IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: Blank Capital Research ("BCR") is a technology platform, not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer. The algorithmically generated signals, scores, and rankings provided on this site ("God Mode" Signals) are for informational and research purposes only and do not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to sell or solicit an offer to buy any securities.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS: The "timing scores" and "regime signals" displayed are based on quantitative models. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not actually been executed, the results may have under-or-over compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity.
RISK OF LOSS: Trading in financial markets involves a high degree of risk and may result in the loss of your entire investment. Data provided by third-party sources (Intrinio, Snowflake) is believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
© 2026 Blank Capital Research. All rights reserved. System Version: Aegis V8 (God Mode).
Verdict
Quantitative factor alignment verified for current market regime.
Quant Score
Rank
#1025
Positioning
Market Dominance
Manufacturing
Apparel
$2.1B
Colin Browne
Under Armour, Inc. engages in the developing, marketing, and distributing performance apparel, footwear, and accessories for men, women, and youth. The company offers its apparel in compression, fitted, and loose fit types. It also provides footwear products for running, training, basketball, cleated sports, recovery, and outdoor applications.
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
X-AXIS: EV/EBITDA (LOWER = CHEAPER) | Y-AXIS: ROE (HIGHER = ELITE) | RED CIRCLE = UAA ANALYSIS TARGET
| Stock | Rating | Score▼ | Quality | Value | Momentum | P/E | EV/EBITDA | ROE | ROA | Gross Mgn | Op Mgn | Net Mgn | Rev Growth | Div Yield | D/E | Mkt Cap | AUDIT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$UL UNILEVER PLC | 78 | 96 | 98 | 59 | - | - | 28.5% | 8.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 10.4% | -4.6% | 3.3% | 0.0x | $141.8B | VS | |
$ASML ASML HOLDING NV | 77 | 89 | 86 | 83 | - | - | 46.1% | 16.6% | 51.3% | 31.9% | 26.8% | -4.0% | 1.0% | 25.0x | $272.1B | VS | |
$ESLT ELBIT SYSTEMS LTD | 76 | 81 | 87 | 85 | - | - | 10.3% | 3.1% | 24.1% | 7.2% | 4.7% | 14.3% | 0.8% | 25.0x | $11.4B | VS | |
$MT ArcelorMittal | 75 | 71 | 98 | 85 | - | - | 2.2% | 1.5% | 9.3% | 5.3% | 2.2% | -8.5% | 2.2% | 16.0x | $18.9B | VS | |
$AMAT APPLIED MATERIALS INC /DE | 75 | 85 | 87 | 84 | 20.9x | 13.6x | 35.5% | 19.8% | 48.7% | 29.2% | 24.7% | 4.4% | 0.8% | 32.0x | $181.9B | VS | |
$SIMO Silicon Motion Technology CORP | 75 | 84 | 86 | 85 | - | - | 11.8% | 8.8% | 45.9% | 11.3% | 11.1% | 25.7% | 3.7% | 0.0x | $1.8B | VS | |
$CODA Coda Octopus Group, Inc. | 74 | 83 | 90 | 79 | 16.3x | 11.9x | 7.6% | 7.0% | 66.5% | 17.1% | 15.6% | 39.0% | 0.0% | 0.0x | $115M | VS | |
$GSK GSK plc | 74 | 84 | 90 | 70 | - | - | 22.6% | 4.9% | 71.2% | 12.8% | 9.4% | 1.7% | 5.9% | 124.0x | $72.1B | VS | |
$EFXT Enerflex Ltd. | 74 | 80 | 91 | 83 | - | - | 3.0% | 1.1% | 20.9% | 7.3% | 1.3% | 3.0% | 0.9% | 67.0x | $1.2B | VS | |
$BUD Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV | 74 | 84 | 97 | 63 | - | - | 8.2% | 3.5% | 55.3% | 25.9% | 12.4% | 0.7% | 1.7% | 0.0x | $87.0B | VS | |
$UAA Under Armour, Inc. | 57 | 59 | 57 | 60 | 23.1x | 13.4x | 8.1% | 3.1% | 48.2% | 3.7% | 2.7% | 12.7% | 0.0% | 64.0x | $2.1B | ||
| SECTOR BENCH | - | - | - | - | - | 22.3x | 11.5x | -2.5% | -0.1% | 42.5% | 1.3% | -0.2% | 5.9% | 0.0% | 0.2x | - | REF |
Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) receives a "Hold" rating with a composite score of 57.0/100. It ranks #1025 out of 7,333 stocks in our coverage universe and carries a 3-star rating. Ratings are driven by a 6-factor quantitative model measuring quality, value, momentum, investment, stability, and short interest.
Sign in to join the discussion.
YOY expansion rate
Core pricing power
Operating efficiency
Bottom-line conversion
Equity capital efficiency
Asset base utilization
Financial leverage load
Direct cash return
Colin Browne
Chief Executive Officer
Labor Force
17,500
59
48
47
Audit Verdict: Average governance indicators based on financial metrics.
No recent insider transactions available for UAA
Outperforming peers — winners tend to keep winning over 3-12 months
Fair valuation relative to peers
Average quality profile
Average volatility — neutral timing signal
Moderate investment profile
Mid-range overall rating
Get full access to institutional-quality research tools with Blank Capital Pro.
Upgrade to ProStarting at $19.99/mo
Relative valuation derived from Manufacturing sector benchmarks. Model weights: EV/EBITDA (40%), P/B (35%), P/S (25%). Re-calculated daily.
Projection based on user-defined inputs. Re-calculated daily against current market data.
Reverse DCF Framework — Mauboussin Methodology
Institutional-grade Reverse DCF analysis. This model identifies the growth hurdles embedded in current market prices. When implied growth is significantly lower than historical or projected rates, a margin of safety may exist. Re-audited daily.
No analyst ratings for UAA.
View All RatingsMaterial decline in asset turnover efficiency detected
High margin volatility — erratic forensic earnings quality
| Factor | Global | Sector | Tilt |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROFITABILITY | 59 | 54 | +5NEUTRAL |
| MOMENTUM | 60 | 54 | +6ALPHA |
| VALUATION | 57 | 38 | +19ALPHA |
| INVESTMENT | 48 | 89 | -41DRAG |
| STABILITY | 47 | 29 | +18ALPHA |
| SHORT INT | 59 | 68 | -9DRAG |
Global = full universe. Sector = relative to industry peers. Positive tilt indicates idiosyncratic strength.
ROIC 1.1% vs WACC 7.9% (spread -6.8%)
GM 48% vs sector 43%, OM 4% vs sector 1%
Capital turnover 1.68x
Rev growth 13%, 10yr history
Interest coverage N/A, Net debt/EBITDA 18.0x
Composite assessment of profitability, capital efficiency, and financial strength. Top-tier entities demonstrate sustainable cash flow generation and elite competitive moats.
Profit generated per dollar of shareholder equity
Efficiency of asset utilization
Pricing power and cost efficiency
Core business profitability
Bottom-line profitability
The Quality factor evaluates the persistence and magnitude of realized cash flows. Companies with scores >70 exhibit superior pricing power and structural financial resilience through diverse economic regimes.
Our uncertainty rating tracks the predictability of future cash flows and potential for permanent capital loss. Moderate visibility with standard industry cyclicality.
Our model assigns Under Armour, Inc. a Hold rating, with a composite score of 57.0/100 and 3 out of 5 stars. Ranked #1025 of 7,333 stocks, UAA presents a mixed quantitative picture — neither compelling enough to initiate new positions nor weak enough to warrant selling. Investors already holding may consider maintaining their position while monitoring for changes in the factor profile.
With a quality score of 59/100, UAA shows adequate but unremarkable business quality. The company reports a return on equity of 8.1% (sector avg: -2.5%), gross margins of 48.2% (sector avg: 42.5%), net margins of 2.7% (sector avg: -0.2%). This suggests the company generates acceptable returns but may lack the competitive positioning or operational efficiency to stand out from peers.
UAA's value score of 57/100 indicates the stock is fairly valued based on its current fundamentals. Key valuation metrics include a P/E ratio of 23.08x, an EV/EBITDA of 13.39x, a P/B ratio of 1.87x. At this level, neither a clear bargain nor overpriced, the stock's attractiveness depends more on forward growth expectations and qualitative factors.
With an investment score of 48/100, UAA exhibits moderate growth-oriented spending. Key growth metrics include revenue growth of 12.7% vs. a sector average of 5.9% and a return on assets of 3.1% (sector: -0.1%). The company appears to be balancing growth investments with capital returns, though the pace of investment may not be enough to accelerate top-line growth meaningfully.
UAA demonstrates moderate momentum with a score of 60/100, suggesting a neutral price trend without strong directional conviction. Revenue growth stands at 12.7% year-over-year, while a beta of 1.33 reflects its sensitivity to broader market moves. Moderate momentum may indicate the stock is consolidating or transitioning between trends, warranting close monitoring of upcoming catalysts.
With a stability score of 47/100, UAA exhibits average financial resilience. Key stability metrics include a beta of 1.33 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 64.00x (sector avg: 0.2x). While the balance sheet is not a major concern, the stock is subject to typical market volatility and may experience sharper drawdowns during risk-off episodes.
The short interest score of 59/100 for UAA suggests somewhat elevated bearish positioning by institutional traders. Specific risk factors include above-average market sensitivity (beta: 1.33), elevated leverage (D/E: 64.00x). With a $2.1B market cap (mid-cap), Under Armour, Inc. may experience above-average volatility. Investors should consider whether the short thesis has merit or if it creates a potential short-squeeze opportunity.
Under Armour, Inc. is a mid-cap company in the Manufacturing sector, ranked #0 of 50 in its sector (100th percentile) and #1025 of 7,333 overall (86th percentile). Key comparisons include ROE of 8.1% exceeding the -2.5% sector median and operating margins of 3.7% above the 1.3% sector average. This top-quartile standing reflects exceptional competitive strength relative to Manufacturing peers.
While UAA currently exhibits a HOLD profile, superior opportunities exist within the MANUFACTURING sector. Our model identifies several "Strong Buy" candidates with higher quality scores and more attractive valuations among direct industry competitors.
View Top Manufacturing Alpha →Quant Factor Profile
Upgrade catalyst
Stability (47) is the limiting factor — improvement here would lift the composite score most.
EV/EBITDA 17% ABOVE SECTOR MEDIAN
ROE 426% BELOW SECTOR MEDIAN
Gross Margin 13% ABOVE SECTOR MEDIAN (FAVORABLE)
AUDIT DATA AS OF SEP 30, 2025 (Q2 FY2025)
We rate Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) as a Hold with a composite score of 57.0/100 at a current price of $7.76. The stock presents a mixed quantitative picture — neither compelling enough to warrant new accumulation nor weak enough to justify selling for existing holders. Our factors are split, and the overall profile suggests patience is warranted.
The rating is primarily driven by strength in momentum (60th percentile) and quality (59th percentile), which together account for the majority of the composite score. All factors score above the 40th percentile, indicating no material weakness in the quantitative profile. We assign a No Moat rating (32/100), High uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation.
Key items to watch: quarterly earnings execution and sector-level competitive dynamics. Any material change in these dynamics could warrant a reassessment of our rating. The moat trend is stable, which suggests the competitive landscape is stable for now.
Under Armour, Inc. holds a top-quartile position (#0 of 50) within the Manufacturing sector, based on our composite quantitative scoring across quality, value, momentum, and stability factors. The composite score of 57.0/100 places it at rank #1025 in our full 7,333-stock universe. At $2.1B in market capitalization, Under Armour, Inc. is a mid-cap player in the Manufacturing space, which limits certain scale advantages but may allow for more agile strategic execution.
The outlook is moderately positive, with revenue expanding at 13% and favorable momentum (60th percentile) reflecting constructive market sentiment. The business shows steady execution, though the growth rate is below the levels typically associated with high-conviction growth stories. Momentum confirmation provides support for the current price level.
The margin cascade tells an important story: gross margins of 48% (+5.7pp vs sector) narrow to operating margins of 4% (+2.4pp vs sector) and net margins of 2.7%, yielding a gross-to-net conversion rate of 6%. The significant margin erosion from gross to net suggests elevated operating expenses, high interest costs, or other structural drags that warrant monitoring.
At a current price of $7.76, Under Armour, Inc. is trading near fair value based on current fundamentals. Our value factor score of 57/100 reflects a composite assessment across multiple valuation metrics including price-to-earnings, price-to-book, EV/EBITDA, and price-to-sales ratios relative to both sector peers and the broader market. Valuation metrics are mixed, with no strong signal of mispricing in either direction.
The stock currently trades at a P/E of 23.1x (roughly in line with the sector median of 22.3x), EV/EBITDA of 13.4x (near the sector median), P/B of 1.9x, P/S of 0.7x. The above-sector P/E multiple suggests the market is pricing in superior growth or quality, which our analysis finds only partially justified by current fundamentals.
Gross margins of 48% signal strong pricing power and brand/IP advantages — businesses with margins above 40% have historically demonstrated more resilient earnings through economic cycles.
Revenue growth of 13% confirms the business is expanding its addressable market — growth at this level typically supports multiple expansion and attracts institutional capital.
Thin net margins of 2.7% provide limited cushion against cost pressures, competitive pricing, or macroeconomic headwinds — even small changes in costs could swing the company to a loss.
We assign a High uncertainty rating to Under Armour, Inc.. Key risk factors include elevated market sensitivity (beta of 1.33), the combination of leverage (64% D/E) and thin margins (2.7% net) amplifies downside risk. The wide range of potential outcomes widens our fair value estimate and increases the possibility of permanent capital impairment. Investors considering this name should size positions accordingly and demand a meaningful margin of safety before initiating.
Specific risk factors that inform our assessment include: elevated market sensitivity (beta of 1.33); the combination of leverage (64% D/E) and thin margins (2.7% net) amplifies downside risk. Each of these factors independently widens the distribution of potential outcomes, and in combination they create a risk profile that demands careful position sizing. The stability factor at the 47th percentile and quality factor at the 59th percentile provide a quantitative summary of the overall risk landscape.
Key risk mitigants include: healthy gross margins of 48% provide a buffer against cost pressures. These factors partially offset the identified risks and provide downside protection in adverse scenarios. On balance, the risk-reward profile warrants caution and disciplined position management.
We rate Under Armour, Inc.'s capital allocation as Poor. Key concerns include suboptimal returns on capital. Exemplary capital allocators generate ROE above 20% and maintain conservative leverage — Under Armour, Inc. significantly underperforms these benchmarks, raising questions about management's ability to create shareholder value.
Investors should scrutinize management's reinvestment decisions and balance sheet trajectory before committing capital. Poor capital allocation often compounds over time: overlevered balance sheets limit strategic flexibility, while low returns on capital destroy shareholder value. We would need to see sustained improvement in profitability metrics and balance sheet discipline before considering an upgrade.
In summary, Under Armour, Inc. receives a Hold rating with a composite score of 57.0/100 (rank #1025 of 7,333). Our quantitative framework assigns a No Moat (32/100, trend: stable), High uncertainty, and Poor capital allocation. The average factor score across quality, value, momentum, stability, and investment is 54/100.
Our analysis supports a neutral stance on Under Armour, Inc.. While the quantitative profile is not weak enough to warrant selling, it lacks the multi-factor strength required for a buy recommendation. Existing holders should maintain positions and monitor for catalysts — either fundamental improvement or valuation compression — that would shift the risk-reward balance.
Analysis derived from Blank Capital Research quantitative terminal. For informational purposes only. No trade solicitation. Past performance not indicative of future results. Consult a qualified advisor.
We do not assign Under Armour, Inc. a meaningful economic moat, scoring 32/100 on our composite assessment. The ROIC-WACC spread of -6.8% is the primary signal of economic value creation. Current fundamentals do not demonstrate the kind of durable competitive advantages — such as superior returns on invested capital, margin superiority, or reinvestment efficiency — that would protect the company from competitive erosion over the long term. The highest-scoring pillar, margin superiority, reached only 14/20.
The strongest moat sources are margin superiority (14/20) and growth durability (7.7/20). GM 48% vs sector 43%, OM 4% vs sector 1%. Rev growth 13%, 10yr history. These pillars form the core of Under Armour, Inc.'s competitive identity and are the primary drivers of excess returns in our framework.
Areas of relative weakness include financial resilience (2.5/20) and economic value creation (3/20). Interest coverage N/A, Net debt/EBITDA 18.0x. Improvement in these areas could meaningfully widen the moat over time, while deterioration would be an early warning of competitive erosion.
Our moat trend assessment is Stable. Multi-year ROIC and operating margin trajectories show neither meaningful improvement nor deterioration, suggesting the competitive position is steady. We expect Under Armour, Inc.'s moat profile to remain largely unchanged absent a material shift in return on capital or industry dynamics.
Key profit drivers include gross margins of 48% providing a solid profitability foundation, moderate revenue growth of 13%. The margin cascade from 48% gross to 4% operating to 2.7% net reveals the company's cost structure and reinvestment intensity. Our analysis indicates that profit quality is adequate though not exceptional, with the quality factor at the 59th percentile.
The margin profile shows gross margins of 48%, operating margins of 4%, net margins of 2.7%. Return metrics include ROE of 8.1% and ROA of 3.1%. Relative to the Manufacturing sector, gross margins are 5.7 percentage points above the sector median of 43%, and ROE of 8.1% compares to a sector median of -2.5%.
The balance sheet reflects moderate leverage with D/E of 64%, revenue growth of 13%. The sector median D/E is 0%, putting Under Armour, Inc. at higher leverage than the typical peer. Overall balance sheet health is adequate for the current business environment.
Above 50MA
37.18%
Net New Highs
+51081

U.S. equity markets reached record highs on Friday as solid jobs data eased recession fears while maintaining Fed rate-cut expectations. The S&P 500 and Russell 2000 both climbed to all-time highs, with Vistra surging 13% after securing a major energy deal with Meta. Intel jumped 10% following positive comments from President Trump. Commodities extended gains with silver climbing 4% to $80/oz, while Bitcoin remained flat near $91,000.

V. Prem Watsa, a 10% owner of Under Armour, purchased 13.2 million shares for $67.4 million on January 2, 2026, through indirect entities. The purchase reflects confidence in the undervalued athletic apparel company, though recent financial performance shows revenue contraction and operational losses, making it a risky investment for everyday investors.

Bill Ackman's hedge fund Pershing Square invested $1.4 billion in Nike, converting stock to call options, betting on the company's turnaround strategy under new leadership after experiencing revenue declines and management challenges.
The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Trump era tariffs has quickly filtered into markets. Under Armour (UAA) is among the stocks reacting as investors reassess potential cost pressures for manufacturers and retailers. See our latest analysis for Under Armour. Against the tariff news, Under Armour’s recent 30 day share price return of 20% and 90 day return of 69.33% point to building momentum. However, the 5 year total shareholder return of a 66.49% decline shows the longer term...
A number of stocks fell in the afternoon session after the Trump administration's announcement of new global tariffs, reignited trade policy uncertainty.