IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: Blank Capital Research ("BCR") is a technology platform, not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer. The algorithmically generated signals, scores, and rankings provided on this site ("God Mode" Signals) are for informational and research purposes only and do not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to sell or solicit an offer to buy any securities.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS: The "timing scores" and "regime signals" displayed are based on quantitative models. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not actually been executed, the results may have under-or-over compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity.
RISK OF LOSS: Trading in financial markets involves a high degree of risk and may result in the loss of your entire investment. Data provided by third-party sources (Intrinio, Snowflake) is believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
© 2026 Blank Capital Research. All rights reserved. System Version: Aegis V8 (God Mode).
Based on our 6-factor quantitative model, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) is the stronger stock with a composite score of 74.4/100 and a Buy rating, compared to F5, INC. (FFIV) at 65.4/100 (Buy). CODA ranks #17 in our universe versus #273 for FFIV, giving it an edge of 9.0 points across quality, value, momentum, investment, stability, and short interest factors.
On the Quality factor, which measures profitability and business quality through metrics like ROE, gross margins, and capital efficiency, these stocks are closely matched (FFIV: 88/100, CODA: 83/100). The narrow 4-point spread suggests similar quality profiles, so this factor alone is unlikely to be a decisive differentiator.
On the Value factor, which evaluates whether a stock is cheap or expensive relative to its earnings, book value, and cash flows, these stocks are closely matched (CODA: 90/100, FFIV: 87/100). The narrow 3-point spread suggests similar value profiles, so this factor alone is unlikely to be a decisive differentiator.
For the Momentum factor — which captures price trends and institutional sentiment over the trailing 3-12 months — CODA leads at 79/100, while FFIV trails at 40/100 (CODA: 79/100, FFIV: 40/100). The 38-point gap indicates a meaningful difference in momentum characteristics between these stocks.
For the Investment factor — which assesses capital allocation quality including reinvestment rates and asset growth — FFIV leads at 39/100, while CODA trails at 32/100 (FFIV: 39/100, CODA: 32/100). The 7-point gap indicates a meaningful difference in investment characteristics between these stocks.
For the Stability factor — which measures financial health through leverage ratios and price volatility — FFIV leads at 74/100, while CODA trails at 66/100 (FFIV: 74/100, CODA: 66/100). The 8-point gap indicates a meaningful difference in stability characteristics between these stocks.
For the Short Interest factor — which tracks institutional bearish positioning and potential risk from elevated short selling — CODA leads at 88/100, while FFIV trails at 82/100 (CODA: 88/100, FFIV: 82/100). The 6-point gap indicates a meaningful difference in short interest characteristics between these stocks.
Based on our 6-factor model, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) is utilizing a stronger overall profile than FFIV, with a Composite Score of 74 vs 65. CODA holds a moderate edge, particularly in Momentum and Short Interest, though both stocks have merits.
| Overall Rating | ||
| Composite Score | 74 | 65 |
| Rank | #17 | #273 |
| Stars | 4 / 5 | 4 / 5 |
| Action | Buy | Buy |
| Factor Scores | ||
| Quality | 83 | 88 |
| Value | 90 | 87 |
| Momentum | 79 | 40 |
| Stability | 66 | 74 |
| Investment | 32 | 39 |
| Short Interest | 88 | 82 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E Ratio | 16.31 | 22.25 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.46 | 4.87 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.96 | 5.42 |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.91 | 17.94 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| ROE | 7.6% | 20.6% |
| ROA | 7.0% | 11.6% |
| Gross Margin | 66.5% | 81.4% |
| Operating Margin | 17.1% | 24.8% |
| Net Margin | 15.6% | 22.4% |
| Growth & Risk | ||
| Revenue Growth | 39.0% | 9.7% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Beta | 0.52 | 1.05 |
| Market | ||
| Market Cap | $115M | $18.57B |
Based on our 6-factor quantitative model, CODA currently has the higher composite score (74.4/100, Buy) and ranks #17 in our universe. However, the "better" stock depends on your investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. We recommend reviewing the full factor breakdown above before making a decision.
Our comparison analyzes six quantitative factors: Quality (profitability and business strength, 30% weight), Momentum (price trends, 25%), Value (valuation attractiveness, 15%), Investment (capital allocation, 10%), Stability (financial health, 10%), and Short Interest (institutional positioning, 10%). Each factor is scored 0-100 and combined into a composite score.
CODA has the higher value score at 90/100 compared to FFIV at 87/100. A higher value score indicates the stock trades at a more attractive valuation relative to its earnings, book value, and cash flows.
Our stock rankings and comparisons are updated daily using the latest available market data, financial statements, and price information. Factor scores reflect the most recent quarterly filings and trailing price data.