IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: Blank Capital Research ("BCR") is a technology platform, not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer. The algorithmically generated signals, scores, and rankings provided on this site ("God Mode" Signals) are for informational and research purposes only and do not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to sell or solicit an offer to buy any securities.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS: The "timing scores" and "regime signals" displayed are based on quantitative models. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not actually been executed, the results may have under-or-over compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity.
RISK OF LOSS: Trading in financial markets involves a high degree of risk and may result in the loss of your entire investment. Data provided by third-party sources (Intrinio, Snowflake) is believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
© 2026 Blank Capital Research. All rights reserved. System Version: Aegis V8 (God Mode).
Verdict
Quantitative factor alignment verified for current market regime.
Quant Score
Rank
#3409
Positioning
Market Dominance
Finance, Insurance, And Real Estate
Trading
$313M
Martin D. McNulty
Acacia Research Corporation invests in intellectual property and related absolute return assets. The company owns or controls the rights to various patent portfolios, which include U.S. patents and foreign counterparts. It also designs manufactures printers and parts, and consumable products for various industrial printing applications.
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
X-AXIS: EV/EBITDA (LOWER = CHEAPER) | Y-AXIS: ROE (HIGHER = ELITE) | RED CIRCLE = ACTG ANALYSIS TARGET
| Stock | Rating | Score▼ | Quality | Value | Momentum | P/E | EV/EBITDA | ROE | ROA | Gross Mgn | Op Mgn | Net Mgn | Rev Growth | Div Yield | D/E | Mkt Cap | AUDIT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$SII SPROTT INC. | 75 | 91 | 87 | 98 | - | - | 15.7% | 12.8% | 48.9% | 37.0% | 28.8% | 14.9% | 2.5% | 0.0x | $1.1B | VS | |
$PUK PRUDENTIAL PLC | 73 | 88 | 97 | 80 | - | - | 13.2% | 1.4% | 100.0% | 97.0% | 23.8% | 11.8% | 2.7% | 5.0x | $21.5B | VS | |
$NMR NOMURA HOLDINGS INC | 72 | 81 | 92 | 87 | - | - | 9.9% | 0.6% | 84.5% | 70.0% | 7.3% | 14.9% | 0.0% | 923.0x | $18.3B | VS | |
$PSLV Sprott Physical Silver Trust | 69 | 82 | 80 | 98 | - | - | 17.3% | 17.7% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 1643.8% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $5.0B | VS | |
$UFCS UNITED FIRE GROUP INC | 68 | 81 | 93 | 76 | 5.0x | 3.5x | 13.2% | 4.1% | 99.9% | 14.7% | 11.1% | 9.2% | 2.1% | 16.0x | $775M | VS | |
$SLF SUN LIFE FINANCIAL INC | 68 | 83 | 95 | 63 | - | - | 12.6% | 0.9% | 32.0% | 31.3% | 7.9% | -12.9% | 4.3% | 24.0x | $37.8B | VS | |
$CBOE Cboe Global Markets, Inc. | 68 | 75 | 63 | 77 | 21.3x | 15.7x | 24.0% | 13.7% | 41.7% | 32.4% | 26.4% | 8.2% | 1.1% | 30.0x | $25.7B | VS | |
$PHYS Sprott Physical Gold Trust | 67 | 64 | 82 | 91 | - | - | 22.5% | 22.8% | 101.8% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 138.9% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $8.4B | VS | |
$VTMX Vesta Real Estate Corporation, S.A.B. de C.V. | 67 | 69 | 77 | 80 | - | - | 8.8% | 5.8% | 98.7% | 75.7% | 88.5% | 17.6% | 4.3% | 34.0x | $2.2B | VS | |
$GLDM World Gold Trust | 66 | 54 | 85 | 92 | 11.3x | 11.3x | - | 27.1% | 100.0% | 98.9% | 459.9% | 333.4% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $43.7B | VS | |
$ACTG ACACIA RESEARCH CORP | 41 | 29 | 30 | 54 | 49.9x | 43.5x | 1.4% | 1.1% | 22.9% | -12.1% | -9.5% | 130.1% | 0.0% | 33.0x | $313M | ||
| SECTOR BENCH | - | - | - | - | - | 11.9x | 7.8x | 8.9% | 1.2% | 76.5% | 17.0% | 21.5% | 10.8% | 1.9% | 0.5x | - | REF |
ACACIA RESEARCH CORP (ACTG) receives a "Reduce" rating with a composite score of 41.0/100. It ranks #3409 out of 7,333 stocks in our coverage universe and carries a 2-star rating. Ratings are driven by a 6-factor quantitative model measuring quality, value, momentum, investment, stability, and short interest.
Sign in to join the discussion.
YOY expansion rate
Core pricing power
Operating efficiency
Bottom-line conversion
Equity capital efficiency
Asset base utilization
Financial leverage load
Direct cash return
Martin D. McNulty
Chief Executive Officer
Labor Force
290
29
23
34
Audit Verdict: Lower quality and stability scores may indicate governance concerns.
No recent insider transactions available for ACTG
In-line with peers — no strong momentum signal
Expensive relative to fundamentals — limited margin of safety
Weak fundamentals — higher risk of value trap
High volatility — wider range of outcomes increases timing risk
Aggressive spending — empire-building risk, dilutive growth
Mid-range overall rating
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Relative valuation derived from Finance, Insurance, And Real Estate sector benchmarks. Model weights: EV/EBITDA (40%), P/B (35%), P/S (25%). Re-calculated daily.
Projection based on user-defined inputs. Re-calculated daily against current market data.
Reverse DCF Framework — Mauboussin Methodology
Institutional-grade Reverse DCF analysis. This model identifies the growth hurdles embedded in current market prices. When implied growth is significantly lower than historical or projected rates, a margin of safety may exist. Re-audited daily.
No analyst ratings for ACTG.
View All RatingsMaterial decline in asset turnover efficiency detected
High margin volatility — erratic forensic earnings quality
| Factor | Global | Sector | Tilt |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROFITABILITY | 29 | 27 | +2NEUTRAL |
| MOMENTUM | 54 | 57 | -3NEUTRAL |
| VALUATION | 30 | 23 | +7ALPHA |
| INVESTMENT | 23 | 11 | +12ALPHA |
| STABILITY | 34 | 26 | +8ALPHA |
| SHORT INT | 22 | 8 | +14ALPHA |
Global = full universe. Sector = relative to industry peers. Positive tilt indicates idiosyncratic strength.
ROE proxy 1.4% (sector 8.9%)
GM 23% vs sector 77%, OM -12% vs sector 17%
Capital turnover N/A
Rev growth 130%, 10yr history
Interest coverage -2.9x
Composite assessment of profitability, capital efficiency, and financial strength. Top-tier entities demonstrate sustainable cash flow generation and elite competitive moats.
Profit generated per dollar of shareholder equity
Efficiency of asset utilization
Pricing power and cost efficiency
Core business profitability
Bottom-line profitability
The Quality factor evaluates the persistence and magnitude of realized cash flows. Companies with scores >70 exhibit superior pricing power and structural financial resilience through diverse economic regimes.
Our uncertainty rating tracks the predictability of future cash flows and potential for permanent capital loss. Moderate visibility with standard industry cyclicality.
ACACIA RESEARCH CORP receives a Reduce rating from our analysis, with a composite score of 41.0/100 and 2 out of 5 stars, ranking #3409 out of 7,333 stocks. ACTG's factor profile shows weakness across multiple dimensions, suggesting the stock may underperform going forward. Existing holders may want to consider trimming positions or tightening stop-losses.
ACTG's quality score of 29/100 is below average, suggesting challenges with profitability or capital efficiency. The company reports a return on equity of 1.4% (sector avg: 8.9%), gross margins of 22.9% (sector avg: 76.5%), net margins of -9.5% (sector avg: 21.5%). Investors should examine whether management is actively addressing these weaknesses or if they reflect structural industry headwinds.
With a value score of 30/100, ACTG appears somewhat expensive relative to its fundamentals. Key valuation metrics include a P/E ratio of 49.91x, an EV/EBITDA of 43.51x, a P/B ratio of 0.70x. Investors paying a premium here are likely betting on above-average growth or margin expansion to justify current prices.
ACACIA RESEARCH CORP's investment score of 23/100 suggests limited reinvestment activity. Key growth metrics include revenue growth of 130.1% vs. a sector average of 10.8% and a return on assets of 1.1% (sector: 1.2%). While this can be positive for mature, cash-generative businesses returning capital to shareholders, it may also signal a lack of growth opportunities or management conservatism.
ACTG demonstrates moderate momentum with a score of 54/100, suggesting a neutral price trend without strong directional conviction. Revenue growth stands at 130.1% year-over-year, while a beta of 0.72 reflects its sensitivity to broader market moves. Moderate momentum may indicate the stock is consolidating or transitioning between trends, warranting close monitoring of upcoming catalysts.
ACTG's stability score of 34/100 signals elevated volatility and/or leverage concerns. Key stability metrics include a beta of 0.72 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 33.00x (sector avg: 0.5x). Investors should be prepared for wider-than-average price swings and consider position sizing accordingly to manage portfolio risk.
ACACIA RESEARCH CORP's short interest score of 22/100 reveals significant bearish positioning, suggesting institutional investors are actively betting against the stock. Specific risk factors include elevated leverage (D/E: 33.00x), small-cap liquidity risk. At $313M (small-cap), ACTG carries meaningful risk and is best suited for investors with high risk tolerance who have thoroughly evaluated the bear thesis.
ACACIA RESEARCH CORP is a small-cap company in the Finance, Insurance, And Real Estate sector, ranked #0 of 50 in its sector (100th percentile) and #3409 of 7,333 overall (54th percentile). Key comparisons include ROE of 1.4% trailing the 8.9% sector median and operating margins of -12.1% below the 17.0% sector average. This top-quartile standing reflects exceptional competitive strength relative to Finance, Insurance, And Real Estate peers.
While ACTG currently exhibits a REDUCE profile, superior opportunities exist within the FINANCE, INSURANCE, AND REAL ESTATE sector. Our model identifies several "Strong Buy" candidates with higher quality scores and more attractive valuations among direct industry competitors.
View Top Finance, Insurance, And Real Estate Alpha →Quant Factor Profile
Upgrade catalyst
Improvement in Short Int. (22) would have the largest impact on the composite score.
EV/EBITDA 460% ABOVE SECTOR MEDIAN
ROE 84% BELOW SECTOR MEDIAN
Gross Margin 70% BELOW SECTOR MEDIAN
AUDIT DATA AS OF SEP 30, 2025 (Q2 FY2025)
We rate ACACIA RESEARCH CORP (ACTG) as a Reduce with a composite score of 41.0/100 at a current price of $4.03. The quantitative profile shows weakness across multiple dimensions, suggesting limited upside potential and elevated risk of underperformance relative to peers over the next 12 months.
The rating is primarily driven by strength in momentum (54th percentile) and stability (34th percentile), which together account for the majority of the composite score. Offsetting weakness in investment (23th percentile) and quality (29th percentile) tempers our overall conviction. We assign a No Moat rating (29/100), High uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation.
Key items to watch: sustainability of the current growth rate; the path to profitability. Any material change in these dynamics could warrant a reassessment of our rating. The moat trend is stable, which suggests the competitive landscape is stable for now.
ACACIA RESEARCH CORP holds a top-quartile position (#0 of 50) within the Finance, Insurance, And Real Estate sector, based on our composite quantitative scoring across quality, value, momentum, and stability factors. The composite score of 41.0/100 places it at rank #3409 in our full 7,333-stock universe. At $313M in market capitalization, ACACIA RESEARCH CORP is a small-cap player in the Finance, Insurance, And Real Estate space, which limits certain scale advantages but may allow for more agile strategic execution.
Revenue is growing at 130%, though momentum at the 54th percentile suggests the market has not yet fully recognized this trajectory. This potential disconnect between fundamental improvement and market recognition could represent an opportunity for patient investors if the growth trend persists.
The margin cascade tells an important story: gross margins of 23% (-53.6pp vs sector) narrow to operating margins of -12% (-29.1pp vs sector) and net margins of -9.5%, yielding a gross-to-net conversion rate of -41%. The significant margin erosion from gross to net suggests elevated operating expenses, high interest costs, or other structural drags that warrant monitoring.
At a current price of $4.03, ACACIA RESEARCH CORP is trading at a premium to fundamental value. Our value factor score of 30/100 reflects a composite assessment across multiple valuation metrics including price-to-earnings, price-to-book, EV/EBITDA, and price-to-sales ratios relative to both sector peers and the broader market. The premium valuation implies the market is pricing in significant future growth or quality improvements that are not yet fully reflected in current fundamentals.
The stock currently trades at a P/E of 49.9x (a 318% premium to the sector median of 11.9x), EV/EBITDA of 43.5x (at a premium), P/B of 0.7x, P/S of 1.6x. The above-sector P/E multiple suggests the market is pricing in superior growth or quality, which our analysis finds only partially justified by current fundamentals.
Revenue growth of 130% confirms the business is expanding its addressable market — growth at this level typically supports multiple expansion and attracts institutional capital.
The Reduce rating (composite 41.0/100) reflects multi-factor weakness, and historically, stocks in this scoring range have underperformed the market by a meaningful margin.
A P/E of 49.9x leaves little room for execution misses — any earnings disappointment could trigger a sharp multiple compression.
Thin net margins of -9.5% provide limited cushion against cost pressures, competitive pricing, or macroeconomic headwinds — even small changes in costs could swing the company to a loss.
Below-average quality (29th percentile) raises durability concerns about the fundamental profile and increases the risk of negative earnings surprises.
We assign a High uncertainty rating to ACACIA RESEARCH CORP. Key risk factors include current negative profitability (net margin -9.5%), below-average price stability (34th percentile), weak quality scores (29th percentile). The wide range of potential outcomes widens our fair value estimate and increases the possibility of permanent capital impairment. Investors considering this name should size positions accordingly and demand a meaningful margin of safety before initiating.
Specific risk factors that inform our assessment include: current negative profitability (net margin -9.5%); below-average price stability (34th percentile); weak quality scores (29th percentile); elevated valuation multiple (P/E 49.9x) that leaves limited margin for error. Each of these factors independently widens the distribution of potential outcomes, and in combination they create a risk profile that demands careful position sizing. The stability factor at the 34th percentile and quality factor at the 29th percentile provide a quantitative summary of the overall risk landscape.
We identify limited risk mitigants at this time, which contributes to our high uncertainty assessment. Investors should monitor for improvement in balance sheet metrics, margin stability, and business predictability that could warrant a downgrade in our risk assessment over time.
We rate ACACIA RESEARCH CORP's capital allocation as Poor. Key concerns include low returns on equity (1.4%), negative profitability, weak asset returns (ROA 1.1%). Exemplary capital allocators generate ROE above 20% and maintain conservative leverage — ACACIA RESEARCH CORP significantly underperforms these benchmarks, raising questions about management's ability to create shareholder value.
Investors should scrutinize management's reinvestment decisions and balance sheet trajectory before committing capital. Poor capital allocation often compounds over time: overlevered balance sheets limit strategic flexibility, while low returns on capital destroy shareholder value. We would need to see sustained improvement in profitability metrics and balance sheet discipline before considering an upgrade.
In summary, ACACIA RESEARCH CORP receives a Reduce rating with a composite score of 41.0/100 (rank #3409 of 7,333). Our quantitative framework assigns a No Moat (29/100, trend: stable), High uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation. The average factor score across quality, value, momentum, stability, and investment is 34/100.
Our analysis does not support a constructive view on ACACIA RESEARCH CORP at this time. The combination of limited competitive advantages, high uncertainty, and poor capital allocation suggests unfavorable risk-reward at current levels. We recommend investors avoid new positions and existing holders consider reducing exposure.
Analysis derived from Blank Capital Research quantitative terminal. For informational purposes only. No trade solicitation. Past performance not indicative of future results. Consult a qualified advisor.
We do not assign ACACIA RESEARCH CORP a meaningful economic moat, scoring 29/100 on our composite assessment. Current fundamentals do not demonstrate the kind of durable competitive advantages — such as superior returns on invested capital, margin superiority, or reinvestment efficiency — that would protect the company from competitive erosion over the long term. The highest-scoring pillar, growth durability, reached only 17.2/20.
The strongest moat sources are growth durability (17.2/20) and financial resilience (10/20). Rev growth 130%, 10yr history. Interest coverage -2.9x. These pillars form the core of ACACIA RESEARCH CORP's competitive identity and are the primary drivers of excess returns in our framework.
Areas of relative weakness include reinvestment efficiency (0/20) and margin superiority (0.3/20). Capital turnover N/A. Improvement in these areas could meaningfully widen the moat over time, while deterioration would be an early warning of competitive erosion.
Our moat trend assessment is Stable. Multi-year ROIC and operating margin trajectories show neither meaningful improvement nor deterioration, suggesting the competitive position is steady. We expect ACACIA RESEARCH CORP's moat profile to remain largely unchanged absent a material shift in return on capital or industry dynamics.
Key profit drivers include robust top-line growth of 130% expanding the revenue base. The margin cascade from 23% gross to -12% operating to -9.5% net reveals the company's cost structure and reinvestment intensity. Our analysis indicates that profit quality raises some durability concerns, with the quality factor at the 29th percentile.
The margin profile shows gross margins of 23%, operating margins of -12%, net margins of -9.5%. Return metrics include ROE of 1.4% and ROA of 1.1%. Relative to the Finance, Insurance, And Real Estate sector, gross margins are 53.6 percentage points below the sector median of 77%, and ROE of 1.4% compares to a sector median of 8.9%.
The balance sheet reflects moderate leverage with D/E of 33%, revenue growth of 130%. The sector median D/E is 0%, putting ACACIA RESEARCH CORP at higher leverage than the typical peer. Overall balance sheet health is adequate for the current business environment.
Above 50MA
37.18%
Net New Highs
+51081

Microsoft acquires Activision (ATVI) in a $68.7 billion deal. MSFT expects to strengthen its gaming presence and enter the metaverse with strong franchises.
Reported offer of roughly $9 billion would represent a 37% premium to Friday's closing price for Kohl's shares.
SAN JOSE, Calif., January 30, 2026--QuantumScape Corporation (NASDAQ: QS), a global leader in next-generation solid-state lithium-metal battery technology, today announced the appointment of Geoff Ribar to its board of directors. Ribar brings deep expertise and extensive leadership experience in the technology industry, with decades serving as CFO for companies across the sector.

The most oversold stocks in the financial sector presents an opportunity to buy into undervalued companies. The RSI is a momentum indicator, which compares a stock's strength on days when prices go up to its strength on days when prices go down. When compared to a stock's price action, it can give traders a better sense of how a stock may perform in the short term. An asset is typically considered oversold when the RSI is below 30, according to Benzinga Pro. Here’s the latest list of major oversold players in this sector, having an RSI near or below 30. B. Riley Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: RILY) On Nov. 8, B. Riley Financial posted a loss for the third quarter. Bryant Riley, Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer of B. Riley Financial said, "During the third quarter, we generated meaningful operating adjusted EBITDA consistent with our platform objectives to drive better results from a broader client ...

A consortium backed by activist hedge fund Starboard Value LP is offering about $9 billion for retailer Kohl's Corporation (NYSE: KSS), according to a Wall Street Journal report. People familiar with the developments tell WSJ that Acacia Research Corp (NASDAQ: ACTG) has led the offer, an effort spearheaded by CEO Clifford Press. Controlled by Starboard Value LP, Acacia Research Corp offered to buy the department-store chain for $64 a share in cash Friday. Acacia told the retailer (the largest department store chain in the ...