include a beta of 0.09 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 311.00x (sector avg: 1.0x). Stocks with this level of stability tend to act as portfolio anchors, providing downside protection during market corrections while still participating in broad market advances.
CMS ENERGY CORP's short interest score of 31/100 reveals significant bearish positioning, suggesting institutional investors are actively betting against the stock. Specific risk factors include elevated leverage (D/E: 311.00x). At $28.1B (large-cap), CMS carries meaningful risk and is best suited for investors with high risk tolerance who have thoroughly evaluated the bear thesis.
CMS pays a solid dividend yield of 2.9%, contributing an income component to total returns. This compares to a sector average dividend yield of 1.5%. This moderate yield suggests a balance between returning capital to shareholders and retaining earnings for reinvestment — a common profile among quality compounders.
CMS ENERGY CORP is a large-cap company in the Transportation, Communications, Electric, Gas, And Sanitary Services sector, ranked #0 of 50 in its sector (100th percentile) and #3030 of 7,333 overall (59th percentile). Key comparisons include ROE of 10.4% trailing the 11.9% sector median and operating margins of 20.6% above the 17.6% sector average. This top-quartile standing reflects exceptional competitive strength relative to Transportation, Communications, Electric, Gas, And Sanitary Services peers.
While CMS currently exhibits a REDUCE profile, superior opportunities exist within the TRANSPORTATION, COMMUNICATIONS, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND SANITARY SERVICES sector. Our model identifies several "Strong Buy" candidates with higher quality scores and more attractive valuations among direct industry competitors.
View Top Transportation, Communications, Electric, Gas, And Sanitary Services Alpha →Quant Factor Profile
Upgrade catalyst
Improvement in Investment (28) would have the largest impact on the composite score.
EV/EBITDA 82% ABOVE SECTOR MEDIAN
ROE 13% BELOW SECTOR MEDIAN
Gross Margin 10% ABOVE SECTOR MEDIAN (FAVORABLE)
AUDIT DATA AS OF SEP 30, 2025 (Q2 FY2025)
We rate CMS ENERGY CORP (CMS) as a Reduce with a composite score of 43.7/100 at a current price of $76.78. The quantitative profile shows weakness across multiple dimensions, suggesting limited upside potential and elevated risk of underperformance relative to peers over the next 12 months.
The rating is primarily driven by strength in stability (93th percentile) and quality (36th percentile), which together account for the majority of the composite score. Offsetting weakness in investment (28th percentile) and value (31th percentile) tempers our overall conviction. We assign a No Moat rating (37/100), Medium uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation.
Key items to watch: momentum to confirm whether the current price trend has legs; balance sheet deleveraging progress; sustainability of the current growth rate. Any material change in these dynamics could warrant a reassessment of our rating. The moat trend is stable, which suggests the competitive landscape is stable for now.
CMS ENERGY CORP holds a top-quartile position (#0 of 50) within the Transportation, Communications, Electric, Gas, And Sanitary Services sector, based on our composite quantitative scoring across quality, value, momentum, and stability factors. The composite score of 43.7/100 places it at rank #3030 in our full 7,333-stock universe. With a $28.1B market capitalization, CMS ENERGY CORP operates at meaningful scale within the Transportation, Communications, Electric, Gas, And Sanitary Services sector, providing competitive advantages in distribution, procurement, and customer reach.
Revenue is growing at 26%, though momentum at the 35th percentile suggests the market has not yet fully recognized this trajectory. This potential disconnect between fundamental improvement and market recognition could represent an opportunity for patient investors if the growth trend persists.
The margin cascade tells an important story: gross margins of 60% (+5.3pp vs sector) narrow to operating margins of 21% (+3.0pp vs sector) and net margins of 12.5%, yielding a gross-to-net conversion rate of 21%. This conversion rate is typical for the sector, suggesting a standard cost structure without notable efficiency advantages or disadvantages.
At a current price of $76.78, CMS ENERGY CORP is trading at a premium to fundamental value. Our value factor score of 31/100 reflects a composite assessment across multiple valuation metrics including price-to-earnings, price-to-book, EV/EBITDA, and price-to-sales ratios relative to both sector peers and the broader market. The premium valuation implies the market is pricing in significant future growth or quality improvements that are not yet fully reflected in current fundamentals.
The stock currently trades at a P/E of 23.1x (a 36% premium to the sector median of 16.9x), EV/EBITDA of 11.2x (at a premium), P/B of 2.4x, P/S of 2.9x. The above-sector P/E multiple suggests the market is pricing in superior growth or quality, which our analysis finds only partially justified by current fundamentals.
Gross margins of 60% signal strong pricing power and brand/IP advantages — businesses with margins above 40% have historically demonstrated more resilient earnings through economic cycles.
Revenue growth of 26% confirms the business is expanding its addressable market — growth at this level typically supports multiple expansion and attracts institutional capital.
A 2.92% dividend yield provides income while you wait, and dividends historically account for a significant portion of total equity returns.
The Reduce rating (composite 43.7/100) reflects multi-factor weakness, and historically, stocks in this scoring range have underperformed the market by a meaningful margin.
Elevated leverage (311% D/E) amplifies downside risk and limits management's financial flexibility in adverse scenarios.
We assign a Medium uncertainty rating to CMS ENERGY CORP. The stock presents a balanced risk profile: significant leverage (311% debt-to-equity) and low beta of 0.09 — while defensive, this may indicate limited upside participation in bull markets. While not risk-free, the core business fundamentals are adequate to withstand moderate economic stress, and the range of potential outcomes around our fair value estimate is manageable.
Specific risk factors that inform our assessment include: significant leverage (311% debt-to-equity); low beta of 0.09 — while defensive, this may indicate limited upside participation in bull markets. Each of these factors independently widens the distribution of potential outcomes, and in combination they create a risk profile that demands careful position sizing. The stability factor at the 93th percentile and quality factor at the 36th percentile provide a quantitative summary of the overall risk landscape.
Key risk mitigants include: healthy gross margins of 60% provide a buffer against cost pressures; above-average stability (93th percentile) suggests predictable business dynamics; a 2.92% dividend yield anchors total return. These factors partially offset the identified risks and provide downside protection in adverse scenarios. On balance, the risk-reward profile is favorable for long-term investors.
We rate CMS ENERGY CORP's capital allocation as Poor. Key concerns include elevated leverage (311% D/E). Exemplary capital allocators generate ROE above 20% and maintain conservative leverage — CMS ENERGY CORP significantly underperforms these benchmarks, raising questions about management's ability to create shareholder value.
Investors should scrutinize management's reinvestment decisions and balance sheet trajectory before committing capital. Poor capital allocation often compounds over time: overlevered balance sheets limit strategic flexibility, while low returns on capital destroy shareholder value. We would need to see sustained improvement in profitability metrics and balance sheet discipline before considering an upgrade.
In summary, CMS ENERGY CORP receives a Reduce rating with a composite score of 43.7/100 (rank #3030 of 7,333). Our quantitative framework assigns a No Moat (37/100, trend: stable), Medium uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation. The average factor score across quality, value, momentum, stability, and investment is 45/100.
Our analysis does not support a constructive view on CMS ENERGY CORP at this time. The combination of limited competitive advantages, medium uncertainty, and poor capital allocation suggests unfavorable risk-reward at current levels. We recommend investors avoid new positions and existing holders consider reducing exposure.
Analysis derived from Blank Capital Research quantitative terminal. For informational purposes only. No trade solicitation. Past performance not indicative of future results. Consult a qualified advisor.
We do not assign CMS ENERGY CORP a meaningful economic moat, scoring 37/100 on our composite assessment. The ROIC-WACC spread of +2.3% is the primary signal of economic value creation. Current fundamentals do not demonstrate the kind of durable competitive advantages — such as superior returns on invested capital, margin superiority, or reinvestment efficiency — that would protect the company from competitive erosion over the long term. The highest-scoring pillar, margin superiority, reached only 13.5/20.
The strongest moat sources are margin superiority (13.5/20) and growth durability (10.2/20). GM 60% vs sector 55%, OM 21% vs sector 18%. Rev growth 26%, 10yr history. These pillars form the core of CMS ENERGY CORP's competitive identity and are the primary drivers of excess returns in our framework.
Areas of relative weakness include reinvestment efficiency (0/20) and economic value creation (4.2/20). Capital turnover 0.49x. Improvement in these areas could meaningfully widen the moat over time, while deterioration would be an early warning of competitive erosion.
Our moat trend assessment is Stable. Multi-year ROIC and operating margin trajectories show neither meaningful improvement nor deterioration, suggesting the competitive position is steady. We expect CMS ENERGY CORP's moat profile to remain largely unchanged absent a material shift in return on capital or industry dynamics.
Key profit drivers include gross margins of 60% providing a solid profitability foundation, operating margins of 21% reflecting effective cost management, robust top-line growth of 26% expanding the revenue base. The margin cascade from 60% gross to 21% operating to 12.5% net reveals the company's cost structure and reinvestment intensity. Our analysis indicates that profit quality raises some durability concerns, with the quality factor at the 36th percentile.
The margin profile shows gross margins of 60%, operating margins of 21%, net margins of 12.5%. Return metrics include ROE of 10.4% and ROA of 2.5%. Relative to the Transportation, Communications, Electric, Gas, And Sanitary Services sector, gross margins are 5.3 percentage points above the sector median of 55%, and ROE of 10.4% compares to a sector median of 11.9%.
The balance sheet reflects high leverage with D/E of 311%, which may limit financial flexibility, a dividend yield of 2.92%, revenue growth of 26%. The sector median D/E is 1%, putting CMS ENERGY CORP at higher leverage than the typical peer. Elevated leverage in combination with the current margin profile warrants close monitoring for any deterioration in debt-servicing capacity.
Weak momentum (35th percentile) suggests institutional selling pressure and unfavorable technical dynamics that may persist.
Above 50MA
37.18%
Net New Highs
+51081
See why DTE Energy is being framed as an AI power play: Stargate load growth, beat-and-raise results, higher capex through 2030, and key risks.
Diane Leopold, retired executive vice president and chief operating officer at Dominion Energy, Inc, ("Dominion") has been elected to the CMS Energy and Consumers Energy boards of directors. Richard Keyes, president and chief executive officer of Meijer, Inc, has also been elected to the CMS Energy and Consumers Energy boards of directors. Both appointments are effective February 20, 2026.
Why CMS Energy (CMS) is on investors’ radar today CMS Energy (CMS) has not been driven by a single headline event recently, but its recent share performance and fundamentals give investors several concrete data points to weigh. The stock’s recent returns span a mixed short term picture and a stronger longer term track record. CMS is up 0.6% over the past day, has slipped about 0.6% over the past week, and is higher by 7.9% over the past month. Looking further out, the total return stands at...
The traditional ways to plan for your retirement may mean income can no longer cover expenses post-employment. But what if there was another option that could provide a steady, reliable source of income in your nest egg years?
CMS Energy recently reported fourth-quarter 2025 and full-year results showing higher sales and net income year over year, while its Board approved an increase in the common dividend to US$0.57 per share and declared dividends on several preferred securities. Together with a new omnibus shelf registration covering common and preferred stock, depositary shares, debt, stock purchase contracts, and units, these actions highlight CMS Energy’s active capital planning and continued emphasis on...