IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: Blank Capital Research ("BCR") is a technology platform, not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer. The algorithmically generated signals, scores, and rankings provided on this site ("God Mode" Signals) are for informational and research purposes only and do not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to sell or solicit an offer to buy any securities.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS: The "timing scores" and "regime signals" displayed are based on quantitative models. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not actually been executed, the results may have under-or-over compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity.
RISK OF LOSS: Trading in financial markets involves a high degree of risk and may result in the loss of your entire investment. Data provided by third-party sources (Intrinio, Snowflake) is believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
© 2026 Blank Capital Research. All rights reserved. System Version: Aegis V8 (God Mode).
Verdict
Quantitative factor alignment verified for current market regime.
Quant Score
Rank
#1414
Positioning
Market Dominance
Finance, Insurance, And Real Estate
Trading
$2.2B
N/A
N/A
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
| Stock | Rating | Score▼ | Quality | Value | Momentum | P/E | EV/EBITDA | ROE | ROA | Gross Mgn | Op Mgn | Net Mgn | Rev Growth | Div Yield | D/E | Mkt Cap | AUDIT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$SII SPROTT INC. | 75 | 91 | 87 | 98 | - | - | 15.7% | 12.8% | 48.9% | 37.0% | 28.8% | 14.9% | 2.5% | 0.0x | $1.1B | VS | |
$PUK PRUDENTIAL PLC | 73 | 88 | 97 | 80 | - | - | 13.2% | 1.4% | 100.0% | 97.0% | 23.8% | 11.8% | 2.7% | 5.0x | $21.5B | VS | |
$NMR NOMURA HOLDINGS INC | 72 | 81 | 92 | 87 | - | - | 9.9% | 0.6% | 84.5% | 70.0% | 7.3% | 14.9% | 0.0% | 923.0x | $18.3B | VS | |
$PSLV Sprott Physical Silver Trust | 69 | 82 | 80 | 98 | - | - | 17.3% | 17.7% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 1643.8% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $5.0B | VS | |
$UFCS UNITED FIRE GROUP INC | 68 | 81 | 93 | 76 | 5.0x | 3.5x | 13.2% | 4.1% | 99.9% | 14.7% | 11.1% | 9.2% | 2.1% | 16.0x | $775M | VS | |
$SLF SUN LIFE FINANCIAL INC | 68 | 83 | 95 | 63 | - | - | 12.6% | 0.9% | 32.0% | 31.3% | 7.9% | -12.9% | 4.3% | 24.0x | $37.8B | VS | |
$CBOE Cboe Global Markets, Inc. | 68 | 75 | 63 | 77 | 21.3x | 15.7x | 24.0% | 13.7% | 41.7% | 32.4% | 26.4% | 8.2% | 1.1% | 30.0x | $25.7B | VS | |
$PHYS Sprott Physical Gold Trust | 67 | 64 | 82 | 91 | - | - | 22.5% | 22.8% | 101.8% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 138.9% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $8.4B | VS | |
$VTMX Vesta Real Estate Corporation, S.A.B. de C.V. | 67 | 69 | 77 | 80 | - | - | 8.8% | 5.8% | 98.7% | 75.7% | 88.5% | 17.6% | 4.3% | 34.0x | $2.2B | VS | |
$GLDM World Gold Trust | 66 | 54 | 85 | 92 | 11.3x | 11.3x | - | 27.1% | 100.0% | 98.9% | 459.9% | 333.4% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $43.7B | VS | |
$AAAU Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF | 54 | 29 | 49 | 92 | 9.6x | 2.0x | - | 31.3% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 189.0% | 0.0% | - | $2.2B | ||
| SECTOR BENCH | - | - | - | - | - | 11.9x | 7.8x | 8.9% | 1.2% | 76.5% | 17.0% | 21.5% | 10.8% | 1.9% | 0.5x | - | REF |
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) receives a "Hold" rating with a composite score of 53.8/100. It ranks #1414 out of 7,333 stocks in our coverage universe and carries a 3-star rating. Ratings are driven by a 6-factor quantitative model measuring quality, value, momentum, investment, stability, and short interest.
Sign in to join the discussion.
YOY expansion rate
Core pricing power
Operating efficiency
Bottom-line conversion
Asset base utilization
Direct cash return
N/A
Chief Executive Officer
29
18
68
Audit Verdict: Lower quality and stability scores may indicate governance concerns.
No recent insider transactions available for AAAU
Outperforming peers — winners tend to keep winning over 3-12 months
Fair valuation relative to peers
Weak fundamentals — higher risk of value trap
Low volatility — smoother ride and historically better risk-adjusted returns
Aggressive spending — empire-building risk, dilutive growth
Mid-range overall rating
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Relative valuation derived from Finance, Insurance, And Real Estate sector benchmarks. Model weights: EV/EBITDA (40%), P/B (35%), P/S (25%). Re-calculated daily.
Projection based on user-defined inputs. Re-calculated daily against current market data.
Reverse DCF Framework — Mauboussin Methodology
Institutional-grade Reverse DCF analysis. This model identifies the growth hurdles embedded in current market prices. When implied growth is significantly lower than historical or projected rates, a margin of safety may exist. Re-audited daily.
No analyst ratings for AAAU.
View All RatingsInsufficient data for Financial Analysis
| Factor | Global | Sector | Tilt |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROFITABILITY | 29 | 24 | +5NEUTRAL |
| MOMENTUM | 92 | 96 | -4NEUTRAL |
| VALUATION | 49 | 64 | -15DRAG |
| INVESTMENT | 18 | 1 | +17ALPHA |
| STABILITY | 68 | 77 | -9DRAG |
| SHORT INT | 53 | 62 | -9DRAG |
Global = full universe. Sector = relative to industry peers. Positive tilt indicates idiosyncratic strength.
Insufficient data for ROIC calculation
GM 0% vs sector 77%, OM 100% vs sector 17%
Capital turnover N/A
Rev growth 189%, 2yr history
Interest coverage N/A
Composite assessment of profitability, capital efficiency, and financial strength. Top-tier entities demonstrate sustainable cash flow generation and elite competitive moats.
Profit generated per dollar of shareholder equity
Efficiency of asset utilization
Pricing power and cost efficiency
Core business profitability
Bottom-line profitability
The Quality factor evaluates the persistence and magnitude of realized cash flows. Companies with scores >70 exhibit superior pricing power and structural financial resilience through diverse economic regimes.
Our uncertainty rating tracks the predictability of future cash flows and potential for permanent capital loss. Moderate visibility with standard industry cyclicality.
Our model assigns Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF a Hold rating, with a composite score of 53.8/100 and 3 out of 5 stars. Ranked #1414 of 7,333 stocks, AAAU presents a mixed quantitative picture — neither compelling enough to initiate new positions nor weak enough to warrant selling. Investors already holding may consider maintaining their position while monitoring for changes in the factor profile.
AAAU's quality score of 29/100 is below average, suggesting challenges with profitability or capital efficiency. The company reports gross margins of 0.0% (sector avg: 76.5%), net margins of 100.0% (sector avg: 21.5%). Investors should examine whether management is actively addressing these weaknesses or if they reflect structural industry headwinds.
With a value score of 49/100, AAAU appears somewhat expensive relative to its fundamentals. Key valuation metrics include a P/E ratio of 9.59x, an EV/EBITDA of 2.04x. Investors paying a premium here are likely betting on above-average growth or margin expansion to justify current prices.
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF's investment score of 18/100 suggests limited reinvestment activity. Key growth metrics include revenue growth of 189.0% vs. a sector average of 10.8% and a return on assets of 31.3% (sector: 1.2%). While this can be positive for mature, cash-generative businesses returning capital to shareholders, it may also signal a lack of growth opportunities or management conservatism.
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) is exhibiting exceptional momentum with a score of 92/100, placing it among the strongest trending stocks in the market. Revenue growth stands at 189.0% year-over-year, while a beta of 0.01 reflects its sensitivity to broader market moves. Stocks with momentum scores this high have historically outperformed over the following 3–12 months, suggesting AAAU may continue to benefit from strong institutional interest and positive price trends.
AAAU shows good financial stability with a score of 68/100. Key stability metrics include a beta of 0.01. This suggests manageable leverage and moderate price volatility, making it appropriate for investors seeking a balance between growth potential and capital preservation.
The short interest score of 53/100 for AAAU suggests somewhat elevated bearish positioning by institutional traders. With a $2.2B market cap (mid-cap), Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF may experience above-average volatility. Investors should consider whether the short thesis has merit or if it creates a potential short-squeeze opportunity.
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF is a mid-cap company in the Finance, Insurance, And Real Estate sector, ranked #0 of 50 in its sector (100th percentile) and #1414 of 7,333 overall (81st percentile). Key comparisons include operating margins of 100.0% above the 17.0% sector average. This top-quartile standing reflects exceptional competitive strength relative to Finance, Insurance, And Real Estate peers.
While AAAU currently exhibits a HOLD profile, superior opportunities exist within the FINANCE, INSURANCE, AND REAL ESTATE sector. Our model identifies several "Strong Buy" candidates with higher quality scores and more attractive valuations among direct industry competitors.
View Top Finance, Insurance, And Real Estate Alpha →Quant Factor Profile
Key factor gap
Momentum (92) vs Investment (18) — closing this gap could shift the rating.
EV/EBITDA 74% BELOW SECTOR MEDIAN (FAVORABLE)
Gross Margin 100% BELOW SECTOR MEDIAN
Op. Margin 488% ABOVE SECTOR MEDIAN (FAVORABLE)
AUDIT DATA AS OF SEP 30, 2025 (Q2 FY2025)
We rate Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) as a Hold with a composite score of 53.8/100 at a current price of $50.81. The stock presents a mixed quantitative picture — neither compelling enough to warrant new accumulation nor weak enough to justify selling for existing holders. Our factors are split, and the overall profile suggests patience is warranted.
The rating is primarily driven by strength in momentum (92th percentile) and stability (68th percentile), which together account for the majority of the composite score. Offsetting weakness in investment (18th percentile) and quality (29th percentile) tempers our overall conviction. We assign a No Moat rating (37/100), Low uncertainty, and Standard capital allocation.
Key items to watch: sustainability of the current growth rate. Any material change in these dynamics could warrant a reassessment of our rating. The moat trend is stable, which suggests the competitive landscape is stable for now.
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF holds a top-quartile position (#0 of 50) within the Finance, Insurance, And Real Estate sector, based on our composite quantitative scoring across quality, value, momentum, and stability factors. The composite score of 53.8/100 places it at rank #1414 in our full 7,333-stock universe. At $2.2B in market capitalization, Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF is a mid-cap player in the Finance, Insurance, And Real Estate space, which limits certain scale advantages but may allow for more agile strategic execution.
The near-term outlook is constructive, with revenue growing at 189% and momentum in the 92th percentile confirming positive market sentiment and institutional accumulation. The combination of strong top-line growth and favorable price dynamics suggests the company is executing well on its growth strategy. Investment factor at the 18th percentile indicates reinvestment patterns that investors should monitor for sustainability.
The margin cascade tells an important story: gross margins of 0% (-76.5pp vs sector) narrow to operating margins of 100% (+83.0pp vs sector) and net margins of 100.0%, yielding a gross-to-net conversion rate of N/A%. The significant margin erosion from gross to net suggests elevated operating expenses, high interest costs, or other structural drags that warrant monitoring.
At a current price of $50.81, Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF is trading near fair value based on current fundamentals. Our value factor score of 49/100 reflects a composite assessment across multiple valuation metrics including price-to-earnings, price-to-book, EV/EBITDA, and price-to-sales ratios relative to both sector peers and the broader market. Valuation metrics are mixed, with no strong signal of mispricing in either direction.
The stock currently trades at a P/E of 9.6x (roughly in line with the sector median of 11.9x), EV/EBITDA of 2.0x (discounted to peers), P/S of 2.0x. The below-sector P/E suggests possible undervaluation or the market pricing in near-term headwinds.
Revenue growth of 189% confirms the business is expanding its addressable market — growth at this level typically supports multiple expansion and attracts institutional capital.
Positive momentum (92th percentile) indicates institutional accumulation and favorable technical dynamics that tend to persist in the intermediate term.
Return on assets of 31.3% indicates efficient deployment of the full asset base, not just equity capital.
Below-average quality (29th percentile) raises durability concerns about the fundamental profile and increases the risk of negative earnings surprises.
We assign a Low uncertainty rating to Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF. The company exhibits strong financial stability with a beta of 0.01, and a stability factor in the 68th percentile. The predictable nature of the business model and solid financial position reduce the range of potential outcomes, giving us confidence in our fair value estimate.
Specific risk factors that inform our assessment include: weak quality scores (29th percentile); low beta of 0.01 — while defensive, this may indicate limited upside participation in bull markets. Each of these factors independently widens the distribution of potential outcomes, and in combination they create a risk profile that demands careful position sizing. The stability factor at the 68th percentile and quality factor at the 29th percentile provide a quantitative summary of the overall risk landscape.
Key risk mitigants include: above-average stability (68th percentile) suggests predictable business dynamics. These factors partially offset the identified risks and provide downside protection in adverse scenarios. On balance, the risk-reward profile is favorable for long-term investors.
We rate Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF's capital allocation as Standard. Management has shown adequate — though not exceptional — stewardship of shareholder capital. Returns on equity stand at N/A, and the balance sheet is managed within acceptable parameters (D/E: N/A). Exemplary allocators typically sustain ROE above 20% and D/E below 50%; Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF falls short on at least one dimension.
There is room for improvement in optimizing the capital structure or enhancing shareholder returns. Absent a dividend, the overall capital allocation framework would benefit from either higher reinvestment returns, improved balance sheet efficiency, or increased shareholder distributions. We will monitor for signs of strategic improvement that could warrant an upgrade.
In summary, Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF receives a Hold rating with a composite score of 53.8/100 (rank #1414 of 7,333). Our quantitative framework assigns a No Moat (37/100, trend: stable), Low uncertainty, and Standard capital allocation. The average factor score across quality, value, momentum, stability, and investment is 51/100.
Our analysis supports a neutral stance on Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF. While the quantitative profile is not weak enough to warrant selling, it lacks the multi-factor strength required for a buy recommendation. Existing holders should maintain positions and monitor for catalysts — either fundamental improvement or valuation compression — that would shift the risk-reward balance.
Analysis derived from Blank Capital Research quantitative terminal. For informational purposes only. No trade solicitation. Past performance not indicative of future results. Consult a qualified advisor.
We do not assign Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF a meaningful economic moat, scoring 37/100 on our composite assessment. Current fundamentals do not demonstrate the kind of durable competitive advantages — such as superior returns on invested capital, margin superiority, or reinvestment efficiency — that would protect the company from competitive erosion over the long term. The highest-scoring pillar, growth durability, reached only 20/20.
The strongest moat sources are growth durability (20/20) and margin superiority (9.5/20). Rev growth 189%, 2yr history. GM 0% vs sector 77%, OM 100% vs sector 17%. These pillars form the core of Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF's competitive identity and are the primary drivers of excess returns in our framework.
Areas of relative weakness include reinvestment efficiency (0/20) and financial resilience (2.5/20). Capital turnover N/A. Improvement in these areas could meaningfully widen the moat over time, while deterioration would be an early warning of competitive erosion.
Our moat trend assessment is Stable. Multi-year ROIC and operating margin trajectories show neither meaningful improvement nor deterioration, suggesting the competitive position is steady. We expect Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF's moat profile to remain largely unchanged absent a material shift in return on capital or industry dynamics.
Key profit drivers include operating margins of 100% reflecting effective cost management, robust top-line growth of 189% expanding the revenue base. The margin cascade from 0% gross to 100% operating to 100.0% net reveals the company's cost structure and reinvestment intensity. Our analysis indicates that profit quality raises some durability concerns, with the quality factor at the 29th percentile.
The margin profile shows gross margins of 0%, operating margins of 100%, net margins of 100.0%. Return metrics include ROA of 31.3%. Relative to the Finance, Insurance, And Real Estate sector, gross margins are 76.5 percentage points below the sector median of 77%.
The balance sheet reflects revenue growth of 189%. Overall balance sheet health is adequate for the current business environment.
Above 50MA
37.18%
Net New Highs
+51081

Gold prices surged past $5,506, approaching the $5,600 mark, with a 10% gain in four sessions. Five major gold ETFs have entered the top 10th percentile for momentum scores, driven by the Federal Reserve's interest rate pause and geopolitical tensions between the U.S. and Iran, which are fueling a flight to safety into tangible assets.

Gold prices hit a record high of $3,699.57, with analysts suggesting this is the beginning of a new cycle for precious metals. Mining stocks are showing strong performance, driven by a weakening US dollar and expectations of Federal Reserve rate cuts.

US gold reserves have reached a market value of $1 trillion, with gold prices nearing $3,840 per ounce, despite the country's global gold reserve share hitting a 90-year low. Central banks like China, Russia, and India have been actively accumulating gold while the US has remained passive.

The article compares two precious metal ETFs: Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). SLV has delivered significantly higher one-year returns (137.63% vs 73.1%), while AAAU offers a lower expense ratio (0.18% vs 0.50%). Both ETFs provide direct exposure to precious metals, with gold and silver prices surging in 2025 due to geopolitical tensions and economic uncertainty. However, investors should be cautious of the high volatility in precious metals, particularly silver, which experienced a 27% single-day drop in January.

Two gold ETFs, SPDR Gold Shares and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF, offer investors different options for gold exposure. While SPDR has larger assets, Goldman Sachs provides a more cost-effective investment with a lower expense ratio.