- 1P/E measures price relative to profit; P/S measures price relative to revenue
- 2Use P/E for profitable companies; use P/S for unprofitable or early-stage companies
- 3P/E is more useful but can't be calculated for money-losing companies
- 4P/S ignores profitability entirely, which is its biggest weakness
- 5Use both together for a complete valuation picture
#The Core Difference
| Metric | Formula | Measures |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | Price ÷ Earnings Per Share | How much you pay for $1 of profit |
| P/S Ratio | Market Cap ÷ Revenue | How much you pay for $1 of sales |
P/E is about profitability. P/S is about scale.
A company with $10B revenue and 20% margins earns $2B. At a $50B market cap: - P/S = 5.0x - P/E = 25.0x
#When to Use P/E
Best for: - **Profitable companies** — P/E requires positive earnings - **Mature businesses** — Stable earnings make P/E meaningful - **Comparing within sectors** — Same industry, similar margins - **Income-focused analysis** — How many years of earnings to pay back your investment
P/E Benchmarks
| P/E Range | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| < 10 | Cheap or distressed |
| 10–15 | Value territory |
| 15–20 | Fair value |
| 20–30 | Growth premium |
| 30+ | Expensive or high-growth |
Deep dive: P/E Ratio Explained →
#When to Use P/S
Best for: - **Unprofitable companies** — SaaS, biotech, early-stage tech - **Cyclical businesses** — When earnings are temporarily depressed - **Cross-sector comparisons** — Revenue is more stable than earnings - **Growth companies** — Revenue shows scale even without profits
P/S Benchmarks
| P/S Range | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| < 1 | Very cheap (commodity businesses) |
| 1–3 | Moderate valuation |
| 3–8 | Growth premium |
| 8–15 | High-growth SaaS territory |
| 15+ | Hypergrowth or speculative |
Deep dive: Price-to-Sales Explained →
#Head-to-Head Comparison
| Dimension | P/E | P/S |
|---|---|---|
| Works for unprofitable companies | ❌ | ✅ |
| Accounts for profitability | ✅ | ❌ |
| Difficulty to manipulate | Moderate | Low |
| Stability across cycles | Lower | Higher |
| Meaningfulness | Higher | Lower |
| Standard for mature companies | ✅ | ❌ |
| Standard for growth companies | ❌ | ✅ |
#The Hidden Relationship
P/E and P/S are actually connected through profit margins:
P/S × Net Margin = P/E (approximately)
Or equivalently: P/S = P/E × Net Margin
This means: - A stock with P/S of 10x and 10% margins has an implied P/E of 100x - A stock with P/S of 2x and 20% margins has an implied P/E of 10x
When evaluating unprofitable companies by P/S, always ask: what margins will this company achieve at maturity? That converts P/S into an implied P/E.
#Which Is Better for Factor Investing?
Neither in isolation. Our Value factor uses earnings yield (inverse of P/E but using enterprise value) and cash flow yield — both of which account for profitability.
Pure P/S-based value screens can be misleading because they don't distinguish between a cheap, highly profitable business and a cheap, money-losing business.
#The Bottom Line
| Scenario | Use |
|---|---|
| Analyzing Apple or Johnson & Johnson | P/E |
| Analyzing an unprofitable SaaS startup | P/S |
| Comparing two software companies | Both |
| Building a value screen | Earnings yield (P/E-based) |
| Quick sanity check | P/E first, P/S as supplement |
Last updated: February 6, 2026