IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: Blank Capital Research ("BCR") is a technology platform, not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer. The algorithmically generated signals, scores, and rankings provided on this site ("God Mode" Signals) are for informational and research purposes only and do not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to sell or solicit an offer to buy any securities.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS: The "timing scores" and "regime signals" displayed are based on quantitative models. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not actually been executed, the results may have under-or-over compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity.
RISK OF LOSS: Trading in financial markets involves a high degree of risk and may result in the loss of your entire investment. Data provided by third-party sources (Intrinio, Snowflake) is believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
© 2026 Blank Capital Research. All rights reserved. System Version: Aegis V8 (God Mode).
AngloGold Ashanti PLC vs HARMONY GOLD MINING CO LTD — Side-by-side quantitative comparison
HMY and AU are remarkably close in our quantitative rankings. HARMONY GOLD MINING CO LTD holds a slight edge with a composite score of 63.7/100 (Hold) versus AngloGold Ashanti PLC at 63.2/100 (Hold). With a spread of just 0.5 points, the difference is marginal — investors should weigh qualitative factors like management quality, competitive positioning, and industry outlook to make a final decision.
For the Quality factor — which measures profitability and business quality through metrics like ROE, gross margins, and capital efficiency — HMY leads at 91/100, while AU trails at 70/100 (HMY: 91/100, AU: 70/100). The 22-point gap indicates a meaningful difference in quality characteristics between these stocks.
For the Value factor — which evaluates whether a stock is cheap or expensive relative to its earnings, book value, and cash flows — HMY leads at 88/100, while AU trails at 65/100 (HMY: 88/100, AU: 65/100). The 23-point gap indicates a meaningful difference in value characteristics between these stocks.
For the Momentum factor — which captures price trends and institutional sentiment over the trailing 3-12 months — AU leads at 84/100, while HMY trails at 53/100 (AU: 84/100, HMY: 53/100). The 31-point gap indicates a meaningful difference in momentum characteristics between these stocks.
For the Investment factor — which assesses capital allocation quality including reinvestment rates and asset growth — HMY leads at 35/100, while AU trails at 26/100 (HMY: 35/100, AU: 26/100). The 10-point gap indicates a meaningful difference in investment characteristics between these stocks.
For the Stability factor — which measures financial health through leverage ratios and price volatility — AU leads at 64/100, while HMY trails at 52/100 (AU: 64/100, HMY: 52/100). The 13-point gap indicates a meaningful difference in stability characteristics between these stocks.
For the Short Interest factor — which tracks institutional bearish positioning and potential risk from elevated short selling — HMY leads at 69/100, while AU trails at 48/100 (HMY: 69/100, AU: 48/100). The 20-point gap indicates a meaningful difference in short interest characteristics between these stocks.
Based on our 6-factor model, HARMONY GOLD MINING CO LTD (HMY) is utilizing a stronger overall profile than AU, with a Composite Score of 64 vs 63. The comparison is extremely close. While HMY leads slightly on Value, AU remains a competitive alternative.
| Overall Rating | ||
| Composite Score | 64 | 63 |
| Rank | #368 | #409 |
| Stars | 3 / 5 | 3 / 5 |
| Action | Hold | Hold |
| Factor Scores | ||
| Quality | 91 | 70 |
| Value | 88 | 65 |
| Momentum | 53 | 84 |
| Stability | 52 | 64 |
| Investment | 35 | 26 |
| Short Interest | 69 | 48 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E Ratio | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | — | — |
| EV/EBITDA | — | — |
| Dividend Yield | 1.3% | 1.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| ROE | 33.0% | 17.1% |
| ROA | 21.3% | 9.8% |
| Gross Margin | 32.1% | 38.8% |
| Operating Margin | 27.0% | 18.4% |
| Net Margin | 19.3% | 19.7% |
| Growth & Risk | ||
| Revenue Growth | 24.8% | 20.5% |
| Debt/Equity | 4.00 | 31.00 |
| Beta | 0.44 | 0.38 |
| Market | ||
| Market Cap | $8.79B | $9.32B |
Based on our 6-factor quantitative model, HMY currently has the higher composite score (63.7/100, Hold) and ranks #368 in our universe. However, the "better" stock depends on your investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. We recommend reviewing the full factor breakdown above before making a decision.
Our comparison analyzes six quantitative factors: Quality (profitability and business strength, 30% weight), Momentum (price trends, 25%), Value (valuation attractiveness, 15%), Investment (capital allocation, 10%), Stability (financial health, 10%), and Short Interest (institutional positioning, 10%). Each factor is scored 0-100 and combined into a composite score.
HMY has the higher value score at 88/100 compared to AU at 65/100. A higher value score indicates the stock trades at a more attractive valuation relative to its earnings, book value, and cash flows.
Our stock rankings and comparisons are updated daily using the latest available market data, financial statements, and price information. Factor scores reflect the most recent quarterly filings and trailing price data.