IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: Blank Capital Research ("BCR") is a technology platform, not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer. The algorithmically generated signals, scores, and rankings provided on this site ("God Mode" Signals) are for informational and research purposes only and do not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to sell or solicit an offer to buy any securities.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS: The "timing scores" and "regime signals" displayed are based on quantitative models. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not actually been executed, the results may have under-or-over compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity.
RISK OF LOSS: Trading in financial markets involves a high degree of risk and may result in the loss of your entire investment. Data provided by third-party sources (Intrinio, Snowflake) is believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
© 2026 Blank Capital Research. All rights reserved. System Version: Aegis V8 (God Mode).
Icon Energy Corp vs Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. — Side-by-side quantitative comparison
Based on our 6-factor quantitative model, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) is the stronger stock with a composite score of 69.9/100 and a Buy rating, compared to Icon Energy Corp (ICON) at 40.7/100 (Reduce). SHIP ranks #96 in our universe versus #3458 for ICON, giving it an edge of 29.2 points across quality, value, momentum, investment, stability, and short interest factors.
For the Quality factor — which measures profitability and business quality through metrics like ROE, gross margins, and capital efficiency — SHIP leads at 77/100, while ICON trails at 37/100 (SHIP: 77/100, ICON: 37/100). The 40-point gap indicates a meaningful difference in quality characteristics between these stocks.
For the Value factor — which evaluates whether a stock is cheap or expensive relative to its earnings, book value, and cash flows — SHIP leads at 81/100, while ICON trails at 19/100 (SHIP: 81/100, ICON: 19/100). The 62-point gap indicates a meaningful difference in value characteristics between these stocks.
For the Momentum factor — which captures price trends and institutional sentiment over the trailing 3-12 months — SHIP leads at 86/100, while ICON trails at 67/100 (SHIP: 86/100, ICON: 67/100). The 19-point gap indicates a meaningful difference in momentum characteristics between these stocks.
For the Investment factor — which assesses capital allocation quality including reinvestment rates and asset growth — SHIP leads at 32/100, while ICON trails at 21/100 (SHIP: 32/100, ICON: 21/100). The 11-point gap indicates a meaningful difference in investment characteristics between these stocks.
For the Stability factor — which measures financial health through leverage ratios and price volatility — SHIP leads at 40/100, while ICON trails at 4/100 (SHIP: 40/100, ICON: 4/100). The 36-point gap indicates a meaningful difference in stability characteristics between these stocks.
For the Short Interest factor — which tracks institutional bearish positioning and potential risk from elevated short selling — ICON leads at 90/100, while SHIP trails at 72/100 (ICON: 90/100, SHIP: 72/100). The 18-point gap indicates a meaningful difference in short interest characteristics between these stocks.
Based on our 6-factor model, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) is utilizing a stronger overall profile than ICON, with a Composite Score of 70 vs 41. This represents a significant advantage. SHIP dominates specifically in Value (+62 points) and Quality, making it the clear quantitative winner.
| Overall Rating | ||
| Composite Score | 70 | 41 |
| Rank | #96 | #3,458 |
| Stars | 4 / 5 | 2 / 5 |
| Action | Buy | Reduce |
| Factor Scores | ||
| Quality | 77 | 37 |
| Value | 81 | 19 |
| Momentum | 86 | 67 |
| Stability | 40 | 4 |
| Investment | 32 | 21 |
| Short Interest | 72 | 90 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E Ratio | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | — | — |
| EV/EBITDA | — | — |
| Dividend Yield | 10.6% | 7.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| ROE | 17.7% | -2.0% |
| ROA | 8.5% | -1.0% |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Operating Margin | 37.4% | 3.2% |
| Net Margin | 26.0% | -4.0% |
| Growth & Risk | ||
| Revenue Growth | 51.9% | 18.6% |
| Debt/Equity | 98.00 | 136.00 |
| Beta | 0.98 | 3.02 |
| Market | ||
| Market Cap | $137M | $112M |
Based on our 6-factor quantitative model, SHIP currently has the higher composite score (69.9/100, Buy) and ranks #96 in our universe. However, the "better" stock depends on your investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. We recommend reviewing the full factor breakdown above before making a decision.
Our comparison analyzes six quantitative factors: Quality (profitability and business strength, 30% weight), Momentum (price trends, 25%), Value (valuation attractiveness, 15%), Investment (capital allocation, 10%), Stability (financial health, 10%), and Short Interest (institutional positioning, 10%). Each factor is scored 0-100 and combined into a composite score.
SHIP has the higher value score at 81/100 compared to ICON at 19/100. A higher value score indicates the stock trades at a more attractive valuation relative to its earnings, book value, and cash flows.
Our stock rankings and comparisons are updated daily using the latest available market data, financial statements, and price information. Factor scores reflect the most recent quarterly filings and trailing price data.