IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: Blank Capital Research ("BCR") is a technology platform, not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer. The algorithmically generated signals, scores, and rankings provided on this site ("God Mode" Signals) are for informational and research purposes only and do not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to sell or solicit an offer to buy any securities.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS: The "timing scores" and "regime signals" displayed are based on quantitative models. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not actually been executed, the results may have under-or-over compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity.
RISK OF LOSS: Trading in financial markets involves a high degree of risk and may result in the loss of your entire investment. Data provided by third-party sources (Intrinio, Snowflake) is believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
© 2026 Blank Capital Research. All rights reserved. System Version: Aegis V8 (God Mode).
PARK OHIO HOLDINGS CORP vs TACTILE SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY INC — Side-by-side quantitative comparison
Based on our 6-factor quantitative model, TACTILE SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY INC (TCMD) is the stronger stock with a composite score of 64.7/100 and a Hold rating, compared to PARK OHIO HOLDINGS CORP (PKOH) at 57.5/100 (Hold). TCMD ranks #299 in our universe versus #954 for PKOH, giving it an edge of 7.2 points across quality, value, momentum, investment, stability, and short interest factors.
For the Quality factor — which measures profitability and business quality through metrics like ROE, gross margins, and capital efficiency — TCMD leads at 82/100, while PKOH trails at 51/100 (TCMD: 82/100, PKOH: 51/100). The 31-point gap indicates a meaningful difference in quality characteristics between these stocks.
For the Value factor — which evaluates whether a stock is cheap or expensive relative to its earnings, book value, and cash flows — TCMD leads at 89/100, while PKOH trails at 70/100 (TCMD: 89/100, PKOH: 70/100). The 20-point gap indicates a meaningful difference in value characteristics between these stocks.
For the Momentum factor — which captures price trends and institutional sentiment over the trailing 3-12 months — TCMD leads at 78/100, while PKOH trails at 56/100 (TCMD: 78/100, PKOH: 56/100). The 22-point gap indicates a meaningful difference in momentum characteristics between these stocks.
For the Investment factor — which assesses capital allocation quality including reinvestment rates and asset growth — PKOH leads at 43/100, while TCMD trails at 26/100 (PKOH: 43/100, TCMD: 26/100). The 17-point gap indicates a meaningful difference in investment characteristics between these stocks.
For the Stability factor — which measures financial health through leverage ratios and price volatility — PKOH leads at 65/100, while TCMD trails at 51/100 (PKOH: 65/100, TCMD: 51/100). The 14-point gap indicates a meaningful difference in stability characteristics between these stocks.
For the Short Interest factor — which tracks institutional bearish positioning and potential risk from elevated short selling — PKOH leads at 60/100, while TCMD trails at 36/100 (PKOH: 60/100, TCMD: 36/100). The 25-point gap indicates a meaningful difference in short interest characteristics between these stocks.
Based on our 6-factor model, TACTILE SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY INC (TCMD) is utilizing a stronger overall profile than PKOH, with a Composite Score of 65 vs 58. TCMD holds a moderate edge, particularly in Quality and Momentum, though both stocks have merits.
| Overall Rating | ||
| Composite Score | 65 | 58 |
| Rank | #299 | #954 |
| Stars | 3 / 5 | 3 / 5 |
| Action | Hold | Hold |
| Factor Scores | ||
| Quality | 82 | 51 |
| Value | 89 | 70 |
| Momentum | 78 | 56 |
| Stability | 51 | 65 |
| Investment | 26 | 43 |
| Short Interest | 36 | 60 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E Ratio | — | 16.26 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.51 | 0.82 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.90 | 0.19 |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.12 | 2.80 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.0% | 2.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| ROE | 14.0% | 16.9% |
| ROA | 10.9% | 1.3% |
| Gross Margin | 75.8% | 16.7% |
| Operating Margin | 12.8% | 4.3% |
| Net Margin | 9.6% | 1.2% |
| Growth & Risk | ||
| Revenue Growth | 17.3% | -4.5% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.00 | 178.00 |
| Beta | 0.64 | 1.17 |
| Market | ||
| Market Cap | $309M | $306M |
Based on our 6-factor quantitative model, TCMD currently has the higher composite score (64.7/100, Hold) and ranks #299 in our universe. However, the "better" stock depends on your investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. We recommend reviewing the full factor breakdown above before making a decision.
Our comparison analyzes six quantitative factors: Quality (profitability and business strength, 30% weight), Momentum (price trends, 25%), Value (valuation attractiveness, 15%), Investment (capital allocation, 10%), Stability (financial health, 10%), and Short Interest (institutional positioning, 10%). Each factor is scored 0-100 and combined into a composite score.
TCMD has the higher value score at 89/100 compared to PKOH at 70/100. A higher value score indicates the stock trades at a more attractive valuation relative to its earnings, book value, and cash flows.
Our stock rankings and comparisons are updated daily using the latest available market data, financial statements, and price information. Factor scores reflect the most recent quarterly filings and trailing price data.