IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: Blank Capital Research ("BCR") is a technology platform, not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer. The algorithmically generated signals, scores, and rankings provided on this site ("God Mode" Signals) are for informational and research purposes only and do not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to sell or solicit an offer to buy any securities.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS: The "timing scores" and "regime signals" displayed are based on quantitative models. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not actually been executed, the results may have under-or-over compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity.
RISK OF LOSS: Trading in financial markets involves a high degree of risk and may result in the loss of your entire investment. Data provided by third-party sources (Intrinio, Snowflake) is believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
© 2026 Blank Capital Research. All rights reserved. System Version: Aegis V8 (God Mode).
Verdict
Quantitative factor alignment verified for current market regime.
Quant Score
Rank
#3288
Positioning
Market Dominance
Finance, Insurance, And Real Estate
Insurance
$76.9B
David M. Cordani
Cigna Corporation provides insurance and related products and services in the United States. Its Evernorth segment provides a range of coordinated and point solution health services to health plans, employers, government organizations, and health care providers. The company also offers permanent insurance contracts to corporations to provide coverage on the lives of certain employees for financing employer-paid future benefit obligations.
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Dates updated upon official exchange announcement.
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
X-AXIS: EV/EBITDA (LOWER = CHEAPER) | Y-AXIS: ROE (HIGHER = ELITE) | RED CIRCLE = CI ANALYSIS TARGET
| Stock | Rating | Score▼ | Quality | Value | Momentum | P/E | EV/EBITDA | ROE | ROA | Gross Mgn | Op Mgn | Net Mgn | Rev Growth | Div Yield | D/E | Mkt Cap | AUDIT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$SII SPROTT INC. | 75 | 91 | 87 | 98 | - | - | 15.7% | 12.8% | 48.9% | 37.0% | 28.8% | 14.9% | 2.5% | 0.0x | $1.1B | VS | |
$PUK PRUDENTIAL PLC | 73 | 88 | 97 | 80 | - | - | 13.2% | 1.4% | 100.0% | 97.0% | 23.8% | 11.8% | 2.7% | 5.0x | $21.5B | VS | |
$NMR NOMURA HOLDINGS INC | 72 | 81 | 92 | 87 | - | - | 9.9% | 0.6% | 84.5% | 70.0% | 7.3% | 14.9% | 0.0% | 923.0x | $18.3B | VS | |
$PSLV Sprott Physical Silver Trust | 69 | 82 | 80 | 98 | - | - | 17.3% | 17.7% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 1643.8% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $5.0B | VS | |
$UFCS UNITED FIRE GROUP INC | 68 | 81 | 93 | 76 | 5.0x | 3.5x | 13.2% | 4.1% | 99.9% | 14.7% | 11.1% | 9.2% | 2.1% | 16.0x | $775M | VS | |
$SLF SUN LIFE FINANCIAL INC | 68 | 83 | 95 | 63 | - | - | 12.6% | 0.9% | 32.0% | 31.3% | 7.9% | -12.9% | 4.3% | 24.0x | $37.8B | VS | |
$CBOE Cboe Global Markets, Inc. | 68 | 75 | 63 | 77 | 21.3x | 15.7x | 24.0% | 13.7% | 41.7% | 32.4% | 26.4% | 8.2% | 1.1% | 30.0x | $25.7B | VS | |
$PHYS Sprott Physical Gold Trust | 67 | 64 | 82 | 91 | - | - | 22.5% | 22.8% | 101.8% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 138.9% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $8.4B | VS | |
$VTMX Vesta Real Estate Corporation, S.A.B. de C.V. | 67 | 69 | 77 | 80 | - | - | 8.8% | 5.8% | 98.7% | 75.7% | 88.5% | 17.6% | 4.3% | 34.0x | $2.2B | VS | |
$GLDM World Gold Trust | 66 | 54 | 85 | 92 | 11.3x | 11.3x | - | 27.1% | 100.0% | 98.9% | 459.9% | 333.4% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $43.7B | VS | |
$CI Cigna Group | 42 | 32 | 60 | 28 | 12.7x | 7.8x | 13.9% | 3.7% | 23.1% | 3.5% | 2.2% | 15.2% | 2.1% | 276.0x | $76.9B | ||
| SECTOR BENCH | - | - | - | - | - | 11.9x | 7.8x | 8.9% | 1.2% | 76.5% | 17.0% | 21.5% | 10.8% | 1.9% | 0.5x | - | REF |
Cigna Group (CI) receives a "Reduce" rating with a composite score of 41.9/100. It ranks #3288 out of 7,333 stocks in our coverage universe and carries a 2-star rating. Ratings are driven by a 6-factor quantitative model measuring quality, value, momentum, investment, stability, and short interest.
Sign in to join the discussion.
YOY expansion rate
Core pricing power
Operating efficiency
Bottom-line conversion
Equity capital efficiency
Asset base utilization
Financial leverage load
Direct cash return
David M. Cordani
Chief Executive Officer
Labor Force
71,300
32
29
52
Audit Verdict: Lower quality and stability scores may indicate governance concerns.
No recent insider transactions available for CI
Lagging peers — losers tend to keep underperforming
Trading at a discount to fundamentals — favorable entry valuation
Weak fundamentals — higher risk of value trap
Average volatility — neutral timing signal
Aggressive spending — empire-building risk, dilutive growth
Mid-range overall rating
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Relative valuation derived from Finance, Insurance, And Real Estate sector benchmarks. Model weights: EV/EBITDA (40%), P/B (35%), P/S (25%). Re-calculated daily.
Projection based on user-defined inputs. Re-calculated daily against current market data.
Reverse DCF Framework — Mauboussin Methodology
Institutional-grade Reverse DCF analysis. This model identifies the growth hurdles embedded in current market prices. When implied growth is significantly lower than historical or projected rates, a margin of safety may exist. Re-audited daily.
No analyst ratings for CI.
View All RatingsConservative accounting — High cash conversion efficiency
Material decline in asset turnover efficiency detected
| Factor | Global | Sector | Tilt |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROFITABILITY | 32 | 52 | -20DRAG |
| MOMENTUM | 28 | 21 | +7ALPHA |
| VALUATION | 60 | 84 | -24DRAG |
| INVESTMENT | 29 | 34 | -5NEUTRAL |
| STABILITY | 52 | 54 | -2NEUTRAL |
| SHORT INT | 52 | 61 | -9DRAG |
Global = full universe. Sector = relative to industry peers. Positive tilt indicates idiosyncratic strength.
ROIC 6.0% vs WACC 7.8% (spread -1.7%)
GM 23% vs sector 77%, OM 4% vs sector 17%
Capital turnover 1.87x
Rev growth 15%, 8yr history
Interest coverage N/A, Net debt/EBITDA 14.5x
Composite assessment of profitability, capital efficiency, and financial strength. Top-tier entities demonstrate sustainable cash flow generation and elite competitive moats.
Profit generated per dollar of shareholder equity
Efficiency of asset utilization
Pricing power and cost efficiency
Core business profitability
Bottom-line profitability
The Quality factor evaluates the persistence and magnitude of realized cash flows. Companies with scores >70 exhibit superior pricing power and structural financial resilience through diverse economic regimes.
Our uncertainty rating tracks the predictability of future cash flows and potential for permanent capital loss. Moderate visibility with standard industry cyclicality.
Cigna Group receives a Reduce rating from our analysis, with a composite score of 41.9/100 and 2 out of 5 stars, ranking #3288 out of 7,333 stocks. CI's factor profile shows weakness across multiple dimensions, suggesting the stock may underperform going forward. Existing holders may want to consider trimming positions or tightening stop-losses.
CI's quality score of 32/100 is below average, suggesting challenges with profitability or capital efficiency. The company reports a return on equity of 13.9% (sector avg: 8.9%), gross margins of 23.1% (sector avg: 76.5%), net margins of 2.2% (sector avg: 21.5%). Investors should examine whether management is actively addressing these weaknesses or if they reflect structural industry headwinds.
CI's value score of 60/100 indicates the stock is fairly valued based on its current fundamentals. Key valuation metrics include a P/E ratio of 12.65x, an EV/EBITDA of 7.83x, a P/B ratio of 1.76x. At this level, neither a clear bargain nor overpriced, the stock's attractiveness depends more on forward growth expectations and qualitative factors.
Cigna Group's investment score of 29/100 suggests limited reinvestment activity. Key growth metrics include revenue growth of 15.2% vs. a sector average of 10.8% and a return on assets of 3.7% (sector: 1.2%). While this can be positive for mature, cash-generative businesses returning capital to shareholders, it may also signal a lack of growth opportunities or management conservatism.
Cigna Group is experiencing notably weak momentum with a score of just 28/100. The stock has underperformed its peers and is trending below major moving averages. Revenue growth stands at 15.2% year-over-year, while a beta of 0.19 reflects its sensitivity to broader market moves. While deep momentum weakness can occasionally present value opportunities, it often reflects deteriorating fundamentals or structural headwinds that may persist.
With a stability score of 52/100, CI exhibits average financial resilience. Key stability metrics include a beta of 0.19 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 276.00x (sector avg: 0.5x). While the balance sheet is not a major concern, the stock is subject to typical market volatility and may experience sharper drawdowns during risk-off episodes.
The short interest score of 52/100 for CI suggests somewhat elevated bearish positioning by institutional traders. Specific risk factors include elevated leverage (D/E: 276.00x). With a $76.9B market cap (large-cap), Cigna Group may experience above-average volatility. Investors should consider whether the short thesis has merit or if it creates a potential short-squeeze opportunity.
CI pays a solid dividend yield of 2.1%, contributing an income component to total returns. This compares to a sector average dividend yield of 1.9%. This moderate yield suggests a balance between returning capital to shareholders and retaining earnings for reinvestment — a common profile among quality compounders.
Cigna Group is a large-cap company in the Finance, Insurance, And Real Estate sector, ranked #0 of 50 in its sector (100th percentile) and #3288 of 7,333 overall (55th percentile). Key comparisons include ROE of 13.9% exceeding the 8.9% sector median and operating margins of 3.5% below the 17.0% sector average. This top-quartile standing reflects exceptional competitive strength relative to Finance, Insurance, And Real Estate peers.
While CI currently exhibits a REDUCE profile, superior opportunities exist within the FINANCE, INSURANCE, AND REAL ESTATE sector. Our model identifies several "Strong Buy" candidates with higher quality scores and more attractive valuations among direct industry competitors.
View Top Finance, Insurance, And Real Estate Alpha →Quant Factor Profile
Upgrade catalyst
Improvement in Momentum (28) would have the largest impact on the composite score.
EV/EBITDA IN LINE WITH SECTOR BENCHMARKS
ROE 56% ABOVE SECTOR MEDIAN (FAVORABLE)
Gross Margin 70% BELOW SECTOR MEDIAN
AUDIT DATA AS OF SEP 30, 2025 (Q2 FY2025)
We rate Cigna Group (CI) as a Reduce with a composite score of 41.9/100 at a current price of $280.88. The quantitative profile shows weakness across multiple dimensions, suggesting limited upside potential and elevated risk of underperformance relative to peers over the next 12 months.
The rating is primarily driven by strength in value (60th percentile) and stability (52th percentile), which together account for the majority of the composite score. Offsetting weakness in momentum (28th percentile) and investment (29th percentile) tempers our overall conviction. We assign a No Moat rating (30/100), Medium uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation.
Key items to watch: momentum to confirm whether the current price trend has legs; balance sheet deleveraging progress. Any material change in these dynamics could warrant a reassessment of our rating. The moat trend is stable, which suggests the competitive landscape is stable for now.
Cigna Group holds a top-quartile position (#0 of 50) within the Finance, Insurance, And Real Estate sector, based on our composite quantitative scoring across quality, value, momentum, and stability factors. The composite score of 41.9/100 places it at rank #3288 in our full 7,333-stock universe. With a $76.9B market capitalization, Cigna Group operates at meaningful scale within the Finance, Insurance, And Real Estate sector, providing competitive advantages in distribution, procurement, and customer reach.
Revenue is growing at 15%, though momentum at the 28th percentile suggests the market has not yet fully recognized this trajectory. This potential disconnect between fundamental improvement and market recognition could represent an opportunity for patient investors if the growth trend persists.
The margin cascade tells an important story: gross margins of 23% (-53.4pp vs sector) narrow to operating margins of 4% (-13.5pp vs sector) and net margins of 2.2%, yielding a gross-to-net conversion rate of 9%. The significant margin erosion from gross to net suggests elevated operating expenses, high interest costs, or other structural drags that warrant monitoring.
At a current price of $280.88, Cigna Group is trading near fair value based on current fundamentals. Our value factor score of 60/100 reflects a composite assessment across multiple valuation metrics including price-to-earnings, price-to-book, EV/EBITDA, and price-to-sales ratios relative to both sector peers and the broader market. Valuation metrics are mixed, with no strong signal of mispricing in either direction.
The stock currently trades at a P/E of 12.7x (roughly in line with the sector median of 11.9x), EV/EBITDA of 7.8x (near the sector median), P/B of 1.8x, P/S of 0.3x. The above-sector P/E multiple suggests the market is pricing in superior growth or quality, which our analysis finds only partially justified by current fundamentals.
Revenue growth of 15% confirms the business is expanding its addressable market — growth at this level typically supports multiple expansion and attracts institutional capital.
A 2.06% dividend yield provides income while you wait, and dividends historically account for a significant portion of total equity returns.
The Reduce rating (composite 41.9/100) reflects multi-factor weakness, and historically, stocks in this scoring range have underperformed the market by a meaningful margin.
Elevated leverage (276% D/E) amplifies downside risk and limits management's financial flexibility in adverse scenarios.
Thin net margins of 2.2% provide limited cushion against cost pressures, competitive pricing, or macroeconomic headwinds — even small changes in costs could swing the company to a loss.
We assign a Medium uncertainty rating to Cigna Group. The stock presents a balanced risk profile: significant leverage (276% debt-to-equity) and weak quality scores (32th percentile). While not risk-free, the core business fundamentals are adequate to withstand moderate economic stress, and the range of potential outcomes around our fair value estimate is manageable.
Specific risk factors that inform our assessment include: significant leverage (276% debt-to-equity); weak quality scores (32th percentile); low beta of 0.19 — while defensive, this may indicate limited upside participation in bull markets; the combination of leverage (276% D/E) and thin margins (2.2% net) amplifies downside risk. Each of these factors independently widens the distribution of potential outcomes, and in combination they create a risk profile that demands careful position sizing. The stability factor at the 52th percentile and quality factor at the 32th percentile provide a quantitative summary of the overall risk landscape.
Key risk mitigants include: large-cap scale ($76.9B) provides resilience; a 2.06% dividend yield anchors total return. These factors partially offset the identified risks and provide downside protection in adverse scenarios. On balance, the risk-reward profile is favorable for long-term investors.
We rate Cigna Group's capital allocation as Poor. Key concerns include elevated leverage (276% D/E). Exemplary capital allocators generate ROE above 20% and maintain conservative leverage — Cigna Group significantly underperforms these benchmarks, raising questions about management's ability to create shareholder value.
Investors should scrutinize management's reinvestment decisions and balance sheet trajectory before committing capital. Poor capital allocation often compounds over time: overlevered balance sheets limit strategic flexibility, while low returns on capital destroy shareholder value. We would need to see sustained improvement in profitability metrics and balance sheet discipline before considering an upgrade.
In summary, Cigna Group receives a Reduce rating with a composite score of 41.9/100 (rank #3288 of 7,333). Our quantitative framework assigns a No Moat (30/100, trend: stable), Medium uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation. The average factor score across quality, value, momentum, stability, and investment is 40/100.
Our analysis does not support a constructive view on Cigna Group at this time. The combination of limited competitive advantages, medium uncertainty, and poor capital allocation suggests unfavorable risk-reward at current levels. We recommend investors avoid new positions and existing holders consider reducing exposure.
Analysis derived from Blank Capital Research quantitative terminal. For informational purposes only. No trade solicitation. Past performance not indicative of future results. Consult a qualified advisor.
We do not assign Cigna Group a meaningful economic moat, scoring 30/100 on our composite assessment. The ROIC-WACC spread of -1.7% is the primary signal of economic value creation. Current fundamentals do not demonstrate the kind of durable competitive advantages — such as superior returns on invested capital, margin superiority, or reinvestment efficiency — that would protect the company from competitive erosion over the long term. The highest-scoring pillar, growth durability, reached only 11.7/20.
The strongest moat sources are growth durability (11.7/20) and margin superiority (6.2/20). Rev growth 15%, 8yr history. GM 23% vs sector 77%, OM 4% vs sector 17%. These pillars form the core of Cigna Group's competitive identity and are the primary drivers of excess returns in our framework.
Areas of relative weakness include financial resilience (3/20) and economic value creation (3.7/20). Interest coverage N/A, Net debt/EBITDA 14.5x. Improvement in these areas could meaningfully widen the moat over time, while deterioration would be an early warning of competitive erosion.
Our moat trend assessment is Stable. Multi-year ROIC and operating margin trajectories show neither meaningful improvement nor deterioration, suggesting the competitive position is steady. We expect Cigna Group's moat profile to remain largely unchanged absent a material shift in return on capital or industry dynamics.
Key profit drivers include robust top-line growth of 15% expanding the revenue base. The margin cascade from 23% gross to 4% operating to 2.2% net reveals the company's cost structure and reinvestment intensity. Our analysis indicates that profit quality raises some durability concerns, with the quality factor at the 32th percentile.
The margin profile shows gross margins of 23%, operating margins of 4%, net margins of 2.2%. Return metrics include ROE of 13.9% and ROA of 3.7%. Relative to the Finance, Insurance, And Real Estate sector, gross margins are 53.4 percentage points below the sector median of 77%, and ROE of 13.9% compares to a sector median of 8.9%.
The balance sheet reflects high leverage with D/E of 276%, which may limit financial flexibility, a dividend yield of 2.06%, revenue growth of 15%. The sector median D/E is 0%, putting Cigna Group at higher leverage than the typical peer. Elevated leverage in combination with the current margin profile warrants close monitoring for any deterioration in debt-servicing capacity.
Weak momentum (28th percentile) suggests institutional selling pressure and unfavorable technical dynamics that may persist.
Below-average quality (32th percentile) raises durability concerns about the fundamental profile and increases the risk of negative earnings surprises.
Above 50MA
37.18%
Net New Highs
+51081
SEM posts a Q4 EPS miss as rising expenses and margin pressure weigh on results despite revenue growth and strength in key segments.

UnitedHealth Group CEO Stephen Hemsley testified before House panels that rising hospital prices, consolidation, and prescription drug costs—not insurers—are the primary drivers of U.S. health care spending. He pledged to voluntarily eliminate and rebate profits on ACA exchange coverage this year and urged policy reforms including site-neutral payments and patent reform. UnitedHealth also announced a pilot program to accelerate Medicare Advantage payments for rural hospitals.
The cuts aim to make the drugs more accessible to insured patients, particularly people with high-deductible health plans or co-insurance benefit designs.
Lilly shares rose more than 4% Monday, while rival Novo Nordisk tanked.

UnitedHealth Group's stock has dropped 35% in 2025 due to misjudged medical service costs, but the company plans to improve profit margins in 2026-2027 by adjusting Medicare Advantage bids and negotiating better rates.