IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: Blank Capital Research ("BCR") is a technology platform, not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer. The algorithmically generated signals, scores, and rankings provided on this site ("God Mode" Signals) are for informational and research purposes only and do not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to sell or solicit an offer to buy any securities.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS: The "timing scores" and "regime signals" displayed are based on quantitative models. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not actually been executed, the results may have under-or-over compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity.
RISK OF LOSS: Trading in financial markets involves a high degree of risk and may result in the loss of your entire investment. Data provided by third-party sources (Intrinio, Snowflake) is believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
© 2026 Blank Capital Research. All rights reserved. System Version: Aegis V8 (God Mode).
Johnson Controls International plc vs ELBIT SYSTEMS LTD — Side-by-side quantitative comparison
ESLT and JCI are remarkably close in our quantitative rankings. ELBIT SYSTEMS LTD holds a slight edge with a composite score of 75.6/100 (Strong Buy) versus Johnson Controls International plc at 72.8/100 (Buy). With a spread of just 2.8 points, the difference is marginal — investors should weigh qualitative factors like management quality, competitive positioning, and industry outlook to make a final decision.
On the Quality factor, which measures profitability and business quality through metrics like ROE, gross margins, and capital efficiency, these stocks are closely matched (ESLT: 81/100, JCI: 80/100). The narrow 1-point spread suggests similar quality profiles, so this factor alone is unlikely to be a decisive differentiator.
On the Value factor, which evaluates whether a stock is cheap or expensive relative to its earnings, book value, and cash flows, these stocks are closely matched (ESLT: 87/100, JCI: 86/100). The narrow 1-point spread suggests similar value profiles, so this factor alone is unlikely to be a decisive differentiator.
For the Momentum factor — which captures price trends and institutional sentiment over the trailing 3-12 months — ESLT leads at 85/100, while JCI trails at 66/100 (ESLT: 85/100, JCI: 66/100). The 19-point gap indicates a meaningful difference in momentum characteristics between these stocks.
For the Investment factor — which assesses capital allocation quality including reinvestment rates and asset growth — JCI leads at 53/100, while ESLT trails at 48/100 (JCI: 53/100, ESLT: 48/100). The 5-point gap indicates a meaningful difference in investment characteristics between these stocks.
On the Stability factor, which measures financial health through leverage ratios and price volatility, these stocks are closely matched (ESLT: 87/100, JCI: 83/100). The narrow 4-point spread suggests similar stability profiles, so this factor alone is unlikely to be a decisive differentiator.
For the Short Interest factor — which tracks institutional bearish positioning and potential risk from elevated short selling — JCI leads at 80/100, while ESLT trails at 67/100 (JCI: 80/100, ESLT: 67/100). The 13-point gap indicates a meaningful difference in short interest characteristics between these stocks.
Based on our 6-factor model, ELBIT SYSTEMS LTD (ESLT) is utilizing a stronger overall profile than JCI, with a Composite Score of 76 vs 73. The comparison is extremely close. While ESLT leads slightly on Momentum, JCI remains a competitive alternative.
| Overall Rating | ||
| Composite Score | 76 | 73 |
| Rank | #5 | #39 |
| Stars | 5 / 5 | 4 / 5 |
| Action | Strong Buy | Buy |
| Factor Scores | ||
| Quality | 81 | 80 |
| Value | 87 | 86 |
| Momentum | 85 | 66 |
| Stability | 87 | 83 |
| Investment | 48 | 53 |
| Short Interest | 67 | 80 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E Ratio | — | 22.33 |
| P/B Ratio | — | 4.39 |
| P/S Ratio | — | 2.87 |
| EV/EBITDA | — | 17.95 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.8% | 1.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| ROE | 10.3% | 23.2% |
| ROA | 3.1% | 8.7% |
| Gross Margin | 24.1% | 36.4% |
| Operating Margin | 7.2% | 9.7% |
| Net Margin | 4.7% | 14.9% |
| Growth & Risk | ||
| Revenue Growth | 14.3% | 2.8% |
| Debt/Equity | 25.00 | 76.00 |
| Beta | 0.22 | 1.04 |
| Market | ||
| Market Cap | $11.44B | $71.95B |
Based on our 6-factor quantitative model, ESLT currently has the higher composite score (75.6/100, Strong Buy) and ranks #5 in our universe. However, the "better" stock depends on your investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. We recommend reviewing the full factor breakdown above before making a decision.
Our comparison analyzes six quantitative factors: Quality (profitability and business strength, 30% weight), Momentum (price trends, 25%), Value (valuation attractiveness, 15%), Investment (capital allocation, 10%), Stability (financial health, 10%), and Short Interest (institutional positioning, 10%). Each factor is scored 0-100 and combined into a composite score.
ESLT has the higher value score at 87/100 compared to JCI at 86/100. A higher value score indicates the stock trades at a more attractive valuation relative to its earnings, book value, and cash flows.
Our stock rankings and comparisons are updated daily using the latest available market data, financial statements, and price information. Factor scores reflect the most recent quarterly filings and trailing price data.