IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: Blank Capital Research ("BCR") is a technology platform, not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer. The algorithmically generated signals, scores, and rankings provided on this site ("God Mode" Signals) are for informational and research purposes only and do not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to sell or solicit an offer to buy any securities.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS: The "timing scores" and "regime signals" displayed are based on quantitative models. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not actually been executed, the results may have under-or-over compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity.
RISK OF LOSS: Trading in financial markets involves a high degree of risk and may result in the loss of your entire investment. Data provided by third-party sources (Intrinio, Snowflake) is believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
© 2026 Blank Capital Research. All rights reserved. System Version: Aegis V8 (God Mode).
PROSPECT CAPITAL CORP vs FIDUS INVESTMENT Corp — Side-by-side quantitative comparison
Based on our 6-factor quantitative model, FIDUS INVESTMENT Corp (FDUS) is the stronger stock with a composite score of 50.1/100 and a Hold rating, compared to PROSPECT CAPITAL CORP (PSEC) at 43.3/100 (Reduce). FDUS ranks #1994 in our universe versus #3070 for PSEC, giving it an edge of 6.8 points across quality, value, momentum, investment, stability, and short interest factors.
For the Quality factor — which measures profitability and business quality through metrics like ROE, gross margins, and capital efficiency — PSEC leads at 38/100, while FDUS trails at 31/100 (PSEC: 38/100, FDUS: 31/100). The 7-point gap indicates a meaningful difference in quality characteristics between these stocks.
For the Value factor — which evaluates whether a stock is cheap or expensive relative to its earnings, book value, and cash flows — PSEC leads at 66/100, while FDUS trails at 41/100 (PSEC: 66/100, FDUS: 41/100). The 26-point gap indicates a meaningful difference in value characteristics between these stocks.
For the Momentum factor — which captures price trends and institutional sentiment over the trailing 3-12 months — FDUS leads at 64/100, while PSEC trails at 53/100 (FDUS: 64/100, PSEC: 53/100). The 11-point gap indicates a meaningful difference in momentum characteristics between these stocks.
For the Investment factor — which assesses capital allocation quality including reinvestment rates and asset growth — FDUS leads at 27/100, while PSEC trails at 22/100 (FDUS: 27/100, PSEC: 22/100). The 5-point gap indicates a meaningful difference in investment characteristics between these stocks.
For the Stability factor — which measures financial health through leverage ratios and price volatility — FDUS leads at 78/100, while PSEC trails at 18/100 (FDUS: 78/100, PSEC: 18/100). The 60-point gap indicates a meaningful difference in stability characteristics between these stocks.
For the Short Interest factor — which tracks institutional bearish positioning and potential risk from elevated short selling — FDUS leads at 91/100, while PSEC trails at 28/100 (FDUS: 91/100, PSEC: 28/100). The 64-point gap indicates a meaningful difference in short interest characteristics between these stocks.
Based on our 6-factor model, FIDUS INVESTMENT Corp (FDUS) is utilizing a stronger overall profile than PSEC, with a Composite Score of 50 vs 43. FDUS holds a moderate edge, particularly in Short Interest and Stability, though both stocks have merits.
| Overall Rating | ||
| Composite Score | 50 | 43 |
| Rank | #1,994 | #3,070 |
| Stars | 3 / 5 | 2 / 5 |
| Action | Hold | Reduce |
| Factor Scores | ||
| Quality | 31 | 38 |
| Value | 41 | 66 |
| Momentum | 64 | 53 |
| Stability | 78 | 18 |
| Investment | 27 | 22 |
| Short Interest | 91 | 28 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E Ratio | 9.36 | 4.01 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.01 | 0.42 |
| P/S Ratio | 4.54 | 2.00 |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.39 | 3.91 |
| Dividend Yield | 11.2% | 20.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| ROE | 11.3% | 5.0% |
| ROA | 6.3% | 3.4% |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | 48.5% | 49.8% |
| Growth & Risk | ||
| Revenue Growth | 17.9% | 115.0% |
| Debt/Equity | 75.00 | 64.00 |
| Beta | 0.69 | 0.75 |
| Market | ||
| Market Cap | $717M | $1.25B |
Based on our 6-factor quantitative model, FDUS currently has the higher composite score (50.1/100, Hold) and ranks #1994 in our universe. However, the "better" stock depends on your investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. We recommend reviewing the full factor breakdown above before making a decision.
Our comparison analyzes six quantitative factors: Quality (profitability and business strength, 30% weight), Momentum (price trends, 25%), Value (valuation attractiveness, 15%), Investment (capital allocation, 10%), Stability (financial health, 10%), and Short Interest (institutional positioning, 10%). Each factor is scored 0-100 and combined into a composite score.
PSEC has the higher value score at 66/100 compared to FDUS at 41/100. A higher value score indicates the stock trades at a more attractive valuation relative to its earnings, book value, and cash flows.
Our stock rankings and comparisons are updated daily using the latest available market data, financial statements, and price information. Factor scores reflect the most recent quarterly filings and trailing price data.